ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05593380BIATICHUpdated Sep 8, 2025

Bleeding Intracerebral Hemorrhage With Early Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring Trial

An interventional study of Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor and Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations in Cerebral Hemorrhage, Hypertensive, Intracranial Hypertension and Monitoring, sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University. Completed at 17 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-08.

Sponsored by Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
193
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage (SICH) is a hemorrhage caused by the rupture of a blood vessel within the brain parenchyma that is non-traumatic. Its rapid onset and dangerous condition seriously threaten human health; it accounts for about 15% of strokes and 50% of stroke-related mortality. Hunan Province is recognized as one of the high incidence areas of cerebral hemorrhage in the world; according to statistics, the direct economic loss caused by cerebral hemorrhage in Hunan Province is more than 1 billion yuan per year, which should be paid great attention. A 30-day follow-up study of large-volume cerebral hemorrhage (defined as supratentorial hemorrhage greater than 30 ml, infratentorial greater than 5 ml, and thalamus and cerebellum greater than 15 ml) found that the morbidity and mortality rate of ICH with hemorrhage of 30-60 ml was as high as 44-74%, while the morbidity and mortality rate of ICH with hemorrhage of \<30 ml was 19% and that of >60 ml was 91%. According to studies, the occurrence of hematoma occupancy and malignant cerebral edema in large-volume cerebral hemorrhage can lead to secondary malignant intracranial pressure elevation and subsequent secondary brain injury, which are the main factors of high morbidity and mortality and poor prognosis in patients with large-volume cerebral hemorrhage. Clinical monitoring and management is the key to treatment, and despite aggressive surgical treatment and anti-brain edema therapy, a large number of patients progress to malignant brain edema disease, leading to poor outcomes. This study aims to conduct a multicenter clinical trial in China investigating the role of invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring in managing patients with large-volume supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage. The trial will evaluate whether ICP-guided treatment protocols for cerebral edema improve patient outcomes and generate evidence to support the clinical application of invasive ICP monitoring in this patient population.

Read the detailed description

Intracranial pressure and cerebral edema monitoring are widely employed modalities of neurological assessment in neurocritical care patients globally. However, uncertainties remain regarding the prognostic value of invasive and noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring and cerebral edema monitoring techniques on neurological function in patients with both traumatic and non-traumatic brain injuries. Additionally, clinical practices for these modalities vary significantly in patients with extensive cerebral hemorrhage. This study aims to determine whether continuous ambulatory monitoring of intracranial pressure, administered postoperatively to patients with large-volume cerebral hemorrhage, can enhance overall prognosis by guiding adjustments in brain-specific therapeutic intensity and reducing mortality within 90 days. The study is designed as a prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial with a sample size estimated based on the efficacy observed in prior research, encompassing approximately 190 cases across 15-20 clinical institutions in China experienced in treating large-volume cerebral hemorrhage. The study population consists of patients diagnosed with significant supraventricular cerebral hemorrhage (≥30 ml, based on the Coniglobus formula) via CT examination within 48 hours of symptom onset. Informed consent was obtained from patients who met the eligibility criteria. Ethical risks associated with high-volume cerebral hemorrhage were mitigated by offering surgical treatment (either open debridement flap or endoscopic hematoma removal) in accordance with established guidelines and consideration of the patients condition, the physicians judgment, and the familys preferences. Enrolled participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the invasive intracranial pressure monitoring group or the imaging-clinical examination (ICE) group. All relevant research organizations and personnel will adhere to the Declaration of Helsinki and the Chinese Standards of Good Clinical Practice. This trial has received approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee (EC) of Xiangya Hospital, Central South University.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Hemorrhage, Hypertensive
  • Intracranial Hypertension
  • Monitoring
  • Critical Care
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring
  • Large-volume Cerebral Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • Spontaneous cerebral hemorrhage
  • Brain Edema
  • Intracranial Hypertension
  • Massive intracerebral hemorrhage
  • Treatment Outcome
  • invasive intracranial pressure monitoring
  • Large-volume cerebral hemorrhage
03

In context

Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive

23 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive; 8 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 193 is below the median of 306 across 17 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive.

Browse Intracranial Hemorrhage, Hypertensive studies →

Lead sponsor

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University is the lead sponsor of 174 studies on the registry; 77 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥18 years old and Age \<80 years old.
  2. Diagnosed of a supratentorial spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.
  3. Diagnosis of supratentorial large-volume cerebral hemorrhage by CT or other imaging and meeting the diagnostic criteria for large-volume cerebral hemorrhage(hemorrhage volume ≥ 30 mL of supratentorial cerebral parenchymal hematoma volume according to the Coniglobus formula on the first CT scan at onset).
  4. Participants were enrolled within 48 hours of symptom onset.
  5. The family signed the .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Traumatic cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral amyloid angiopathy(CAA), secondary cerebral hemorrhage due to other specific etiologies (aneurysm, vascular malformation, smoker's disease, coagulopathy, aneurysmal stroke, vasculitis, cerebral venous thrombosis, hemorrhagic cerebral infarction, etc.)
  2. The presence of fixed bilateral dilated pupils on admission, no recovery of pupils after initial dehydration treatment, and very poor survival
  3. Patients with extremely unstable vital signs after admission, with extremely poor prognosis and those considered non-viable, and patients whose families have abandoned follow-up treatment
  4. Patients who are pregnant or lactating.
  5. Patients with bilateral temporal skin ulceration, or subcutaneous hematoma in which monitoring electrode placement cannot be implemented
  6. The presence of other serious underlying diseases (intractable hypoxemia and circulatory failure with cardiopulmonary insufficiency that is difficult to correct by treatment, severe abnormal coagulation, severely reduced , severe hepatic and renal insufficiency, combined neurodegenerative diseases, psychiatric diseases, diseases, malignant tumors, thyroid diseases, etc.)
  7. The patient is agitated, coughing or choking too frequently, unable to be sedated or has difficulty in handling.
  8. Those with mRS score > 2 before this onset.
  9. Individuals unable to complete the follow-up phase of this trial due to psychiatric, cognitive, or emotional conditions;
  10. Family members decline to provide .

Exit criteria:

  1. Acute onset of other life-threatening illnesses identified as the primary cause of mortality;
  2. Participants who voluntarily withdraw from the study before completion;
  3. Participants deemed unsuitable for the trial's monitoring protocol post-enrollment;
  4. Participants requiring a modification of the treatment plan post-enrollment due to medical reasons, resulting in compromised monitoring feasibility or significant deviations in monitoring accuracy that undermine the integrity of the final analysis.

Elimination criteria:

  1. Participants who failed to record any data post-enrollment;
  2. Participants who did not receive per-protocol treatment post-enrollment, were discharged within 72 hours, and had their families voluntarily withdraw informed consent;
  3. Participants whose invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring probes shifted and were not promptly reinserted or calibrated, leading to excessive data errors precluding analysis;
  4. Participants not receiving the invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring module according to their assigned group.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
193 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ICP monitoring

    Intracranial pressure monitoring equipment enables continuous dynamic monitoring of changes in intracranial pressure values. This technology reflects sudden shifts in intracranial pressure resulting from hemorrhage and other cranial conditions, allowing for timely adjustments in the intensity of cerebral therapeutic interventions.

    Device: Parenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor

  • Other
    imaging-clinical examination (ICE)

    According to routine head CT imaging examinations, dynamic observations of changes in the patient's condition should be conducted. This involves closely monitoring clinical consciousness, pupil response, limb activity, and other clinical manifestations. Adjustments to the intensity of cerebral intervention should be made based on the clinical reflections of these dynamic changes.

    Other: Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations

Interventions

  • DeviceParenchymal Intracranial pressure monitor

    Treatment based on readings from Parenchymal intracranial pressure monitor.

    Also known as: Integra Life Sciences Camino Intracranial Monitor

  • OtherTreatment based on clinical and imaging observations

    Treatment based on clinical and imaging observations.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. mRS score on day 90 of treatment.

    The differences between the two groups were evaluated using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days post-treatment. Additionally, the proportion of patients achieving functional independence, defined as an mRS score of 0-3, was calculated.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Categorical shift in Modified Rankin scale

    The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is utilized to assess functional outcomes following intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), with scores ranging from 0 (no symptoms) to 6 (death). The study compared mRS scores between the two groups at 14 and 90 days post-treatment, categorized as favorable (0-3) and unfavorable (4-6) outcomes. Additionally, the study investigated other mRS classifications, including good prognosis (0-2), moderate prognosis (3-4), and poor prognosis (≥5).

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Neurological recovery

    The difference value of the NIHSS between Day 14/Day 90 and the baseline.

    Time frame: 14days, 90 days

  3. Duration of ICU treatment

    Time from the start of patient randomization to stable transfer out of the ICU.

    Time frame: 90 days

  4. GOS-E score

    The difference value of the GOS-E between Day 90,was used to evaluate the functional outcomes after ICH.

    Time frame: 90 days

  5. Quality of life score (EQ-5D)

    Generic health status evaluated by EQ-5D questionnaire at the end of the therapy.

    Time frame: 90 days

  6. Length of hospitalization

    Length of stay of patients throughout the treatment period since randomization.

    Time frame: 90 days

  7. The incidence of serious adverse events

    The percentage of the Severity Adverse Events within the 14 days/90 days of the therapy.

    Time frame: 90 days

  8. Total mortality

    All deaths reported post-randomization will be recorded and adjudicated

    Time frame: 90 days

  9. Adverse Events

    The percentage of the Adverse Events during the therapy.

    Time frame: 90 days

  10. Severity Adverse Event

    The percentage of the Severity Adverse Events within the 14 days of the therapy.

    Time frame: 14 days

  11. Total mortality

    All deaths reported post-randomization will be recorded and adjudicated. Deaths will be subclassified by the adjudication committee as cardiovascular or non-cardiovascular.

    Time frame: 14 days

  12. Adverse Events

    The percentage of the Adverse Events during the therapy.

    Time frame: 14 days

  13. The incidence of adverse events That are related to treatment

    The incidence of complications, including intracranial infections, probe displacement, recurrent intracranial hemorrhage, and skin infections, was assessed following the random grouping of patients undergoing invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring.

    Time frame: 90 days

07

Study locations

17 sites
  • The First People's Hospital of Changde City (Changde Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University)
    Changde, Hunan 410008, China
  • Changsha Central Hospital
    Changsha, Hunan 410004, China
  • The Fourth Hospital of Changsha
    Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
  • Xiangya Hospital, Central South University
    Changsha, Hunan 410008, China
  • Changsha Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Changsha Eighth Hospital)
    Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Chenzhou First People's Hospital
    Chenzhou, Hunan 410008, China
  • Hunan University of Medicine General Hospital
    Huaihua, Hunan 410008, China
  • Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital of Jishou University School of Medicine
    Jishou, Hunan 416000, China
  • The Central Hospital of Shaoyang
    Shaoyang, Hunan 410008, China
  • The Central Hospital of Xiangtan, The Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University
    Xiangtan, Hunan 410008, China
  • The Central Hospital of Yongzhou
    Yongzhou, Hunan 410008, China
  • Yueyang Central Hospital
    Yueyang, Hunan 414000, China
  • Zhangjiajie People's Hospital
    Zhangjiajie, Hunan 427000, China
  • Zhuzhou Central Hospital
    Zhuzhou, Hunan 410008, China
  • Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital
    Nanchang, Jiangxi 330006, China
  • Chengdu Fifth Pepole's Hospital
    Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University
    Beijing, 1000053, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • GBD 2016 Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional, and national age-sex specific mortality for 264 causes of death, 1980-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2017 Sep 16;390(10100):1151-1210. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32152-9. PubMed 28919116 ↗
  • Bao YH, Liang YM, Gao GY, Pan YH, Luo QZ, Jiang JY. Bilateral decompressive craniectomy for patients with malignant diffuse brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injury: a 37-case study. J Neurotrauma. 2010 Feb;27(2):341-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2009.1040. PubMed 19715392 ↗
  • Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition. Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432. PubMed 27654000 ↗
  • Chesnut RM, Temkin N, Carney N, Dikmen S, Rondina C, Videtta W, Petroni G, Lujan S, Pridgeon J, Barber J, Machamer J, Chaddock K, Celix JM, Cherner M, Hendrix T; Global Neurotrauma Research Group. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Dec 27;367(26):2471-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363. Epub 2012 Dec 12. PubMed 23234472 ↗
  • Raj R, Bendel S, Reinikainen M, Hoppu S, Laitio R, Ala-Kokko T, Curtze S, Skrifvars MB. Costs, outcome and cost-effectiveness of neurocritical care: a multi-center observational study. Crit Care. 2018 Sep 20;22(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2151-5. PubMed 30236140 ↗
  • Kumar G, Kalita J, Misra UK. Raised intracranial pressure in acute viral encephalitis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2009 Jun;111(5):399-406. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.03.004. Epub 2009 Apr 15. PubMed 19372001 ↗
  • Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jun;75(6):813-21. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.033126. PubMed 15145991 ↗
  • Treggiari MM, Schutz N, Yanez ND, Romand JA. Role of intracranial pressure values and patterns in predicting outcome in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Neurocrit Care. 2007;6(2):104-12. doi: 10.1007/s12028-007-0012-1. PubMed 17522793 ↗
  • Helbok R, Olson DM, Le Roux PD, Vespa P; Participants in the International Multidisciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring. Intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure monitoring in non-TBI patients: special considerations. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S85-94. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0040-6. PubMed 25208677 ↗
  • Simma B, Burger R, Falk M, Sacher P, Fanconi S. A prospective, randomized, and controlled study of fluid management in children with severe head injury: lactated Ringer's solution versus hypertonic saline. Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;26(7):1265-70. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199807000-00032. PubMed 9671379 ↗
  • O'Sullivan MG, Statham PF, Jones PA, Miller JD, Dearden NM, Piper IR, Anderson SI, Housley A, Andrews PJ, Midgley S, et al. Role of intracranial pressure monitoring in severely head-injured patients without signs of intracranial hypertension on initial computerized tomography. J Neurosurg. 1994 Jan;80(1):46-50. doi: 10.3171/jns.1994.80.1.0046. PubMed 8271021 ↗
  • Hiler M, Czosnyka M, Hutchinson P, Balestreri M, Smielewski P, Matta B, Pickard JD. Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2006 May;104(5):731-7. doi: 10.3171/jns.2006.104.5.731. PubMed 16703877 ↗
  • Ropper AH. Management of raised intracranial pressure and hyperosmolar therapy. Pract Neurol. 2014 Jun;14(3):152-8. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2014-000811. Epub 2014 Jan 30. PubMed 24481284 ↗
  • Bales JW, Bonow RH, Buckley RT, Barber J, Temkin N, Chesnut RM. Primary External Ventricular Drainage Catheter Versus Intraparenchymal ICP Monitoring: Outcome Analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2019 Aug;31(1):11-21. doi: 10.1007/s12028-019-00712-9. PubMed 31037639 ↗
  • Aiolfi A, Khor D, Cho J, Benjamin E, Inaba K, Demetriades D. Intracranial pressure monitoring in severe blunt head trauma: does the type of monitoring device matter? J Neurosurg. 2018 Mar;128(3):828-833. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.JNS162198. Epub 2017 May 26. PubMed 28548592 ↗
  • Liu H, Wang W, Cheng F, Yuan Q, Yang J, Hu J, Ren G. External Ventricular Drains versus Intraparenchymal Intracranial Pressure Monitors in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study. World Neurosurg. 2015 May;83(5):794-800. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2014.12.040. Epub 2014 Dec 23. PubMed 25541084 ↗
  • Tavakoli S, Peitz G, Ares W, Hafeez S, Grandhi R. Complications of invasive intracranial pressure monitoring devices in neurocritical care. Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Nov;43(5):E6. doi: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17450. PubMed 29088962 ↗
  • LANGFITT TW, WEINSTEIN JD, KASSELL NF, SIMEONE FA. TRANSMISSION OF INCREASED INTRACRANIAL PRESSURE. I. WITHIN THE CRANIOSPINAL AXIS. J Neurosurg. 1964 Nov;21:989-97. doi: 10.3171/jns.1964.21.11.0989. No abstract available. PubMed 14238966 ↗
  • Lenfeldt N, Koskinen LO, Bergenheim AT, Malm J, Eklund A. CSF pressure assessed by lumbar puncture agrees with intracranial pressure. Neurology. 2007 Jan 9;68(2):155-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000250270.54587.71. PubMed 17210899 ↗
  • Andrews PJ, Citerio G. Intracranial pressure. Part one: historical overview and basic concepts. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep;30(9):1730-3. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2376-4. Epub 2004 Jul 9. No abstract available. PubMed 15243684 ↗
  • Miller C, Armonda R; Participants in the International Multi-disciplinary Consensus Conference on Multimodality Monitoring. Monitoring of cerebral blood flow and ischemia in the critically ill. Neurocrit Care. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 2:S121-8. doi: 10.1007/s12028-014-0021-9. PubMed 25208667 ↗
  • Nag DS, Sahu S, Swain A, Kant S. Intracranial pressure monitoring: Gold standard and recent innovations. World J Clin Cases. 2019 Jul 6;7(13):1535-1553. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i13.1535. PubMed 31367614 ↗
  • Fernando SM, Tran A, Cheng W, Rochwerg B, Taljaard M, Kyeremanteng K, English SW, Sekhon MS, Griesdale DEG, Dowlatshahi D, McCredie VA, Wijdicks EFM, Almenawer SA, Inaba K, Rajajee V, Perry JJ. Diagnosis of elevated intracranial pressure in critically ill adults: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019 Jul 24;366:l4225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4225. PubMed 31340932 ↗
  • Dubourg J, Javouhey E, Geeraerts T, Messerer M, Kassai B. Ultrasonography of optic nerve sheath diameter for detection of raised intracranial pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1059-68. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2224-2. Epub 2011 Apr 20. PubMed 21505900 ↗
  • Reid A, Marchbanks RJ, Burge DM, Martin AM, Bateman DE, Pickard JD, Brightwell AP. The relationship between intracranial pressure and tympanic membrane displacement. Br J Audiol. 1990 Apr;24(2):123-9. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077853. PubMed 2350622 ↗
  • Lou JH, Wang J, Liu LX, He LY, Yang H, Dong WW. Measurement of brain edema by noninvasive cerebral electrical impedance in patients with massive hemispheric cerebral infarction. Eur Neurol. 2012;68(6):350-7. doi: 10.1159/000342030. Epub 2012 Oct 23. PubMed 23095732 ↗
  • He LY, Wang J, Luo Y, Dong WW, Liu LX. Application of non-invasive cerebral electrical impedance measurement on brain edema in patients with cerebral infarction. Neurol Res. 2010 Sep;32(7):770-4. doi: 10.1179/016164109X12478302362572. Epub 2009 Sep 1. PubMed 19726011 ↗
  • Makarenko S, Griesdale DE, Gooderham P, Sekhon MS. Multimodal neuromonitoring for traumatic brain injury: A shift towards individualized therapy. J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Apr;26:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.05.065. Epub 2016 Jan 2. PubMed 26755455 ↗
  • Dallagiacoma S, Robba C, Graziano F, Rebora P, Hemphill JC, Galimberti S, Citerio G; SYNAPSE-ICU Investigators. Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Insights From the SYNAPSE-ICU Study. Neurology. 2022 Jul 12;99(2):e98-e108. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200568. Epub 2022 May 4. PubMed 35508390 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05593380
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 25, 2022
Start date
Nov 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 26, 2025
Completion
Jul 28, 2025
Last update
Sep 8, 2025

Study contacts

Zhang Le, PhD
principal investigator · Department of Neurology,Xiangya Hospital, Central South University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion