CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05589727Updated Nov 20, 2024

Application of Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE) in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) Notified in Brazil

An observational study in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia and Healthcare Associated Infection, sponsored by Giovanna Marssola Nascimento. Completed at 12 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-20.

Sponsored by Giovanna Marssola Nascimento · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
987
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Multicentric observational prospective cohort study in 12 (twelve) hospitals representing all Brazilian regions.

The main objective of this project is to evaluate the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria for VAP versus VAE criteria defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). The diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be compared, characterizing other events associated with mechanical ventilation that are not VAP, when applicable.

The study also aims to adjudicate ventilator-associated pneumonias reported to ANVISA using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria.

Read the detailed description

The study will be carried out in about 12 centers, comprising the five Brazilian regions. It will be conducted from 2022 to 2024. Data collection will be performed at each center during six months.

Trained health professionals from Infections Control Committees of each participating center will collect data.

Mechanical ventilation data will be entered daily in the database system from the moment the patient is submitted to mechanical ventilation until the first day after the end of mechanical ventilation.

VAPs notified to ANVISA, according to its own criteria, will be reported monthly in the database system for adjudication.

The VAE definition will be performed automatically in the database system by mans of a specific algorithm. The diagnosis established by the system will be manually validated by a nurse with experience in healthcare-associated infection (HAI) surveillance. Agreement variables (Kappa) between the two criteria will be analyzed.

The adjudication will be carried out by two independent professionals (doctor and nurse) with experience in HAIs surveillance. In case of disagreement, there will be an evaluation by a third adjudicator.

The complete project was submitted to the local Institutional Review Board (IRB)/National Research Ethics Commission (CONEP) system and has ethical approval (CAAE: 52354721.0.1001.0070).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
  • Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
  • Healthcare Associated Infection

Keywords

  • pneumonia
  • surveillance
  • healthcare associated infections
  • Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
  • Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia
03

In context

Pneumonia

2,044 studies on the registry are indexed under Pneumonia; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 987 is above the median of 203 across 688 observational studies indexed under Pneumonia.

Browse Pneumonia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Giovanna Marssola Nascimento as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients aged 18 years or older who are hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) using mechanical ventilation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Pacients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) using mechanical ventilation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients withdrawn from mechanical ventilation (MV) on the first day (D1) or second day (D2), with D1 being the day of initiation of MV;
  • Patients with hospital discharge (discharge, death or transfer) on D1 or D2 of mechanical ventilation
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
987 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with VAP - ANVISA criteria

    Patients notified with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria.

  • Patients with VAP - NHSN criteria

    Patients notified with Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE) criteria defined by the NHSN.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) using two different surveillance criteria.

    To evaluate the incidence of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (VAP) when using the current ANVISA criteria for VAP versus the criteria for events Ventilator-Associated Events (VAE) defined by the NHSN.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP

    The diagnostic accuracy of the two criteria for identifying VAP will also be compared, characterizing other events associated with mechanical ventilation other than VAP, when applicable - Ventilator-Associated Condition (VAC), Infection-related Ventilator-Associated Complication (IVAC), Possible Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia (PVAP).

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

  2. Adjudication of VAP

    To adjudicate ventilator-associated pneumonias reported to ANVISA using current epidemiological diagnostic criteria.

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 months

07

Study locations

12 sites
  • Hospital São Vicente de Paula
    Barbalha, Ceará, Brazil
  • Hospital OTOclínica
    Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
  • Hospital Universitário de Brasília
    Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil
  • Hospital Geral de Goiânia Alberto Rassi
    Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil
  • Hospital Presidente Vargas
    São Luís, Maranhão, Brazil
  • Hospital Municipal de Maringá
    Maringá, Paraná, Brazil
  • Hospital Jean Bittar
    Belém, Pará, Brazil
  • Hospital do Tricentenário
    Olinda, Pernambuco, Brazil
  • Hospital Geral de Caxias do Sul
    Caxias Do Sul, Rio do Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Hospital Ernesto Dornelles
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
  • Instituto Estadual do Cérebro Paulo Niemeyer
    Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
  • A. C. Camargo Cancer Center
    São Paulo, Brazil
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Horan TC, Andrus M, Dudeck MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control. 2008 Jun;36(5):309-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002. No abstract available. PubMed 18538699 ↗
  • Klompas M. Ventilator-Associated Events: What They Are and What They Are Not. Respir Care. 2019 Aug;64(8):953-961. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07059. PubMed 31346070 ↗
  • Klompas M. The paradox of ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention measures. Crit Care. 2009;13(5):315. doi: 10.1186/cc8036. Epub 2009 Oct 15. PubMed 19849825 ↗
  • Fan Y, Gao F, Wu Y, Zhang J, Zhu M, Xiong L. Does ventilator-associated event surveillance detect ventilator-associated pneumonia in intensive care units? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2016 Oct 24;20(1):338. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1506-z. PubMed 27772529 ↗
  • Raoof S, Baumann MH; Critical Care Societies Collaborative, consisting of the leadership of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. Ventilator-associated events: the new definition. Am J Crit Care. 2014 Jan;23(1):7-9. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014469. No abstract available. PubMed 24382609 ↗
  • Stevens JP, Silva G, Gillis J, Novack V, Talmor D, Klompas M, Howell MD. Automated surveillance for ventilator-associated events. Chest. 2014 Dec;146(6):1612-1618. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2255. PubMed 25451350 ↗
  • Hebert C, Flaherty J, Smyer J, Ding J, Mangino JE. Development and validation of an automated ventilator-associated event electronic surveillance system: A report of a successful implementation. Am J Infect Control. 2018 Mar;46(3):316-321. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Nov 10. PubMed 29132696 ↗
  • Sim J, Wright CC. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Phys Ther. 2005 Mar;85(3):257-68. PubMed 15733050 ↗
  • Donner A, Eliasziw M. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation. Stat Med. 1992 Aug;11(11):1511-9. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780111109. PubMed 1410963 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 20, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05589727
Lead sponsor
Giovanna Marssola Nascimento
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Brazil
Responsible party
Giovanna Marssola Nascimento (Principal Investigator, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2022
Start date
Oct 21, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 21, 2023
Completion
Jan 21, 2024
Last update
Nov 20, 2024

Study contacts

Giovanna M Nascimento, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion