ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05589259Updated Mar 15, 2024

Feasibility Study of Combined Peripheral Nerve Block and Physiotherapy for CRPS

An interventional study of Axillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy and Physiotherapy alone in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, sponsored by Tracy Cupido. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 110 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-03-15.

Sponsored by Tracy Cupido · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Sep 2025, 1 year 2 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 110 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Complex Regional Pain Syndromes · Canada.

Planned enrollment
3rd of 15
60 · median 22
Started
2025
with 2 others
No phase
10 of 17
4 open now
Registered
14th of 17
by date

Among the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada, this one is the 3rd largest by planned enrollment of the 15 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2025, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 14th registered.

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies recruiting now, 17 (44%) set no upper age limit and 16 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 110 Years · all sexes · healthy volunteers too.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting 1 in 5 Canadians with a yearly economic cost of over $40 billion in healthcare spending and loss of productivity. Since the prevalence of chronic pain is increasing, especially as the population ages, effective low-cost treatment is key to reduce the impact of chronic pain on patient quality of life and on healthcare costs. Due to the complexity of chronic pain and differences between the multitudes of pain conditions, developing effective treatments is challenging. This is especially true for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

CRPS is characterized by severe pain out of proportion to tissue trauma, with local autonomic and inflammatory changes. The severity of pain from CRPS may result in an inability to work, depression, sleep disorders, or suicidal ideation.

Although its prevalence is low in Canada, CRPS is considered one the most debilitating and least understood pain conditions. As most current treatment options have low evidence of effectiveness, there is no definitive treatment available and most often, patients are struggling to maintain an acceptable quality of life. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify new and improved treatments for adults with CRPS.

An early hypothesis of CRPS pathophysiology posited that sympathetic nervous system over-activity led to many of the signs and symptoms of CRPS. As such, sympathetic nerve blocks, including stellate ganglion and lumbar sympathetic blocks, have been repeatedly investigated as a potential treatment of CRPS. However, a recent meta-analysis suggests that these blocks provided no benefits for those suffering with CRPS. Newer evidence suggests that a peripheral microvascular dysfunction may underlie CRPS pathophysiology. However, no clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of a treatment targeting this peripheral pathway.

The goal of this project is to assess the efficacy of a single-shot axillary approach to the brachial plexus block plus physiotherapy as a novel treatment protocol for CRPS. Our primary hypothesis is that providing a brachial plexus block in conjunction with a physiotherapy program would be superior to physiotherapy alone in treating pain and function in CRPS. Since this is a novel treatment protocol for CRPS, the purpose of our proposed study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered clinical trial.

Read the detailed description

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition affecting 1 in 5 Canadians with a yearly economic cost of over $40 billion in healthcare spending and loss of productivity. Since the prevalence of chronic pain is increasing, especially as the population ages, effective low-cost treatment is key to reduce the impact of chronic pain on patient quality of life and on healthcare costs. Due to the complexity of chronic pain and differences between the multitudes of pain conditions, developing effective treatments is challenging. This is especially true for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS).

CRPS is characterized by severe pain out of proportion to tissue trauma, with local autonomic and inflammatory changes. The severity of pain from CRPS may result in an inability to work, depression, sleep disorders, or suicidal ideation.

Although its prevalence is low in Canada, CRPS is considered one the most debilitating and least understood pain conditions. As most current treatment options have low evidence of effectiveness, there is no definitive treatment available and most often, patients are struggling to maintain an acceptable quality of life. Thus, there is a pressing need to identify new and improved treatments for adults with CRPS.

An early hypothesis of CRPS pathophysiology posited that sympathetic nervous system over-activity led to many of the signs and symptoms of CRPS. As such, sympathetic nerve blocks, including stellate ganglion and lumbar sympathetic blocks, have been repeatedly investigated as a potential treatment of CRPS. However, a recent meta-analysis suggests that these blocks provided no benefits for those suffering with CRPS. Newer evidence suggests that a peripheral microvascular dysfunction may underlie CRPS pathophysiology. However, no clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of a treatment targeting this peripheral pathway. Current evidence of the efficacy of peripheral nerve block in treating CRPS are mostly derived from small case studies involving cost- and labour-intense regimens, including in-patient protocols with continuous nerve blocks.

The goal of this project is to assess the efficacy of a single-shot axillary brachial plexus block plus physiotherapy as a novel treatment protocol for CRPS. Our primary hypothesis is that providing a brachial plexus block in conjunction with a physiotherapy program would be superior to physiotherapy alone in treating pain and function in CRPS. Since this is a novel treatment protocol for CRPS, the purpose of our proposed study is to determine the feasibility of conducting a fully powered clinical trial. The specific aims of the feasibility trial are to assess: 1) the capacity (recruitment and staffing) required for conducting a fully powered trial, 2) the design of the novel treatment protocol, and 3) the patient response to treatment and trial protocol.

Statement of Relevance The incidence of CRPS in the US is estimated to be 5.4-26.2 per 100,000 person-years. Although unknown, the incidence of CRPS in Ontario is likely similar considering similar prevalence of chronic pain with the US. CRPS is known to be severely debilitating, leading to decreased quality of life and substantial lost productivity, which can be long-term if not quickly and properly treated. Historically, proposed treatments have been variable, resource intensive and results have been mixed. Therefore, specialized pain clinics in Ontario and across Canada are struggling to provide effective and quality care for this patient population. To date there is no definitive treatment for CRPS. Thus, pain specialists have no other choice to trial several treatment options to possibly find one beneficial for their patients.

By testing the efficacy of a single shot brachial plexus block followed by physiotherapy, on an outpatient basis, with the combination of home-based structured physiotherapy, the investigators hope to define a reproducible and effective outpatient treatment for CRPS. If the investigators can demonstrate superiority of a brachial plexus block with physiotherapy over physiotherapy alone, the investigators will be laying the groundwork for further research into not only a new treatment protocol of CRPS that is feasible and scalable for pain clinics in Ontario and around the world but also translating animal models of CRPS pathophysiology to humans.

03

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

Keywords

  • chronic pain
  • pain management
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 110 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Meets the Budapest criteria for CRPS of the upper extremity
  • Able to consent to treatment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anesthetic
  • Allergy to chlorhexidine
  • Infection at site of injection
  • Previous treatment of current CRPS with a regional anesthetic technique within 6 months
  • Unable to tolerate regional anesthesia or physiotherapy
  • Another pain condition that affects the same limb
  • Patient refusal or inability to consent.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Axillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy

    Participants who are randomized to the experimental group (EXP arm) will receive a single-shot axillary-approach brachial plexus block with 1.5mg/kg (up to 50mg total) bupivacaine 0.25% at the Kingston Health Sciences Centre Chronic Pain Clinic (KHSC-CPC). Prior to treatment, a blinded third party will perform a baseline physical exam. Under the brachial plexus block, the physiotherapist will provide standard of care, including manual therapy. The patient will then complete a 6-week physiotherapy program, including GMI. Following the 6 week program, a blind observer will repeat the physical exam.

    Procedure: Axillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Physiotherapy alone

    Participants who are randomized to not receive a block (CON arm) will also have a baseline physical exam performed by a blinded third party. Following baseline data collection, the physiotherapist will provide standard of care, including manual therapy. They will then complete a 6-week home exercise program, including GMI. Following the 6 week program, a blinded observer will repeat the physical exam.

    Procedure: Physiotherapy alone

Interventions

  • ProcedureAxillary Brachial Plexus Block plus Physiotherapy

    Participants will receive a single-shot axillary-approach brachial plexus block. For the procedure, a 22g or larger peripheral intravenous cannula will be placed, and skin will be sterilized with chlorhexidine. Using aseptic technique, the anesthesiologist will anesthetize the skin and tract with 5cc of 1% lidocaine using a 25g 1.5" needle. After this, a 50mm 21g Pajunk needle will be guided under ultrasound with an in-plane technique to anesthetize the median, ulnar, radial, and musculocutaneous nerves. Identification of the axillary artery, vein and surrounding vessels will be done to ensure an intravascular injection is avoided. Once proper location is confirmed, the anesthesiologist will aspirate to ensure the needle is not intravascular. Once aspiration is confirmed negative, bupivacaine 0.25% 1.5mg/kg (lean body weight) will be injected in divided doses. 30 minutes after placement of the block, the standardized physiotherapy protocol will begin.

  • ProcedurePhysiotherapy alone

    Participants in the EXP arm and the CON arm will complete the same physiotherapy program. PHYSIOTHERAPY PROTOCOL The physiotherapy program will include manipulation with or without a block. The goal of manipulation is to break up adhesions, possibly overcoming microvascular dysfunction. After the manipulation, participants will take part in a 6-week program which will include a weekly one-hour session with a physiotherapist at the KHSC-CPC and a home exercise program (HEP). During each session, the physiotherapist will work with the participants to increase ROM and limb function using manual therapy, stretching, and strengthening exercises specific to the affected joint(s) and most importantly using GMI. At the end of each session, the physiotherapist will prescribe exercises to complete at home.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility Assessment

    Assess the ability to recruit 60 patients (30 per arm) to complete the study protocol. Protocol data: Attrition (with reasons) will be monitored by the research coordinator. Data completeness will be computed from data entered from surveys and electronic diaries. Treatment compliance data (visit attendance and average hours/day of home exercise completed weekly) will be collected. Staff time will be monitored using logs by each team member (e.g., physician, physiotherapist, blind assessor, nurses). Patient satisfaction: A custom patient satisfaction questionnaire will also be completed with post-treatment clinical assessment questionnaire to capture patients' impression of the study protocol (e.g., time commitment, treatment length).

    Time frame: 2 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Cost

    Estimate the cost of a randomized controlled study in order to apply for future funding.

    Time frame: 2 years

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Feb 2025; primary completion for Sep 2025, 7 months later.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 24, 2022
First posted
Oct 21, 2022
StartEst.
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2025
CompletionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
Last update
Mar 15, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 15, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05589259
Lead sponsor
Tracy Cupido
Responsible party
Tracy Cupido (Principal Investigator, Kingston Health Sciences Centre) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2022
Start date
Feb 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 15, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion