ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06987747Updated May 23, 2025

Reducing Pain in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Using Personalized Brain Stimulation: A Feasibility Study

An interventional study of Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS), sponsored by McMaster University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-23.

Sponsored by McMaster University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2025, 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada — 4 open to participants now, 5 under way, none of them phase 3. Complex Regional Pain Syndromes · Canada.

Planned enrollment
12th of 15
10 · median 22
Started
2025
with 2 others
No phase
10 of 17
4 open now
Registered
16th of 17
by date
Lead sponsor
3 of 17
McMaster University

Among the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada, this one is the 12th largest by planned enrollment of the 15 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 3 that started in 2025, is one of 10 with no phase, and was the 16th registered.

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes

206 studies on the registry are indexed under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes; 55 are open to participants now.

Browse Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies →

Open to participants now

4 of the 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

All 4 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in Canada have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Canada →

Who these studies take

Of the 39 Complex Regional Pain Syndromes studies recruiting now, 17 (44%) set no upper age limit and 16 (41%) stop at 75 or younger; 3 take children under 18; 5 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 70 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 17 studies in Complex Regional Pain Syndromes with a site in Canada, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

This research study looks at the feasibility of using a new treatment, noninvasively activating the brain through repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to treat pain symptoms of complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS). This study will help us determine if this technique is feasible (able to recruit participants and if the research activities are feasible and can be used to treat CRPS patients with pain in a larger study. The investigators will also examine how TMS can be personalized to individuals using an individual's brain activity measured using EEG. The investigators will also study whether the effects of TMS are stronger if the TMS is delivered during a specific timing of the EEG activity.

Read the detailed description

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain condition that is debilitating and dramatically decreases the quality of life. CRPS is characterized by a constellation of sensory, motor, and autonomic dysfunction. CRPS patients present with allodynia and hyperalgesia. There are also trophic changes of the affected limb, changes in skin colour and temperature, alterations in motor control, the presence of tremors, dystonia and edema, and feelings of hate towards the CRPS affected limb. Cortical representations of the affected limb in the somatosensory cortex are smaller and possess greater overlap with adjacent areas. This is speculated to be a result of a decrease in afferent input originating from the periphery. Additionally, this reorganization is reinforced by the minimal usage of the affected limb by patients in order to avoid pain. The worldwide incidence of CRPS is 26.2 per 100,000 people per year and is 3 to 4 times more prevalent in females. Based on these reports, it is estimated that Canada will experience \~10,000 new cases of CRPS each year. CRPS creates an economic burden; healthcare costs are increased by \~20% and two-thirds of individuals diagnosed with CRPS will not return to work. Taken together, these findings demonstrate the existing impact and increasing burden of CRPS on the Canadian workforce, economy, and healthcare. Pain relief is an unmet need in patients with CRPS. Options for medical management of CRPS include medications such as opioids, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, sympathetic blockade and invasive spinal cord stimulation (SCS). However, evidence for these treatments come from medium to low quality randomized control trials (RCTs). SCS, though effective for many patients with CRPS, is associated with significant complications and costs. At present, CRPS is managed through continued physiotherapy with supportive treatment for pain and mental health . However, this method does not effectively alleviate pain in CRPS.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied to the motor cortex has been shown to effectively alleviate pain in CRPS along with several other pain conditions. However, rTMS does not effectively alleviate pain for all individuals and there exists a large degree of interindividual variability in the efficacy of rTMS as a treatment for pain. This interindividual variability is thought to be a result of individual differences in patterns of brain activity. Indeed, in depression, tailoring rTMS to individual differences in depression-related brain activity recorded non-invasively via electroencephalography (EEG) resulted in more consistent and enhanced improvements in depression symptoms. Specifically, altering the frequency and location of rTMS according to alpha, beta, and theta power enhanced improvements in depression symptoms. In CRPS, one promising EEG marker is the movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) and is generated by real or imagined movement. Nerve stimulation delivered at the peak-negativity of the MRCP generated by attempted dorsiflexions in stroke patients resulted in improvements in a 10-meter walking task but not in a finger tapping task. Further, these patients had enhanced excitability of the cortical representation of the stimulated muscle. This is thought to have occurred because nerve stimulation caused cortical activity via afferent feedback within a couple hundred milliseconds of movement intention. Additionally, the peak-negativity of the MRCP is closely timed to alpha desynchronization, an EEG marker of cortical excitability.

MRCPs occur in paraplegic individuals, individuals suffering from stroke, individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. Given that MRCPs persist in a variety of conditions whereby movement is limited or even abolished, it is probable that MRCPs are quantifiable in CRPS. Using the MRCP in CRPS, one can theoretically reinforce connections used in sensorimotor control of the affected limb and the sensorimotor cortex. In addition to pain, CRPS is associated with structural and functional changes of the somatosensory, primary motor, and supplementary motor areas. MRCPs which are obtained from the sensorimotor cortices will provide a window into the movement planning processes that can be enhanced through MRCP tailored brain stimulation. Further, even if an individual cannot move, imagined movements that are furnished by the same sensorimotor cortices can be used to tailor brain stimulation.

To the best of the investigator's knowledge, MRCPs have not been used to trigger TMS by a real-time brain-computer interface (BCI) in healthy controls or in patient populations. The investigator's lab has developed a BCI that accurately detects MRCPs in healthy controls (Appendix Figure 1) with its best performance being an accuracy of 92%, true-positive-rate of 80% and a false-positive-rate of 7%. These results are comparable to other BCIs that detect MRCPs. Additionally, the investigator's lab has developed and validated a closed-loop EEG-triggered TMS framework that is compatible with the investigator's BCI (Appendix Figure 2). Ultimately, it is feasible for the investigator's lab to accurately tailor rTMS timing to MRCPs in healthy controls. However, the feasibility of doing so in a pain population and specifically in CRPS has yet to be determined. To the best of the investigator's knowledge MRCP morphology has not been studied in CRPS. However, MRCPs have been characterized in paraplegic individuals, individuals suffering from stroke, individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. Therefore, the feasibility of real-time MRCP tailored rTMS needs to be established in CRPS. Further, the effect of this approach on subjective and neurophysiological measures of pain have yet to be determined. Understanding the short-term effects of this novel approach would inform a future real-time MRCP tailored rTMS intervention for CRPS. The goal of the research is to determine the feasibility and effects of a novel BCI approach to delivering rTMS in individuals suffering from complex regional pain syndrome.

The goals of this study are to:

  1. Determine the feasibility of triggering rTMS at MRCPs in individuals with CRPS. This aim will be assessed by measuring the accuracy of the BCI.
  2. Determine the effects of real-time MRCP tailored rTMS on subjective pain in individuals with CRPS. This aim will be assessed using a numeric pain rating scale.
  3. Determine the effects of real-time MRCP tailored rTMS on neurophysiological markers of pain. This aim will be assessed by EEG biomarkers of chronic pain.

Participants: 12 eligible participants will include males and females aged 20 through 80 years with a diagnosis of CRPS Type 1 affecting the upper or lower limb using the revised Budapest criteria. The investigators will recruit patients with a history of CRPS of at least 3 months since the start of symptoms or diagnosis. The investigators will exclude patients if they have had CRPS diagnosis greater than 3 years to avoid patients with chronic CRPS who may not respond to interventions. According to published literature, chronic CRPS patients (> 3 years) may be a subtype with specific phenotypic traits, including possible non-response to therapy.

Study Design: This research will be conducted in Dr. Nelson's Human Neurophysiology and Neuroimaging lab, Ivor Wynne Centre (IWC), room IWC AB-131, at McMaster University. This lab is equipped with all the needed infrastructure for this study. At the beginning of a session, participants will first be asked to fill out the paper copy of the TMS screening questionnaire and handedness questionnaire. Participants will also be provided with a paper copy of the consent form and will be given ample time to read and sign the form. Participants will be blinded for the duration of the study, unaware as to which stimulation is applied. The investigator team will be unblinded while collecting data.

This experiment will include 8 phases during a single session of \~3 hours (Figure 1). Pre-intervention pain rating measures will be acquired using the numeric rating scale (NRS). Then EEG will be prepared (\~45 minutes), and 5 minutes of resting-state EEG will be measured. The motor hot spot and resting motor threshold (RMT) for TMS will be determined. Next, the BCI will be trained on 30 trials of the investigator's task (Figure 2). Following BCI training, the real-time MRCP tailored rTMS intervention will begin (\~15 minutes). Then, 5 minutes of resting-state EEG will be measured again, and pain ratings via the NRS will be measured again.

Outcomes and Data Analysis:

Aim 1 (accuracy of BCI): Offline analysis of the EEG data recorded during intervention will be used to determine the true positive (TPR), false positive (FPR), true negative (TNR), and false negative rates (FNR) of the model. This aim will be achieved if 70% or more of the participants' trained BCI achieve a TPR > 65% and an FPR \< 10%.

Aim 2 (pain ratings): Pain ratings will be measured before and after intervention in all 12 participants using the NRS. Ratings will be compared before and after intervention.

Aim 3 (neurophysiological markers of pain): Resting state EEG before and after the intervention will be analyzed offline and compared with the outcome from Aim 2 to provide a more comprehensive evaluation of pain severity and explore neurobiological changes associated with the intervention. Changes in EEG are observed across various chronic pain conditions, including elevated theta band power at rest and increased levels of event-related desynchronization (ERD). Importantly, the magnitude of these changes is associated with pain severity and can be used as objective markers of pain following an intervention. In this study, EEG markers of pain, including peak-alpha/theta frequency, alpha-gamma phase amplitude coupling, and power spectral density will be computed.

Significance: This study uses a cutting-edge approach through the most advanced technology in the field of neuromodulation to optimize rTMS as a therapeutic management option for CRPS. The proposed research will produce the preliminary data necessary for a larger study that is likely to make a significant impact in the treatment and management of CRPS in Canada and worldwide. The proposed research is an essential precursor to build a solid foundation for tailored rTMS in CRPS. The present research paves the way for this advancement in a population that is in desperate need of alternative pain-relief solutions. In the future, the methodology herein can be tested in and adapted to other chronic pain conditions.

03

Conditions studied

  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS)

Keywords

  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • personalized repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
  • CRPS
  • Electroencephalogram
  • EEG guided TMS
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of CRPS Type 1 affecting the upper or lower limb using the revised Budapest criteria
  • History of CRPS of at least 3 months since the start of symptoms or diagnosis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CRPS diagnosis greater than 3 years to avoid patients with chronic CRPS who may not respond to interventions
  • to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)
  • Known psychological diagnosis affecting comprehension
  • Prior experience with TMS
  • Inability to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BCI training and testing group

    This group will contain all participants. All participants will receive the same rTMS brain stimulation, a series of 90 triplet pulses at 100 Hz.

    Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive, non-painful procedure used to relieve chronic pain and promote short-term changes. The first dorsal interossei (FDI) muscle of the left motor cortex will be targeted using neuronavigation software. A series of 90 triplet pulses will be delivered at 100 Hz stimulation. Stimulation will be delivered at 80% of the resting motor threshold obtained from the right FDI muscle. The delivery of rTMS requires \~ 15 minutes in total.

    Also known as: rTMS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of BCI

    Offline analysis of the EEG data recorded during intervention will be used to determine the true positive (TPR), false positive (FPR), true negative (TNR), and false negative rates (FNR) of the model. This aim will be achieved if 70% or more of the participants' trained BCI achieve a TPR \> 65% and an FPR \< 10%.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Ratings

    Pain ratings will be measured before and after intervention in all 12 participants using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NRPS). Ratings will be compared before and after the intervention. The NPRS is an 11-item questionnaire that gauges participants' pain on scales of 0-10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being the worst possible pain. The NRPS has a minimum possible value of 0 and a maximum of 110.

    Time frame: Immediately before intervention - immediately after intervention

Other outcomes

  1. EEG assessment of Corticomuscular coherence (CMC)

    This will include an assessment of CMC using EEG electrodes. CMC will be recorded as a single value between 0-1 with 0 representing no coherence and 1 representing complete coherence.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jul 2025; primary completion for Dec 2025, 5 months later.

Of 64 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Complex Regional Pain Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 65 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2025
First posted
May 23, 2025
StartEst.
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2025
CompletionEst.
Feb 1, 2026
Last update
May 23, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 23, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06987747
Collaborators
Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care (IPRC)
Responsible party
Aimee Nelson (Local Principal Investigator, McMaster University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 23, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
May 23, 2025

Study contacts

Amandeep K Atwal, BSc Science
Contact
atwala9@mcmaster.ca
6476330118
Stevie Foglia, PhD
Contact
foglias@mcmaster.ca
9053920144
Aimee J Nelson, PhD
principal investigator · McMaster University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion