ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05587244Updated Oct 20, 2025

G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Liners

An interventional study of Total Hip Arthroplasty with G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Liners in Osteoarthritis, Hip, Rheumatoid Arthritis and Non-Union Fracture, sponsored by Zimmer Biomet. Enrolling by invitation at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-20.

Sponsored by Zimmer Biomet · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
202
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Acetabular Liners in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Read the detailed description

The main objectives of this study are to confirm the long-term safety, performance, and clinical benefits of the G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Acetabular Liners in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

The primary endpoint is defined by the survival of the implant system at 10 years, which is based on removal of the study device and will be determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. The safety of the system will be assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of adverse events. Relation of the events to the implant, instrumentation and/or procedure should be specified.

The secondary endpoints are the assessment of performance and clinical benefits by recording patient-reported clinical outcomes measures (PROMs) as well as radiographic outcomes (if available).

The G7 Vivacit-E Freedom Constrained Liner is indicated for use (per IFU) as a component of a total hip prosthesis in primary and revision patients at high risk of dislocation due to a history of prior dislocation, bone loss, joint or soft tissue laxity, neuromuscular disease, or intraoperative instability, and for whom all other options to constrained acetabular components have been considered.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis, Hip
  • Rheumatoid Arthritis
  • Non-Union Fracture
  • Trochanteric Fractures
  • Femoral Neck Fractures
  • Avascular Necrosis
  • Dislocation, Hip
03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 202 is above the median of 90 across 457 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

Zimmer Biomet is the lead sponsor of 275 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 19 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient is 18 to 80 years of age, inclusive
  • Patient is skeletally mature
  • Patient qualifies for unilateral total hip arthroplasty based on physical exam and medical history including at least one of the following:

    • Non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease, including osteoarthritis and avascular necrosis
    • Rheumatoid arthritis
    • High risk for dislocation
    • Undergoing revision hip arthroplasty
    • Correction of functional deformity
    • In need of treatment of non-union, femoral neck fracture, and trochanteric fractures of the proximal femur with head involvement, unmanageable by other techniques
  • Patient is willing and able to complete scheduled follow-up evaluations as described in the protocol and
  • Patient, or the patient's legally authorized representative, has participated in the Informed Consent process and is willing and able to sign an IRB approved informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is septic, has an active infection or has osteomyelitis at the affected joint
  • Patient has significant osteoporosis as defined by treating surgeon
  • Patient has metabolic disorder(s) which may impair bone formation
  • Patient has osteomalacia
  • Patient has distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
  • Patient has rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption on pre-operative radiographs
  • Patient underwent contralateral THA within 3 months of planned index procedure or has a contralateral THA planned within 3 months of the index procedure
  • Patient is undergoing simultaneous bilateral THA
  • Patient has vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy at the implant site or neuromuscular disease which might jeopardize the outcome of the surgery.
  • In the opinion of the investigator, patient has any concomitant disease which is likely to jeopardize the functioning or success of the implant
  • Patient is known to be pregnant
  • The patient is in the vulnerable population group, such as

    • a prisoner
    • a known alcohol or drug abuser
    • mentally incompetent or unable to understand what participation in this study entails
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
202 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Total Hip Arthroplasty Treatment Group

    This study will enroll (implant) up to 202 hips in total according to the IFU and surgical technique. Of these, up to 135 will be revision hips and up to 67 will be primary hips. This is a dual cohort study (primary and revision); each subject will receive the G7 Acetabular System with the Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E bearing. To minimize potential bias and to maximize our ability to assess inter-site differences, each study site will target up to 27 primary hip arthroplasties and up to 54 revision hip arthroplasties (not exceed 81 implanted hips or 40% of total study population). Each site is encouraged to enroll (implant) both primary and revision subjects.

    Device: Total Hip Arthroplasty with G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Liners

Interventions

  • DeviceTotal Hip Arthroplasty with G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Liners

    Primary and/or Revision total hip arthroplasty with the G7 Freedom Constrained Vivacit-E Liners

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survival of the study device

    Survival (whether or not it is still implanted in the subject) determined using Kaplan Meier method.

    Time frame: 10 years

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of treatment-emergent Adverse Events (safety)

    Safety is assessed by monitoring the frequency and incidence of all adverse events, with particular focus on those that may be related to the study device.

    Time frame: 10 years

  2. Pain and Functional Performance - Modified Harris Hip Score

    The Harris Hip Score evaluates hip function, pain, mobility and daily activity impairment after hip replacement surgery. The ten items in the Harris hip score consist of answer choices, awarded a number of points. There are four domains evaluated, as follows: * Pain - 1 item which scores between 0 and 44; * Function - 7 items, scores are between 0 and 47; * Deformity - 1 item which scores either 0 or 4; * Range of motion - 1 item which scores between 0 and 5. The overall score varies between 0 and 100, where scores closer to 0 are suggestive of impaired hip function and scores closer to 100 indicate positive outcome. There are four categories of hip function status: * \<70: poor hip status; * 70 - 79: fair hip status; * 80 - 89: good hip status; * 90 - 100: excellent hip status.

    Time frame: 10 years

  3. Pain and Functional Performance - Oxford Hip Score

    "The Oxford Hip Score is patient-reported outcome instrument which contains 12 questions on activities of daily living that assess function and residual pain in patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery. Grading the Oxford Hip Score 0 to 19-May indicate severe hip arthritis... 20 to 29-May indicate moderate to severe hip arthritis... 30 to 39-May indicate mild to moderate hip arthritis... 40 to 48-May indicate satisfactory joint function..." Oxford Hip Score. (n.d.) Segen's Medical Dictionary. (2011). Retrieved August 19 2022 from https://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Oxford+Hip+Score Each question is scored from 0 to 4 with 4 being the best outcome. This method, when summed, produces overall scores running from 0 to 48 with 48 being the best outcome. The overall score is reached by simply summing the scores received for individual questions. This results in a continuous score ranging from 0 (most severe symptoms) to 48 (least symptoms).

    Time frame: 10 years

  4. Euroqol Patient Quality of life measured at 2 years follow-up (EQ-5D-5L)

    The EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) is a five dimensional self-assessment that is comprised of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. These five dimensions can be used to index a subject's health utility on a scale of 0 to 1, where 0 is death and 1 is perfect health. The scoring rule for EQ-5D permits scores less than 0, implying that some health states may be worse than death. Note: no VAS measures will be obtained if completed by phone interview.

    Time frame: 10 Years

  5. Radiographic Performance evaluating radiolucency at 5 years follow-up

    X-rays will be evaluated for radiolucency lines to show the number of subjects with radiolucency. Radiolucency refers to structures that are less dense and permit the x-ray beam to pass through them. Radiolucent structures appear dark or black in the radiographic image.

    Time frame: 5 Years

  6. Radiographic Performance evaluating osteolysis at 5 years follow-up

    X-rays will be evaluated for osteolysis to show the number of subjects with osteolysis. Osteolysis is a progressive condition where bone tissue is destroyed. In this process, bones lose minerals (mostly calcium), softens, degenerates and become weaker.

    Time frame: 5 Years

  7. Radiographic Performance evaluating atrophy/hypertrophy at 5 years follow-up

    X-rays will be evaluated for muscular atrophy/hypertrophy. An increase in total mass of a muscle is referred to as as hypertrophy, whereas a decrease in total mass of a muscle is referred to as atrophy.

    Time frame: 5 Years

  8. Radiographic Performance evaluating component migration at 5 years follow-up

    X-rays will be evaluated for component migration to show the number of subjects with migration. Component migration refers to the presence of the device component gradually moving anteriorly, posteriorly, superiorly, or inferiorly in relation to original placement.

    Time frame: 5 Years

  9. Radiographic Performance evaluating device fracture at 5 years follow-up

    Radiographs will be evaluated (up to 5 years) for evidence of device fracture.

    Time frame: 5 Years

  10. Radiographic Performance evaluating heterotopic ossification at 5 years follow-up

    X-rays will be evaluated for heterotopic ossification to show the number of subjects with heterotopic ossification. Heterotopic ossification refers to the presence of bone in soft tissue where bone normally does not exist (extraskeletal bone).

    Time frame: 5 Years

07

Study locations

10 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 20, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05587244
Lead sponsor
Zimmer Biomet
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2022
Start date
May 8, 2023
Primary completion
Dec 2037 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2038 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2025

Study contacts

Hillary Overholser
study director · Zimmer Biomet

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion