ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05572736PhysioSync-HFUpdated Jun 8, 2025

Conduction System Pacing Versus Biventricular Resynchronization in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

An interventional study of Conduction system pacing and Biventricular pacing in Heart Failure, Left Bundle-Branch Block and Cardiac Resynchronization, sponsored by Hospital Moinhos de Vento. Completed at 14 sites in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-08.

Sponsored by Hospital Moinhos de Vento · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jan 2025, 1 year 10 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
179
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of conduction system pacing versus biventricular pacing in patients with chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Left Bundle-Branch Block
  • Cardiac Resynchronization
  • Conduction System Pacing
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 179 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Moinhos de Vento is the lead sponsor of 34 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male or female, age ≥18 years
  • Established diagnosis of symptomatic heart failure ( class II-III)
  • ≤35% in prior 3 months
  • Left bundle branch block (QRS ≥130 ms)
  • Clinical indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy
  • Patients should be clinically stable
  • Patients should receive background standard of care for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, with the maximum tolerated doses of ACE inhibitor or ARB or ARNI, beta-blocker, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • \<12 months due to any disease
  • Dementia or advanced cerebrovascular disease
  • class IV
  • Plan to implant an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), with or without resynchronization therapy (CRT-D)
  • Enrollment in other clinical trials involving cardiac pacing
  • Pregnancy or pre-menopausal women who do not use regular methods
  • Patients unable to understand and sign the consent for participation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
179 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Conduction system pacing

    Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing.

    Device: Conduction system pacing

  • Active comparator
    Biventricular pacing

    Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either conduction system pacing or biventricular pacing.

    Device: Biventricular pacing

Interventions

  • DeviceConduction system pacing

    Pacing from the His-Purkinje system (His-bundle pacing, left bundle branch area pacing, or deep septal pacing).

  • DeviceBiventricular pacing

    Pacing from the coronary sinus and right ventricular leads.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome Measure

    Heart failure-related net composite outcome, a hierarchical composite of all-cause death, any hospitalization for heart failure, any urgent heart failure visit, and left ventricular ejection fraction change at 12 months. The category of the composite outcome for each patient will be determined by assessing the following criteria sequentially, stopping when the event is present: All-cause death: death during follow-up. Hospitalization for heart failure: any hospitalization for heart failure during follow-up. Urgent heart failure visit: any urgent heart failure visit during follow-up. Left ventricular ejection fraction change: the difference between baseline and follow-up, categorized by every 5-point change. The distribution of outcome categories will be compared by ordinal distribution analysis. Non-inferiority margin: odds ratio \<1.2.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Key secondary outcome: Cost analysis (dominance) (superiority)

    Mean total direct medical cost per patient at 12 months.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Change in QRS complex

    Time frame: Duration of the QRS complex, defined as the widest paced QRS complex rated at 12-lead ECG, measured immediately after the index procedure

  3. Change in left ventricular ejection fraction

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Change in natriuretic peptide values

    BNP and NT-proBNP

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Change in 6-minute walk test

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Change in NYHA Classification

    New York Heart Association Functional Class

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score

    The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary Score ranges from 0-100, where a lower score indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. EuroQol Group 5-Dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Hierarchical endpoint of death, hospitalization for heart failure, urgent heart failure visit, and change in KCCQ Clinical Summary Score

    Time frame: 12 months

Other outcomes

  1. Change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2)

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

14 sites
  • Fundação Hospital do Coração Francisca Mendes
    Manaus, Amazonas 69097720, Brazil
  • Hospital Ana Nery
    Salvador, Bahia 40301-155, Brazil
  • Hospital Universitário Cassiano Antônio de Moraes
    Vitória, Espírito Santo 29041-295, Brazil
  • Hospital Geral Universitário de Cuiabá
    Cuiabá, Mato Grosso 78020-840, Brazil
  • Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira
    Recife, Pernambuco 50070-902, Brazil
  • Hospital Universitário da Universidade Federal do Piauí
    Teresina, Piauí 64049-550, Brazil
  • Hospital Moinhos de Vento
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90035-000, Brazil
  • Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 90035-903, Brazil
  • Hospital Mãe de Deus
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande Do Sul 900880-481, Brazil
  • SOS Cardio
    Florianópolis, Santa Catarina 88030-000, Brazil
  • Instituto de Cardiologia de Santa Catarina
    São José, Santa Catarina 88103-901, Brazil
  • Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia
    Rio De Janeiro, 22240-006, Brazil
  • Beneficência Portuguesa
    São Paulo, 01323-001, Brazil
  • Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz
    São Paulo, 01323-020, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05572736
Lead sponsor
Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, Brazil
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 10, 2022
Start date
Nov 7, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 10, 2025
Completion
Jan 10, 2025
Last update
Jun 8, 2025

Study contacts

Carisi Polanczyk, MD PhD
study chair · Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Andre d'Avila, MD PhD
principal investigator · Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
Alexander Dal Forno, MD
principal investigator · Hospital SOS Cardio
Leandro Zimerman, MD PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Luis E Rohde, MD PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Andre Zimerman, MD PhD
principal investigator · Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Caique Ternes, MD
principal investigator · Hospital Moinhos de Vento
Fernanda D Alves, PhD
study director · Hospital Moinhos de Vento

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion