ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05555771DETECT-EDUpdated Apr 23, 2026

Paediatric Syncope in the Emergency Department

An interventional study of Counterpressure Maneuvers and Usual Care in Syncope, Vasovagal, Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome and Orthostatic Intolerance, sponsored by Dr. Victoria Claydon. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by Dr. Victoria Claydon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators will assess the efficacy of clinically recommended counterpressure maneuvers (CPM) in preventing syncope for paediatric patients. Participants presenting to the emergency department (ED) will first provide written informed consent. In stage I, they will be asked to complete a brief survey documenting the presentation of their syncopal episode, and any prodromal symptoms they experienced. Participants that consent to the second stage of the study will either receive usual care (control arm) or training in counter pressure maneuvers alongside usual care (intervention arm; leg crossing, bending, arm tensing). These patients will be followed for one years time, and will be asked to complete monthly surveys detailing their syncopal and presyncopal recurrence. Medical records will be accessed over the duration of the study to identify any changes in medical diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

Knowledge Gaps and Objectives The typical presentation and management for paediatric syncope is poorly understood. From research in adults, it is known that obtaining a detailed history of prodromal symptoms and the circumstance of a syncopal event is important for diagnosis, risk stratification, and determining patient prognosis. However, research in paediatric patients is lacking, with recommendations often disputed and based on a paucity of direct evidence, assuming that children will respond similarly to adults; however, this may not be the case. The investigators will (stage I) catalogue the syncopal symptoms observed in paediatric patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with transient loss of consciousness, and (stage II) assess the efficacy of counter pressure maneuver (CPM) training in preventing recurrent syncope for paediatric patients.

Methods, Stage I; Presentation of syncope in paediatric patients Ethical approval for this study was granted by the University of British Columbia's Clinical Research Ethics Board. The investigators will recruit paediatric patients (age 7-19 years) presenting to the ED with resolved transient loss of consciousness in the last week. Research assistants will identify potential participants based on exclusion criteria, and a clinician will later gather a brief medical history and perform a screen for study eligibility. Exclusion criteria: suspected or confirmed cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis; traumatic head injury; new presentation of a seizure disorder or epilepsy; structural heart disease; hypoglycemia; physical and/or psychological disability associated with vasovagal syncope (VVS).

Consenting patients will complete a survey detailing the nature of their episodes in terms of the provocative situation, their signs and symptoms, and history of syncope or presyncope alongside a brief medical history (age, self-reported Tanner stage, age at onset of female menarche if applicable).

The primary outcome is to document the typical presentation of syncope and presyncope in paediatric patients identified as having experienced VVS. Additional outcomes include predictive factors for uncomplicated syncope in this population, including the influence of pubertal stage on the onset of paediatric syncope. Secondary outcomes include identifying the incidence of syncope, determining typical causes for syncope, and reporting on predictive factors for syncope secondary to other causes in this population. Bivariate analyses assessing possible associations between presenting prodromes and syncopal diagnoses will be conducted using either Fisher or Chi-square tests for categorical variables, and univariate multinomial models for continuous variables. These analyses will also be conducted adjusting for age and sex (either through regression or matching). The incidence and subtype of syncope presented will be calculated using an appropriate reference population. Qualitative data will be analyzed using a thematic approach, to identify trends in chosen variables based on patient responses.

Methods, Stage II; Paediatric counterpressure manoeuvres trial Stage I patients with a confirmed diagnosis of VVS from a clinician will be referred to stage II. Patients will be followed for one year while they implement either usual care for syncope (behavioural interventions and avoidance measures) or usual care alongside CPM use (leg crossing, hand grip, crouching). The primary outcome measure will be the time to syncopal reoccurrence over the 1-year follow up period, while secondary outcome measures include history of syncope in the prior 2 years, frequency of presyncopal episodes, preferred management strategies (CPM, or usual care), and barriers to implementing CPM. The predicted risk of syncopal reoccurrence will be identified using a logistic regression model with a covariate for treatment arm (CPM, standard of care). Outcomes will be compared between groups using the estimated risk ratio and risk difference. The Wald test for the log-odds coefficient from the logistic model will be used to test for treatment effect (level of 0.05). The investigators will also perform a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (time to syncope recurrence), using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards analysis to compare curves. Qualitative follow-up call data will again be analyzed using a thematic approach.

02

Conditions studied

  • Syncope, Vasovagal
  • Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome
  • Orthostatic Intolerance
03

In context

Syncope, Vasovagal

88 studies on the registry are indexed under Syncope, Vasovagal; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 59 across 58 interventional studies indexed under Syncope, Vasovagal.

Browse Syncope, Vasovagal studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Dr. Victoria Claydon as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Those between the ages of 6-18 years (inclusive)
  2. Presenting to the ED daily 1000-2200 with resolved transient loss of consciousness that has occurred within the last week
  3. Able to complete the survey in English
  4. Willing and able to provide consent and assent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Those with a known history of any of the following:

    • Suspected or confirmed cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis (e.g., Wolff-Parkinson-White, long )
    • Traumatic head injury
    • New presentation of seizure disorder
    • Epilepsy recurrence
    • Overdose, intoxication
    • Structural heart disease
  2. Patients with hypoglycaemia and who are psychogenic with vasovagal syncope who do not present with prodromal symptoms
  3. Previously enrolled in this study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Counterpressure Maneuvers

    Participants will receive standard of care treatment (behavioural intervention and avoidance measures, as indicated in "Usual Care"), alongside training in counter pressure maneuvers. Training in counterpressure maneuvers will be delivered through a handout and video that will show three maneuvers (i.e. arm-tensing, squatting, and leg-crossing) that patients enrolled in the intervention arm can perform when they begin to experience common signs and symptoms of syncope. Patients will be instructed to start with one of the maneuvers and if their symptoms do not go away, move on to a second or third maneuver if needed.

    Behavioral: Counterpressure Maneuvers

  • Active comparator
    Usual Care

    Participants will receive standard of care treatment for their diagnosis of syncope. This primarily includes behavioural interventions and avoidance measures (e.g., stay hydrated, increase salt intake, avoid hot situations, avoid standing for long periods of time, engage in regular physical activity). Some patients may be prescribed medication (Midodrine, Fludrocortisone) at the discretion of their physician.

    Behavioral: Usual Care

Interventions

  • BehavioralCounterpressure Maneuvers

    Movements that can aid in delaying or preventing syncope by recruiting skeletal muscle pumping (via compression of major veins by contracting muscle to eject blood through cardiovascular circuit) and increased sympathetic drive (via sustaining an isometric muscle contraction). In this trial, we will be evaluating three commonly recommended maneuvers of arm tensing, squatting, and leg crossing with arm tensing. Maneuvers should be held for 1-2 minutes, or until symptoms subside.

    Also known as: Physical counter maneuvers, counter maneuvers,

  • BehavioralUsual Care

    Participants will engage in behavioural interventions and avoidance measures that are commonly recommended as a part of usual care for recurrent syncope. This primarily includes recommendations such as staying hydrated, increasing salt intake, avoiding warm temperatures, avoiding standing for long periods of time, and engaging in regular physical activity. Some patients may be prescribed medication (Midodrine, Fludrocortisone), or other assistive interventions (e.g., compression stockings) at the discretion of their physician.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with syncopal recurrence

    Participant experiences an episode of syncope (transient loss of consciousness and postural tone followed by a spontaneous recovery) over the course of the one year follow up.

    Time frame: One year, reported in monthly surveys.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Syncopal incidence

    Report on the incidence of syncope in our cohort

    Time frame: One year

  2. Documentation of typical prodromal symptoms

    Link the prodromal symptoms of the different types of syncope in the pediatric population with the final diagnosis after at least one year of follow-up.

    Time frame: One year

  3. Number of patients with exercise-related syncope

    Determine the diagnosis of pediatric patients who may experience syncope that is temporally associated to exercise

    Time frame: One year

  4. Number of patients with syncope secondary to other causes

    Report on predictive factors for syncope secondary to other causes

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Primary Writing Committee; Sandhu RK, Raj SR, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Kaul P, Morillo CA, Krahn AD, Guzman JC, Sheldon RS; Secondary Writing Committee; Banijamali HS, MacIntyre C, Manlucu J, Seifer C, Sivilotti M. Canadian Cardiovascular Society Clinical Practice Update on the Assessment and Management of Syncope. Can J Cardiol. 2020 Aug;36(8):1167-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.12.023. Epub 2020 Jul 2. PubMed 32624296 ↗
  • Malloy-Walton L, Tisma-Dupanovic S. The approach to pediatric syncope with exercise. HeartRhythm Case Rep. 2019 Oct 15;5(10):485-488. doi: 10.1016/j.hrcr.2019.04.012. eCollection 2019 Oct. No abstract available. PubMed 33145167 ↗
  • Sanatani S, Chau V, Fournier A, Dixon A, Blondin R, Sheldon RS. Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Pediatric Cardiology Association Position Statement on the Approach to Syncope in the Pediatric Patient. Can J Cardiol. 2017 Feb;33(2):189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Oct 3. PubMed 27838109 ↗
  • van Dijk N, Quartieri F, Blanc JJ, Garcia-Civera R, Brignole M, Moya A, Wieling W; PC-Trial Investigators. Effectiveness of physical counterpressure maneuvers in preventing vasovagal syncope: the Physical Counterpressure Manoeuvres Trial (PC-Trial). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1652-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.059. Epub 2006 Sep 26. PubMed 17045903 ↗
  • Runser LA, Gauer RL, Houser A. Syncope: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2017 Mar 1;95(5):303-312. PubMed 28290647 ↗
  • Chen L, Zhang Q, Ingrid S, Chen J, Qin J, Du J. Aetiologic and clinical characteristics of syncope in Chinese children. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Oct;96(10):1505-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00446.x. Epub 2007 Aug 20. PubMed 17714543 ↗
  • Anderson JB, Willis M, Lancaster H, Leonard K, Thomas C. The Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Syncope. Pediatr Neurol. 2016 Feb;55:6-13. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.10.018. Epub 2015 Nov 17. PubMed 26706050 ↗
  • van Wijnen VK, Gans ROB, Wieling W, Ter Maaten JC, Harms MPM. Diagnostic accuracy of evaluation of suspected syncope in the emergency department: usual practice vs. ESC guidelines. BMC Emerg Med. 2020 Aug 3;20(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00344-9. PubMed 32746777 ↗
  • Sheldon R, Rose S, Connolly S, Ritchie D, Koshman ML, Frenneaux M. Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history. Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb;27(3):344-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi584. Epub 2005 Oct 13. PubMed 16223744 ↗
  • Calkins H, Shyr Y, Frumin H, Schork A, Morady F. The value of the clinical history in the differentiation of syncope due to ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular block, and neurocardiogenic syncope. Am J Med. 1995 Apr;98(4):365-73. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80315-5. PubMed 7709949 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05555771
Lead sponsor
Dr. Victoria Claydon
Collaborators
Provincial Health Services Authority British Columbia, University of British Columbia, Simon Fraser University
Responsible party
Dr. Victoria Claydon (Professor, Simon Fraser University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 27, 2022
Start date
Sep 3, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Erin L Williams, BSc
Contact
erin_williams_2@sfu.ca
6048976372
Sonia Franciosi, PhD
Contact
Sonia.Franciosi@cw.bc.ca
(604) 875-2345 ext. 7955
Shubhayan Sanatani, MD
principal investigator · University of British Columbia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion