ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05551234Part'AgesUpdated Jun 23, 2026

Reciprocal Benefit by Intergenerational Meetings

An observational study in Isolation, Social, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 5 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-23.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
5 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The investigators want to set up an experiment that allows a reciprocal benefit to 2 fragile populations: isolated seniors and disadvantaged children. The main hypothesis is that regular exchanges between these two populations reduce the feeling of social isolation of seniors and improve the school behavior of childrens. Therefore the investigators propose the following study design. The seniors and childrens will meet once a week, for 7 months, in a defined location in the city of Vallauris, over a period of one and a half hours, outside school hours (4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) and school holidays. During the school holidays the group will meet 3 times for day-long activities in the presence of at least one of the parents and possibly brothers and sisters. At the end of the project, a convivial evening will be organized in the presence of the families. The group will meet in a room in the city center and in the presence of a facilitator so that an adult will never be alone with a child. The formed pair will follow a defined schedule where will alternate activities proposed by the senior, sessions proposed by the facilitator and convivial moments in the presence of families . During the sessions proposed by the senior, he will offered the child a leisure activity that he likes and masters (eg gardening, DIY, sewing, etc.). All the proposed activities will be validated upstream by the project managers. The sessions proposed by the facilitator (e.g. games, walks) could be done with the participation of an outside speaker (e.g. for writing a gazette). A new evaluation session will be offered to all participants at the end of the meeting period, then at the end of the project, 1 month after the end of the meeting period.

02

Conditions studied

  • Isolation, Social

Browse trials for

03

In context

Social Isolation

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Social Isolation; 61 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 200 across 35 observational studies indexed under Social Isolation.

Browse Social Isolation studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice is the lead sponsor of 723 studies on the registry; 176 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

isolated seniors (from 65 years old) and disadvantaged children (from 5 years old)

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria for children :

  • Girls or boys from last year of kindergarten to last year of elementary school,
  • Educated in priority education network,
  • Having the cognitive and sensory-motor capacities to follow and interact during the workshops,

Exclusion Criteria for children :

- subject does not speak French, does not read French,

Inclusion Criteria for seniors:

  • Men or women over the age of 65, - score greater than or equal to 24/30,
  • A score above 4 on the 3-point Loneliness Scale (Three-item Loneliness Scale),
  • Clean record.

Exclusion Criteria for Seniors:

  • subject does not speak French, does not read French,
  • subject with visual impairment,
  • subject under guardianship or curatorship,
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Isolated senior

    Other: Regular exchanges

  • Children

    Other: Regular exchanges

Interventions

  • OtherRegular exchanges

    The seniors and childrens will meet once a week, for 7 months, over a period of one and a half hours, outside school hours (4:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.) and school holidays.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. For Senior : the 3-point loneliness scale;

    The 3-point lonelisness scale evaluates loneless with 3 questions.

    Time frame: At 8 months

  2. For children : SDQ-fra

    The SDQ is a behavioral screening questionnaire applicable to children aged 3 to 16 and comprising 25 questions divided into 5 domains (emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, relationship problems with other children, social behavior).

    Time frame: At 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. For Senior : the Nottingham Perceptual Health Indicator score (ISPN or NHP)

    This is a self-questionnaire of 38 items covering 6 dimensions: pain, physical mobility, sleep, energy, emotional reaction, social isolation. We will focus on the average score (and not the classes/slices: low, medium, etc.). This is a self-questionnaire of 38 items covering 6 dimensions: pain, physical mobility, sleep, energy, emotional reaction, social isolation. We will focus on the average score (and not the classes/slices: low, medium, etc.).

    Time frame: Before (Month 0), after the sessions (Month 7), one month after the end of the sessions (M8)

  2. Geriatric depression scale 15

    The GDS is a 15-item scale used to screen for mood disorders.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  3. rosenberg self-esteem scale

    This scale consists of 10 questions each evaluated by a 4-level Likert scale.

    Time frame: Up to 8 months

  4. satisfaction questionnaire

    for children and their parents and teachers, for the senior

    Time frame: At 7 months

  5. semi-directive interiew

    "for children, for the senior, for entourage of senior and children interview defined especially for this study to evaluate social impact written transcription or oral records"

    Time frame: Up to 7 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Institut Claude Pompidou
    Nice, 06100, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD sharing is not planed

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2022 to primary completion in May 2026, 44 months.

Of 17 observational studies under Social Isolation, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 44. This study's 44 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 9, 2022
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
StartActual
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
May 19, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 12, 2026
Last update
Jun 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05551234
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2022
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
May 19, 2026
Completion
Jun 12, 2026
Last update
Jun 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion