ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05542784Updated Sep 15, 2022

Modified Laparoendoscopic Rendezvous for Secondary Choledocholithiasis: a Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Study

An observational study in Choledocholithiasis, sponsored by Shenzhen Second People's Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-09-15.

Sponsored by Shenzhen Second People's Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study intends to explore the success rate and clinical efficacy of modified LERV in the treatment of patients with non-dilated common bile duct (internal diameter ≤10mm) through a non-randomized controlled clinical trial, and to clarify whether modified LERV can be used as the preferred routine treatment for choledocholithiasis secondary to gallbladder stones.

Read the detailed description

Patients with cholecystolithiasis secondary to common bile duct stones requiring surgical treatment during a 3-year period from 2022-6-1 to 2025-3-31 were enrolled in this non-randomized controlled clinical trial. Preoperative diameter of the middle common bile duct was determined by magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRCP) or B-ultrasound measurement. The actual treatment plan of the patients was recorded, including LERV treatment and ERCP+LC treatment. The baseline data and the success rate of stone removal, operation time, postoperative stone residual rate, complication rate, length of hospital stay and hospitalization cost were recorded for observation and follow-up. To determine whether modified LERV can be used as the preferred routine treatment for choledocholithiasis secondary to gallbladder stones.

02

Conditions studied

  • Choledocholithiasis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Choledocholithiasis

109 studies on the registry are indexed under Choledocholithiasis; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 90 is below the median of 200 across 31 observational studies indexed under Choledocholithiasis.

Browse Choledocholithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Shenzhen Second People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 51 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients aged 18 to 85 years with common bile duct stones who are suitable for and consent to undergo laparoscopic plus endoscopic surgery under general anesthesia

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

1、18 years ≤ age \<85 years 2、clinical diagnosis of choledocholithiasis secondary to cholecystolithiasis and middle choledocholithiasis (MCBD) diameter ≤10mm; The diameter of MCBD was based on MRCP measurements. If MRCP could not be performed, CT images were used as reference, and B-ultrasound measurements were used as the standard.

3、 Good cardiopulmonary function, anesthesia evaluation tolerance under general anesthesia laparoscopic + endoscopic surgery.

-

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1、 Intrahepatic bile duct stones with indications for surgery, and need simultaneous surgery; 2、 Patients with choledocholithiasis >2 cm or a large number of stones were difficult to remove; 3、 Patients with malignant hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumors or biliary tract malformations; 4、 Severe patients with severe pancreatitis and septic shock before operation; 5、Patients with previous gastric and duodenoscopic surgery history and interruption of gastroduodenal continuity; 6、 Severe partial stenosis of the upper gastrointestinal tract (from the oral cavity to the second duodenum), which is expected to be inaccessible to the duodenoscope.

-

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with choledocholithiasis secondary to choledocholithiasis undergoing LERV surgery

    Procedure: Modified LERV

  • Patients with choledocholithiasis secondary to choledocholithiasis undergoing PreERCP+LC surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedureModified LERV

    Patients routinely underwent LC. The ligature clamp clamps the distal end of the capsule tube. In this case, you need to perform two steps: Laparoscopic operation: proximal incision, anterograde placement of guide wire into the duodenum. The catheter was removed and the balloon dilated. The balloon was released and removed when the ERCP was initiated for cannulation. After successful ERCP retrograde placement, the anterograde guide wire was pulled out and the gallbladder was removed. ERCP procedure: After the anterograde guide wire was observed by duodenoscope, duodenal papilla was placed through a retrograde incision along the anterograde guide wire, and a retrograde cannula was inserted into the common bile duct. Remove stones by dragging them with a net basket or/and balloon. Angiography confirmed that there was no filling defect in the extrahepatic bile duct, and ENBD was indwelled.

    Also known as: Pre ERCP+LC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness evaluation index

    Success rate of stone removal (as judged by ERCP imaging)

    Time frame: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative related clinical indicators

    The incidence of PEP

    Time frame: Blood routine, pancreatic enzyme binomial and liver function were examined on the first and second day after operation.

  2. The hospital indicators

    Length of hospital stay after operation (including operation day), hospitalization cost after operation (including operation day)

    Time frame: an average 1 week

  3. the incidence of serious complications

    including duodenal papilla hemorrhage, duodenal perforation, acute pancreatitis, duodenal leakage (fistula), abdominal abscess, the incidence of hyperamylasemia, the incidence of residual common bile duct stones, etc.

    Time frame: Within 1 year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
    Recruiting
    • Guohui Nie, dean · Contact
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tazuma S. Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(6):1075-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.05.009. PubMed 17127189 ↗
  • Bradley A, Sami S, Hemadasa N, Macleod A, Brown LR, Apollos J. Decision analysis of minimally invasive management options for cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2020 Dec;34(12):5211-5222. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07816-w. Epub 2020 Jul 24. PubMed 32710213 ↗
  • Deslandres E, Gagner M, Pomp A, Rheault M, Leduc R, Clermont R, Gratton J, Bernard EJ. Intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Jan-Feb;39(1):54-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70011-5. No abstract available. PubMed 8454146 ↗
  • Liu W, Wang Q, Xiao J, Zhao L, Huang J, Tan Z, Li P. A modified technique reduced operative time of laparoendoscopic rendezvous endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for concomitant gallstone and common bile ductal stone. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2014;2014:861295. doi: 10.1155/2014/861295. Epub 2014 Jun 15. PubMed 25024701 ↗
  • Mine T, Morizane T, Kawaguchi Y, Akashi R, Hanada K, Ito T, Kanno A, Kida M, Miyagawa H, Yamaguchi T, Mayumi T, Takeyama Y, Shimosegawa T. Clinical practice guideline for post-ERCP pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep;52(9):1013-1022. doi: 10.1007/s00535-017-1359-5. Epub 2017 Jun 26. PubMed 28653082 ↗
  • Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ, Walsh PR, Murray MA, Lee EY, Kwan V, Lynch PM. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2008 Apr;40(4):296-301. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-995566. PubMed 18389448 ↗
  • Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.039. Epub 2009 Mar 14. PubMed 19286178 ↗
  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Buxbaum JL, Abbas Fehmi SM, Sultan S, Fishman DS, Qumseya BJ, Cortessis VK, Schilperoort H, Kysh L, Matsuoka L, Yachimski P, Agrawal D, Gurudu SR, Jamil LH, Jue TL, Khashab MA, Law JK, Lee JK, Naveed M, Sawhney MS, Thosani N, Yang J, Wani SB. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 Jun;89(6):1075-1105.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.10.001. Epub 2019 Apr 9. PubMed 30979521 ↗
  • Noel R, Enochsson L, Swahn F, Lohr M, Nilsson M, Permert J, Arnelo U. A 10-year study of rendezvous intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography during cholecystectomy and the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2498-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2768-4. Epub 2013 Jan 26. PubMed 23355164 ↗
  • Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20. PubMed 31863440 ↗
  • Pan L, Chen M, Ji L, Zheng L, Yan P, Fang J, Zhang B, Cai X. The Safety and Efficacy of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration Combined with Cholecystectomy for the Management of Cholecysto-choledocholithiasis: An Up-to-date Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 Aug;268(2):247-253. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002731. PubMed 29533266 ↗
  • Ricci C, Pagano N, Taffurelli G, Pacilio CA, Migliori M, Bazzoli F, Casadei R, Minni F. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of 4 Combinations of Laparoscopic and Intraoperative Techniques for Management of Gallstone Disease With Biliary Duct Calculi: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2018 Jul 18;153(7):e181167. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1167. Epub 2018 Jul 18. PubMed 29847616 ↗
  • Tan C, Ocampo O, Ong R, Tan KS. Comparison of one stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intra-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus two-stage pre-operative endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the management of pre-operatively diagnosed patients with common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2018 Feb;32(2):770-778. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5739-y. Epub 2017 Jul 21. PubMed 28733744 ↗
  • Tse F, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P, Leontiadis GI. Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013 Aug;45(8):605-18. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1326640. Epub 2013 Jun 27. PubMed 23807804 ↗
  • Morino M, Baracchi F, Miglietta C, Furlan N, Ragona R, Garbarini A. Preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy versus laparoendoscopic rendezvous in patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones. Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):889-93; discussion 893-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000246913.74870.fc. PubMed 17122614 ↗
  • Tatulli F, Cuttitta A. Laparoendoscopic approach to treatment of common bile duct stones. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000 Dec;10(6):315-7. doi: 10.1089/lap.2000.10.315. PubMed 11132910 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05542784
Lead sponsor
Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2022
Primary completion
Mar 1, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2022

Study contacts

Yongqiang Zhan, Chief physician
Contact
yqzhan@sina.com
13714096676
Zibing Fan, Attending physician
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Ganchen Sun, Nurse practitioner
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Yanan Bao, nurse-in-charge
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Xuelin Liu, Nurse practitioner
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Haoyuan Deng, Attending physician
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Yifan Zhang, Master's Degree student
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Yang Li, Nurse practitioner
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Haoran Ma, Nurse practitioner
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Naiyang Zhan, Attending physician
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital
Yiyuan Chen, Master's Degree student
study chair · Shenzhen Second People's Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion