An interventional study of Right ventricular septal pacing followed by left bundle branch area pacing and Left bundle branch area pacing followed by right ventricular septal pacing in Complete Heart Block, High Degree Second Degree Atrioventricular Block and Pacemaker-Induced Cardiomyopathy, sponsored by Main Line Health. Active, not recruiting at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-12-10.
Sponsored by Main Line Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of the study is to investigate the superiority of chronic left bundle branch area pacing compared to traditional right ventricular (RV) septal pacing in patients with high-grade conduction disease after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). In this investigator initiated, multicenter, prospective, double-blinded, crossover study, chronic left bundle branch area pacing will be compared to chronic right ventricular septal pacing using echocardiographic measures of left ventricular systolic function in patients with a high cumulative ventricular pacing burden after TAVR.
1,176 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiomyopathies; 287 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 46 is close to the median of 51 across 609 interventional studies indexed under Cardiomyopathies.
Browse Cardiomyopathies studies →Main Line Health is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Subject has at least one of these conduction disturbances:
Exclusion Criteria:
Device: Right ventricular septal pacing followed by left bundle branch area pacing
Device: Left bundle branch area pacing followed by right ventricular septal pacing
All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.
All patients will undergo implantation of right ventricular septal lead, left bundle branch area lead, and atrial lead in the absence of permanent atrial fibrillation with a CRT-pacing generator. Patients will be randomized to pacing protocols based on group assignment and crossover during the study.
Change in global longitudinal strain (GLS%)
Primary efficacy outcome
Time frame: 9 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF%)
Primary efficacy outcome
Time frame: 9 months
Composite of left bundle branch area pacing lead septal myocardial or coronary artery perforation, lead dislodgment, and repeat procedures related to left bundle branch area lead implantation
Primary safety endpoint
Time frame: 18 months
Adverse events related to device function
Time frame: 18 months
Quality of life measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire (MLHQ)
Time frame: 9 months
Functional capacity measured using the New York Heart Association functional classification (NYHA)
Time frame: 9 months
Six minute walk test score
Time frame: 9 months
Hospitalizations for heart failure
Time frame: 18 months
Mortality
Time frame: 18 months
Right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS%)
Time frame: 9 months
Left ventricular mechanical systolic dyssynchrony indexed to heart rate (SDI)
Time frame: 9 months
Interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD)
Time frame: 9 months
Left ventricular end-systolic volume
Time frame: 9 months
Left ventricular stroke volume
Time frame: 9 months
Severity of tricuspid regurgitation
Time frame: 18 months
Severity of mitral regurgitation
Time frame: 18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead pacing threshold
Time frame: 18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead sensed R wave amplitude
Time frame: 18 months
Left bundle branch area pacing lead impedence
Time frame: 18 months
Brain natriuretic peptide or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide concentration
Time frame: 9 months
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Main Line Health