ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05516433MERIMIUpdated Feb 27, 2023

Effect of Imipenem and Meropenem on the Digestive Microbiota and the Emergence and Carriage of Multidrug-resistant Bacteria

An observational study in Enterobacteriaceae Infections, sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph. Status unknown at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-27.

Sponsored by Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2023), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Among enterobacteria, ESBL production is the leading cause of multidrug resistance. The first cases of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae (EBLSE) infections were described in the 1980s and subsequently spread worldwide.

Since the turn of the century, the prevalence of EBLSE infections, particularly among E. coli and K. pneumoniae, has increased dramatically. The emergence of multidrug-resistant enteric bacteria (MRE) is currently a real public health problem. The European network for monitoring antibiotic resistance in cooperation with Santé Publique France evaluated the rate of resistance to third generation cephalosporins (C3G) among clinical strains at 10.2% for Escherichia coli and 28.8% for Klebsiella pneumoniae. The consequences of infections with multi-resistant enteric bacteria, mainly represented by ESBL, are currently well known, both from an individual point of view (increased mortality and length of hospitalization) and from a collective point of view (increased costs of care).

The current reference treatment for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae infections is based on carbapenems.

Imipenem and meropenem are the two most commonly used carbapenems in clinical practice. Despite their similar spectrum of action, these two molecules have different pharmacokinetic properties, notably concerning their half-life and their elimination routes (mainly urinary for imipenem, mixed: biliary and urinary for meropenem).

Some studies have suggested that imipenem has a low impact on the digestive microbiota. However, no studies comparing the impact of imipenem and meropenem have been conducted.

Woerther et coll. explained in their work that the digestive microbiota confers resistance to colonization by MREs. The impact of antibiotics on the microbiota probably leads to a breakdown of this barrier and a loss of this resistance to colonization. Moreover, each antibiotic therapy does not impact the digestive microbiota in the same way and it seems that antibiotics with a high activity against strict anaerobic species and/or a high biliary elimination are the most impacting. It is therefore essential, in the era of multidrug resistance, to look at the influence of antibiotics on the digestive microbiota and on the emergence and carriage of MRE.

In a context where the incidence of multi-resistant bacteria is constantly increasing, it seems relevant to conduct a study aiming at comparing the respective impact of the use of imipenem and meropenem on the emergence of MRE and on the digestive microbiota at the individual level. This study aims at comparing the microbiological impact (in terms of emergence of bacterial resistance and in terms of impact on the diversity of cultivable digestive bacteria). It will be a comparative study with matching of patients according to age, service and previous duration of hospitalization. Indeed, the usual management of patients with an infection requiring treatment with a carbapenem is different between the 2 participating centers. Thus, according to the usual management of patients in these 2 participating centers, patients at Avicenne Hospital are treated with meropenem and patients at the Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group with imipenem, except in the case of a need for a high daily dose (osteoarticular infection, for example) due to the neurological toxicity of imipenem at high dosage. In the case of high-dose use, meropenem will be the preferred molecule.

02

Conditions studied

  • Enterobacteriaceae Infections
03

In context

Enterobacteriaceae Infections

57 studies on the registry are indexed under Enterobacteriaceae Infections; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 300 across 27 observational studies indexed under Enterobacteriaceae Infections.

Browse Enterobacteriaceae Infections studies →

Lead sponsor

Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph is the lead sponsor of 344 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patient hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph or the Avicenne Hospital, with an infection requiring probabilistic or documented treatment with a carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem)

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient hospitalized in the intensive care unit of the Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph or the Avicenne Hospital
  • Patient with an infection requiring probabilistic or documented treatment with a carbapenem (imipenem or meropenem)
  • French speaking patient
  • Patient or relative able to give his or her non-objection

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a carbapenem allergy
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
  • Patient under guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient deprived of liberty
  • Patient under court protection
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Imipenem

    Prescribing rules differ from one department to another: Imipenem is the preferred drug at Saint-Joseph Hospital.

  • Meropenem

    Prescribing rules differ from one department to another: Meropenem is the preferred carbapenem at Avicenne Hospital.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ecological impact of imipenem and meropenem on the microbiota (modification of bacterial diversity)

    This outcome corresponds to the rate of modification in bacterial diversity judged by the loss of at least one bacterial species in the microbiota after initiation of antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: Month 1

  2. Ecological impact of imipenem and meropenem on the microbiota (abundance)

    This outcome corresponds to the rate of diminution in bacterial abundance within the microbiota, defined as a decrease of at least 2 logs in abundance.

    Time frame: Month 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Evaluate the change in bacterial diversity

    This outcome corresponds to the rate of loss of at least one bacterial species in the microbiota after initiation of antibiotic therapy.

    Time frame: Month 1

  2. Change in bacterial abundance

    This outcome corresponds to the rate of loos corresponding to at least 2 log decrease in bacterial abundance.

    Time frame: Month 1

07

Study locations

1 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Hôpital Avicenne
    Bobigny, 93000, France
    • Jean-Ralph Zahar, MD · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Groupe Hospitalier Paris Saint-Joseph
    Paris, 75014, France
    • Benoit PILMIS, MD · Contact
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schwaber MJ, Navon-Venezia S, Kaye KS, Ben-Ami R, Schwartz D, Carmeli Y. Clinical and economic impact of bacteremia with extended- spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Apr;50(4):1257-62. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.4.1257-1262.2006. PubMed 16569837 ↗
  • Gudiol C, Calatayud L, Garcia-Vidal C, Lora-Tamayo J, Cisnal M, Duarte R, Arnan M, Marin M, Carratala J, Gudiol F. Bacteraemia due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) in cancer patients: clinical features, risk factors, molecular epidemiology and outcome. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010 Feb;65(2):333-41. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkp411. Epub 2009 Dec 3. PubMed 19959544 ↗
  • Woerther PL, Lepeule R, Burdet C, Decousser JW, Ruppe E, Barbier F. Carbapenems and alternative beta-lactams for the treatment of infections due to extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae: What impact on intestinal colonisation resistance? Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018 Dec;52(6):762-770. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.08.026. Epub 2018 Aug 31. PubMed 30176355 ↗
  • Ruppe E, Burdet C, Grall N, de Lastours V, Lescure FX, Andremont A, Armand-Lefevre L. Impact of antibiotics on the intestinal microbiota needs to be re-defined to optimize antibiotic usage. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 Jan;24(1):3-5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Sep 29. No abstract available. PubMed 28970162 ↗
  • Ruppe E, Lixandru B, Cojocaru R, Buke C, Paramythiotou E, Angebault C, Visseaux C, Djuikoue I, Erdem E, Burduniuc O, El Mniai A, Marcel C, Perrier M, Kesteman T, Clermont O, Denamur E, Armand-Lefevre L, Andremont A. Relative fecal abundance of extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli strains and their occurrence in urinary tract infections in women. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 Sep;57(9):4512-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00238-13. Epub 2013 Jul 8. PubMed 23836184 ↗
  • Holub M, Mizrahi A, Miot O, Pean de Ponfilly G, Huriez P, Cachera L, Genty T, Zahar J-R, Leveque N, Le Monnier A, Pilmis B. Comparative impact of imipenem and meropenem on intestinal carriage and relative fecal abundance of multidrug-resistant bacteria, with detection of residual antibiotics in rectal swabs. Microbiol Spectr. 2026 Sep 17:e0123526. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01235-26. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42752244 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 27, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05516433
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 25, 2022
Start date
Jan 23, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 22, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 27, 2023

Study contacts

Benoit PILMIS, MD
Contact
bpilmis@ghpsj.fr
144127820 ext. +33
Helene BEAUSSIER, PharmD, PhD
Contact
crc@ghpsj.fr
144127883 ext. +33
Benoit PILMIS, MD
principal investigator · Fondation Hôpital Saint-Joseph

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion