CClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT05511688Updated Sep 2, 2025

National Cohort of Colorectal Cancers With Microsatellite Instability

An observational study in Colorectal Cancer and Microsatellite Instability, sponsored by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive. Active, not recruiting at 14 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-02.

Sponsored by Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
637
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The three main pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis are chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability (MSI) (15% of colorectal cancers =CRCs) and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). MSI CRCs are associated with a better prognosis after curative surgery than CRCs without microsatellite instability (MSS). In contrast, MSI CRCs do not appear to benefit from adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy, unlike patients with MSS CRCs. Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX seems to be retained. The identification of prognostic markers in this subgroup of patients is therefore essential to decide on adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of which is currently debated in MSI CRC.

To date, there are very few data concerning metastatic MSI CRC. Metastatic forms are rare (about 5% of metastatic CRCs), but are thought to be associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis. Nevertheless, data are very sparse and there are no data regarding the use of modern chemotherapies and targeted therapies in metastatic MSI CRC. Thus, it is important to characterize the chemosensitivity of metastatic forms.

Clinical predictors of recurrence after curative CRC surgery are known but have only been studied in MSI CRC retrospectively. Similarly, many molecular and immunohistochemical factors, prognostic or predictive of response to adjuvant chemotherapy, have been recently identified in CRC (KRAS, BRAF, TP53, PI3KCA mutations, CIMP phenotype, SMAD4, immune response...). Most of these markers have been studied in all CRCs, but not specifically in the MSI CRC subgroup. All these prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers need to be better characterized in a large cohort of MSI CRCs.

Read the detailed description

Colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability The 3 main pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis are chromosomal instability (75% of CRCs), microsatellite instability (15% of CRCs) and CpG island hypermethylation or CIMP (CpG island methylator phenotype) (25% of CRCs).

Microsatellite instability (MSI) or RER+ (replication errors) phenotype is related to an acquired or inherited inactivation of the MMR (mismatch repair) system of DNA mismatch repair. In MSI CRCs associated with Lynch syndrome or HNPCC (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) (3% of CRCs), there is a germline mutation in one of the genes of the MMR system, essentially MLH1 or MSH2, more rarely MSH6 or PMS2. In sporadic MSI cancers, frequently observed in the elderly, the loss of function of the MMR system is linked to a biallelic hypermethylation of the CpG islands of the MLH1 gene promoter causing its inactivation. Molecular individualization of CRCs has allowed the identification of tumor subgroups, such as MSI CRCs, that are more homogeneous in terms of their progression pathway, but the impact in terms of prognosis and treatment sensitivity remains to be clarified.

Prognosis and chemosensitivity of colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability MSI CRCs are associated with a better prognosis after curative surgery than CRCs without microsatellite instability (MSS) . In contrast, retrospective analyses of randomized trials indicate that patients with MSI CRC do not appear to benefit from adjuvant 5-FU-based chemotherapy in contrast to patients with MSS CRC. Nevertheless, the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX seems to be retained . The identification of prognostic markers in this subgroup of patients is therefore essential to decide on adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of which is currently debated in MSI CRC.

To date, there are very few data concerning metastatic MSI CRC. Metastatic forms are rare (about 5% of metastatic CRCs), but are thought to be associated with chemoresistance and poor prognosis . Nevertheless, data are very sparse and there are no data regarding the use of modern chemotherapies and targeted therapies in metastatic MSI CRC. Thus, it is important to characterize the chemosensitivity of metastatic forms in order to offer the best treatment to patients.

Recent data show significant efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSI CRC, including anti-PD1. Indeed, these tumors present a high number of mutations generating immunogenic neo-antigens. Thus, escape from anti-tumor immunity is a major mechanism of progression of MSI CRCs .

Prognostic and predictive factors of response to chemotherapy in colorectal cancer with microsatellite instability The clinical predictive factors for recurrence after curative CRC surgery are known (lymph node involvement, T4 stage, VELIPI criteria (vascular emboli, perineural sheaths, and lymphatic emboli), poorly differentiated tumor, analysis of fewer than 12 nodes, tumor perforation, and overt bowel obstruction). These criteria have only been studied in MSI CRCs retrospectively. A large French retrospective study of MSI CRCs included 521 MSI CRCs. Four independent predictors of recurrence-free survival were identified, age (HR=1.02; 95%IC 1.00-1.04, p=0.014), initial bowel obstruction (HR=2.33; 95%CI 1.29-4.23, p=0.005), vascular emboli (HR=2.27; 95%IC 1.41-3.63, p\<0.001), and stage T4 (HR=2.09; 95%IC 1.28-3.40, p=0.003). It should be noted that, unlike MSS CRCs, the prognostic impact of lymph node involvement appears to be small. This work is nevertheless limited by missing data (5-30%), biases related to retrospective analysis and the absence of exploitable molecular analyses (notably KRAS and BRAF mutation). These data can be validated prospectively from the COLOMIN 2 cohort.

In stage III MSI CRC, adjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFOX is recommended. On the other hand, in stage II MSI CRC, simple surveillance is recommended given the good prognosis . Nevertheless, in case of vascular emboli and/or T4 stage in MSI stage II CRC, the risk of recurrence becomes clinically significant (more than 20% at 2 years) and therefore raises the question of adjuvant treatment on a case-by-case basis. Indeed, in high-risk stage II MSI CRC, FOLFOX seems to provide a benefit in terms of recurrence-free survival compared with surgery alone . The COLOMIN 2 cohort will allow prospective confirmation of the chemosensitivity of these tumors to oxaliplatin.

Many molecular and immunohistochemical factors, prognostic or predictive of response to adjuvant chemotherapy, have been recently identified in CRC (KRAS, BRAF, TP53, PI3KCA mutations, CIMP phenotype, SMAD4, immune response...). These markers have been mostly studied in all CRCs, but not specifically in the subgroup of MSI CRCs. All these molecular and immunohistochemical factors need to be better characterized in a large cohort of MSI CRCs in order to determine their exact frequencies, their associations with each other, their prognostic and predictive values of response to chemotherapy. The constitution of a biological collection in COLOMIN 2 will allow the analysis of different biomarkers. For example, the BRAF mutation (V600E) is associated with a poor prognosis in CRC. Nevertheless, its prognostic impact remains debated in MSI CRC, whereas more than 50% of MSI CRC are BRAF mutated. COLOMIN 2 will assess the prognostic impact of BRAF mutation in MSI CRC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Colorectal Cancer
  • Microsatellite Instability
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with MSI colrectal cancers (stage I to IV)

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient with MSI colorectal cancer defined either by molecular biology (more than 30% of microsatellites tested unstable) or by immunohistochemistry (loss of expression of at least one MMR protein: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2)
  • Histologically proven colorectal cancer diagnosed on or after January 1 of the cohort start date
  • Stage I, II, III (non-metastatic) or IV (metastatic)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Colorectal cancer MSS
  • Contraindication due to psychological, social, or geographical reasons that may hinder patient follow-up
  • Opposition of the patient to registration in the cohort
  • Stage 0 (Tumor in situ, N0, M0)
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
637 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Progression Free Survival for stage IV colorectal cancers

    Identification of clinical, immunohistochemical and molecular prognostic factors

    Time frame: from date of diagnosis up to 36 months

  2. Time to recurrence for stage I , II or III colorectal cancers

    Identification of clinical, immunohistochemical and molecular prognostic factors

    Time frame: from date of diagnosis up to 36 months

06

Study locations

14 sites
  • Chu Poitiers
    Poitiers, VIENNE 86021, France
  • CH
    Abbeville, France
  • Chu - Hôpital Sud
    Amiens, France
  • Chu - Hôpital Hôtel Dieu
    Angers, France
  • CH
    Angoulême, France
  • Ch - Hôpital Victor Dupouy
    Argenteuil, France
  • Ch - Ght Unyon Auxerre
    Auxerre, France
  • Ch - Hôpital Henri Duffaut
    Avignon, France
  • Privé - Institut Du Cancer Avignon Provence
    Avignon, France
  • Chu - Hôpital Jean Minjoz
    Besançon, France
  • Privé- Centre Pierre Curie
    Beuvry, France
  • Ch - Centre Hospitalier de Bézier
    Béziers, France
  • Privé - Clinique Tivoli
    Bordeaux, France
  • Privé - Polyclinique Bordeaux Nord
    Bordeaux, France
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05511688
Lead sponsor
Federation Francophone de Cancerologie Digestive
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 23, 2022
Start date
Mar 22, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 2, 2025

Study contacts

David Tougeron, MD PHD
principal investigator · CHU POTIERS

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion