ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05502484DASHBOARDUpdated Aug 16, 2022

Development of Self-regulation by Dialectial Behavioural Therapy in Adults With Autism

An interventional study of Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) in Autism Spectrum Disorder and Regulation, Self, sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center. Status unknown at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-16.

Sponsored by Radboud University Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2021, registered Jun 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at risk to develop more pervasive emotion-dysregulation. In this study experiences of adults with ASD and severe emotion dysregulation with Integrative Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) and the mechanisms and processes that hinder and advance the pathway to recovery will be studied, in order to make the treatment more tailored and effective for this target group.

Read the detailed description

Individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at risk to develop more pervasive emotion-dysregulation and in conjunction with that they also show more maladaptive coping compared to non-autistic people. Sensory differences and impaired interoceptive body-awareness may influence emotion-dysregulation. Maladaptive coping is reflected by a variety of harmful behaviours, particularly strong social avoidance, rumination, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, disordered eating, substance abuse, agitation, non-suicidal-self-injury (NSSI), and suicidal ideation and behaviour. For a part of these individuals, treatment as usual does not have any effect at all, causing a vicious circle of isolation, demoralization, life-long psychiatric treatments, and crisis. DBT is an empirically supported psychotherapy to treat severe emotion-dysregulation. An effective inpatient treatment for adults with ASD and severe emotion-dysregulation is lacking, as well insight in the development of the process of self-regulation, particularly the role of sensory hyper- and hyposensitivity and interoceptive body-awareness. Therefore, an integrative, mostly inpatient treatment program based on DBT is developed and outcomes will be evaluated in the currently presented research. Standard DBT is used, adapted to adults with ASD, and augmented with a body-oriented DBT-skills training, because of their possible impairments of interoceptive body-awareness. Experiences of participants with the treatment program, the mechanisms and processes that hinder and advance the pathway to recovery will be studied, in order to make the treatment more tailored and effective for this target group.

The first aim is to quantify the effectiveness of integrative DBT in adults with ASD and difficult to treat severe emotion-dysregulation and maladaptive coping (primary outcome measure). The second aim is to determine the improvements over time in sensory hyper- and hyposensitivity, interoceptive body-awareness, cognitive and behavioural emotion-regulation, and well-being. Moreover, we will explore how (full and partial) responders, non-responders and deteriorators will differ with regard to autistic traits, PTSS-symptoms, sensory hyper- and hyposensitivity and interoceptive body-awareness. The third aim is to determine how qualitative findings regarding patients' experiences with integrative DBT enhance the deeper understanding of the quantitative clinical outcomes, in order to get insight in the process and sustainability of self-regulation, and to make the treatment more tailored and effective in the pathway to recovery.

A mixed-methods strategy consisting of three elements is executed:

  1. A randomized, multiple-baseline single-case design with staggered baselines of 4, 6, or 8 weeks (randomized allocation) and daily measurements of emotion dysregulation.
  2. A quasi-experimental design with 5 measurements with questionnaires at baseline (T0), start outpatient DBT pretreatment of 8 weeks (T1), start inpatient DBT of 40 weeks (T2), end inpatient DBT (T3), and end follow-up of 24 weeks (T4).
  3. A qualitative study consisting of interviews with 30 participants.
02

Conditions studied

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Regulation, Self

Keywords

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
  • dialectical behavioural therapy (DBT)
  • self-regulation
  • emotion-dysregulation
  • body-awareness
  • interoception
  • sensory hypersensitivity
  • sensory hyposensitivity
  • non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)
  • suicidal ideation
  • suicidal behaviour
  • coping skills
03

In context

Autism Spectrum Disorder

1,755 studies on the registry are indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder; 507 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 52 across 1,391 interventional studies indexed under Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Browse Autism Spectrum Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Radboud University Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 984 studies on the registry; 135 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

The inclusion criteria to enroll in the study are the same as the inclusion criteria for integrative DBT. Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years old.
  • A clinical diagnosis of ASD as diagnosed by a qualified health care professional (in Dutch: BIG registration).
  • Non-responding to TAU (treatment as usual) for at least a year.
  • IQ ≥ 85, based upon previous levels of education or previous IQ test, when available.
  • Consent from the participant to record the DBT sessions on video or audio for supervision and assessing therapy integrity.
  • Proficient in the Dutch language.
  • Motivation to address problems through integrative DBT.
  • Ability to work on treatment goals in collaboration with multiple therapists and counselors and to function in a group of maximal 8 adults with ASD.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Severe, current psychotic and manic symptoms, severe substance abuse disorder and eating disorder, requiring other specialized treatment first.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    4 weeks baseline followed by Integrative DBT

    Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) consisting of 8 weeks outpatient pretreatment DBT, 40 weeks inpatient DBT, 24 weeks follow-up including 12 weeks after care DBT and 12 weeks no DBT.

    Behavioral: Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT)

  • Experimental
    6 weeks baseline followed by Integrative DBT

    Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) consisting of 8 weeks outpatient pretreatment DBT, 40 weeks inpatient DBT, 24 weeks follow-up including 12 weeks after care DBT and 12 weeks no DBT.

    Behavioral: Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT)

  • Experimental
    8 weeks baseline followed by Integrative DBT

    Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT) consisting of 8 weeks outpatient pretreatment DBT, 40 weeks inpatient DBT, 24 weeks follow-up including 12 weeks after care DBT and 12 weeks no DBT.

    Behavioral: Integrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT)

Interventions

  • BehavioralIntegrative Dialectical Behavioural Therapy (DBT)

    8 weeks outpatient pre-treatment DBT followed by integrative, inpatient DBT of 40 weeks, using standard DBT, augmented with an experience-oriented, body-oriented skills training based on DBT-principles by trained DBT-therapists, and a follow-up phase of 12 weeks outpatient aftercare (maximal 8 sessions individual DBT and 4 booster sessions) and 12 weeks no DBT. The inpatient treatment takes place in a living environment that is based on the principles of DBT and takes into account several aspects of autism.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Maladaptive coping: using harmful behaviours

    The diary card consists of four Likert scale questions related to standard categories in DBT, such as suicidality, NSSI, substance abuse, and in addition rumination. Scores for each of the constructs will be obtained on a range from 0 - 5: 0 = no urge until 5 = very much urge and a measure of performance of the maladaptive coping (no/yes).

    Time frame: Change during inpatient treatment (phase C, 40 weeks)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Non Suicidal Self Injury (NSSI)

    NSSI will be assessed by the Self-Injury Questionnaire-Treatment Related (SIQ-TR, Dutch version: Zelfverwondingsvragenlijst; Claes \& Vandereycken, 2007). The SIQ-TR addresses five common forms of NSSI (scratching, bruising, cutting, burning and biting), the frequency, duration and pain experience of NSSI. There is an open question in which other self-injurious behaviour can be recorded, that is not standard mentioned (e.g., head banging).

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  2. Suicidal ideation

    Suicidal ideation will be assessed by the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS, Dutch version, Van Spijker et al., 2014). The SIDAS is a 5-item scale assessing frequency (item 1), controllability (item 2), closeness to attempt (item 3), distress (item 4), and interference with daily activities (item 5) on 10-point scales over the past month.

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  3. Interoceptive body-awareness

    Interoceptive body-awareness will be assessed by the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Dutch version (MAIA-2, Mehling et al., 2018). The MAIA is a multidimensional self-report measure of interoceptive body-awareness consisting of 37 items and 8 scales: Noticing, not ignoring, not worrying, attention regulation, emotional awareness, self-regulation, listening, trusting.

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  4. Emotion-dysregulation

    Emotion-dysregulation will be assessed by the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS, Gratz \& Roemer, 2004; Dutch translation: Neumann \& Koot, 2010). The DERS is an self-report measure consisting of 36 items, and designed to assess multiple aspects of emotion-dysregulation.

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  5. Cognitive emotion-regulation

    Cognitive emotion-regulation will be assessed by the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ, Garnefski et al., 2001; Garnefski, Kraaij \& Spinhoven, 2002; Garnefski \& Kraaij, 2006). The CERQ consists of 9 scales with 4 items each that can be answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). For each subscale score the 4 items are added (range 4 to 20), indicating the extent to which a certain strategy is used. The CERQ subscales are: self-blame, other-blame, rumination, catastrophizing (more maladaptive strategies), and acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective (more adaptive strategies).

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  6. Behavioural emotion-regulation

    Behavioural emotion-regulation will be measured by the Behavioural Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (BERQ, Garnefski \& Kraaij, 2019). The BERQ consists of 5 scales with 4 items each that can be answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (almost never) to 5 (almost always). For each subscale score the 4 items are added (range 4 to 20). The BERQ subscales are seeking distraction, actively approaching and seeking social support, and withdrawal and ignoring.

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  7. Sensory sensitivity

    Hyper- and hyposensitivity will be measured by the Dutch Glasgow Sensory Questionnaire (GSQ-NL) (Kuiper et al., 2019). It consists of 42 self-reported questions scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (always). There are six items representing each modality (visual, auditory, gustatory, olfactory, tactile, vestibular and proprioception), half measuring hypersensitivity and half measuring hyposensitivity.

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  8. Well-being

    Well-being will be measured by the Mental Health Continuum - Short Form (MHC-SF, Dutch version). The MHC-SF comprises 14 items, which represent emotional well-being, psychological well-being, and social well-being. Respondents indicate the frequency of experienced feelings in the last month on a 6-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 5 (every day).

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during inpatient treatment (Phase C, 40 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

  9. Maladaptive coping: using harmful behaviours

    The diary card consists of four Likert scale questions related to standard categories

    Time frame: Change: during baseline period (Phase A, randomized 4-6-8 weeks); during pre-treatment (Phase B, 8 weeks); during follow-up (Phase D: 24 weeks)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dimence mental health institute
    Deventer, Gelderland 7416 SB, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — see: https://dmp.radboudumc.nl/plans/93902

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Clinical study report, Analytic code

Time frame: After data are published, possibly in 2025.

Access criteria: conditions for access to the data are described here: https://www.dimencegroep.nl/onderzoek/sites/default/files/documenten/richtlijn_databeheerplan_def_092018_0.pdf

Data sharing details ↗ · dmp.radboudumc.nl

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jan 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2025, 54 months after the start.

Of 801 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Autism Spectrum Disorder, half reached primary completion within 25 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48. This study's planned 54 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 825 studies reached it within 25 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 28, 2022
First posted
Aug 16, 2022
StartActual
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2025
CompletionEst.
Jul 2025
Last update
Aug 16, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 16, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05502484
Collaborators
Dimence mental health institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 16, 2022
Start date
Jan 1, 2021
Primary completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 16, 2022

Study contacts

Ella Lobregt-van Buuren, MSc
principal investigator · Dimence mental health institute
Nanda Lambregts-Rommelse, PhD
study chair · Radboud University Medical Center
Wouter Staal, PhD
study chair · Radboud University Medical Center
Lisette Verhoeven, PhD
study chair · Dr. Leo Kannerhuis
Peter Goossens, PhD
study chair · Dimence mental health institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion