An interventional study of Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System (VACOM) in Stroke, DVT and Ankle Contracture, sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore. Completed at 1 site in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.
Sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Stroke is closely associated with high mortality among patients in hospitals and immobility leading development of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) leading to pulmonary embolism (PE) and Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and/or ankle joint contracture, which impairs mobility resulting in bedridden. Worldwide, the incidences of DVTs is 0.75-2.69 per 1000 individuals and 2-7 per 1000 for individuals aged > 70 years and accounts for 600,000-800,000 deaths yearly.
Pharmacological treatment for DVTs include anti-coagulants to prevent blood clot development and VTE but may cause haemorrhagic stroke leading to death. Non-invasive treatment such as intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and anti-embolism stockings may prevent DVT but not ankle joint contractures, which affects 50% of all stroke patients. Joint contractures exacerbate pedal edema and fluid retention, hamper proper joint movement and decreases ADLs and quality of life. Regular physiotherapy is vital for preventing ankle joint contracture and DVT but is labour intensive hence posing an increased workload on physiotherapists resulting in decreased physiotherapy duration.
This study will investigate the use of an automated robot-assisted ankle exercise solution (Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System, VACOM) to mimic therapist-assisted on bed passive ankle exercises to preclude the development of ankle joint contracture and facilitate venous flow in lower extremities to reduce DVT risk. The investigators hypothesize that the Venous Assistance and Contracture Management (VACOM) system can prevent ankle contracture, improve ankle range of motion (ROM) and flexibility while reducing the risk of DVT incidence among stroke patients more than using IPC alone. Additionally, through early ankle mobilization, rehabilitation can be optimized to achieve better neurological recovery.
Stroke is one of the top medical conditions resulting in high mortality among patients in hospitals, where complications related to immobility such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or ankle joint contracture can affect patients in their road to recovery. Patients may often take months or even years to fully recover their limb functions, where certain activities of daily living cannot be easily achieved prior to recovery. In the case of the affected lower limbs, immobility can affect common activities such as getting out of bed resulting in bedridden. Bedridden is also highly susceptible to the vicious cycle which developing ankle joint contracture and DVT.
In severe DVT cases, the blood clots in the deep veins can dislodge into the bloodstream and circulate in the whole body. There is a chance to occlude the arteries in the lungs, leading to pulmonary embolism (PE). Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including DVT and PE, occurs at an annual incidence rate of 0.75-2.69 per 1000 individuals worldwide; this incidence rate increased to 2-7 per 1000 for individuals aged > 70 years (ISTH Steering Committee, 2014). Among those diagnosed with DVT, 10-30% dies within 1 month of diagnosis (Beckman et al., 2010), and 600,000-800,000 people die from DVT worldwide annually (worldthrombosisday.org), which equates to approximately 1 DVT-related death per minute.
Current treatment approaches include pharmacological prophylaxis can be often used as the blood thinner to prevent blood clot development. Low-dose anticoagulation reduces the incidence of VTE, however, the benefit can be often offset by haemorrhagic complications which can lead to death, especially for patients suffering from haemorrhagic stroke (Roderick et al., 2005).
Other non-invasive treatment or mechanical prophylaxis, such as intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and anti-embolism stockings, have some efficacy in preventing DVT based on clinical reports (Mazzone et al., 2004; Caprini, 2010); however, these devices do not prevent ankle joint contractures as their action mechanism is related with passive compression and decompression of lower limb muscles without the actual mobilization of joints. Approximately 50% of all stroke patients develop at least one contracture within six months of stroke (Li et al. 2012). Once the ankle joint contracture developed, it can exacerbate pedal edema and fluid retention, and hamper proper joint movement, which is indispensable for regaining ambulatory function and quality of life. These patients usually have to rely on regular physiotherapy sessions that provide therapist-assisted ankle exercises to prevent ankle joint contracture and reduce the risk of DVT. However, given growing manpower constraints and a greying global population, there is an increasing workload on physiotherapists, resulting in insufficient time to complete their physiotherapy routines.
This study is important for the following reasons:
The automated robot-assisted ankle exercise solution (Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System, VACOM) aims to mimic therapist-assisted on bed passive ankle exercises to preclude the development of ankle joint contracture and facilitate venous flow in lower extremities to reduce DVT risk.
The VACOM uses soft pneumatic extension actuators, which is capable of providing robot-assisted ankle exercises, specifically dorsiflexion-plantarflexion and inversion-eversion movements. Through these natural movements to improve blood flow and venous return and maintain ankle joint flexibility. Furthermore, it can facilitate and stimulate the neurologic recovery in walking by early mobilization.
The investigators will conduct a multi-site clinical trial on around 100 stroke patients across different hospitals and healthcare institutions in Singapore to establish the efficacy of our soft robotic system (VACOM) in preventing ankle joint contracture and reducing DVT risk. Importantly, to investigate the effect and impact of the current healthcare system on the cost-effectiveness and workload reduction for the healthcare staff.
The Investigators hypothesize that the Venous Assistance and Contracture Management (VACOM) system can improve ankle range of motion (ROM) and flexibility by preventing ankle contracture while reducing the risk of DVT incidence among stroke patients. It might have a better outcome than using IPC alone. Additionally, through early ankle mobilization, rehabilitation can be optimized to achieve better neurological recovery.
7,287 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,006 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 19 is below the median of 50 across 5,370 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →National University Hospital, Singapore is the lead sponsor of 444 studies on the registry; 96 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System (VACOM) + Inpatient rehabilitation (daily Physiotherapy therapy and Occupational therapy)
Device: Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System (VACOM)
Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) which is the standard care + Inpatient rehabilitation (daily Physiotherapy therapy and Occupational therapy)
Device: Venous Assistance and Contracture Management System (VACOM)
Mimic therapist-assisted on bed passive ankle exercises to preclude the development of ankle joint contracture and facilitate venous flow in lower extremities to reduce DVT risk. Using soft pneumatic extension actuators, which is capable of providing robot-assisted ankle exercises, specifically dorsiflexion-plantarflexion and inversion-eversion movements. Through these natural movements to improve blood flow and venous return and maintain ankle joint flexibility. Furthermore, it can facilitate and stimulate the neurologic recovery in walking by early mobilization.
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Validated tool for measuring muscle tone and spasticity. its performed by extending the patients limb first from a position of maximal possible flexion to maximal possible extension ( the point at which the first soft resistance is met). Afterwards, the modified Ashworth scale is assessed while moving from extension to flexion. Measurements are scored on a scale of 0 to 4, where score of 0= no increase in tone, 1= slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension, 1+ = slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM ), 2= more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed, 3= considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult, 4= limb rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores post-intervention represents improvements in participants.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Validated tool for measuring muscle tone and spasticity. its performed by extending the patients limb first from a position of maximal possible flexion to maximal possible extension ( the point at which the first soft resistance is met). Afterwards, the modified Ashworth scale is assessed while moving from extension to flexion. Measurements are scored on a scale of 0 to 4, where score of 0= no increase in tone, 1= slight increase in tone giving a catch when slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by the limb was moved in flexion or extension, 1+ = slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch followed by minimal resistance throughout (ROM ), 2= more marked increase in tone but more marked increased in muscle tone through most limb easily flexed, 3= considerable increase in tone, passive movement difficult, 4= limb rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores post-intervention represents improvements in participants.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
To measure the ability of a joint ability to move in its full range of motion using a goniometer. Normal ranges of ankle: Plantar flexion: 0 degrees to 40 degrees, Dorsiflexion: 0 degrees to 20. The normal range of motion for a foot is: Inversion: 0 degrees to 30 degrees, Eversion: 0 degrees to 20 degrees. Increasing degree of difference in the angles measured compared to baseline represents improvements in the range of motion of the ankle/foot.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Ankle Range of Motion (ROM)
To measure the ability of a joint ability to move in its full range of motion using a goniometer. Normal ranges of ankle: Plantar flexion: 0 degrees to 40 degrees, Dorsiflexion: 0 degrees to 20. The normal range of motion for a foot is: Inversion: 0 degrees to 30 degrees, Eversion: 0 degrees to 20 degrees. Increasing degree of difference in the angles measured compared to baseline represents improvements in the range of motion of the ankle/foot.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for muscle strength
The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = No movement is observed, Grade 5 = muscle contracts normally against full resistance hence the larger the score, the better the muscle strength. Higher subsequent score trend represents improving muscle strength.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale for muscle strength
The muscle scale grades muscle power on a scale of 0 to 5 in relation to the maximum expected for that muscle. Grade 0 = No movement is observed, Grade 5 = muscle contracts normally against full resistance hence the larger the score, the better the muscle strength. Higher subsequent score trend represents improving muscle strength.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity (FMA-LE)
Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) scale measures 17 items in 2 subscales - Lower Extremity (E) and Speed/Coordination (F) - to assess the lower limb impairment in individuals who have had stroke. Measured using a 3 point scale, where 0= cannot perform, 1= performs partially, 2= performs fully. The maximum score for the Lower Extremity Subscale is 28 points and for Speed/Coordination 6 points. The total summed score of 34 points indicates normal function. Hence the higher score trends compared to the baseline indicates improvements in the lower limb functions.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Lower Extremity (FMA-LE)
Lower Extremity (FMA-LE) scale measures 17 items in 2 subscales - Lower Extremity (E) and Speed/Coordination (F) - to assess the lower limb impairment in individuals who have had stroke. Measured using a 3 point scale, where 0= cannot perform, 1= performs partially, 2= performs fully. The maximum score for the Lower Extremity Subscale is 28 points and for Speed/Coordination 6 points. The total summed score of 34 points indicates normal function. Hence the higher score trends compared to the baseline indicates improvements in the lower limb functions.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)
The Functional Ambulation Scale is a 6 point for assessing ability to ambulate through determining the extent to which an individual requires assistance when walking, regardless of with or without assistive device. When measuring FAC, the assessor asks the subject various questions and briefly observes their walking ability to provide a rating from 0 to 5, where 0 = patient is a non-functional ambulator (cannot walk); score of 1, 2 or 3 denotes a dependent ambulator who requires assistance from another person in the form of continuous manual contact (1), continuous or intermittent manual contact (2), or verbal supervision/guarding (3), a score of 4 or 5 describes an independent ambulator who can walk freely on: level surfaces only (4) or any surface (5=maximum score). Increasing FAC scores through time indicates improvements in a person's ability to ambulate.
Time frame: Baseline assessment
Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC)
The Functional Ambulation Scale is a 6 point for assessing ability to ambulate through determining the extent to which an individual requires assistance when walking, regardless of with or without assistive device. When measuring FAC, the assessor asks the subject various questions and briefly observes their walking ability to provide a rating from 0 to 5, where 0 = patient is a non-functional ambulator (cannot walk); score of 1, 2 or 3 denotes a dependent ambulator who requires assistance from another person in the form of continuous manual contact (1), continuous or intermittent manual contact (2), or verbal supervision/guarding (3), a score of 4 or 5 describes an independent ambulator who can walk freely on: level surfaces only (4) or any surface (5=maximum score). Increasing FAC scores through time indicates improvements in a person's ability to ambulate.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days
Compression Ultrasound Sonography (U/S) for the lower limbs
To detect the presence of Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for participants in both intervention and control group.
Time frame: Baseline measurement
Compression Ultrasound Sonography (U/S) for the lower limbs
To detect the presence of Deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Post-intervention U/S results should reveal that the occurrence of new DVT in the intervention group is lower than the control group thus indicating that the intervention is efficacious in preventing DVTs.
Time frame: Post-intervention assessment at 21 days.
This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National University Hospital, Singapore