CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07789821Updated Sep 24, 2026

Nd:YAG Laser Photobiomodulation for Neurosensory Recovery Following Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

An interventional study of Nd:YAG laser photobiomodulation and Sham laser in Infraorbital Nerve Injury, Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury and Neurosensory Disturbance Following Orthognathic Surgery, sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study investigates whether low-energy laser light therapy applied to the skin (photobiomodulation, PBM) can speed up recovery of sensation in the lower lip, chin, and cheek area following jaw surgery (bimaxillary orthognathic surgery). Numbness and altered sensation in these areas are common and expected side effects of jaw surgery, affecting approximately one third of patients at 12 months without active treatment. There is currently no proven non-invasive treatment to accelerate nerve recovery after jaw surgery.

Eligible participants who develop numbness after jaw surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either active PBM laser treatment or an inactive sham laser treatment (6 sessions over 3 weeks). Neither the participant nor the assessor measuring recovery will know which treatment was received. All participants also receive standard postoperative care.

The study aims to determine whether active PBM significantly reduces the time to functional sensory recovery compared with sham treatment, and to characterise recovery patterns using a standardised multicomponent neurosensory assessment battery over 12 months.

Read the detailed description

Neurosensory disturbances affecting the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) and infraorbital nerve (ION) are well-recognised expected sequelae of bimaxillary orthognathic surgery, arising from surgical manipulation during sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and Le Fort I osteotomy respectively. Published incidence data from a major Asian orthognathic centre [1] reported subjective IAN neurosensory disturbance rates of 35.4% at 6 months and 36.6% at 12 months following mandibular SSRO, and ION disturbance rates of 16.2% at 6 months and 13% at 12 months following Le Fort I osteotomy. These figures represent persistent clinically significant deficits in a substantial proportion of patients at a major Chinese-majority Asian tertiary centre, making them the most directly applicable published proxy for the expected National University Hospital Singapore (NUHS) study population.

Current management of post-orthognathic neurosensory deficits is expectant. In cases of non-recovery beyond six months, pharmacological options or microsurgical repair may be considered, but both carry limited efficacy data and significant procedural risk respectively. There is a clear unmet need for safe, non-invasive adjunctive interventions capable of accelerating neurosensory recovery.

PBM involves the application of low-energy laser irradiation to stimulate mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase, increasing ATP production, modulating reactive oxygen species, and upregulating neurotrophic factors including nerve growth factor (NGF) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF). These effects promote axonal regeneration, Schwann cell proliferation, and remyelination. A recent randomised controlled trial [2] comparing Nd:YAG and diode laser PBM versus no-treatment control in 30 post-orthognathic patients reported IAN functional sensory recovery (FSR) rates of 90% in laser-treated groups versus 40% in controls at 12 months (log-rank p=0.001; adjusted hazard ratio 8.04, 95% CI 2.03-31.90). However, that study lacked a sham control, leaving placebo-adjusted efficacy unestablished. The present study addresses this critical gap with a fully sham-controlled, double-blinded design.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infraorbital Nerve Injury
  • Inferior Alveolar Nerve Injury
  • Neurosensory Disturbance Following Orthognathic Surgery
  • Photobiomodulation

Keywords

  • inferior alveolar nerve injury
  • photobiomodulation
  • Neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery
  • Infraorbital nerve injury
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age 21-80 years and above at time of orthognathic surgery.
  2. Underwent bimaxillary orthognathic surgery (SSRO and Le Fort I osteotomy)
  3. Willing and able to comply with the full 12-month follow-up schedule comprising 12 visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Systemic diseases known to impair peripheral nerve regeneration, including diabetes mellitus (any type), peripheral neuropathy of any aetiology, multiple sclerosis, or other demyelinating disorders.
  2. Pregnant women are excluded
  3. Patients with cognitive impairment are excluded
  4. History of hypersensitivity or adverse reaction to laser therapy of any type.
  5. Surgical complication directly attributable to the orthognathic procedure that required reoperation or microsurgical nerve repair, as these represent a fundamentally different injury severity and recovery trajectory from the neurapraxic and axonotmetic injuries targeted by this study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Photobiomodulation

    Photobiomodulation

    Device: Nd:YAG laser photobiomodulation

  • Sham comparator
    Control

    Sham laser

    Other: Sham laser

Interventions

  • DeviceNd:YAG laser photobiomodulation

    Fotona Laser, Lightwalker, Nightlase

  • OtherSham laser

    Control

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) in the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) distribution

    FSR is defined as simultaneous achievement of all three of: (1) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) = 10 across lateral IAN territory bilaterally using standardised blunt 21-gauge needle shaft; (2) Semmes-Weinstein monofilament ≤3.61 detectable at lateral IAN test sites bilaterally; and (3) Disk-Criminator static two-point discrimination positive at ≤15 mm at lateral IAN test sites bilaterally. Mandibular central incisor regions excluded due to bilateral innervation. The date of the first assessment at which all three criteria are simultaneously met is recorded as time to FSR.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) in the infraorbital nerve (ION) distribution

    FSR is defined as simultaneous achievement of all three of: (1) VAS = 10 across lateral IAN territory bilaterally using standardised blunt 21-gauge needle shaft; (2) Semmes-Weinstein monofilament ≤3.61 detectable at lateral IAN test sites bilaterally; and (3) Disk-Criminator static two-point discrimination positive at ≤15 mm at lateral IAN test sites bilaterally. The date of the first assessment at which all three criteria are simultaneously met is recorded as time to FSR.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Oral Health Impact Profile - 14 (OHIP-14)

    Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) total score (0-56) and domain subscores; higher scores indicate greater oral health impact

    Time frame: 12 months

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Kayim YT, Ozkan N, Akbulut N, Kirtiloglu T. Nd:YAG and Diode Laser Biostimulation in Infraorbital and Inferior Alveolar Neurosensory Recovery After Orthognathic Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2026 May 20:S0278-2391(26)00402-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2026.05.062. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42229538 ↗
  • Alolayan AB, Leung YY. Risk factors of neurosensory disturbance following orthognathic surgery. PLoS One. 2014 Mar 5;9(3):e91055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091055. eCollection 2014. PubMed 24599321 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jul 17, 2026
  • Informed consent form · Jul 17, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared. The informed consent obtained from participants did not include provisions for sharing individual-level data beyond the research team involved in this study.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07789821
Lead sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 27, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Chee Weng Yong, BDS, MDS
Contact
dencwy@Nus.edu.sg
+65 97872962

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion