ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05459233ECHOCATHUpdated Mar 24, 2026

Valve Hemodynamic Optimization Based on Doppler-Echocardiography vs Catheterization Measurements Following ViV TAVR

An interventional study of Doppler-echocardiography and Invasive hemodynamic measurements in Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Regurgitation and Prosthesis Failure, sponsored by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval. Recruiting at 7 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-24.

Sponsored by Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2023; still recruiting 3 years 10 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
310
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Data on valve performance following ViV-TAVR has usually been obtained with the use of Doppler-echocardiography. However, some reports have shown significant discordances in the evaluation of mean transvalvular gradient between echocardiography and catheterization, with an overestimation of the real gradient with echo (vs. cath) in most cases. Thus, the incidence of procedural-device failure may be lower than that reported in the ViV-TAVR literature,

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, single-blinded design trial including patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction in the presence of a stented surgical bioprosthesis with a labeled size ≤25 mm. Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a ViV-TAVR procedure with the SAPIEN 3 ULTRA valve (or its subsequent iterations), patients will be randomized to valve hemodynamic optimization according to Doppler-echocardiography versus cardiac catheterization parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Aortic Valve Regurgitation
  • Prosthesis Failure
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

1,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 293 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 310 is above the median of 126 across 554 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic valve failure defined as severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation approved for a valve-in-valve procedure by the Heart Team
  • Surgical stented bioprosthetic valve (label size ≤25 mm)
  • TAVR with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Stentless or sutureless surgical valves
  • Trifecta bioprosthesis
  • Hancock II bioprosthesis
  • High-risk of coronary obstruction (defined either as a virtual transcatheter valve - coronary distance as evaluated by CT \<4 mm or based on the criterion of the heart team responsible for the procedure).
  • Impossibility to obtain written
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
310 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Other
    Doppler-echocardiography

    Following valve implantation, further intervention will be based on Doppler-echocardiographic measurements.

    Procedure: Doppler-echocardiography

  • Other
    Invasive hemodynamic measurements

    Following valve implantation, further interventions will be based on invasive hemodynamic measurements (with simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure recording).

    Procedure: Invasive hemodynamic measurements

Interventions

  • ProcedureDoppler-echocardiography

    The TAVR (valve-in-valve) procedure will be performed with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with valve sizing according to current manufacturer recommendations. Following valve implantation, further intervention will be based on Doppler-echocardiographic measurements. Balloon post-dilation with a non-compliant balloon will be performed in the presence of a residual mean gradient ≥20 mmHg as assessed by Doppler-echocardiography.

  • ProcedureInvasive hemodynamic measurements

    The TAVR (valve-in-valve) procedure will be performed with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra valve, with valve sizing according to current manufacturer recommendations. Following valve implantation, further interventions will be based on invasive hemodynamic measurements (with simultaneous aortic and ventricular pressure recording). Balloon post-dilation will be performed with a non-compliant balloon in the presence of a mean residual gradient ≥20 mmHg as assessed by hemodynamic measurements.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in Quality of life (Efficacy)

    Change in quality of life as evaluated by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). All score are represented on a 0-to-100-point scale (lower scores represent more severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life).The KCCQ is a 7 domains questionnaire; symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy.

    Time frame: 12 months follow-up

  2. Periprocedural complications (Safety)

    Periprocedural complications including in-hospital mortality, stroke, annular rupture, coronary obstruction, new-onset left bundle branch block, need for permanent pacemaker implantation and conversion to open heart surgery.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

Secondary outcomes

  1. Residual transvalvular gradient

    Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months follow-up

  2. Combined enpoint: Moderate or severe prothesis-patient mismatch and/or moderate or severe aortic regurgitation (valve performance)

    Moderate or severe prothesis-patient mismatch (defines as an index aortic valve area 0.85-0.66 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.65 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ˂30km/m2 and 0.70-0.56 cm2/m2 (moderate), ≤0.55 cm2/m2 (severe) for patient with BMI ≥30km/m2 and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-3 definition).

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months follow-up

  3. Heart failure

    Evaluated by the New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  4. Exercise capacity

    Exercise capacity as evaluated by the six-minute wlak test.

    Time frame: 1 month and 12 months follow-up

  5. Changes in Quality of life

    severe symptoms and/or limitations and scores of 100 indicate no symptoms, no limitations, and excellent quality of life).The KCCQ is a 7 domains questionnaire; symptom frequency, symptom burden, symptom stability, physical limitations, social limitations, quality of life and self-efficacy.

    Time frame: after 1-year follow-up (yearly up to 5 years)

  6. Clinical safety endpoints

    Individually and combined: death, stroke, major of lifethreatening bleeding, pacemaker implantation, myocardial infarction

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  7. re-hospitalization

    Need for re-hospitalization

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  8. wear and tear deterioration (Structural valve degeneration)

    wear and tear evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  9. Leaflet disruption (Structural valve degeneration)

    leaflet disruption evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  10. flail leaflet (Structural valve degeneration)

    flail leaflet evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  11. leaflet fibrosis and/or calcification (Structural valve degeneration)

    leaflet fibrosis and/or calcification evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  12. strut fracture or deformation (Structural valve degeneration)

    strut fracture or deformation evaluated by echocardiography imaging

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  13. Valve re-intervention

    Need for valve re-intervention

    Time frame: 1 and 12 months follow-up and yearly up to 5 years

  14. Changes in Left ventricle mass

    Changes in LV mass

    Time frame: 1-month and 1-year follow-up

07

Study locations

5 of 7 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Paradis JM, Del Trigo M, Puri R, Rodes-Cabau J. Transcatheter Valve-in-Valve and Valve-in-Ring for Treating Aortic and Mitral Surgical Prosthetic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Nov 3;66(18):2019-2037. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.015. PubMed 26516006 ↗
  • VARC-3 WRITING COMMITTEE:; Genereux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, Nazif T, Hahn RT, Pibarot P, Bax JJ, Leipsic JA, Blanke P, Blackstone EH, Finn MT, Kapadia S, Linke A, Mack MJ, Makkar R, Mehran R, Popma JJ, Reardon M, Rodes-Cabau J, Van Mieghem NM, Webb JG, Cohen DJ, Leon MB. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 1;77(21):2717-2746. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Apr 19. PubMed 33888385 ↗
  • Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, Pasic M, Waksman R, Kodali S, Barbanti M, Latib A, Schaefer U, Rodes-Cabau J, Treede H, Piazza N, Hildick-Smith D, Himbert D, Walther T, Hengstenberg C, Nissen H, Bekeredjian R, Presbitero P, Ferrari E, Segev A, de Weger A, Windecker S, Moat NE, Napodano M, Wilbring M, Cerillo AG, Brecker S, Tchetche D, Lefevre T, De Marco F, Fiorina C, Petronio AS, Teles RC, Testa L, Laborde JC, Leon MB, Kornowski R; Valve-in-Valve International Data Registry Investigators. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):162-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7246. PubMed 25005653 ↗
  • Bleiziffer S, Simonato M, Webb JG, Rodes-Cabau J, Pibarot P, Kornowski R, Windecker S, Erlebach M, Duncan A, Seiffert M, Unbehaun A, Frerker C, Conzelmann L, Wijeysundera H, Kim WK, Montorfano M, Latib A, Tchetche D, Allali A, Abdel-Wahab M, Orvin K, Stortecky S, Nissen H, Holzamer A, Urena M, Testa L, Agrifoglio M, Whisenant B, Sathananthan J, Napodano M, Landi A, Fiorina C, Zittermann A, Veulemans V, Sinning JM, Saia F, Brecker S, Presbitero P, De Backer O, Sondergaard L, Bruschi G, Franco LN, Petronio AS, Barbanti M, Cerillo A, Spargias K, Schofer J, Cohen M, Munoz-Garcia A, Finkelstein A, Adam M, Serra V, Teles RC, Champagnac D, Iadanza A, Chodor P, Eggebrecht H, Welsh R, Caixeta A, Salizzoni S, Dager A, Auffret V, Cheema A, Ubben T, Ancona M, Rudolph T, Gummert J, Tseng E, Noble S, Bunc M, Roberts D, Kass M, Gupta A, Leon MB, Dvir D. Long-term outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic valves. Eur Heart J. 2020 Aug 1;41(29):2731-2742. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa544. PubMed 32592401 ↗
  • de Freitas Campos Guimaraes L, Urena M, Wijeysundera HC, Munoz-Garcia A, Serra V, Benitez LM, Auffret V, Cheema AN, Amat-Santos IJ, Fisher Q, Himbert D, Garcia Del Blanco B, Dager A, Le Breton H, Paradis JM, Dumont E, Pibarot P, Rodes-Cabau J. Long-Term Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve-in-Valve Replacement. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep;11(9):e007038. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007038. PubMed 30354588 ↗
  • Wernly B, Zappe AK, Unbehaun A, Sinning JM, Jung C, Kim WK, Fichtlscherer S, Lichtenauer M, Hoppe UC, Alushi B, Beckhoff F, Wewetzer C, Franz M, Kretzschmar D, Navarese E, Landmesser U, Falk V, Lauten A. Transcatheter valve-in-valve implantation (VinV-TAVR) for failed surgical aortic bioprosthetic valves. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Jan;108(1):83-92. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1326-z. Epub 2018 Jul 12. PubMed 30003366 ↗
  • Webb JG, Murdoch DJ, Alu MC, Cheung A, Crowley A, Dvir D, Herrmann HC, Kodali SK, Leipsic J, Miller DC, Pibarot P, Suri RM, Wood D, Leon MB, Mack MJ. 3-Year Outcomes After Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprostheses: The PARTNER 2 Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 4;73(21):2647-2655. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.483. PubMed 31146808 ↗
  • Kaneko T, Makkar RR, Krishnaswami A, Hermiller J, Greenbaum A, Babaliaros V, Shah PB, Bailey SH, Bapat V, Kapadia S, Abbas AE. Valve-in-Surgical-Valve With SAPIEN 3 for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May;14(5):e010288. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010288. Epub 2021 May 18. PubMed 34003666 ↗
  • Saxon JT, Allen KB, Cohen DJ, Chhatriwalla AK. Bioprosthetic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve TAVR: Bench to Bedside. Interv Cardiol. 2018 Jan;13(1):20-26. doi: 10.15420/icr.2017:29:1. PubMed 29593832 ↗
  • O'Donnell JP, O'Sullivan CJ. Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Fracture During Valve-in-valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. Interv Cardiol. 2019 Nov 18;14(3):147-151. doi: 10.15420/icr.2019.08.R2. eCollection 2019 Nov. PubMed 31867060 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05459233
Lead sponsor
Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
Responsible party
Josep Rodes-Cabau (Principal investigator, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 14, 2022
Start date
Jan 11, 2023
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 24, 2026

Study contacts

Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD
Contact
josep.rodes@criucpq.ulaval.ca
418-656-8711
Emilie Pelletier Beaumont, MSc
Contact
emilie.pelletier-beaumont@criucpq.ulaval.ca
418-656-8711 ext. 3929
Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD
principal investigator · Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion