ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05454956ErsaUpdated Oct 1, 2025Results posted

Pilot Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Two Dosing Regimens of TP-03 for the Treatment of MGD

A Phase 2 interventional study of TP-03 and TP-03 Vehicle in Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Blepharitis and Demodex Infestation, sponsored by Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Completed at 5 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-01.

Sponsored by Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of TP-03, 0.25%, an eyedrop, BID vs TID dosing regimens for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Demodex lid infestation.

Read the detailed description

This Phase 2a study is a randomized, two-arm, double-masked, multicenter, parallel pilot study to compare the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of TP-03, BID vs TID, for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction in patients with Demodex lid infestation. The primary objective of the study is to assess the safety and efficacy of two dosing regimens of TP-03, 0.25% from Day 1 to Day 85 in adult participants with meibomian gland dysfunction in the presence of Demodex infestation. Efficacy will be determined by assessing lower lid meibomian gland secretion, lid margin erythema, bulbar redness, tear breakup time, ocular surface staining, and dry eye symptoms. Safety will be determined by assessing adverse effects related to the treatment as well as evaluating any changes in visual acuity and slit lamp biomicroscopy from baseline.

02

Conditions studied

  • Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
  • Blepharitis
  • Demodex Infestation

Keywords

  • Demodex
03

In context

Meibomian Gland Dysfunction

172 studies on the registry are indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 50 across 138 interventional studies indexed under Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Browse Meibomian Gland Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (38%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be willing to sign the and deemed capable of complying with the requirements of the study protocol
  • Meets all of the following criteria in at least one eye: have more than 10 lashes with collarettes present on the upper lid; have the presence of one or more mites in the upper and lower lids; have evidence of meibomian gland dysfunction; have at least mild erythema of the lower lid; have a tear breakup time of less than 10 seconds; and have intact partial to full meibomian glands in at least 33% of the total meibomian gland area of the lower lid

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have used lid hygiene products within 7 days of Day 1 or unwilling to forego the use of lid hygiene products during the study
  • Have used systemic antihistamines within 30 days of Day 1
  • Have used artificial eyelashes, eyelash extensions or had other cosmetic eyelash or eyelid procedures within 7 days of Day 1 or be unwilling to forego their use during the study
  • Contact lens wear within 7 days of Day 1 or unwilling to forego contact lens wear for the duration of the study
  • Be pregnant or lactating at Day 1
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BID Dosing

    TP-03, lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% administered topically twice a day and TP-03 vehicle administered once a day to maintain masking for approximately 85 days

    Drug: TP-03 · Drug: TP-03 Vehicle

  • Experimental
    TID Dosing

    TP-03, lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% administered topically three times a day for approximately 85 days

    Drug: TP-03

Interventions

  • DrugTP-03

    TP-03, lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25%, administered twice a day in participants in the BID dosing arm and three times a day in participants in the TID dosing arm

  • DrugTP-03 Vehicle

    Vehicle of TP-03 ophthalmic solution, administered once a day in participants in the BID dosing arm to maintain masking between arms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Number of participants with TEAEs related (definitely or potentially) to treatment summarized by MedDRA preferred term.

    Time frame: 85 days

Other outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Lower Lid Meibomian Gland Secretion Score at Day 85

    For each of the 15 glands expressed, meibomian gland secretion characteristics were graded via slit lamp examination on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=worst, 3=best). Total meibomian gland secretion score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range from 0 to 45

    Time frame: Day 85 visit

  2. Change From Baseline in Lid Margin Erythema (Upper Eyelid) at Day 85

    Erythema of the eyelid margin was assessed via slit lamp examination and graded on a scale of 0 (normal) to 3 (severe).

    Time frame: Day 85 visit

07

Results

Posted Oct 1, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneBID DosingTID Dosing
Started2118
Completed2018
Not completed10

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Number of participants with TEAEs related (definitely or potentially) to treatment summarized by MedDRA preferred term.

Time frame:
85 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsBID DosingTID Dosing
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)11
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Lower Lid Meibomian Gland Secretion Score at Day 85

For each of the 15 glands expressed, meibomian gland secretion characteristics were graded via slit lamp examination on a scale of 0 to 3 (0=worst, 3=best). Total meibomian gland secretion score is the sum of the grades for all 15 glands with a range from 0 to 45

Time frame:
Day 85 visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Lower Lid Meibomian Gland Secretion Score at Day 85
score on a scaleBID DosingTID Dosing
Change From Baseline in Lower Lid Meibomian Gland Secretion Score at Day 8510.5 ± 6.9411.7 ± 7.89
Other pre-specifiedChange From Baseline in Lid Margin Erythema (Upper Eyelid) at Day 85

Erythema of the eyelid margin was assessed via slit lamp examination and graded on a scale of 0 (normal) to 3 (severe).

Time frame:
Day 85 visit
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Lid Margin Erythema (Upper Eyelid) at Day 85
score on a scaleBID DosingTID Dosing
Change From Baseline in Lid Margin Erythema (Upper Eyelid) at Day 85-1.1 ± 0.85-1.0 ± 0.59

Adverse events

Collected over 200 days. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
BID Dosing0/21 (0%)1/21 (4.8%)8/21 (38.1%)
TID Dosing0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)1/18 (5.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBID DosingTID Dosing
PresyncopeNervous system disorders1/210/18
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventBID DosingTID Dosing
Upper respiratory tract infectionInfections and infestations2/210/18
ConjunctivitisInfections and infestations1/211/18
Ocular discomfortEye disorders1/210/18
ConjunctivochalasisEye disorders1/210/18
Vitreous floatersEye disorders1/210/18
Gastroesophageal reflux diseaseGastrointestinal disorders1/210/18
BronchitisInfections and infestations1/210/18
COVID-19Infections and infestations1/210/18
Gastroenteritis viralInfections and infestations1/210/18
HordeolumInfections and infestations1/210/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)BID DosingTID DosingTotal
Mean61.2 ± 15.7466.6 ± 13.1363.7 ± 14.66
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)BID DosingTID DosingTotal
Female121123
Male9716
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BID DosingTID DosingTotal
Hispanic or Latino224
Not Hispanic or Latino191635
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)BID DosingTID DosingTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian123
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American213
White181533
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)BID DosingTID DosingTotal
United States211839
08

Study locations

5 sites
  • Mitchell C. Shultz, MD
    Northridge, California 91325, United States
  • Silverstein Eye Center
    Kansas City, Missouri 64133, United States
  • Oculus Research
    Cary, North Carolina 27513, United States
  • CORE Inc.
    Shelby, North Carolina 28150, United States
  • Medical Optometry America
    New Freedom, Pennsylvania 17349, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Aug 2022 to primary completion in May 2023, 9 months.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 2 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 27, 2022
First posted
Jul 12, 2022
StartActual
Aug 3, 2022
Primary completionActual
May 18, 2023
CompletionActual
May 18, 2023
Results first posted
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 1, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 1, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05454956
Lead sponsor
Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2022
Start date
Aug 3, 2022
Primary completion
May 18, 2023
Completion
May 18, 2023
Results posted
Oct 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 1, 2025

Study contacts

Mitchell Shultz, MD
principal investigator · Mitchell C. Shultz, MD

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: TP-03

Start the discussion