CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05447273Updated Apr 3, 2024

The Role of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Preoperative Assessment of Primary Penile Carcinoma

An observational study in Penile Cancer, sponsored by Oslo University Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Norway. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-04-03.

Sponsored by Oslo University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2025, 1 year 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2022; still recruiting 4 years 2 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The proposed project is intended as a prospective study that includes 60 patients with newly diagnosed penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) referred to Oslo University Hospital (OUH), Radiumhospitalet, for surgery, primarily organ-sparing surgery (OSS).

OSS may improve not only quality of life, but also quality of sexual function. However, there is a potential for increased risk of local recurrence after OSS compared to the amputation of the penis. Appropriate preoperative staging, including multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), can substantially improve selection of patients and decrease the recurrence rate after surgery.

MpMRI without artificial erection is promising diagnostic tool that is poised to be all-in-one solution for staging and preoperative assessment of primary penile cancer, especially prior to OSS. The method is non-invasive and thus comfortable to perform for most of the patients. Novel MRI techniques are not incorporated into current clinical recommendations, and the potential of new, functional sequences has not been evaluated before. The accuracy of functional, non-erectile mpMRI for detecting and staging of primary penile cancer is not known. Thus, the main purpose of this study is to assess the diagnostic value of this method for preoperative assessment of penile cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Penile Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Penile Neoplasms

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Penile Neoplasms; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 167 across 13 observational studies indexed under Penile Neoplasms.

Browse Penile Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Oslo University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 810 studies on the registry; 148 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with newly diagnosed penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), referred to surgical treatment.

Inclusion criteria

  • newly diagnosed penile squamous cell carcinoma (SCC)
  • the patient will benefit from organ-sparing surgery (OSS)
  • signed broad consent for cancer research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • N/A
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

    Patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma.

    Diagnostic Test: Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMulti-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)

    Multi-parametric, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) will be performed in all included patients prior to surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Functional imaging

    Assess tumor extent and infiltration depth on multi-parametric MRI (mrT-stage) with histopathological evaluation as a reference standard. Explore usefulness of multi-parametric MRI in assessing inguinal and pelvic lymph nodes (mrN-stage). 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG PET-CT), sentinel lymph node evaluation and histopathological examination of the resected specimen will be a gold standard.

    Time frame: 2022-2024

Secondary outcomes

  1. Clinical outcome

    Assess the locoregional recurrence rate and 5-year survival rate following OSS. Clinical outcome data will be obtained from 5 years clinical follow-up at the Department of Urology OUH.

    Time frame: 2022-2030

  2. Functional outcome

    Evaluation of urinary and sexual function following surgery. Functional outcome data will be assessed by urologists using a scoring system and according to the clinical practice, and from interviews with clinical sexologist.

    Time frame: 2022-2030

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hanchanale V, Yeo L, Subedi N, Smith J, Wah T, Harnden P, Bhattarai S, Chilka S, Eardley I. The accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in predicting the invasion of the tunica albuginea and the urethra during the primary staging of penile cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Mar;117(3):439-43. doi: 10.1111/bju.13041. Epub 2015 Jun 3. PubMed 25600638 ↗
  • Cubilla AL, Barreto J, Caballero C, Ayala G, Riveros M. Pathologic features of epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. A prospective study of 66 cases. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Aug;17(8):753-63. doi: 10.1097/00000478-199308000-00001. PubMed 8338190 ↗
  • Kayes O, Minhas S, Allen C, Hare C, Freeman A, Ralph D. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of penile cancer. Eur Urol. 2007 May;51(5):1313-8; discussion 1318-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.11.014. Epub 2006 Nov 13. PubMed 17113213 ↗
  • Philippou P, Shabbir M, Malone P, Nigam R, Muneer A, Ralph DJ, Minhas S. Conservative surgery for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: resection margins and long-term oncological control. J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):803-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.012. Epub 2012 Jul 19. PubMed 22818137 ↗
  • Kieffer JM, Djajadiningrat RS, van Muilekom EA, Graafland NM, Horenblas S, Aaronson NK. Quality of life for patients treated for penile cancer. J Urol. 2014 Oct;192(4):1105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.014. Epub 2014 Apr 18. PubMed 24747092 ↗
  • Romero FR, Romero KR, Mattos MA, Garcia CR, Fernandes Rde C, Perez MD. Sexual function after partial penectomy for penile cancer. Urology. 2005 Dec;66(6):1292-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.081. PubMed 16360459 ↗
  • Veeratterapillay R, Teo L, Asterling S, Greene D. Oncologic Outcomes of Penile Cancer Treatment at a UK Supraregional Center. Urology. 2015 May;85(5):1097-1103. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2014.11.048. Epub 2015 Mar 10. PubMed 25769781 ↗
  • Petralia G, Villa G, Scardino E, Zoffoli E, Renne G, de Cobelli O, Bellomi M. Local staging of penile cancer using magnetic resonance imaging with pharmacologically induced penile erection. Radiol Med. 2008 Jun;113(4):517-28. doi: 10.1007/s11547-008-0273-6. Epub 2008 May 13. English, Italian. PubMed 18478188 ↗
  • Scardino E, Villa G, Bonomo G, Matei DV, Verweij F, Rocco B, Varela R, de Cobelli O. Magnetic resonance imaging combined with artificial erection for local staging of penile cancer. Urology. 2004 Jun;63(6):1158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.01.008. PubMed 15183971 ↗
  • Krishna S, Shanbhogue K, Schieda N, Morbeck F, Hadas B, Kulkarni G, McInnes MD, Baroni RH. Role of MRI in Staging of Penile Cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;51(6):1612-1629. doi: 10.1002/jmri.27060. Epub 2020 Jan 24. PubMed 31976600 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 3, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05447273
Lead sponsor
Oslo University Hospital
Responsible party
Marta Daniela Switlyk (Principal Investigator, Oslo University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 7, 2022
Start date
Jul 15, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 3, 2024

Study contacts

Marta D Switlyk, MD PhD
Contact
marswi@ous-hf.no
47 915 02 770
Marta D Switlyk, MD PhD
principal investigator · Oslo University Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion