ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05437042Updated Jul 6, 2022

Effect of Medial Wedge on Static Balance in Pronated Feet

An observational study in Foot; Deformity, Valgus, Congenital, Foot; Deformity, Valgus (Acquired) and Foot Deformities, sponsored by Pamukkale University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-06.

Primary conditionFlatfootRegistry: Congenital AbnormalitiesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Congenital Abnormalities — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Flatfoot
Why
  1. Congenital Abnormalities is a broad heading, used only when no more specific condition is named.
  2. The study's listed conditions name Flatfoot, a narrower term within Congenital Abnormalities.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Pamukkale University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of heel wedges is often recommended as a clinical routine in individuals with foot pronation. However, there is a lack of information for examining the immediate effect of supports used to restore foot biomechanics on balance. The aim of our study is to examine the immediate effect of calcaneal support in the frontal plane on static balance in individuals with increased pronated foot. In this study, the fore-hind foot load distribution in static bipedal stance will be examined in healthy young adults. Then, static balance measurements will be made on one leg with and without support (medial heel wedge). For the evaluation of static balance on one leg, x-y mean, ellipse surface, A-P index measurements and romberg test will be used. In addition, the pain of individuals will be questioned and their foot postures will be evaluated. Healthy young adult individuals with a subtalar angle of 5 degrees and above in the weighted position will be included in the evaluations. Evaluations of the participants are planned to take approximately 15 minutes.

Read the detailed description

In a normal foot, the subtalar joint is pronated from heel strike to sole contact, which makes the midtarsal joint and forefoot flexible. Between sole contact and toe lift, the subtalar joint becomes supinated and the foot turns into a rigid lever (1,2). Hindfoot overpronation can be defined as pronation of the subtalar joint during gait phases in which supination is normal. It can cause problems such as abnormal pronation in the foot, increased flexibility, deterioration in load distribution, hallux valgus and heel spurs, and postural disorders involving the leg, knee, hip and spine (3). In addition, the increase in rear foot pronation negatively affects the physical performance of individuals such as jumping and running (4). Commonly used conservative methods to prevent pronation in the subtalar joint include exercises to support the medial arch, strengthen muscles and ligaments, electrical stimulation, insoles, wedges, and applications such as flexible and inflexible taping techniques (1,5).

Medial wedge is a method frequently preferred by physiotherapists in terms of ease of use among the methods used in the routine. It is thought that the contact of the medial longitudinal arch support of the insole with the foot prevents the increase in pronation of the foot and reduces the load on the arch structures. The medial longitudinal arch support transfers the load on the heel region to the midfoot and the decrease in maximum pressure in the 2nd and 3rd metatarsal regions is explained by the insoles turning the foot towards supination. It is stated that excessive pronation of the hindfoot and the secondary deformities it may cause can be prevented by the use of simple supports applied under the foot.

The foot is located at the most distal point and acts as the support base for this kinematic chain. For this reason, the smallest dynamic change in the foot affects the balance of the whole body (6). Balance is the ability to keep the body's center of gravity within the acceptable limits of the support surface during activities such as sitting, standing or walking, and it is a complex process that includes versatile sensory, motor and biomechanical components (7).

It is known that foot deformities in seniors negatively affect balance and cause falls (8). Along with the changes in the gravity line in neurological diseases, problems are seen in maintaining the balance starting from the sitting level and in situations that require a change in movement. Conditions such as loss of balance or inability to maintain body position in athletes may prevent the athlete from performing the expected performance, as well as cause injuries (9). Balance improvement has an important place in every field of physiotherapy. Improving balance, increasing function in the athlete, improving performance; To ensure the continuity of mobility in neuromuscular diseases and neurological problems, to increase the quality of life; in healthy individuals, it is important to prevent injuries. In this study, the immediate effect of the medial heel wedge on static balance and weight distribution in individuals with pronated foot was investigated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Foot; Deformity, Valgus, Congenital
  • Foot; Deformity, Valgus (Acquired)
  • Foot Deformities
  • Flatfoot

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Foot Orthoses
  • Postural Balance
  • Subtalar Joint
03

In context

Flatfoot Reclassified

173 studies on the registry are indexed under Flatfoot; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 47 across 48 observational studies indexed under Flatfoot.

Browse Flatfoot studies →

Lead sponsor

Pamukkale University is the lead sponsor of 342 studies on the registry; 61 are open to participants now.

Compared within Flatfoot, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Congenital Abnormalities. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Young adults who has pronated foot

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Standing subtalar angle of 5° or more
  • Foot Posture Index score of 6 or more
  • Right lower limb dominance
  • Agreeing to participate in the study voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having a neurological or orthopedic problem
  • Having any surgery on the lower extremity
  • Having a foot-ankle complex Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score above 6.4
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Individuals with pronated foot

    Other: Medial calcaneal wedge

Interventions

  • OtherMedial calcaneal wedge

    Immediate effect of medial calcaneal wedge for static balance and weight distribution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Immediate effect of medial heel wedge on static balance

    Time frame: Day 1

Secondary outcomes

  1. Immediate effect of medial heel wedge on load distribution

    Time frame: Day 1

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation
    Ankara, Sıhhiye, Turkey
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Leung AK, Mak AF, Evans JH. Biomedical gait evaluation of the immediate effect of orthotic treatment for flexible flat foot. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1998 Apr;22(1):25-34. doi: 10.3109/03093649809164454. PubMed 9604273 ↗
  • McPoil TG, Hunt GC. Evaluation and management of foot and ankle disorders: present problems and future directions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995 Jun;21(6):381-8. doi: 10.2519/jospt.1995.21.6.381. PubMed 7655482 ↗
  • Valmassy RL. clinical biomechanics of the lower extermities. Mosby, Missouri. 1996;12:143-5.
  • Kararti C, Bilgin S, Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B. Arka Ayaktaki Pronasyon Artisinin Fiziksel Performans Uzerine Etkisi. Hacettepe University Faculty of Health Sciences Journal. 2018;5(1):1-0.
  • Hadley A, Griffiths S, Griffiths L, Vicenzino B. Antipronation taping and temporary orthoses. Effects on tibial rotation position after exercise. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1999 Mar;89(3):118-23. doi: 10.7547/87507315-89-3-118. PubMed 10095333 ↗
  • Al Abdulwahab SS, Kachanathu SJ. The effect of various degrees of foot posture on standing balance in a healthy adult population. Somatosens Mot Res. 2015;32(3):172-6. doi: 10.3109/08990220.2015.1029608. Epub 2015 Sep 7. PubMed 26400632 ↗
  • Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait & posture. 1995 Dec 1;3(4):193-214.
  • Whitney KA. Foot deformities, biomechanical and pathomechanical changes associated with aging including orthotic considerations, Part II. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003 Jul;20(3):511-26, x. doi: 10.1016/S0891-8422(03)00046-6. PubMed 12952051 ↗
  • Borklu T, Dolu N. Sporcularda Isitsel Uyarilma Potansiyellerindeki Hemisferik Farkliliklar. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi (Journal of Health Sciences). 2010;19(2):108-18.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05437042
Responsible party
Izgi Guven (Research Assistant, Pamukkale University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 29, 2022
Start date
Apr 1, 2021
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2021
Completion
Jan 1, 2022
Last update
Jul 6, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion