ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05431114OREFUpdated May 15, 2025

Quantitative MRI of Glenohumeral Cartilage & Labrum in Shoulder Instability

An observational study in Instability, Joint, Shoulder Dislocation and Shoulder Injuries, sponsored by Duke University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by Duke University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to assess cartilage strain and contact areas following glenohumeral instability compared to healthy individuals.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this study is to assess cartilage strain and contact areas following glenohumeral instability compared to healthy individuals.

This is a prospective longitudinal cohort study to investigate cartilage strain and labral injury utilizing advance MRI techniques. Patients with shoulder instability will be studied at baseline (after injury and prior to surgical treatment) with glenohumeral cartilage strain MRI protocol, pre and post exercise. Patient reported outcomes including Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score, and PROMIS physical function and pain scores, will also be evaluated.

Data from this study will be compared to a previous study involving healthy controls that underwent the same exercises and imaging.

02

Conditions studied

  • Instability, Joint
  • Shoulder Dislocation
  • Shoulder Injuries
  • Shoulder Subluxation
  • Anterior Shoulder Instability
  • Glenoid; Dislocation

Keywords

  • Instability
  • Shoulder
  • Dislocation
  • Glenoid
  • Acute
  • Arthroscopy
03

In context

Joint Instability

115 studies on the registry are indexed under Joint Instability; 21 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 54 observational studies indexed under Joint Instability.

Browse Joint Instability studies →

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of individuals ages 18 to 50 years old, who have sustained an anterior shoulder dislocation that requires surgical intervention.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females ≥ 18 years old and ≤ 50 years old
  • Acute injury involving anterior (front) shoulder dislocation
  • Willingness to undergo arthroscopic shoulder stabilization
  • Willingness to participant in standard rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Moderate to severe osteoarthritis prior to surgery
  • Will undergo bony augmentation to glenoid or humerus in addition to shoulder stabilization
  • Unable to undergo standard pre and post-injury/operative rehabilitation
  • History of inflammatory arthritis
  • Previous surgery of the injured shoulder
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Shoulder patients

    Participants who presents with glenohumeral instability.

    Diagnostic Test: MRI

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testMRI

    Images of the injured shoulder will then be taken with magnetic resonance (MR) scanner. MRIs of each participant's shoulder will be acquired before and after completion of an exercise protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cartilage Strain at baseline

    Cartilage strain will be assessed using images from MRIs.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Cartilage Strain at baseline at six months post-surgery

    Cartilage strain will be assessed using images from MRIs.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  3. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at baseline

    The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is an instability-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measure for individuals with shoulder instability that was designed for use as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials evaluating treatments for patients with shoulder instability. The WOSI questionnaire consists of 21 items, each scored on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Each item falls into one of the domains of physical function, sports/recreation/work, lifestyle and emotional well-being. Each question is scored between 0-100 points and the summation of all the questions results in a final WOSI score. The final score ranges from 0 (no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life) to 2100 (extreme distress in shoulder-related quality of life).

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) at six months post-surgery

    The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) is an instability-specific patient reported outcome (PRO) measure for individuals with shoulder instability that was designed for use as a primary outcome measure in clinical trials evaluating treatments for patients with shoulder instability. The WOSI questionnaire consists of 21 items, each scored on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Each item falls into one of the domains of physical function, sports/recreation/work, lifestyle and emotional well-being. Each question is scored between 0-100 points and the summation of all the questions results in a final WOSI score. The final score ranges from 0 (no decrease in shoulder-related quality of life) to 2100 (extreme distress in shoulder-related quality of life).

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  5. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score at baseline

    The final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score is obtained by summing the pain and functional portions with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score at six months post-surgery

    The final American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) Score is obtained by summing the pain and functional portions with higher scores indicating better outcomes.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  7. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function at baseline

    A PROMIS score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Function, Mobility, and Upper Extremity function, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.

    Time frame: Baseline

  8. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical function at six months post-surgery

    A PROMIS score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation of 10. A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For positively-worded concepts like Physical Function, Mobility, and Upper Extremity function, a T-score of 60 is one SD better than average. By comparison, a Physical Function T-score of 40 is one SD worse than average.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

  9. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) Scores at baseline

    The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating and is The SANE score represents one's perception of shoulder function as a percentage of normal, 0% being no function and 100% being normal function.

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. SANE Scores at six months post-surgery

    The Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) is a patient rating and is The SANE score represents one's perception of shoulder function as a percentage of normal, 0% being no function and 100% being normal function.

    Time frame: 6 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Correlation of labral injury and glenohumeral cartilage strain

    The relationship between labral injury and glenohumeral cartilage strain and contact areas will be assessed using images from MRIs.

    Time frame: Baseline & six months post-surgery

  2. Change in cartilage strain and labrum following surgery

    The relationship between labral injury and glenohumeral cartilage strain and contact areas will be assessed using images from MRIs from pre and post-surgery.

    Time frame: Six months post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Duke Sports Science Institute
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05431114
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 24, 2022
Start date
Aug 2, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2025
Completion
Apr 1, 2025
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Brian Lau, MD
principal investigator · Duke University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion