CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05417503NIVUpdated Jun 14, 2022

Non Invasive Ventilation on Peripheral Muscle Function and Aerobic Performance

An interventional study of Non-invasive ventilation bi-level and Non-invasive ventilation placebo in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-14.

Sponsored by Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2017, registered Jun 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
14
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) reduces respiratory load and demands on peripheral muscles. Methods: This study aims to evaluate the acute effects of bi-level NIV on peripheral muscle function during isokinetic exercise and aerobic performance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This is a pilot crossover study performed with a non-probabilistic sample of 14 moderate to very severe COPD patients. Procedures carried out in two days. Dyspnea, quality of life, lung function, respiratory muscle strength, functional capacity (6-minute walk test - 6MWT), and isokinetic assessment of the quadriceps were assessed. Blood samples (lactate, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase concentration) were also collected. Right after, NIV was performed for 30 minutes (bi-level or placebo, according to randomization) followed by new blood sample collection, 6MWT, and isokinetic dynamometer tests. Before and after evaluations, the subjective perception of dyspnea and fatigue in the lower limbs was quantified. After a wash-out period of seven days, participants returned, and all assessments were performed again.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

  • COPD
  • Skeletal muscle
  • Non-Invasive Ventilation
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 14 is below the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte is the lead sponsor of 84 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinically stable COPD patients (diagnosed according to the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease), of both sexes, without exacerbation or changes in medication for at least one month before the study, and no dyspnea during daily activities (grades 2, 3, and 4 of the Medical Research Council - MRC scale) were included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with a diagnosis of neoplasia, orthopedic or neurological conditions affecting exercise capacity, peripheral arterial obstructive disease, heart failure, kidney or liver disease, did not adapt, or failed to complete the study procedures, were excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
14 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    bi-level

    Other: Non-invasive ventilation bi-level

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    Other: Non-invasive ventilation placebo

Interventions

  • OtherNon-invasive ventilation bi-level

    For the NIV intervention, two levels of positive airway pressure (bi-level) were used: the positive inspiratory airway pressure (IPAP) was fixed at 6 cmH2O (centimeters of water), which could be gradually increased up to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort. and gradually increased to 14 cmH2O (2 cmH2O every minute), While the expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was set at 3 cmH2O, it could be gradually increased up to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute), depending on the patient's comfort.while expiratory airway pressure (EPAP) was fixed at 3 cmH2O and gradually increased to 7 cmH2O (1 cmH2O every minute).

  • OtherNon-invasive ventilation placebo

    The same pressure chosen by the subject during adaptation was used in the placebo intervention; however, a T tube was connected between the equipment and the circuit, creating a leak and leaving the circuit open. The tube characteristics were: 22 x 18 x 22 mm nebulizer T-connector.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Lung function

    Lung function was assessed using a spirometer (Koko Digidoser, Longmont, USA), according to the American Thoracic Society/European Throracic Society recommendations14. At least three tests were performed, with a variation of less than 5%, and the highest value obtained was compared with predicted values for the Brazilian population.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

  2. Respiratory muscle strength

    Respiratory muscle strength was assessed using a digital manometer (MVD 300 - Brazil). Maximum inspiratory and expiratory pressures were performed from residual volume and total lung capacity, respectively, and values were compared with previously reference values for the Brazilian population

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

  3. Functional capacity

    The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) was performed in a flat 30-m corridor, according to the ATS recommendations17. Subjects were instructed to keep walking for six minutes, and standardized verbal incentives were given each minute. The perception of dyspnea (using the 10-point Borg scale) were assessed at rest, at the end of the 6MWT, and two minutes after the test. In this test, the walked distance (in meters) was considered for analysis.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

  4. COPD Assessement Test

    The Portuguese version of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) questionnaire was used to assess the quality of life. Subjects were instructed to choose only one option in each item of the questionnaire (cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness, limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness, and energy). Item scores range from 0 to 5 points resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 40 points. The clinical impact of COPD was assessed according to the following stratification: mild (6-10), moderate (11-20), severe (21-30), and very severe (31-40)20.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

  5. Disease severity

    COPD severity was assessed using the BODE index (body mass index \[B\], degree of airway obstruction \[O\], dyspnea \[D\], and exercise capacity \[E\]). For each variable, the following scores were assigned: body mass index (BMI), from 0 to 1 point; degree of airflow obstruction (FEV1% predicted), from 0 to 3 points; dyspnea (MRC scale), from 0 to 3 points; exercise capacity (walked distance in the 6MWT), from 0 to 3 points. The final score of the index ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater disease severity.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quadriceps femoris performance

    QF (Quadriceps femoris) strength was evaluated with subjects performing 20 repetitions at the same speed. The protocol established was designed to reach a fatigue threshold in the QF muscle. Dyspnea and perceived level of exertion (Borg scale) were also assessed before and after isokinetic evaluation.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes after intervention

  2. Biochemical analyzes

    Before and after procedures, venous blood samples were collected by a blinded experienced pharmacist to analyze lactate, LDH enzyme, and CK (creatine kinase) concentration. Samples were processed, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes at room temperature. The serum concentration was assessed using a specific enzyme kit for each biomarker, following manufacturer's recommendations.

    Time frame: change from baseline and 30 minutes intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte
    Natal, Rio Grande Do Norte 59082-100, Brazil
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 14, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05417503
Lead sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte
Responsible party
Patri-cia Angelica de Miranda Silva Nogueira (Professora associada da UFRN, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 14, 2022
Start date
Dec 1, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 24, 2018
Completion
Feb 28, 2018
Last update
Jun 14, 2022

Study contacts

Patrícia Nogueira
principal investigator · Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion