CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05416476ATEMUpdated Feb 28, 2024

Anisodine Hydrobromide For The Preventive Treatment Of Episodic Migraine

A Phase 3 interventional study of Anisodine Hydrobromide and Anisodine Hydrobromide placebo in Migraine Without Aura and Migraine With Aura, sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University. Recruiting at 19 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-28.

Sponsored by Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University · Phase 3, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Oct 2025, 11 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Oct 2023; still recruiting 2 years 11 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
288
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study,288 adult migraine patients aged 18-65 years (diagnosed with migraine without aura and/or migraine with aura, with at least a 1-year history)will be collected to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Anisodine Hydrobromide in preventing migraine attacks in episodic migraine in adults.

Read the detailed description
  1. Research contents:

    In this study,288 adult migraine patients aged 18-65 years (diagnosed with migraine without aura and/or migraine with aura, with at least a 1-year history)will be collected to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Anisodine Hydrobromide in preventing migraine attacks in episodic migraine in adults.

  2. Research target:

    To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of oral Anisodine Hydrobromide in preventing migraine attacks in episodic migraine in adults, we used the change from baseline in migraine days per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period as the primary endpoint.

  3. Research design:

    This study uses a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design and plans to enroll 288 adult patients with episodic migraine.

    A total of 288 patients were planned to be enrolled, and all subjects were randomly assigned to group A (Anisodine Hydrobromide 1 mg bid) and group B (placebo 1 mg bid) according to a 1:1 ratio, with 144 subjects in each group.Both anisodine hydrobromide and placebo were produced and supplied by Chengdu First Pharmaceutical Limited Company.

    The enrolled subjects were orally administered Anisodine Hydrobromide 1 mg bid or placebo 1 mg bid for 12 consecutive weeks of treatment, and followed up for 4 weeks. That means doing face-to-face visits at the 4th, 8th, 12th and 16th weeks after dosing ,while affected by the epidemic or other special circumstances, video or telephone follow-up can be used.

    This study is divided into 3 phases: screening/baseline period (4 weeks, D-28\~D-1), double-blind treatment period (12 weeks, D1\~D84), follow-up period (4 weeks, D85-D112), a total of About 20 weeks.

  4. In order to ensure the quality of the trial, the sponsor and the researcher shall discuss and formulate the clinical research plan before the trial officially begins. Good Clinical Practice(GCP) training was given to the relevant researchers who participated in the experiment. The research center must manage experimental drugs in accordance with (SOP), including receipt, storage, distribution and recycling. In accordance with the GCP guidelines, necessary steps should be taken during the design and implementation phase of the study to ensure that the data collected are accurate, consistent, complete and credible. All observed results and abnormal findings in clinical trials should be verified and recorded in time to ensure the reliability of the data. The instruments, equipment, reagents and standards used in various examination items in clinical trials should have strict quality standards and ensure that they work under normal conditions. The researcher inputs the information required by the program into the eCRF, and the inspector verifies whether the filling is complete and accurate, and instructs the staff of the research center to make necessary corrections and supplements. The drug regulatory department, the institutional review committee (IRB)/ independent ethics committee (IEC), sponsor inspectors and / or inspectors may conduct systematic inspections of clinical trial-related activities and documents to evaluate whether trials are conducted in accordance with the requirements of the study program, SOP and relevant regulations (e.g. GCP, GMP), and whether trial data are recorded in a timely, true, accurate and complete manner. The inspection should be carried out by personnel who are not directly involved in the clinical trial.
  5. Statistical analysis plan: Efficacy evaluation: The primary endpoint was analyzed by Mixed Model for Repeated Measures(MMRM).And the primary endpoint analysis was based on the analysis results of Full Analysis Set(FAS) and Per Protocol Set(PPS).
02

Conditions studied

  • Migraine Without Aura
  • Migraine With Aura

Keywords

  • Migraine
  • Migraine Without Aura
  • Migraine with Aura
03

In context

Migraine Disorders

1,528 studies on the registry are indexed under Migraine Disorders; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 288 is above the median of 80 across 1,175 interventional studies indexed under Migraine Disorders.

Browse Migraine Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University is the lead sponsor of 1,058 studies on the registry; 511 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to participate in this study.

  1. The age at entry for trails involving adult subjects is 18-65 years (including both ends);
  2. According to ICHD-3(Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society,2018), individuals should be diagnosed with migraine without aura and/or migraine with aura, and should have a history of at least 1 year;
  3. The age at first migraine onset should be \<50 years;
  4. Migraine attacks ≥ 4 days/month and \< 15 days/month within 3 months prior to screening period (Refer to the definition of migraine days);
  5. Within 3 months before entering the screening period, the number of headache (including migraine and other types of headache) attack days per month is less than 15 days/month (Refer to the definition of headache days);
  6. Be willing to take effective contraceptive measures during the period of participating in this experiment and within 28 days after the last time taking investigational product;
  7. Understand and abide by the research procedures and methods, voluntarily participate in this experiment, and sign the informed consent in writing, agreeing to enter the baseline period.

    The following criteria must be met during the baseline period to be eligible for entering the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the drug:

  8. Migraine days ≥4 and \<14 days within 4 weeks of baseline period(Evaluation based on the Annex 14.-Electronic Headache Diary);
  9. Headache days \< 14 days within 4 weeks of baseline period;
  10. Completion of at least 80% of the electronic diary within 4 weeks of the baseline period(Within 28 days of the baseline period, the electronic diary has been completed for at least 23 days), and the investigator believes that the subject is able to read, understand, and complete the study questionnaire and headache diary;
  11. Understand and abide by the research procedures and methods, voluntarily participate in this experiment, and sign the informed consent in writing, agreeing to enter the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of the drug.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Subjects with any of the following cannot participate in this study:

  1. Subject diagnosed with possible migraine according to ICHD-3(2018);
  2. Current and previous diagnosis of primary headache, secondary headache, or painful cranial neuropathy other than migraine(diagnostic criteria are defined according to ICHD-3,2018);
  3. Past use of more than two of the following 7 drugs is ineffective after adequate use, the types of these drugs are as follows:

    • Type 1: Divalproex, Sodium Valproate
    • Type 2: Topiramate
    • Type 3: Beta blockers(such as: Atenolol, Bisoprolol, Metoprolol, Nadolol, Nebivolol, Pindolol, Propranolol, Timolol)
    • Type 4: Tricyclic antidepressants(TCA) (such as: Amitriptyline, Nortriptyline, Protriptyline)
    • Type 5: Serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (such as: Venlafaxine, Desvenlafaxine, Duloxetine, Milnacipran)
    • Type 6: Flunarizine, Verapamil
    • Type 7: lisinopril, Candesartan

    Definition of treatment failure: No reduction in headache frequency, duration, or severity after 6 weeks of administration of the above drugs.

    The following conditions are not defined as treatment failure:

    • Lack of sustained response to medication;
    • Can not be tolerated dose of drug
  4. Use of drugs known to have significant interactions with the study drug (anisodine hydrobromide) (eg donepezil, donepezil hydrochloride, rivastigmine, etc.) in the 2 months prior to the baseline period and throughout the study period;
  5. Use of prohibited drugs, Chinese patent drug, Chinese herbal medicines, instruments or therapies, etc. 2 months before the baseline period or during the baseline period (more details are in Prohibited Drugs/Treatments);
  6. Subjects who intend to undergo head, face or neck injections of therapeutic or cosmetic Botulinum Toxin(such as Dysport, Botox, Xeomin, Myobloc and JeuvwauTM) during the study period or within 4 months before screening;
  7. Simultaneous use of two or more drugs that may have migraine preventive effects within 2 months before the start of the baseline period or during the baseline period (more details are in Annex- The List of Migraine Preventive Medications ) (If only one prophylactic drug is used, the dose must be stable for the two months prior to the baseline period and throughout the study);
  8. The following occurred within two months prior to the start of the baseline period:

    • Taking Ergotamines or Triptans for ≥10 days per month, or
    • Taking NSAIDs alone for ≥15 days compound or preparation of NSAIDs≥10 days, or
    • Taking Opioid or Barbiturate analgesics for ≥4 days per month
  9. Subjects are expected to use the following prohibited drugs, Chinese patent drug, Chinese herbal medicines, instruments or protocols during double-blind treatment (more details are in Prohibited Drugs/Treatments);
  10. Subject has active chronic pain syndrome (eg, fibromyalgia, chronic pelvic pain, facial pain, etc.);
  11. Subject has a history of mental illness (eg, schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) or PHQ-9 score≥15;Subjects are allowed to enter the double-blind treatment period if they had a history of anxiety or depression and were taking no more than one psychotropic drug (excluding contraindicated drugs) (Subjects must have taken a stable therapeutic dose within 3 months prior to the baseline period);
  12. Have a serious neurological disorder other than migraines (Note: Do not rule out single children febrile convulsion);
  13. Patients with a history of malignant tumour within five years prior to the screening period, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer, cervical or breast ductal carcinoma in situ;
  14. The screening period meets any of the following laboratory values:

    • Alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >1.5×(upper limit of normal, ULN), or
    • Total bilirubin(TBIL) >1.5×ULN (Subjects with diagnosed Gilbert syndrome excluded)
  15. Heart disease such as coronary heart disease, severe heart failure and arrhythmia; history of glaucoma, bleeding disorders, stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), reconstructive surgery;
  16. The subject has factors that the investigator believes may put the subject at significant risk or may confound the results of the study; The subject has any medical or other reasons for being unfit to participate in the study;
  17. According to clinical interviews or C-SSRS questionnaires, the researcher believes that the subject is at risk of self-harm or harm to others;
  18. Within 12 months before the screening period, according to the subject's medical records or the subject's self-reported history of drug or alcohol abuse;
  19. Subjects expected to be pregnant or breastfeeding during the study period, or had a positive urine pregnancy test result at screening;
  20. During the study period, female subjects of childbearing potential were reluctant to use an acceptable method of effective contraception; Infertile women are defined as follows:

    -Have a history of menopause, defined as: Age: ≥55 years old, Menopause ≥12 months, or Age:\<55 years old, no spontaneous menstruation for at least 2 years,or Age:\<55 years old, have spontaneous menstruation in the past 1 year, but current is amenorrhea (spontaneous or secondary to hysterectomy), and abnormal postmenopausal Gonadotropin levels: luteinizing hormone(LH), follicle-stimulating hormone(FSH)>40IU/L or postmenopausal estradiol level \<5ng/dL, or

    • Have a history of bilateral oophorectomy, or
    • Have a history of hysterectomy, or
    • Have a history of bilateral salpingectomy
  21. Subjects who participated in other clinical trials within 3 months before the screening period;
  22. Subjects who are allergic to anisodine hydrobromide or anisodine hydrobromide excipients;
  23. Subjects who cannot maintain their original diet and living habits during the trial;
  24. Subjects who intend to take estrogen and/or progesterone drugs during the screening period or after enrollment;
  25. Subject is a researcher involved in the study or an immediate family member (parent, spouse, sibling or child).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
288 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anisodine Hydrobromide

    Participants in this group took oral Anisodine Hydrobromide tablets 1 mg bid for 12 consecutive weeks and were followed up for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Anisodine Hydrobromide

  • Placebo comparator
    Anisodine Hydrobromide Placebo

    Participants in this group took oral Anisodine Hydrobromide placebo tablets 1 mg bid for 12 consecutive weeks and were followed up for 12 weeks.

    Drug: Anisodine Hydrobromide placebo

Interventions

  • DrugAnisodine Hydrobromide

    Anisodine Hydrobromide 1 mg oral tablet, twice times a day

  • DrugAnisodine Hydrobromide placebo

    Anisodine Hydrobromide Placebo 1 mg oral tablet, twice times a day

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Change of Migraine Days

    The change of migraine days per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Baseline refers to the frequency of migraine attacks within the 28 days prior to randomization (baseline period, i.e., D-28 to D-1). Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Change of Headache Attack Frequency

    The change of headache attack frequency per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  2. The Change of Moderate / Severe Headache Days

    The change of days with moderate / severe headache per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  3. The Responder Rate of at Least 50%, 75% and 100% Reduction of Migraine Days

    The Responder Rate of at Least 50%, 75% and 100% Reduction of Migraine Days is compared with the baseline per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period. Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  4. The Dose of Acute Medication Use

    Variation in the dose of medications for the acute migraine per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The allowed medications to treat an acute migraine include the following categories of drugs: triptans, ergots, opioids, analgesics (including acetaminophen), NSAIDs, and antiemetics. Data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  5. The Change of Frequency of Medications Use

    The change of frequency of medications for the acute migraine per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The allowed medications include the following categories of drugs: triptans, ergots, opioids, analgesics (including acetaminophen), NSAIDs, and antiemetics. Data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  6. The Change of Peak Headache Pain Intensity

    The change of peak headache pain intensity per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Subjects should record the maximum intensity of daily headaches and any medication used. An 11-point digital rating scale can be used instead of or in conjunction with a 4-level classified rating scale. The 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) has 10 scales, with a "0" end and a "10" end at both ends, where 0 means no pain, and 10 means the most severe pain that is unbearable.4-level classified rating scale was used to evaluate the headache intensity of each migraine day--painless, mild, moderate, or severe. Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  7. The Change of Average Headache Intensity

    The change of average headache intensity per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Four-point rating scale was used to evaluate the headache intensity of each migraine day--painless, mild, moderate, or severe. Migraine intensity is not recommended as the main outcome measure alone, but it is important to record the decrease in migraine intensity as an indicator of disability reduction. Depending on the design of the trial, subjects should be asked to record the intensity of each migraine. In addition, the 11 point visual rating scale (VAS) can be used instead or in combination with the 4-level classification rating scale. The use of VAS in clinical trials may increase the likelihood of showing differences in severity.The 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS) has 10 scales, with a "0" end and a "10" end at both ends, where 0 means no pain, and 10 means the most severe pain that is unbearable. Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  8. The Change of Cumulative Hours of Moderate / Severe Headache

    The change of cumulative hours of moderate / severe headache per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Headache data were captured through an electronic diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  9. The Change of Days without Symptoms

    The change of days without symptoms per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Days Without Symptoms are defined as the number of days without aura, prodromal symptoms, headaches, pain and subsequent symptoms. It needs to be determined by headache diary.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  10. The Change of Headache-free Days

    The change of headache-free Days per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. Headache-free days are defined as days with no headache or associated symptoms (including disability and cognitive/emotional impairment) that are directly attributable to migraine.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  11. The Change of Migraine Disability Assessment questionnaire (mMIDAS) Score

    The change of mMIDAS score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The mMIDAS has 5 self-assessment items that calculate the missed work days and the missed household work days in the previous month. The mMIDAS also conducts assessments of disability in family, social, and leisure activities. The mMIDAS score is the sum of the scores of the 5 items. The score is multiplied by 3 for grading and is divided into 4 severe levels: I = 0-5 (slight disability); II = 6-10 (mild disability). Disability); Grade III = Grade 11-20 (moderate disability); Grade IV = above Grade 21 (severe disability).

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  12. The Change of Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Score

    The change of HIT-6 score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The HIT-6 is a 6-question assessment used to measure the impact headaches have on a participant's ability to function on the job, at school, at home, and in social situations. It assesses the effect that headaches have on normal daily life and the participant's ability to function. Responses are based on frequency using a 5-point scale ranging from "never" to "always." The HIT-6 total score, which ranges from 36 to 78, is the sum of the responses - each of which is assigned a score ranging from 6 points (never) to 13 points (always).

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  13. The Change of Migraine Specific Quality of Life questionnaire(MSQ v2.1) Score

    The change of MSQ v2.1 score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The MSQ v2.1 is a 14-item questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality-of-life impairments attributed to migraine in the past 4 weeks. It is divided into 3 domains: Role Function Restrictive assesses how migraines limit one's daily social and work-related activities; Role Function Preventive assesses how migraines prevent these activities; and the Emotional Function domain assesses the emotions associated with migraines. Participants respond to items using a 6-point scale ranging from "none of the time" to "all of the time." Raw dimension scores are computed as a sum of item responses and rescaled to a 0 to 100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  14. The Change of The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score

    The change of PGIC score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The PGIC is a single item questionnaire used to measure the participant's impression of overall change in migraine since the first dose of study medication. The measure uses a 7-point rating scale with responses ranging from "very much better" to "very much worse."

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  15. The Change of Patient Health Questionnaire-9(PHQ-9) Score

    The change of PHQ-9 score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. PHQ-9 consists of 9 diagnostic criteria in The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders(DSM)-IV involving depression within the last 2 weeks. Subjects were asked to indicate the frequency of 9 depressive symptoms in the last 2 weeks on a 4-point scale: 0 (none at all), 1 (a few days), 2 (more than half), and 3 (almost every day).The total score of PHQ-9 is between 0 and 27(from the best to the worst). 10-14 points may indicate moderate depression, and 15-19 points may indicate moderately severe depression; 20 to 27 points may have severe depression.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  16. The Change of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Score

    The change of GAD-7 score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. GAD-7 is a proven, self-administered and concise tool for screening and diagnosing mental health disorders, which has been tested in the field in office practice. The screening scale is easy to use and can be completed in a short time, which improves the recognition rate of anxiety disorders and facilitates diagnosis and treatment. The main statistical index of this scale is the total score, that is, the sum of item scores. The total score range of GAD-7 is 0: 21 and that of GAD-2 is 0: 6. The score of GAD-7 can be used to evaluate the severity of anxiety symptoms: 0: 4: no clinical significance: anxiety: 5: 9: mild; 10: 14: moderate; \> 15: severe. When used as an assistant diagnosis of anxiety symptoms, the cut-off value of GAD-7 is greater than or equal to 10.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  17. The Change of Functional Impairment Scale (FIS) Score

    The change of FIS score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. FIS is a four-point scale that assesses functional status and the intensity of impairment during daily activities. It can be used in conjunction with the four-point pain intensity scale and is usually completed daily and summarized over4-week intervals.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  18. The Change of EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) Score

    The change of EQ-5D score per 4 weeks during the 12-week treatment period compared with baseline. The EQ-5D is a self-administered standardized measure of health status. It consists of 2 components - the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ VAS. The descriptive system comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a vertical, VAS where the endpoints are labelled "Best imaginable health state" and "Worst imaginable health state." The scoring range of the EQ VAS is from 0 (worst imaginable health) to 100 (best imaginable health).

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

  19. The Change of Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score

    The change of C-SSRS score during the 12-week treatment period compared with screening period. The C-SSRS was designed to distinguish the domains of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior,and the higher scores mean a worse outcome. Four constructs are measured:the severity of ideation(rated on a 5-point ordinal scale,and the higher scores mean more planned suicidal intent),the intensity of ideation subscale(comprises 5 items, each rated on a 5-point ordinal scale), the behavior subscale(rated on a nominal scale), the lethality subscale(assesses actual attempts; actual lethality is rated on a 6-point ordinal scale, and if actual lethality is zero, potential lethality of attempts is rated on a 3-point ordinal scale). Reports of suicidal ideation with intent to act and reports of actual, aborted, or interrupted suicide attempts or a behavior preparatory for making an attempt indicate subjects at high risk for suicide.

    Time frame: 12-week treatment period(Day 1-Day 84)

07

Study locations

1 of 19 sites recruiting
  • Jinjiang Municipal Hospital
    Jinjiang, Fujian 362200, China
    • Zhiqiang Lin · Contact · 15359508512
    • Benyan Luo · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University
    Quanzhou, Fujian 362000, China
    • Lichao Ye · Contact · 13015823208
    Not yet recruiting
  • Guangdong 999 Brain Hospital
    Guangzhou, Guangdong 510510, China
    • Shuisheng Zhong · Contact · 13710665623
    Not yet recruiting
  • Shenzhen People's Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, China
    • Gang Li · Contact · 13510706396
    Not yet recruiting
  • Shenzhen University General Hospital
    Shenzhen, Guangdong 518055, China
    • Hongya Zhang · Contact · 18126459965
    Not yet recruiting
  • The First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing
    Zhaoqing, Guangdong 526020, China
    • Youjia Li · Contact · 18902368836
    Not yet recruiting
  • People's Hospital Affiliated to Jiangsu University/Zhenjiang First People's Hospital
    Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212000, China
    • Kun Zhao · Contact · 15905288637
    Not yet recruiting
  • Dongyang People's Hospital
    Dongyang, Zhejiang 322100, China
    • Juanyan Chen · Contact · 13566929717
    Not yet recruiting
  • Xinhua Hospital of Zhejiang Province
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310005, China
    • You Wu · Contact · 15658882278
    Not yet recruiting
  • Tongde Hospital of Zhejiang Province
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
    • Xiaodong Zou · Contact · 15267162168
    Not yet recruiting
  • Kaiming Liu
    Hangzhou, Zhejiang 370001, China
    • Kaiming Liu · Contact
    Recruiting
  • The First People's Hospital of Huzhou City
    Huzhou, Zhejiang 313000, China
    • Mengxiong Pan · Contact · 15905723372
    • Qun Gu · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • The First People's Hospital of Jiande
    Jiande, Zhejiang 311600, China
    • Xiyao Zhao · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • Jinhua People's Hospital
    Jinhua, Zhejiang 321000, China
    • Huijun Shao · Contact · 13868988986
    Not yet recruiting
  • Medical Community of Linhai First People's Hospital
    Linhai, Zhejiang 31700, China
    • Guilian Ni · Contact · 13616689395
    Not yet recruiting
  • Tiantai People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province
    Tiantai, Zhejiang 317200, China
    • Faming Wang · Contact · 13958502756
    • Wenwu Hong · Contact
    Not yet recruiting
  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
    Wenzhou, Zhejiang 325000, China
    • Qiuling Tong · Contact · 13676780835
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine
    Yiwu, Zhejiang 322000, China
    • Guohua Zhao · Contact · 13777812308
    Not yet recruiting
  • The Second People's Hospital of Yuhuan
    Yuhuan, Zhejiang 317600, China
    • Xianhong Wu · Contact · 15157623310
    Not yet recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lai J, Dilli E. Migraine Aura: Updates in Pathophysiology and Management. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2020 May 19;20(6):17. doi: 10.1007/s11910-020-01037-3. PubMed 32430657 ↗
  • GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1789-1858. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7. Epub 2018 Nov 8. Erratum In: Lancet. 2019 Jun 22;393(10190):e44. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31047-5. PubMed 30496104 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Headache Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018 Nov;17(11):954-976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3. Erratum In: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Dec;20(12):e7. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00380-X. PubMed 30353868 ↗
  • GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459-480. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30499-X. Epub 2019 Mar 14. PubMed 30879893 ↗
  • Yu S, Liu R, Zhao G, Yang X, Qiao X, Feng J, Fang Y, Cao X, He M, Steiner T. The prevalence and burden of primary headaches in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. Headache. 2012 Apr;52(4):582-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2011.02061.x. PubMed 22590713 ↗
  • Liu R, Yu S, He M, Zhao G, Yang X, Qiao X, Feng J, Fang Y, Cao X, Steiner TJ. Health-care utilization for primary headache disorders in China: a population-based door-to-door survey. J Headache Pain. 2013 Jun 3;14(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1129-2377-14-47. PubMed 23731663 ↗
  • Luo N, Qi W, Zhuang C, Di W, Lu Y, Huang Z, Sun Y, Zhang A, Huang X, Tao Y, Zhu Y, Li A, Jiang Z, Massing MW, Fang Y. A satisfaction survey of current medicines used for migraine therapy in China: is Chinese patent medicine effective compared with Western medicine for the acute treatment of migraine? Pain Med. 2014 Feb;15(2):320-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12277. Epub 2013 Nov 8. PubMed 24524844 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 28, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05416476
Lead sponsor
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 13, 2022
Start date
Oct 30, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 28, 2024

Study contacts

Kaiming Liu, MD & PHD
Contact
2314411@zju.edu.cn
+8615068862055
Kaiming Liu, MD & PHD
study chair · Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion