ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05410964VISIONUpdated Jan 30, 2024Results posted

Non-Linear Imaging of Skin In Vivo

An observational study in Skin Cancer, Skin Condition and Skin Diseases, sponsored by Enspectra Health. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 2 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-01-30.

Sponsored by Enspectra Health · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
122
Ages
2 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The overall objective of this study is to investigate the potential for the VIO System to display microscopic skin structure in people of different age, sex, race, and skin health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Cancer
  • Skin Condition
  • Skin Diseases
  • Skin Lesion
  • Skin Abnormalities
03

In context

Skin Neoplasms

604 studies on the registry are indexed under Skin Neoplasms; 126 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 122 is below the median of 200 across 157 observational studies indexed under Skin Neoplasms.

Browse Skin Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Enspectra Health is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
2 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy subjects, volunteers as well subjects with suspected skin condition recruited from dermatology clinics

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects, ages 2 - 90 years old.
  2. Subject, or guardian, if applicable, must be willing to provide written prior to enrollment and agree to comply with protocol requirements. If applicable, child must be willing to provide written assent prior to enrollment and agree to comply with protocol requirements.
  3. Subject or guardian, if applicable, must have sufficient mental capacity to understand the Informed Consent and provide and reliable feedback regarding their experience with the device.
  4. Subject and guardian, if applicable, must comply with the protocol requirements.
  5. Subject or guardian, if applicable, must agree that anonymized personal data will be made available to Study Sponsor and requisite regional and international regulatory bodies.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any general health condition or systemic disease that may represent, in the opinion of the Principal Investigator, a potential increased risk associated with device use
  2. Currently infected with a communicable skin infection (e.g., shingles or methicillin-resistant S. aureus), which does not include local and minimally pathogenic or non-pathogenic infections distant from the imaging location(s) (e.g., warts, acne)
  3. Any known allergies to any materials used in the preparation of skin and/or device use
  4. Has a temporary or permanent electrical implanted medical device

    -

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
122 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Single Arm

    Device: VIO System

Interventions

  • DeviceVIO System

    To investigate the potential for the VIO System to display microscopic skin structure in people of different age, sex, race, and skin health

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. VIO System Imaging Performance

    Quantify imaging performance in various types of skin, which may include estimated in vivo resolution and imaging depth. Various types of skin includes skin of different people as well as skin in different locations on the body, and skin with skin disease, including basal cell carcinoma. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device imaging performance (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through engineering expert review of VIO images. The engineering expert review determined whether images were of consistent quality.

    Time frame: 3 hours

  2. VIO System Image Quality

    Qualitatively evaluate image quality and interpretability by physicians trained in dermatopathology as a function of skin type. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device image quality (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through clinical expert review of VIO images. The clinical expert review determined whether VIO images could be interpreted by physicians trained in dermatopathology.

    Time frame: 3 hours

07

Results

Posted Jan 30, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneVIO Imaging
Started122
Completed122
Not completed0

Outcome measures

PrimaryVIO System Imaging Performance

Quantify imaging performance in various types of skin, which may include estimated in vivo resolution and imaging depth. Various types of skin includes skin of different people as well as skin in different locations on the body, and skin with skin disease, including basal cell carcinoma. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device imaging performance (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through engineering expert review of VIO images. The engineering expert review determined whether images were of consistent quality.

Time frame:
3 hours
Reported as:
Number · # participants with acceptable images
VIO System Imaging Performance
# participants with acceptable imagesVIO Imaging
VIO System Imaging Performance122
PrimaryVIO System Image Quality

Qualitatively evaluate image quality and interpretability by physicians trained in dermatopathology as a function of skin type. VIO System device design characteristics were iterated during the study to optimize image quality across subjects with various skin types, body locations, and skin disease states. The outcome measure of device image quality (acceptable/not acceptable) was assessed through clinical expert review of VIO images. The clinical expert review determined whether VIO images could be interpreted by physicians trained in dermatopathology.

Time frame:
3 hours
Reported as:
Number · # participants with acceptable images
VIO System Image Quality
# participants with acceptable imagesVIO Imaging
VIO System Image Quality122

Adverse events

Collected over 1 week. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
VIO Imaging0/122 (0%)0/122 (0%)0/122 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)VIO Imaging
Mean47 ± 19
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)VIO Imaging
Female47
Male75
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VIO Imaging
Hispanic or Latino10
Not Hispanic or Latino111
Unknown or Not Reported1
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)VIO Imaging
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian20
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American8
White84
More than one race9
Unknown or Not Reported1
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)VIO Imaging
United States122
Fitzpatrick Skin Type
Fitzpatrick Skin Type(Participants)VIO Imaging
Type I6
Type II30
Type III46
Type IV25
Type V5
Type VI1
Unknown9
Skin Health
Skin Health(Participants)VIO Imaging
Healthy90
Suspected or known skin diseases32
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Enspectra Health
    Mountain View, California 94040, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Ward WH, Farma JM, editors. Cutaneous Melanoma: Etiology and Therapy [Internet]. Brisbane (AU): Codon Publications; 2017 Dec 21. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK481860/ PubMed 29461771 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 30, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05410964
Lead sponsor
Enspectra Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2022
Start date
Mar 28, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 29, 2022
Completion
Aug 6, 2022
Results posted
Jan 30, 2024
Last update
Jan 30, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion