ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05407805Updated Jun 10, 2026Results posted

A Study to Learn About Sickle Cell Disease In Adult Patients

An observational study in Sickle Cell Disease, sponsored by Pfizer. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-10.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
98
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the performance of the sickle cell disease (SCD) electronic diary in people with SCD who are on treatment that will change SCD and those not on such a treatment.

SCD is a type of condition when there are fewer red blood cells to carry oxygen around the body.

This disease can be passed on from parent to child and may cause pain, infections and damage to organs.

This study is seeking participants who:

  • are confirmed with SCD
  • are on a stable regimen of disease changing treatment or have not received any disease changing treatment before the start of the study and do not plan any changes in their treatment during the 6-month study observation period For 6 months, participants will be asked to complete a daily electronic diary to report on their experience in the past 24 hours with sickle cell pain crisis (if they got any treatment and what medications they took), worst pain, worst tiredness, and their ability to perform usual physical activities. We will compare the experiences of people who are taking SCD-modifying therapy to those that are not taking a SCD-modifying therapy.
02

Conditions studied

  • Sickle Cell Disease

Keywords

  • Vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC)
  • Hemoglobin S (HbS)
03

In context

Anemia, Sickle Cell

1,134 studies on the registry are indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 98 is close to the median of 100 across 296 observational studies indexed under Anemia, Sickle Cell.

Browse Anemia, Sickle Cell studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,334 studies on the registry; 149 are open to participants now.

Of its 601 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 391 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants with a confirmed diagnosis of stable Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) (hemoglobin S inherited from both parents [HbS/S] or hemoglobin S inherited from one parent and hemoglobin beta thalassemia inherited from the other parent [HbS/beta-zero-thalassemia] genotype) who are either not on disease modifying treatment or on a stable dose of a SCD disease modifying treatment regimen.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- Confirmed diagnosis of stable SCD (HbS/S or HbS/beta-zero-thalassemia).

Additional Inclusion Criteria (No Disease Modifying Treatment Control Group):

  • Have experienced ≥1 episode(s) of medical utilization (MU) VOC within 12 months prior to Screening.
  • Data available for number of MU VOC(s) during the 12-month interval prior to Screening and a value for %fetal (HbF) collected subsequent to 1 year of age in the absence of recent transfusion.

Additional Inclusion Criteria (SCD Disease Modifying Treatment Group):

  • Have experienced ≥1 episode(s) of MU VOC within 12 months prior to initiation of HU and/or crizanlizumab (whichever was initiated earlier).
  • Must be on a stable dose of their SCD treatment regimen ≥8 weeks prior to Day 1 with the intent of remaining on the same dose throughout the study, unless adjustments are medically necessary due to bone marrow suppression, in accordance with published guidelines and/or product specific guidance (eg, package label). Accepted SCD disease modifying treatment regimens include:

    • HU alone and/or in combination with crizanlizumab, L-glutamine and/or voxelotor; or
    • Crizanlizumab alone and/or in combination with HU, L-glutamine and/or voxelotor.
  • Data available for number of MU VOC(s) during the 12-month interval prior to initiation of any SCD disease modifying treatment, as described above, and a value for %HbF collected subsequent to 1 year of age, prior to initiation of any HU treatment, and in the absence of recent transfusion.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria (All Groups):

  • Evidence or history of ongoing (condition or sequelae) hematological (non-SCD), renal, endocrine, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular (including overt stroke but excluding silent cerebral infarct), hepatic (excluding cholelithiasis), psychiatric or neurological disease as assessed from medical records.
  • Marked ongoing bone marrow suppression as evidenced by any of the following as per medical record: severe anemia, (ANC) \<1000 mm3 white blood cell (WBC), thrombocytopenia ( count \<100,000 mm3) within ≤8 weeks prior to Day 1 enrollment.
  • History of hematopoietic stem cell transplant or treatment with gene therapy as assessed from medical records.
  • History of simple transfusion within ≤4 weeks prior to Day 1 enrollment as assessed from medical records or participant self-report.
  • History of chronic transfusion/exchange transfusion within ≤12 weeks prior to Day 1 enrollment as assessed from medical records or participant self-report and/or plan to initiate such treatment during the 6-month observation period.

Additional Exclusion Criteria (No Disease Modifying Treatment Control Group):

  • Participant received HU and/or crizanlizumab at any time within ≤18 months of Day 1 enrollment and treatment(s) was discontinued due to lack of efficacy (no reduction in the frequency of VOCs, documented or perceived) and/or plan to initiate said treatment(s) during the 6-month observation period.
  • Participant received voxelotor or L-glutamine within ≤4 weeks of Day 1 enrollment and/or plan to initiate said treatment(s) during the 6-month observation period.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Absolute neutrophil count (ANC)

The number of neutrophils, white blood cells that help fight infection, in a given amount of blood. Too few raises the risk of infection.

It is a count, not a percentage of the white cells. Limits are written in units that mean the same: ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L is ≥ 1,500 per mm³ (µL). Each lab has its own reference range.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
98 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Control Group

    SCD participants not on disease modifying treatment.

    Other: Electronic Diary

  • SCD Disease Modifying Treatment Group

    SCD participants on a stable dose of a SCD disease modifying treatment regimen.

    Other: Electronic Diary

Interventions

  • OtherElectronic Diary

    Participants will be asked to complete a daily electronic patient reported outcome diary entry to report on their experience in the past 24 hours.

    Also known as: SCD electronic patient reported outcome (ePRO)

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physician-reported Medical Utilization (MU) Vaso-occlusive Crisis (VOC) Rate

    Physician-reported MU VOC: defined as an acute episode of pain with no other cause other than a VOC event that required a medical facility visit or contact with a health care professional and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, and priapism (requiring a visit to a medical facility) were also considered MU VOC. Contact with healthcare professional included: called healthcare provider (or telemedicine visit) and received treatment, went to clinic and received treatment, went to emergency department and received treatment, admitted to the hospital and received treatment. VOC rate was derived as annualized rate. Annualized MU VOC rate = (Number of MU VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  2. VOC Day Rate

    A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was a self-report by the participant of experiencing a VOC during the past 24 hours. This was assessed through a dichotomous (Yes/No) item on the SCD ePRO system, "Did you have a pain crisis in the past 24 hours?" A response of "Yes" indicated a VOC day. VOC day rate was derived as annualized rate. VOC day rate = (Number of VOC days \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  3. Patient-reported VOC Event Rate

    A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. Patient reported VOC Event is used to define a sequence of VOC days that could also include single intervening days with no pain crisis. The subsequent occurrence of two consecutive days with no pain crisis operationally defines the end of the respective VOC event. Rate were derived as annualized rate. Annualized VOC event rate = (Number of VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  4. Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) Daily Worst Pain Scores by VOC Status

    A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. Participants rated their pain by selecting the one number that best described their pain at its worst in the past 24 hours from 0-10, where 0= no pain and 10= as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  5. Sickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Worst Tiredness Scores by VOC Status

    A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. Participants rated their tiredness by selecting the one number that best described their tiredness at its worst in the past 24 hours from 0-10, where 0= no tiredness and 10= as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worse tiredness. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  6. Sickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Rating for Ability to Perform Usual Physical Activity (UPA) by VOC Status

    A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. A measure of participant's ability to perform their UPA (e.g. walking, climbing stairs, or household chores) during a VOC event was assessed on SCD ePRO recorded by participants using a scale ranging from 1-4 scale, where 1= able to perform with no difficulty and 4= unable to perform usual physical activities, where higher score indicated worse status. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in VOC Day Rate

    MU VOC: acute episode of pain with no other cause other than VOC event that required medical facility visit/contact with health care professional and treatment with oral/parenteral narcotics/NSAIDs. Acute chest syndrome,hepatic/splenic sequestration, priapism also considered MU VOC. MU VOC derived as annualized rate by:(Number of MU VOC events\*365)/(number of days in observation period). VOC day rate: VOC day was self-report by participant experiencing VOC during past 24 hours. It was assessed by dichotomous (Yes/No) item on SCD ePRO system, "Did you have pain crisis in past 24 hours?" Response "Yes" indicated VOC day. VOC day rate derived as annualized rate by: (Number of VOC days\*365)/(number of days in observation period). Parameter of interest was % change of MU VOC rate per unit of change in VOC Day rate. It was estimated via Negative Binomial model to evaluate association between physician-reported MU VOC rate and SCD ePRO VOC Day rate and was reported with corresponding 95% CI.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

  2. Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in Patient-reported VOC Event Rate

    MU VOC: acute episode of pain with no other cause other than VOC event that required medical facility visit/contact with health care professional and treatment with oral/parenteral narcotics/NSAIDs. Acute chest syndrome, hepatic/splenic sequestration, priapism also considered MU VOC. MU VOC derived as annualized rate by:(Number of MU VOC events\*365)/(number of days in observation period). VOC Event rate: Patient-reported VOC Event is used to define a sequence of VOC days. The subsequent occurrence of two consecutive days with no pain crisis operationally defines the end of the respective VOC event. Rate were derived as annualized rate by: (Number of VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period). Parameter of interest was % change of MU VOC rate per unit of change in VOC Event rate. It was estimated via Negative Binomial model to evaluate association between physician-reported MU VOC rate and SCD ePRO VOC Event rate and was reported with corresponding 95% CI.

    Time frame: Baseline up to Day 180

07

Results

Posted Jun 10, 2026

Participant flow

Participants with stable sickle cell disease (SCD) (hemoglobin S inherited from both parents \[HbS/S\] or hemoglobin S inherited from one parent and hemoglobin beta thalassemia inherited from the other parent \[HbS/beta-zero-thalassemia\] genotype) were enrolled in two concurrent groups and were observed for 6 months in this study. This was an observational study, and under this study no therapeutic study interventions were administered.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Started3365
Evaluable analysis population3265
Completed3264
Not completed11
Withdrew: Adverse event10
Withdrew: Protocol violation01

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhysician-reported Medical Utilization (MU) Vaso-occlusive Crisis (VOC) Rate

Physician-reported MU VOC: defined as an acute episode of pain with no other cause other than a VOC event that required a medical facility visit or contact with a health care professional and treatment with oral or parenteral narcotics, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Acute chest syndrome, hepatic sequestration, splenic sequestration, and priapism (requiring a visit to a medical facility) were also considered MU VOC. Contact with healthcare professional included: called healthcare provider (or telemedicine visit) and received treatment, went to clinic and received treatment, went to emergency department and received treatment, admitted to the hospital and received treatment. VOC rate was derived as annualized rate. Annualized MU VOC rate = (Number of MU VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Median · Events per year
Physician-reported Medical Utilization (MU) Vaso-occlusive Crisis (VOC) Rate
Events per yearControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Physician-reported Medical Utilization (MU) Vaso-occlusive Crisis (VOC) Rate2.02 (0.00 to 58.60)2.02 (0.00 to 60.55)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test · p = =0.731 · Median difference (final values): 0 · 80% CI -2.0 to 0.0Hodges-Lehmann estimator with corresponding 80% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for difference between treatment groups.
PrimaryVOC Day Rate

A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was a self-report by the participant of experiencing a VOC during the past 24 hours. This was assessed through a dichotomous (Yes/No) item on the SCD ePRO system, "Did you have a pain crisis in the past 24 hours?" A response of "Yes" indicated a VOC day. VOC day rate was derived as annualized rate. VOC day rate = (Number of VOC days \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Mean · Days per year
VOC Day Rate
Days per yearControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
VOC Day Rate112.79 (70.06 to 181.59)85.06 (52.63 to 137.46)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Negative Binomial regression · p = =0.4134 · Percent reduction in mean voc rate: 0.75 · 95% CI 0.38 to 1.48Percent rate reduction with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated based on Negative binomial model.
PrimaryPatient-reported VOC Event Rate

A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. Patient reported VOC Event is used to define a sequence of VOC days that could also include single intervening days with no pain crisis. The subsequent occurrence of two consecutive days with no pain crisis operationally defines the end of the respective VOC event. Rate were derived as annualized rate. Annualized VOC event rate = (Number of VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period).

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Mean · Events per year
Patient-reported VOC Event Rate
Events per yearControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Patient-reported VOC Event Rate16.22 (11.38 to 23.12)22.63 (15.80 to 32.43)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Negative Binomial regression · p = =0.1958 · Percent reduction in mean voc event rate: 1.4 · 95% CI 0.84 to 2.31Percent rate reduction with corresponding 95% CIs were calculated based on Negative binomial model.
PrimarySickle Cell Disease (SCD) Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) Daily Worst Pain Scores by VOC Status

A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. Participants rated their pain by selecting the one number that best described their pain at its worst in the past 24 hours from 0-10, where 0= no pain and 10= as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worse pain. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) Electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) Daily Worst Pain Scores by VOC Status
Score on a scaleControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
VOC State6.0 (5.1 to 6.9)6.4 (5.6 to 7.3)
Non-VOC State2.4 (1.6 to 3.3)2.9 (2.0 to 3.8)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.4951 · Ls mean difference: 0.4 · 95% CI -0.8 to 1.7
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.4314 · Ls mean difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -0.7 to 1.7
PrimarySickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Worst Tiredness Scores by VOC Status

A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. Participants rated their tiredness by selecting the one number that best described their tiredness at its worst in the past 24 hours from 0-10, where 0= no tiredness and 10= as bad as you can imagine. Higher scores indicated worse tiredness. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Sickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Worst Tiredness Scores by VOC Status
Score on a scaleControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
VOC State5.0 (4.1 to 6.0)5.6 (4.7 to 6.5)
Non-VOC State3.4 (2.5 to 4.3)3.5 (2.6 to 4.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.4143 · Ls mean difference: 0.5 · 95% CI -0.8 to 1.8
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.8262 · Ls mean difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -1.1 to 1.4
PrimarySickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Rating for Ability to Perform Usual Physical Activity (UPA) by VOC Status

A VOC was a complication of SCD characterized by vaso-occlusion presenting as recurrent pain episodes. VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant self-reports sickle pain crisis that was recorded in the SCD ePRO. A non-VOC day was defined as the day on which a SCD participant does not self-reports sickle pain crisis. A measure of participant's ability to perform their UPA (e.g. walking, climbing stairs, or household chores) during a VOC event was assessed on SCD ePRO recorded by participants using a scale ranging from 1-4 scale, where 1= able to perform with no difficulty and 4= unable to perform usual physical activities, where higher score indicated worse status. Data in this outcome measure was presented separately for VOC state and non-VOC state.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Least squares mean · Score on a scale
Sickle Cell Disease Electronic Patient Reported Outcome Daily Rating for Ability to Perform Usual Physical Activity (UPA) by VOC Status
Score on a scaleControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
VOC State2.3 (2.1 to 2.4)2.4 (2.3 to 2.6)
Non-VOC State1.3 (1.1 to 1.4)1.4 (1.2 to 1.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.1319 · Ls mean difference: 0.2 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.4
  • Control Group vs Disease-Modifying Treatment Group · Mixed effects regression model · p = =0.3335 · Ls mean difference: 0.1 · 95% CI -0.1 to 0.3
SecondaryPercent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in VOC Day Rate

MU VOC: acute episode of pain with no other cause other than VOC event that required medical facility visit/contact with health care professional and treatment with oral/parenteral narcotics/NSAIDs. Acute chest syndrome,hepatic/splenic sequestration, priapism also considered MU VOC. MU VOC derived as annualized rate by:(Number of MU VOC events\*365)/(number of days in observation period). VOC day rate: VOC day was self-report by participant experiencing VOC during past 24 hours. It was assessed by dichotomous (Yes/No) item on SCD ePRO system, "Did you have pain crisis in past 24 hours?" Response "Yes" indicated VOC day. VOC day rate derived as annualized rate by: (Number of VOC days\*365)/(number of days in observation period). Parameter of interest was % change of MU VOC rate per unit of change in VOC Day rate. It was estimated via Negative Binomial model to evaluate association between physician-reported MU VOC rate and SCD ePRO VOC Day rate and was reported with corresponding 95% CI.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Number · Percent change
Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in VOC Day Rate
Percent changeControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in VOC Day Rate2.49872.5941
SecondaryPercent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in Patient-reported VOC Event Rate

MU VOC: acute episode of pain with no other cause other than VOC event that required medical facility visit/contact with health care professional and treatment with oral/parenteral narcotics/NSAIDs. Acute chest syndrome, hepatic/splenic sequestration, priapism also considered MU VOC. MU VOC derived as annualized rate by:(Number of MU VOC events\*365)/(number of days in observation period). VOC Event rate: Patient-reported VOC Event is used to define a sequence of VOC days. The subsequent occurrence of two consecutive days with no pain crisis operationally defines the end of the respective VOC event. Rate were derived as annualized rate by: (Number of VOC events \* 365)/ (number of days in the observation period). Parameter of interest was % change of MU VOC rate per unit of change in VOC Event rate. It was estimated via Negative Binomial model to evaluate association between physician-reported MU VOC rate and SCD ePRO VOC Event rate and was reported with corresponding 95% CI.

Time frame:
Baseline up to Day 180
Reported as:
Number · Percent change
Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in Patient-reported VOC Event Rate
Percent changeControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Percent Change in Physician-reported MU VOC Rate Per Unit of Change in Patient-reported VOC Event Rate1.45297.3506

Adverse events

Collected over Day 1 up to Day 180. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Group0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)0/32 (0%)
Disease-Modifying Treatment Group0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)1/65 (1.5%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControl GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment Group
Procedural painInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/321/65

Baseline characteristics

Evaluable Analysis population included all participants who signed the informed consent document and met the eligibility criteria.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Control GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years326395
>=65 years022
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment GroupTotal
Female263965
Male62632
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment GroupTotal
Hispanic or Latino134
Not Hispanic or Latino234366
Unknown or Not Reported81927
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control GroupDisease-Modifying Treatment GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American316293
White011
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported123
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Foundation for Sickle Cell Disease Research
    Hollywood, Florida 33024, United States
  • Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group Largo Medical Center
    Upper Marlboro, Maryland 20774, United States
  • Sanguine Biosciences, Inc.
    Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
  • Cohen Children's Medical Center
    New Hyde Park, New York 11040, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05407805
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2022
Start date
Feb 10, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 24, 2024
Completion
Jun 24, 2024
Results posted
Jun 10, 2026
Last update
Jun 10, 2026

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion