CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05405127Updated Jun 6, 2022

Breathing and Core Stability Exercise Effects on Lumbopelvic Pain

An interventional study of traditional physical therapy and core stability exercises in Breathing Sound, Low Back Pain and Post-operative Pain, sponsored by Riphah International University. Status unknown at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to female participants aged 25 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-06.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Lumbopelvic pain refers to self-reported pain in areas of lower region, anterior and posterior pelvic tilt or combination of these. Physical therapy interventions used are breathing exercises with and without core stability exercises. Tool used were Pain Pressure Algometer and Oswestry Disability Index.

Read the detailed description

Lumbopelvic pain is self-reported pain. It is common complaint for women after labour, and it is found that 25% of newly delivered women experienced low back and pelvic pain. Different interventions have been used to reduce the lumbopelvic pain in general including exercises, drugs, therapies and massage. An increasingly common approach used within physical therapy management are breathing exercises and core stabilization exercises. This study will used to compare the effects of breathing exercises with and without core stability exercise. Pre-assessment will be done using oswestry disability index as subjective measurement and pain pressure algometer as objective measure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breathing Sound
  • Low Back Pain
  • Post-operative Pain
  • Pelvic Pain

Keywords

  • breathing exercises
  • low back pain
  • post-partum pain
  • lumbopelvic pain
03

In context

Respiratory Aspiration

1,092 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Aspiration; 216 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is close to the median of 42 across 881 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Aspiration.

Browse Respiratory Aspiration studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Women had parity (2-4) times
  • Body mass index that did not exceed 30 Kg/m
  • Lumbopelvic pain at least three months until one year postpartum

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • They were pregnant
  • Had systemic inflammatory diseases
  • Prolapsed disc
  • Neuromuscular disorder
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Traditional physical therapy

    breathing exercises

    Other: traditional physical therapy

  • Experimental
    Core stability exercise

    core stability exercise along with breathing exercises and pain pressure algometer is used

    Other: core stability exercises

Interventions

  • Othertraditional physical therapy

    breathing exercises 10 repetitions, 1set, 3 days/week and targeted abdominal muscles. Total 6 sessions were given each consisting of 30 minutes.

  • Othercore stability exercises

    core stability along with breathing exercise 10 repetitions, 1set, 3 days/week and targeted core muscles. Total 6 sessions were given consisting of 30 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Oswestry disability index

    Changes from base line Oswestry disability index was developed first by Fairbank et al. It was designed to measure the back pain and disability over time. It consists of 10, five parts sections. At the end, score is calculated by dividing the obtained score by total (50) multiplied by 100. As the driving section in all the female patients, total score was considered as 45 instead of 50.

    Time frame: 6th week

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Pressure Algometer

    Changes from base line Pain Pressure Algometer was developed first by Baba et al. The pressure algometer has linear response to force application between 0 and 1,300 kilopascal.

    Time frame: 6th week

  2. ROM Back region (flexion)

    Changes from the Baseline ROM range of motion of back region flexion was taken.

    Time frame: 6th week

  3. ROM Back region (extension)

    Changes from the baseline ROM range of motion of back region extension was taken.

    Time frame: 6th week

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Services Hospital
    Lahore, Punjab 54660, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bergstrom C, Persson M, Nergard KA, Mogren I. Prevalence and predictors of persistent pelvic girdle pain 12 years postpartum. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Sep 16;18(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1760-5. PubMed 28915804 ↗
  • Stuber KJ, Wynd S, Weis CA. Adverse events from spinal manipulation in the pregnant and postpartum periods: a critical review of the literature. Chiropr Man Therap. 2012 Mar 28;20:8. doi: 10.1186/2045-709X-20-8. PubMed 22455720 ↗
  • Gutke A, Lundberg M, Ostgaard HC, Oberg B. Impact of postpartum lumbopelvic pain on disability, pain intensity, health-related quality of life, activity level, kinesiophobia, and depressive symptoms. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):440-8. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1487-6. Epub 2010 Jul 1. PubMed 20593205 ↗
  • Robinson HS, Vollestad NK, Veierod MB. Clinical course of pelvic girdle pain postpartum - impact of clinical findings in late pregnancy. Man Ther. 2014 Jun;19(3):190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Jan 22. PubMed 24508067 ↗
  • Malmqvist S, Kjaermann I, Andersen K, Okland I, Bronnick K, Larsen JP. Prevalence of low back and pelvic pain during pregnancy in a Norwegian population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2012 May;35(4):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2012.04.004. PubMed 22632586 ↗
  • O'Sullivan PB, Beales DJ. Diagnosis and classification of pelvic girdle pain disorders--Part 1: a mechanism based approach within a biopsychosocial framework. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):86-97. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2007.02.001. PubMed 17449432 ↗
  • Vermani E, Mittal R, Weeks A. Pelvic girdle pain and low back pain in pregnancy: a review. Pain Pract. 2010 Jan-Feb;10(1):60-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2009.00327.x. Epub 2010 Oct 26. PubMed 19863747 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05405127
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 6, 2022
Start date
May 30, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 6, 2022

Study contacts

Imran Amjad, Phd
Contact
imran.amjad@riphah.edu.pk
03324390125
Hafiza Mehjabeen, MSWHPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion