CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05404685P-NeLoPUpdated Jun 13, 2025

Partial Nephrectomy in Low Pressure

An interventional study of Low insufflation pressure (7mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Standard insufflation pressure (12mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy in Kidney Tumors Treated With Minimally Invasive Surgery, sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux. Completed at 15 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-06-13.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Bordeaux · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
280
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective is to prospectively assess the impact of low insufflation pressure using AirSeal system (7mm Hg) during RAPN on post-operative patient pain (main location and intensity), 24 hours after surgery. The study will be conducted among 15 centers of the French research network on kidney cancer UroCCR.

Read the detailed description

Minimally invasive route for PN is recommended to offer patients ERAS and day-case pathways leading to the best possible recovery. In this setting, pain management is crucial and every innovation supposed to offer a benefit has to be assessed. For transperitoneal laparoscopic procedures, the level and stability of the insufflation pressure will influence the quality of the pneumoperitoneum and may impact the feasibility of the surgery as well as intra and post-operative outcomes. It is universally recognized that the lower insufflation pressure, the better. However, a balance has usually to be found between technical feasibility of the surgery and lowest acceptable insufflation pressure. The AirSeal system aims to generate a stable pneumoperitoneum even in case of active gaz succion by the surgeon's assistant. The investigators then hypothesize that RAPN would be feasible and safe even in low pressure (7mm Hg) and may decrease post-operative patients' pain.

The investigators plan to describe the feasibility of Low Pressure RAPN at 7mm Hg (LP-RAPN) and assess its intra and post-operative outcomes including pain and recovery on a patient perspective. This will be achieved comparatively to RAPN performed at standard insufflation pressure of 12 mm Hg and through a single blinded randomized trial design.

The project has been developed and will be conducted within the framework of the French research network on kidney cancer UroCCR (www.uroccr.fr). INCa has been supporting this multidisciplinary network since 2011 and the web-based shared clinical and biological national database on kidney cancer UroCCR will be used.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Tumors Treated With Minimally Invasive Surgery

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • kidney cancer
  • kidney tumor
  • robotic surgery
  • urology
03

In context

Kidney Neoplasms

956 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Neoplasms; 210 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 280 is above the median of 43 across 650 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Neoplasms.

Browse Kidney Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Bordeaux is the lead sponsor of 783 studies on the registry; 188 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female aged of 18 and over
  • Planned transperitoneal RAPN for tumor with AirSeal system.
  • Affiliation to or beneficiary of the French social security
  • Patient in capacity and willing to accurately report pain-killer intakes in the first postoperative 7 days.
  • Free, informed and written consent signed by the patient and the investigating physician (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required by the research).

Exclusion criteria:

  • Daily chronic pain-killers intake for another indication than the kidney tumor and intended to be maintained at the time of surgery
  • Person deprived of liberty
  • Person under trusteeship, curatorship or legal guardianship
  • Refusal of consent or participation in the UroCCR project and the P-NeLoP ancillary trial

Exclusion Criteria:

-

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
280 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transperitoneal RAPN with AirSeal system set to 7mmH.

    Patient with Low Pressure Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy at 7mm Hg

    Device: Low insufflation pressure (7mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

  • Active comparator
    transperitoneal RAPN with AirSeal system set to standard insufflation pressure (12mmHg)

    Control arm : Patient with standard insufflation pressure of 12 mm Hg

    Device: Standard insufflation pressure (12mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

Interventions

  • DeviceLow insufflation pressure (7mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

    Use of insufflation pressure at 7 mm Hg. The groups will differ only with respect to the insufflation pressure level set on the AirSeal® system. The level of pressure will be adjusted at the beginning of the surgery, after placement of the trocars, in accordance with the result of the randomization.

  • DeviceStandard insufflation pressure (12mm Hg) for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

    Use of insufflation pressure at 12 mm Hg. The groups will differ only with respect to the insufflation pressure level set on the AirSeal® system. The level of pressure will be adjusted at the beginning of the surgery, after placement of the trocars, in accordance with the result of the randomization.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Intensity of post-operative pain

    intensity of pain measured by a numeric analogic scale (between 0 and 10)

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of clamp procedures.

    Determination of the number of off-clamp procedures and the number of on-clamp procedures (type and length of clamping)

    Time frame: at surgery

  2. Main location and intensity of post-operative pain.

    Determination of main location and intensity (visual analogic scale) of post operative pain (minimum=0 correspond to worse outcome; maximum =10 correspond to better outcome)

    Time frame: 6 hours and 48 hours after surgery

  3. Length of surgery

    determination of length of surgery in minutes

    Time frame: up to 30 Days

  4. Estimated blood loss and intra-operative transfusion

    Estimated blood loss (mL) and intra-operative transfusion

    Time frame: at surgery

Other outcomes

  1. Plateau Pressure and PETCO2 60 minutes after incision

    Time frame: at surgery

  2. Length of Hospital stay (days)

    Determination of Length of Hospital stay (days)

    Time frame: up to 30 days after surgery

  3. Number and Clavien-Dindo classification of intra and post-operative complications up to 30 days after surgery

    Time frame: up to 30 days after surgery

  4. Pain-killer intake scoring during the first post-operative week (7days)

    Time frame: up to 7 days after surgery

  5. Minutes between end of surgery and first time out of bed

    Time frame: up to Day 2

  6. Minutes between end of surgery and resumption of feeding

    Time frame: up to Day 2 after surgery

  7. Minutes between end of surgery and resumption of bowel function (stools)

    Time frame: up to day 7 after surgery

  8. Cost difference between the two arms (€)

    Time frame: at surgery

  9. Minutes between end of surgery and resumption of bowel function (gaz)

    Time frame: up to day 2 after surgery

07

Study locations

15 sites
  • CHU d'Angers
    Angers, 49933, France
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux
    Bordeaux, France
  • CHU de Caen
    Caen, 14033, France
  • Hopital Henri-Mondor
    Créteil, 94010, France
  • Hôpital Claude Huriez
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Institut Paoli-Calmettes
    Marseille, 13009, France
  • CHU de Nice
    Nice, 06001, France
  • Hôpital Pitié-Salpétrière
    Paris, 75011, France
  • Hôpital bicêtre
    Paris, 94270, France
  • CHU de Poitiers
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Polyclinique Francheville Périgueux
    Périgueux, 24000, France
  • Clinique La Croix du Sud
    Quint-Fonsegrives, 31130, France
  • CHU de Rennes
    Rennes, 35033, France
  • CHRU de Strasbourg
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • CHU de Tours
    Tours, 37044, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 13, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05404685
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2022
Start date
Oct 4, 2022
Primary completion
Apr 29, 2024
Completion
Apr 29, 2024
Last update
Jun 13, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion