CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05390034REFLEXUpdated Nov 7, 2022

Improving Emotion Regulation Flexibility: Testing the Efficacy of an Emotion Regulation Program in College Students

An interventional study of ART and Relaxation in Anxiety Depression and Emotion Regulation, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Status unknown at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-11-07.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Mar 2022), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
94
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The main objective of this RCT is to test the efficacy of an emotion regulation group program (i.e., ART program) in college students, compared to an active control group (i.e., relaxation program). Using multilevel analyses, we expect an improvement in anxious-depressive symptomatology for both groups. However, we expect the ART group to improve specifically on emotion regulation flexibility ability, and the last to be a mediative variable on mental health.

Read the detailed description

Emotion regulation (ER) is a process associated with difficulties in mental health. Given its transdiagnostic features, its improvement could facilitate the recovery of various psychological issues. A limit of current studies is the lack of knowledge regarding whether available interventions improve ER flexibility (i.e., the ability to implement ER strategies in line with contextual demands), even though this capacity has been associated with better mental health and well-being. Therefore, the aim of the study is to test the efficacy of a 9-weeks ER group program (the Affect Regulation Training-ART), using the most appropriate measures (i.e., experience sampling method) in a student population. Plus, the goal of the study is to explore the potential mediative role of ER flexibility on mental health improvement.

This RCT will compare the ART program group to an active control group (a relaxation program) in 100 participants. To test the mediative role of ER flexibility on mental health, daily measures will be used before, during, and after the interventions to evaluate the extent to which participants are flexible in their ER.

Using multilevel analyses, we expect an improvement in anxious-depressive symptomatology for both groups. However, we expect the ART group to improve specifically on ER flexibility ability, and the last to be a mediative variable on mental health.

This study will enhance knowledge on interventions for students and the impact of interventions on ER flexibility. Also, this research will improve knowledge on ecological measures for assessing the effect of interventions. Overall, this project represents new opportunities to improve ER skills to improve mental health in undergraduate students.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anxiety Depression
  • Emotion Regulation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • emotion regulation flexibility
  • randomized controlled trial
  • experience sampling method
  • daily measures
  • emotion regulation program
03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 94 is above the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 815 studies on the registry; 205 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Grenoble Alpes University student
  • Having a smartphone that can host PIEL application
  • BDI ≥ 10 and ≤ 30
  • Reading, understanding, and speaking French
  • Signed free and informed consent

Non inclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another study related to emotion regulation
  • Participation in other psychotherapies involving cognitive and behavioral intervention (actual or in the past year)
  • Changes in drug treatments in the last two months
  • Student in psychology
  • Individuals concerned in the articles L1121-6 à L1121-8 of CSP (i.e., protected individuals)
  • Suicidal risk (BDI II, item suicidal thoughts > 1 or MINI suicide, low intensity)
  • Anorexia nervose (MINI)
  • Schizophrenic spectrum disorder (MINI)
  • Substance abuse (heroin, cocaine, ecstasy) (MINI)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
94 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ART

    Developed by Berking and Whitley (Berking \& Whitley, 2014), this transdiagnostic program aims to improve general emotion regulation skills, and more specifically by increasing participants' emotion regulation flexibility. ART targets several skills, such as acceptance, tolerance, non-judgmental awareness, self-support, analysis of the causes of emotions and emotional modification. This intervention consists of 9 sessions (2 hours each), each of which starts with the presentation of a vicious circle for psycho-education. This vicious circle is then transformed into a virtuous circle by introducing an emotion regulation skill. Participants are invited to reflect, discuss and practice this skill. Exercises are also recommended at home, with the help of audios and a written workbook made available. All the material was translated into French for the purpose of this research.

    Behavioral: ART

  • Active comparator
    Relaxation

    The relaxation group will be based mainly on the intervention developed by Dominique Servant (Relaxation and meditation, 2021), adapted for this research for the group format and divided into 9 modules (2 hours each). This intervention proposes an added psycho-education part similar to the dedicated session of the ART program, followed by the teaching of different relaxation techniques to the participants, who are invited to test them in session and then to practice them at home. This control group focuses on a specific component present in the ART group (relaxation), allowing us to assess the impact of the other components of the ART program and thus explore our flexibility hypothesis (requiring several emotion regulation skills). Note that the mindfulness meditation components were removed from the program for this study, as they were considered a second emotion regulation skill.

    Behavioral: Relaxation

Interventions

  • BehavioralART

    Session 1: Description of the group \& Psychoeducation Session 2: Breathing and muscle relaxation Session 3: Importance of practice/motivation Session 4: Nonjudgemental awareness Session 5: Acceptance and tolerance Session 6: Self-support Session 7: Analysis of emotions Session 8: Modification of emotions Session 9: Practice and contextual applications + end of group

  • BehavioralRelaxation

    Session 1: Description of the groupe \& Psychoeducation Session 2: Breathing control 1 Session 3: Breathing control 2 Session 4: Muscle relaxation Session 5: Visualisation Session 6: Stretching Session 7: Schultz relaxation Session 8: Schultz relaxation Session 9: Summary and end of group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Emotion regulation

    Emotion Regulation Skills Questionnaire (score), higher scores mean better outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 108

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Depressive symptoms

    Beck Depressive Inventory Questionnaire (BDI-II) (score), higher scores mean worse outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 63

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  2. Change in Anxious symptoms

    Beck Anxiety Inventory Questionnaire (BAI) (score), higher scores mean worse outcome, value minimum of 0 maximum 63

    Time frame: 20 minutes

  3. Change in Daily Emotion regulation flexibility

    Experience sampling method using PIEL application (flexibility in emotion regulation strategies) - Questionnaire on smartphone (score aggregated with the 3 times of measurements)

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

Other outcomes

  1. Therapeutic alliance

    California Psychotherapy Alliance Scale - Control in the two groups - value minimum 24, maximum 168, higher scores mean better outcome

    Time frame: During the procedure/Immediately after the intervention

  2. Expectancies on treatment

    Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire - Control in the two groups, value minimum 4, maximum 36, higher scores mean better outcome

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. Changes in treatment

    Question on possible changes in psychological or drug treatment during intervention

    Time frame: During the procedure/Immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Berking M, Eichler E, Luhmann M, Diedrich A, Hiller W, Rief W. Affect regulation training reduces symptom severity in depression - A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019 Aug 29;14(8):e0220436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220436. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31465443 ↗
  • Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S. The influence of context on the implementation of adaptive emotion regulation strategies. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Aug;50(7-8):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 May 7. PubMed 22659159 ↗
  • Aldao A, Nolen-Hoeksema S, Schweizer S. Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;30(2):217-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Nov 20. PubMed 20015584 ↗
  • Csikszentmihalyi M, Larson R. Validity and reliability of the Experience-Sampling Method. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Sep;175(9):526-36. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198709000-00004. PubMed 3655778 ↗
  • Gross JJ. Emotion regulation: affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology. 2002 May;39(3):281-91. doi: 10.1017/s0048577201393198. PubMed 12212647 ↗
  • Kazdin AE. Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2007;3:1-27. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091432. PubMed 17716046 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Theoretical background, objectives, hypothesis, expected results, methodology

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Analytic code

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 7, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05390034
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
University Grenoble Alps
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 25, 2022
Start date
Sep 1, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2022
Completion
Dec 1, 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 7, 2022

Study contacts

Carla Nardelli, PhD student
Contact
carla.nardelli@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
+33682830595
Catherine Bortolon, Dr HDR
Contact
catherine.bortolon@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Mar 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion