ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05372224Updated Feb 17, 2023

Effect of Vitamin D and Denosumab on Bone Remodelling in Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

An interventional study of Cholecalciferol in Hypovitaminosis D, Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal and Menopause, sponsored by Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to female participants aged 45 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-02-17.

Sponsored by Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2020, registered May 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
55
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
45 Years to 89 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody against RANKL ligand, which is used as an alternative treatment for osteoporosis in patients who have a poor response to first-line antiresorptive therapy. However, discontinuation of denosumab produces a rapid increase in bone turnover, bone loss and potentially increased risk of multiple vertebral fractures.

Read the detailed description

76 postmenopausal women from the climacteric clinic of the regional hospital "1o de Octubre" of the Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE) were firstly considered, of which 23 presented elimination criteria and only 55 who had received denosumab therapy for an average of 2.5 years without a significant improvement in hip and lumbar spine T-scores were enrolled. First, a general medical evaluation was performed. Serum levels of vitamin D were analysed to find the prevalence of hypovitaminosis D. A bone mineral density test was done to calculate hip and lumbar spine T-scores. Then, vitamin D was administrated daily for one year at a dose of 4,000 IU and the studies were repeated after one year. Statistical analysis was performed using PAST 3.0 and GraphPad Prism 8.4.3. software. The arithmetic median (µ) and standard deviation (S.D.) were calculated using Excel-Word. Graphics were constructed with GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 and tables with Excel Word. Categorical variables were analysed with chi-squared or Fisher exact test depending on the number of participants in each cell. Normality was determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To compare two paired samples, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized. The assigned α value for this study was \<0.05. In all cases, if a Montecarlo permutation was available, the exact p-value was taken instead of the raw p-value.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypovitaminosis D
  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal
  • Menopause

Keywords

  • Vitamin D
  • Postmenopausal Osteoporosis
  • Denosumab
  • Hypovitaminosis D
  • Osteoporosis
  • Osteopenia
03

In context

Vitamin D Deficiency

801 studies on the registry are indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency; 60 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 55 is below the median of 78 across 590 interventional studies indexed under Vitamin D Deficiency.

Browse Vitamin D Deficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
45 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of osteoporosis or osteopenia in treatment with denosumab 60mg every six months plus calcium carbonate 1.2g/day + vitamin D 800IU/day.
  • Diagnosis of hypovitaminosis D, with serum cholecalciferol values \<30ng/dL.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete clinical records or clinical records.
  • Age over 90 years.
  • Diagnosis of secondary (hereditary) osteoporosis.
  • History of prolonged use of .
  • Lack of adherence to medical treatment.
  • Diagnosis of cancer.
  • Diagnosis of depression.
  • Diagnosis of Celiac disease or with the presence of alterations in intestinal absorption.
  • Allergies to any of the medications administered.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
55 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Vitamin D 4000 IU

    4000 IU of vitamin D were administrated once a day orally and calcium carbonate 1.2 g a day in a single dose.

    Drug: Cholecalciferol

Interventions

  • 4000 IU were administrated once a day for 3 months.

    Also known as: Histofil®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with hip T-score improvement at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants who improved their hip T-score at three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants with lumbar spine T-score improvement at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants who improved their lumbar spine T-score at three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of participants with osteoporosis of the hip at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score above -2.5 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  4. Number of participants with osteoporosis of the lumbar spine at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score greater than -2.5 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  5. Number of participants with osteopenia on the hip at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score from -1 to -2.4 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  6. Number of participants with osteopenia of the lumbar spine at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score from -1 to -2.4 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  7. Number of participants with normal hip T-score at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a hip T-score below -1 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  8. Number of participants with normal lumbar spine T-score at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants that present a lumbar spine T-score below -1 three months after treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  9. Number of participants with improvement in serum levels of vitamin D at 12 months

    Improvement in serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D \[25(OH)D\] was considered when serum vitamin D levels increased concerning baseline levels.

    Time frame: 12 months

  10. Number of participants with clinical remission of hypovitaminosis D at 12 months

    Remission of hypovitaminosis D was considered when serum levels of 25-hydroxy vitamin D \[25(OH)D\] were above 29 pg/ml.

    Time frame: 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of participants with vitamin D sufficiency at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D above 29 pg/ml after three months of treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  2. Number of participants with vitamin D insufficiency at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D of 21 to 29 pg/ml after three months of treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

  3. Number of participants with vitamin D deficiency at 12 months

    It refers to the number of participants who reached serum levels of vitamin D less than 20 pg/ml after three months of treatment.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Patricia Loranca-Moreno
    Mexico City, Gustavo A. Madero 07300, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tsourdi E, Langdahl B, Cohen-Solal M, Aubry-Rozier B, Eriksen EF, Guanabens N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Eastell R, Zillikens MC. Discontinuation of Denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: A systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone. 2017 Dec;105:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Aug 5. PubMed 28789921 ↗
  • McClung MR, Wagman RB, Miller PD, Wang A, Lewiecki EM. Observations following discontinuation of long-term denosumab therapy. Osteoporos Int. 2017 May;28(5):1723-1732. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-3919-1. Epub 2017 Jan 31. PubMed 28144701 ↗
  • Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster JY; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF). European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int. 2019 Jan;30(1):3-44. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4704-5. Epub 2018 Oct 15. Erratum In: Osteoporos Int. 2020 Jan;31(1):209. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05184-3. Osteoporos Int. 2020 Apr;31(4):801. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05303-5. PubMed 30324412 ↗
  • Miyoshi A, Kameda H, Nagai S, Nakamura A, Miya A, Takase T, Atsumi T, Miyoshi H. Beneficial effects of switching to denosumab from bisphosphonates or selective estrogen receptor modulators in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and osteopenia/osteoporosis. J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Jul;12(7):1293-1300. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13458. Epub 2020 Dec 13. PubMed 33141482 ↗
  • Saag KG, Petersen J, Brandi ML, Karaplis AC, Lorentzon M, Thomas T, Maddox J, Fan M, Meisner PD, Grauer A. Romosozumab or Alendronate for Fracture Prevention in Women with Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Oct 12;377(15):1417-1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. Epub 2017 Sep 11. PubMed 28892457 ↗
  • Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1914. PubMed 19671655 ↗
  • Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Soen S, Yamanaka H, Yoneda T, Tanaka S, Nitta T, Okubo N, Genant HK, van der Heijde D. Effects of the anti-RANKL antibody denosumab on joint structural damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DESIRABLE study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019 Jul;78(7):899-907. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214827. Epub 2019 Apr 29. PubMed 31036625 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05372224
Lead sponsor
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Collaborators
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 12, 2022
Start date
Jun 22, 2020
Primary completion
Jun 22, 2021
Completion
Jun 22, 2021
Last update
Feb 17, 2023

Study contacts

María B Brito-Gavilanes, M.D.
principal investigator · Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1 ISSSTE
Patricia Loranca-Moreno, M.D., M.Sc.
principal investigator · Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE.
Juan M Ocampo-Godínez, M.D., P.hD
principal investigator · Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, UNAM

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cholecalciferol

Start the discussion