ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05464654VABIPUpdated Apr 11, 2023

Vaginal Biorevitalization With Polydeoxyribonucleotides for the Improvement of the Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause

An interventional study of 3 g Polynucleotide vaginal suppositories and Conjugated estrogens cream 1g Tube in Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause, Postmenopausal Disorder and Menopause, sponsored by Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-04-11.

Sponsored by Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2021, registered Jul 2022).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 75 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of vaginal biorevitalization to improve the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) between the gold-standard treatment with local estrogen-based hormone therapy versus local salmon polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) therapy.

Read the detailed description

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of vaginal biorevitalization to improve the genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM) between the gold-standard treatment with local estrogen-based hormone therapy versus local salmon polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) therapy. Thus, a randomized clinical trial was conducted in 136 first-time postmenopausal women with GSM, from the "peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic" of the "Regional Hospital October 1st " of the "Institute of Security and Social Services for State Workers (ISSSTE)", from June 2021 to December 2021. Participants were referred by the family medicine service or by another service of the hospital. The control group (n=63) received local estrogen-based hormonal therapy, applied topically to the vagina mucosa on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of each week, for 3 months, while the experimental group (n=70) received local salmon PDRNs on vaginal suppositories, applied solely for six days every night in the first week. Then, experimental group participants were maintained without further treatment up to the control evaluation. The follow-up assessment was done after 3 months. The alterations in the urogenital domain of the MRS score (items 9-11), vaginal maturity index (VMI), vaginal pH, estrogenic effect, floor pelvic contraction capacity, as well as colposcopy findings, were the main outcomes of the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause
  • Postmenopausal Disorder
  • Menopause
  • Vagina Atrophy

Keywords

  • Polynucleotides
  • Genitourinary syndrome of menopause
  • Postmenopause
  • Vagina atrophy
  • Vaginal biorevitalization
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • First-time patients with the diagnosis of Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause with an MRS > 5 in the urogenital domain, with alterations in the vaginal maturity index (VMI).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Incomplete clinical records.
  • History of prolonged use of .
  • Use of alternative local therapies applied in the vagina's mucosa.
  • Use of local therapies with vaginal suppositories for any reason 15 days before the beginning of the study.
  • Clinical evidence of infectious cervical-vaginitis or vulvovaginitis.
  • Evidence of urinary tract infection (UTI).
  • Lack of adherence to medical treatment.
  • Diagnosis of cancer.
  • Diagnosis of depression.
  • Diagnosis of uncontrolled primary or secondary immunodeficiencies.
  • Allergies to any of the medications administered.
  • BIRADS >2 or high risk of developing breast cancer, ovarian cancer or endometrial cancer.
  • Use of oral hormonal or non-hormanl therapy.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
136 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Polynucleotide vaginal suppositories

    In this arm 72 first-time participants of the "peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic" of the "Regional Hospital October 1st " of ISSSTE Mexico, were randomly enrolled to be treated with local salmon polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) therapy.

    Drug: 3 g Polynucleotide vaginal suppositories

  • Active comparator
    Conjugated estrogens cream

    In this arm 64 first-time participants of the "peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic" of the "Regional Hospital October 1st " of ISSSTE Mexico, were randomly enrolled to be treated with the gold-standard treatment with local estrogen-based hormone therapy.

    Drug: Conjugated estrogens cream 1g Tube

Interventions

  • Drug3 g Polynucleotide vaginal suppositories

    3 g polynucleotide vaginal suppositories were administered nightly for 6 days.

    Also known as: Tunover®

  • Conjugated estrogen cream 1g was applied intravaginally on Monday, Wednesday and Friday for three months.

    Also known as: Generic

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline urogenital domain score in the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) at 3 months

    Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Items 9, 10 and 11 evaluate the urogenital domain. 0 points were considered asymptomatic, 1point indicated mild symptoms, 2-3 points moderate symptoms and \> 4 indicated severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. Change from baseline Item 9 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months

    Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 9 assesses the severity of sexual problems, including changes in libido, sexual activity, and dyspareunia. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. Change from baseline Item 10 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months

    Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 10 assesses the severity of urinary problems such as polyuria, urinary urgency, bladder instability, and urinary incontinence. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  4. Change from baseline Item 11 Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) total score at 3 months

    Menopause Rating Scale measures the severity of ageing symptoms and their impact on Health-Related Quality of Life. Item 11 assesses the severity of vaginal dryness. 0 points were assigned if the participants reported no symptoms, 1 point if they reported mild symptoms, 2 points if they reported moderate symptoms, 3 points if they reported severe symptoms, and 4 points if they reported extremely severe symptoms.

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Change from baseline Vaginal Maturity Index (VMI) at 3 months

    The vaginal maturation index (VMI) is used to assess the hormonal status of the vaginal epithelium, which quantifies the proportions of cell types in the vaginal epithelium. The VMI was evaluated through vaginal cytology, where the percentage of basal/parabasal, intermediate and superficial cells were calculated.

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Change from baseline Estrogenic Effect at 3 months

    The estrogenic effect is used to evaluate the local action of estrogens in the vaginal epithelium. The higher value, it means that it is having a greater trophic effect due to local estrogen stimulation. To calculate this outcome, it was used the next formula: Estrogenic effect= \[(% of basal/parabasal cells\*0)+(% of intermediate cells\*0.5)+(% of superficial cells\*1)\]

    Time frame: 3 months

  7. Change from baseline Oxford grading scale at 3 months

    The Oxford grading scale evaluates the contraction capacity of the muscles of the pelvic floor. It was used at the time of vaginal examination. 0 points meant no contraction , 1 point a flicker contraction, 2 points a weak contraction, 3 points a moderate contraction, 4 points a good contraction, and 5 points a strong contraction.

    Time frame: 3 months

  8. Change from baseline vaginal pH at 3 months

    Vaginal pH tests measure the acidity of the vagina. A normal vaginal pH value was considered when it was between 4.0 and 5.

    Time frame: 3 months

  9. Change from baseline colposcopic findings at 3 months

    The presence or absence of vaginal folds, paleness and vaginal lesions were colposcopic findings that were evaluated as nominal dichotomous variables. Lugol's staining was performed during colposcopy. The degree of Lugol's staining was evaluated as an ordinal variable with 4 degrees, depending on the intensity of staining of the vaginal mucosa.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peri-postmenopause and bone metabolism clinic. Regional Hospital October 1st ISSSTE
    Mexico City, 07300, Mexico
08

References and documents

Publications

  • The NAMS 2020 GSM Position Statement Editorial Panel. The 2020 genitourinary syndrome of menopause position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2020 Sep;27(9):976-992. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001609. PubMed 32852449 ↗
  • Schneider HP, Heinemann LA, Rosemeier HP, Potthoff P, Behre HM. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): reliability of scores of menopausal complaints. Climacteric. 2000 Mar;3(1):59-64. doi: 10.3109/13697130009167600. PubMed 11910611 ↗
  • Heinemann K, Assmann A, Mohner S, Schneider HP, Heinemann LA. [Reliability of the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS): Investigation in the German population]. Zentralbl Gynakol. 2002 Mar;124(3):161-3. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-32268. German. PubMed 12070795 ↗
  • Schneider HP, Rosemeier HP, Schnitker J, Gerbsch S, Turck R. Application and factor analysis of the menopause rating scale [MRS] in a post-marketing surveillance study of Climen. Maturitas. 2000 Dec 29;37(2):113-24. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00177-8. PubMed 11137330 ↗
  • Heinemann K, Ruebig A, Potthoff P, Schneider HP, Strelow F, Heinemann LA, Do MT. The Menopause Rating Scale (MRS) scale: a methodological review. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004 Sep 2;2:45. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-45. PubMed 15345062 ↗
  • Weber MA, Limpens J, Roovers JP. Assessment of vaginal atrophy: a review. Int Urogynecol J. 2015 Jan;26(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2464-0. Epub 2014 Jul 22. PubMed 25047897 ↗
  • McCracken JM, Balaji S, Keswani SG, Hakim JC. An Avant-Garde Model of Injury-Induced Regenerative Vaginal Wound Healing. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2021 Apr;10(4):165-173. doi: 10.1089/wound.2020.1198. Epub 2020 Aug 10. PubMed 32602816 ↗
  • Chung HS, Lee HS, Park K. Estrogen modulates epithelial progenitor cells in rat vagina. Investig Clin Urol. 2021 May;62(3):349-353. doi: 10.4111/icu.20200513. Epub 2021 Apr 2. PubMed 33834644 ↗
  • Rahn DD, Carberry C, Sanses TV, Mamik MM, Ward RM, Meriwether KV, Olivera CK, Abed H, Balk EM, Murphy M; Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group. Vaginal estrogen for genitourinary syndrome of menopause: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;124(6):1147-1156. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000526. PubMed 25415166 ↗
  • Nappi RE, Martini E, Cucinella L, Martella S, Tiranini L, Inzoli A, Brambilla E, Bosoni D, Cassani C, Gardella B. Addressing Vulvovaginal Atrophy (VVA)/Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause (GSM) for Healthy Aging in Women. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Aug 21;10:561. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00561. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31496993 ↗
  • The NAMS 2017 Hormone Therapy Position Statement Advisory Panel. The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 2017 Jul;24(7):728-753. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000921. PubMed 28650869 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jun 2021 to primary completion in Nov 2021, 5 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 15, 2022
First posted
Jul 19, 2022
StartActual
Jun 23, 2021
Primary completionActual
Nov 23, 2021
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2022
Last update
Apr 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05464654
Lead sponsor
Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre
Collaborators
Hospital General Regional No. 1 IMSS, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, National Polytechnic Institute, Mexico
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 19, 2022
Start date
Jun 23, 2021
Primary completion
Nov 23, 2021
Completion
Dec 31, 2022
Last update
Apr 11, 2023

Study contacts

Juan M Ocampo-Godinez, M.D., Ph.D.
study director · Laboratorio de Bioingenieria de Tejidos, UNAM
Patricia Loranca-Moreno, M.D., M.Sc.
principal investigator · Hospital Regional 1o de Octubre, ISSSTE

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion