CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05358925Updated Jan 6, 2026

Psychoeducational Videos and Digital Assessments for BPD

An interventional study of Psychoeducational Videos and Neuropsychological Feedback in Borderline Personality Disorder, sponsored by Mclean Hospital. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-06.

Sponsored by Mclean Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, 100 adults who were recently diagnosed with borderline personality disorder (BPD) will be randomized to either receive educational videos about BPD or educational videos about other topics. All participants in both conditions will complete daily surveys about their emotions and social interactions, and they will respond to surveys and complete cognitive tests at 4 different time points. Some participants will receive feedback about their cognitive test performance, and others will not. The investigators are interested in learning about how accurate education about BPD and enhanced knowledge about cognitive abilities might help people manage their BPD symptoms. The investigators expect that participants who received psychoeducation about BPD will have lower levels of BPD and depressive symptoms than other participants, and that participants who received feedback on their cognitive tests will also have lower symptoms.

Read the detailed description

In this study, 100 adults who were diagnosed with BPD within the past three months will be randomly assigned to receive psychoeducational videos (4-10 minutes each) about the development, symptoms, naturalistic trajectory, and treatment of BPD (2/3 of participants) or matched-length videos about non-BPD, health-related topics (1/3 of participants). One video will be delivered every business day for two weeks. Participants will respond to 5-minute surveys on their recent social interactions, their feelings of threat, connectedness, and aloneness, and will complete a 1-minute version of the Continuous Performance Test (CPT) and Digit Symbol Matching Test, every day for 30 days. Participants will complete additional full-length surveys and cognitive tests at 4 time points: baseline (Day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (Day 30), and Follow-up (day 60). The primary outcome is BPD symptom severity, and the secondary outcome is depressive symptom severity. The investigators expect that BPD-focused psychoeducation and personalized neuropsychological feedback will each lead to separate, measurable reductions in BPD and depressive symptom severity. The investigators also expect that the relationship between psychoeducation and symptom reduction will be mediated by increased knowledge about BPD, and that the relationship between neuropsychological feedback and symptom reduction will be mediated by increased cognitive control.

02

Conditions studied

  • Borderline Personality Disorder

Keywords

  • borderline personality disorder
  • ecological momentary assessment
  • psychoeducation
  • neuropsychological feedback
  • symptom tracking
03

In context

Borderline Personality Disorder

269 studies on the registry are indexed under Borderline Personality Disorder; 67 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is above the median of 70 across 215 interventional studies indexed under Borderline Personality Disorder.

Browse Borderline Personality Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Mclean Hospital is the lead sponsor of 181 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (71%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • reliable access to a smartphone with a data plan for the duration of the study
  • ability to speak and understand English
  • age 18 years or older
  • diagnosis of BPD within the past 6 months
  • awake and able to complete EMA surveys between 9:00am and 9:00pm on most days
  • located within the United States

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • cognitive disability that impedes ability to participate in the study
  • current psychiatric symptoms that interfere with the individual's ability to provide consent or complete the research procedures (e.g., acute mania, acute psychosis, eating disorder threatening medical stability).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    BPD Videos and Feedback

    Ten daily 4-10 minute psychoeducational videos about BPD and personalized feedback about performance on neuropsychological tasks.

    Other: Psychoeducational Videos · Other: Neuropsychological Feedback

  • Experimental
    BPD Videos and No Feedback

    Ten daily 4-10 minute psychoeducational videos about BPD.

    Other: Psychoeducational Videos

  • Sham comparator
    Non-BPD Videos and No Feedback

    Ten daily 4-10 minute educational videos about health-related topics other than BPD.

    Other: Non-BPD-related Educational Videos

Interventions

  • OtherPsychoeducational Videos

    A total of ten videos will be delivered daily Monday-Friday over approximately 2 weeks (days 1-15). The videos will each feature a mental health professional who is an expert in BPD explaining the topic in relatable language that can be understood by the general public. Each video will be approximately 4-10 minutes long, for a total of \~72 minutes of video. Videos will be shared via a hyperlink in a text message. The psychoeducational videos will cover the following topics: symptoms, basic factors about BPD, the naturalistic long term course of BPD, prevalence of BPD and its common comorbid disorders, key principles for recovery, available psychotherapeutic treatment options for BPD, common factors amongst treatments, medications, the interpersonal hypersensitivity model of BPD, and a review of the top 10 tips.

  • OtherNeuropsychological Feedback

    In the second phase of the study, participants randomized to the Feedback condition will receive an email with a personalized summary of their symptom endorsement and neuropsychological performance. The feedback will include the relevant scores or sub-scores for each cognitive test (CPT, RMET, BEST, DST) from the first two time points. For each score and sub-score, there will be a description of the cognitive domain that the metric assesses (e.g., attention span in the CPT). The investigators will tailor the feedback to each participant's scores. The investigators may adjust the format or wording of the feedback based on participant responses (i.e., if a participant alerts the investigators that some wording is unclear or confusing). The investigators may also alter the feedback if they learn new information about the relevance or interpretability of these cognitive tests, as this is a growing field of research.

  • OtherNon-BPD-related Educational Videos

    The non-BPD-related educational videos will be matched in length and frequency to the BPD-related videos. These videos will discuss aspects of mental and physical health that are not related to BPD. Examples may include: nutrition and healthy eating, coping, self-compassion and self-care, stress and anxiety, depression, and healthy sleep habits.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Borderline Symptom List 23 (BSL-23)

    Change (increase or decrease) in BSL-23 mean score (average score across all 23 items) at time 2, time 3, and follow-up, as compared to baseline. Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 4. A higher score indicates more severe BPD symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Change (increase or decrease) in PHQ-9 total score at time 2, time 3, and follow-up, as compared to baseline. Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 27. A higher score indicates more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

Other outcomes

  1. Treatment History Questionnaire

    Change between baseline and follow-up on the following metrics: A) Amount of treatment received in each of the following categories: individual therapy (# appointments per week for X weeks), group therapy (# months in group), day treatment (# days in program). B) Number of past psychiatric hospitalizations. C) History of BPD-specialized psychotherapy (yes/no). The minimum value is 0 for all questions on this questionnaire (e.g., 0 past hospitalizations). There is no maximum value for any question. A higher level of past engagement with mental health services may indicate a history of more severe psychopathology, or may indicate a greater level of access to mental health services, or a combination of these factors.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Follow-Up (day 60)

  2. BPD Knowledge Assessment

    Change (increase or decrease) in BPD Knowledge Assessment total score at time 2 and follow-up, as compared to baseline. This instrument is currently in development. A higher score will indicate a greater level of knowledge related to BPD.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Follow-Up (day 60)

  3. Hospitalization Check-In

    Number of patients who have been hospitalized.

    Time frame: Time 2 (day 15) and Time 3 (day 30)

  4. McLean Assessment of Rejection Sensitivity (MARS)

    Change (increase or decrease) in MARS total score between baseline and follow-up. Minimum score = 11, maximum score = 55. A higher score indicates a greater sensitivity to rejection.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Follow-Up (day 60)

  5. 3-Item Loneliness Scale (LS-3)

    Change (increase or decrease) in LS-3 total score between baseline and follow-up. Minimum score = 3, maximum score = 9. A higher score indicates more frequent feelings of loneliness.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

  6. San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE)

    Change (increase or decrease) in SD-WISE total score and sub-scores (Acceptance of Divergent Perspectives, Decisiveness, Emotional Regulation, Pro-Social Behaviors, Self-Reflection, Social Advising, and Spirituality) between baseline and follow-up. For the total score and all sub-scores, the minimum score = 1, maximum score = 5. A higher score indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Follow-Up (day 60)

  7. Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS)

    Change (increase or decrease) in LPFS total score between baseline and follow-up. Minimum score = 12, maximum score = 48. A higher score indicates more severe impairment in personality functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

  8. Continuous Performance Test (Full-Length Version)

    Change (increase or decrease) in CPT scores (Detectability, Omissions, Commissions, Perseverations) between baseline and follow-up. CPT scores are calculated as T-Scores (minimum=0, maximum=100). Higher Commission and Perseveration scores indicate a higher level of impulsivity. Higher Detectability, Omission, and Commission scores indicate a higher level of inattentiveness.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

  9. Read the Mind in the Eyes Task (RMET). Minimum score = 0, maximum score = 37. Higher score indicates greater accuracy in identifying facial emotion expressions.

    Change (increase or decrease) in RMET score and sub-scores at time 2, time 3, and follow-up, as compared to baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Follow-Up (day 60)

  10. Belmont Emotion Sensitivity Test (BEST)

    Change (increase or decrease) in BEST score for each condition (Happiness, Fear, Anger) at time 2, time 3, and follow-up, as compared to baseline. For each condition, minimum score = 0, maximum score = 56. A higher score indicates greater accuracy in differentiating facial emotion expressions.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Follow-Up (day 60)

  11. Digit Span Test (DST)

    Change (increase or decrease) in DST total score and sub-scores (Digits Forward and Digits Backward) at time 2, time 3, and follow-up, as compared to baseline. The DST total score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 30. The Digits Forward sub-score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 16. The Digits Backward sub-score has a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 14. A higher total score indicates greater memory and attention ability. A higher Digits Forward score primarily indicates greater attention/concentration. A higher Digits Backward score primarily indicates better working memory.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), Time 2 (day 15), Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

  12. Daily Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) Measures

    Trends over time of scores/ratings on all EMA questions and the 1-minute version of the CPT. The EMA Measures include: * General Functioning: "Did you attend work/school today?" (yes/no) A higher number of days attending work/school indicates better functioning. * Social Functioning (# of social interactions since last assessment): Minimum value = 0, no maximum value. A higher number indicates a more active social life. * Psychological \& Interpersonal States: 14 individual questions, each rated from 0-2. Questions are considered individually, rather than combined into summary scores. A higher score indicates that the participant identifies more strongly with the psychological/interpersonal state (e.g., "I feel securely connected to at least one person I care about." or "I am on alert for signs of rejection.") * CPT (1-minute version): The minimum and maximum scores and interpretation of the 1-minute CPT are the same as the full-length version listed above.

    Time frame: Daily, days 1-30

  13. Digit Symbol Matching Test (DSMT)

    Changes (increase or decrease) and trends in DSMT score at time 3 and follow up as compared to baseline, and across the 30 days of EMA. The score indicates processing speed.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1), daily days 1-30, Time 3 (day 30), Follow-Up (day 60)

  14. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    Acceptability measure.

    Time frame: Time 2 (day 15)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • McLean Hospital
    Belmont, Massachusetts 02478, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Choi-Kain LW, Murray GE, Jurist J, Ren B, Germine L. Online psychoeducation and digital assessments as a first step of treatment for borderline personality disorder: A protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0294331. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294331. eCollection 2023. PubMed 38060545 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 6, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05358925
Lead sponsor
Mclean Hospital
Collaborators
Brain & Behavior Research Foundation
Responsible party
Lois W. Choi-Kain, MD (Director, Gunderson Personality Disorder; Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Mclean Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 3, 2022
Start date
Jun 1, 2023
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2024
Completion
Dec 1, 2025
Last update
Jan 6, 2026

Study contacts

Lois W Choi-Kain, MD
principal investigator · Mclean Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion