ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07758010OcTOPUSUpdated Sep 11, 2026

One-Day cTBS Over the Precuneus

An interventional study of Precuneus-targeted continuous theta-burst stimulation and Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex intermittent theta-burst stimulation in Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD) and Treatment Resistant Major Depression Disorder, sponsored by Mclean Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Mclean Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
69
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether two forms of one-day accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can reduce depressive symptoms in adults with treatment-resistant depression. Treatment-resistant depression is depression that has not improved enough after at least two adequate antidepressant medication treatments. TMS is a non-invasive treatment that uses magnetic pulses to stimulate specific areas of the brain.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

  • Does continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) targeting the precuneus reduce depressive symptoms 4 weeks after treatment compared with sham stimulation?
  • Does intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduce depressive symptoms 4 weeks after treatment compared with sham stimulation?

Researchers will compare precuneus cTBS, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex iTBS, and sham stimulation to determine whether either active treatment reduces depressive symptoms more than sham stimulation. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the three groups and will not be told which treatment they initially receive.

Participants will:

  • Complete screening procedures and baseline assessments of depression, rumination, and cognitive function
  • Receive 20 sessions of active or sham TMS during one in-person study day
  • Complete follow-up assessments 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the intervention
  • Report any side effects or medical problems experienced during the study

Participants initially assigned to sham stimulation may choose to receive active TMS after completing the 4-week follow-up period. Those who choose this option will receive either precuneus cTBS or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex iTBS and will complete additional follow-up assessments.

Read the detailed description

Treatment-resistant depression may involve dysfunction across distributed brain networks rather than a disturbance confined to a single brain region. The precuneus is a posterior hub of the default mode network and is involved in internally directed and self-referential processing. Altered interactions among the default mode, affective, and cognitive control networks have been implicated in depressive symptoms and rumination. In this study, precuneus continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) is conceptualized as a hypothesis-driven network intervention that may modulate precuneus-centered network interactions implicated in depression.

A double-cone coil will be used to increase electric-field penetration toward the medial posteromedial cortex beneath the Pz scalp location of the international 10-20 electroencephalography system. Intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is included as an additional active treatment arm because this region is an established stimulation target for depression treatment. The three-arm design allows the novel precuneus target and the established left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex target to be evaluated within the same accelerated treatment framework and compared with sham stimulation.

Participants will be assigned to the three initial study groups using the minimal sufficient balance (MSB) randomization method, with sex and baseline depression severity, as measured by the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, used as balancing factors. The target allocation ratio for the randomized, sham-controlled phase will be 1:1:1. Group allocation will be concealed from participants. Each active or sham intervention will consist of 20 stimulation sessions administered during a single day, with session onsets separated by approximately 30 minutes.

The primary efficacy analyses will use a longitudinal mixed-model framework to estimate treatment effects and evaluate the two prespecified active-versus-sham comparisons. The familywise type I error rate will be controlled across these two comparisons. The direct comparison between precuneus cTBS and left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex iTBS will be considered exploratory.

After completing the 4-week follow-up period, participants initially assigned to sham stimulation may elect to enter an open-label active TMS extension. Extension participants will be assigned to precuneus cTBS or left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex iTBS using the MSB method, with a target allocation ratio of 1:1. Sex and depression severity at the end of the sham-controlled phase, as measured by the Week 4 Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale score, will be used as balancing factors. Because only a subset of participants assigned to sham stimulation is expected to enter the extension, extension analyses will be considered exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant
  • Treatment Resistant Depression (TRD)
  • Treatment Resistant Major Depression Disorder

Keywords

  • Treatment-resistant depression
  • Accelerated transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Precuneus
  • Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex
  • Continuous theta burst stimulation
  • Intermittent theta burst stimulation
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant

448 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant; 147 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 69 is above the median of 59 across 372 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant studies →

Lead sponsor

Mclean Hospital is the lead sponsor of 185 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Of its 15 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 12 (80%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Able to speak, read, and understand English sufficiently to complete the study assessments and provide independently.
  • Diagnosis of major depressive disorder according to criteria, confirmed by a qualified physician.
  • Treatment-resistant depression, defined as an inadequate response to at least two adequate trials of antidepressant pharmacotherapy.
  • Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) total score of 10 or higher.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition identified through TMS safety screening that, in the judgment of a study physician, presents an unacceptable safety risk for TMS. Such conditions may include:
  • A history of a serious adverse reaction during TMS treatment.
  • A history of seizure.
  • A history of stroke.
  • A history of serious head injury or neurosurgery.
  • Metal in the head outside the mouth, such as shrapnel, surgical clips, or metal fragments.
  • An implanted device, such as a cardiac pacemaker, cochlear implant, medical pump, or intracardiac line.
  • Frequent or severe headaches.
  • Another brain-related condition or an illness that caused brain injury.
  • A family history of epilepsy.
  • Permanent tattoos on the head or neck.
  • Current recreational drug use.
  • Current pregnancy or possible pregnancy.
  • Use of a medication or combination of medications, a recent medication change, or medication withdrawal that, in the judgment of a study physician, presents an unacceptable safety risk, including a increase in seizure risk.
  • Current or lifetime diagnosis of bipolar I disorder, bipolar II disorder, a schizophrenia spectrum disorder, or another primary psychotic disorder.
  • Active suicidal ideation with intent or plan requiring immediate clinical intervention, or another acute safety concern that cannot be safely managed within the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
69 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Precuneus cTBS

    Participants receive 20 sessions of active continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS) targeting the Pz location of the international 10-20 EEG system during a single day. Stimulation is delivered using a double-cone coil at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold. Each session consists of 600 pulses delivered over approximately 40 seconds, for a total of 12,000 pulses. Session onsets are separated by approximately 30 minutes. If stimulation at 80% of resting motor threshold is not tolerated, the intensity may be reduced to the highest tolerable level.

    Device: Precuneus-targeted continuous theta-burst stimulation

  • Experimental
    Left dlPFC iTBS

    Participants receive 20 sessions of active intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) targeting the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a single day. The target is identified using the Beam F3 method, and stimulation is delivered using a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold. Each session consists of 600 pulses delivered over approximately 3 minutes, for a total of 12,000 pulses. Session onsets are separated by approximately 30 minutes. If stimulation at 80% of resting motor threshold is not tolerated, the intensity may be reduced to the highest tolerable level.

    Device: Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex intermittent theta-burst stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham TMS

    Participants receive 20 sessions of sham TMS at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex location identified using the Beam F3 method during a single day. A figure-of-eight coil is inverted so that the active surface faces away from the scalp. The device is operated at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold, and sham stimulation follows the same stimulation pattern and approximate 3-minute duration as active iTBS. Session onsets are separated by approximately 30 minutes. After completing the Week 4 assessment, participants may enter an optional open-label extension and are randomized to receive active precuneus cTBS or left dlPFC iTBS.

    Device: Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation

Interventions

  • DevicePrecuneus-targeted continuous theta-burst stimulation

    Active continuous theta-burst stimulation is delivered to the Pz location of the international 10-20 EEG system to target the precuneus. Stimulation is administered with a double-cone coil at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold. Each session consists of 600 pulses delivered over approximately 40 seconds. Participants receive 20 sessions during a single day, for a total of 12,000 pulses, with session onsets separated by approximately 30 minutes. If 80% of resting motor threshold is not tolerated, the intensity may be reduced to the highest tolerable level.

    Also known as: Precuneus cTBS, Continuous theta-burst stimulation

  • DeviceLeft dorsolateral prefrontal cortex intermittent theta-burst stimulation

    Active intermittent theta-burst stimulation is delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. The stimulation target is identified using the Beam F3 method. Stimulation is administered with a figure-of-eight coil at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold. Each session consists of 600 pulses delivered over approximately 3 minutes. Participants receive 20 sessions during a single day, for a total of 12,000 pulses, with session onsets separated by approximately 30 minutes. If 80% of resting motor threshold is not tolerated, the intensity may be reduced to the highest tolerable level.

    Also known as: Left dlPFC iTBS, Intermittent theta-burst stimulation

  • DeviceSham transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation is administered at the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex location identified using the Beam F3 method. A figure-of-eight coil is inverted so that the active surface faces away from the scalp. The stimulator is operated at 80% of the participant's resting motor threshold using the same intermittent theta-burst timing and approximate session duration as the active left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex intervention. Participants receive 20 sham sessions during a single day, with session onsets separated by approximately 30 minutes.

    Also known as: Sham TMS, Sham intermittent theta-burst stimulation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score at Week 4

    The MADRS is a clinician-administered 10-item scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Each item is scored from 0 to 6, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. MADRS total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 after the intervention. Post-intervention scores will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline MADRS total score. The primary treatment comparison will be conducted at Week 4.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. 17-Item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D-17) Total Score Through Week 4

    The HAM-D-17 is a clinician-administered 17-item scale used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. The total score ranges from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. HAM-D-17 total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 after the intervention. Post-intervention scores will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline HAM-D-17 total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the intervention

  2. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Total Score Through Week 4

    The PHQ-9 is a 9-item self-report measure used to assess depressive symptom severity. Each item is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater depressive symptom severity. PHQ-9 total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 after the intervention. Post-intervention scores will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline PHQ-9 total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the intervention

  3. Ruminative Responses Scale (RRS) Total Score Through Week 4

    The RRS is a 22-item self-report measure used to assess the tendency to engage in ruminative responses. Each item is scored from 1 to 4, yielding a total score ranging from 22 to 88. Higher scores indicate greater levels of rumination. RRS total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Weeks 1, 2, 3, and 4 after the intervention. Post-intervention scores will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline RRS total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after the intervention

  4. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total Score at Week 4

    The MoCA is a clinician-administered cognitive screening measure that assesses multiple cognitive domains. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. MoCA total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Week 4 after the intervention. The Week 4 score will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline MoCA total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention

  5. MGH/McLean Objective Neurocognitive Assessment (MONA) Total Score at Week 4

    The MONA is an objective neurocognitive assessment that evaluates multiple cognitive domains. The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. MONA total scores will be assessed at baseline and at Week 4 after the intervention. The Week 4 score will be compared between treatment groups with adjustment for baseline MONA total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Sendi M, Halko M, Traynor J, Brown J, Copersino M, Nickerson L, Harnett N, van Rooij S, Pizzagalli D, House S, Beaudoin F, An X, Neylan T, Clifford G, Jovanovic T, Linnstaedt S, Germine L, Bollen K, Rauch S, Haran J, Storrow A, Lewandowski C, Musey P Jr, Hendry P, Sheikh S, Jones C, Punches B, Swor R, Gentile N, Hudak L, Pascual J, Seamon M, Harris E, Pearson C, Peak D, Domeier R, Rathlev N, O'Neil B, Sergot P, Sanchez L, Bruce S, Sheridan J, Harte S, Kessler R, Koenen K, Phelps E, Salat D, Mayberg H, McLean S, Stevens J, Calhoun V, Ressler K, Dillon D. Comprehensive mapping of cognitive and emotion networks in stress, anxiety, and depression implicates the precuneus as a critical hub. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2025 Aug 26:rs.3.rs-7200801. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7200801/v1. PubMed 40909772 ↗
  • Kim H, Halko M, Copersino ML, Traynor J, Dillon D, Sendi M, Razafsha M, Uflacker A, Bharathan AV, Coyle M, Ganesh P, Nolan J, Parlikar RU, Pettibone T, Gunadeva N, Hur KH, Downar J, McGirr A, Ressler K, Brown J. 6 - Depression and Anxiety Symptom Change Following One-Day Ultra-Accelerated TMS Targeting dlPFC or Network-Guided Precuneus: Preliminary Findings. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. 2026;7(Suppl 1):100228. doi:10.1016/j.transm.2026.100228
  • Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, Veerapal C, Khan N, Cherian K, Felber E, Brown R, Choi E, King S, Pankow H, Bishop JH, Azeez A, Coetzee J, Rapier R, Odenwald N, Carreon D, Hawkins J, Chang M, Keller J, Raj K, DeBattista C, Jo B, Espil FM, Schatzberg AF, Sudheimer KD, Williams NR. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;179(2):132-141. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. Epub 2021 Oct 29. PubMed 34711062 ↗
  • Vaughn DA, Marino B, Engelbertson A, Dojnov A, Johnson L, Stine M, Vila-Rodriguez F, Weiss N, Nanos G, Downar J. Real-world effectiveness of a single-day regimen for transcranial magnetic stimulation using Optimized, Neuroplasticity-Enhanced techniques in Depression (ONE-D): An open-label case series. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. 2025;5:100200. doi:10.1016/j.transm.2025.100200

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — At this time, there is no plan to share individual participant data because external sharing of participant-level data is not included in the current informed consent and institutional data management plan. Aggregate study results will be disseminated through scientific presentations and publications. Any future sharing of de-identified data would require additional institutional and IRB review and approval.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2027, 9 months after the start.

Of 135 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depressive Disorder, Treatment-Resistant, half reached primary completion within 42 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 79. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 139 studies reached it within 50 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 88.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 6, 2026
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
StartActual
Sep 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07758010
Lead sponsor
Mclean Hospital
Responsible party
Hakjoo Kim (Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Mclean Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 11, 2026
Start date
Sep 8, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Hakjoo Kim Kim, Ph.D.
Contact
khj213@gmail.com
979-777-0679

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion