ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT05343650Updated Sep 11, 2023

NOVAPAK Nasal Packing in Shellfish Allergic Patients

A Phase 4 interventional study of NOVAPAK nasal packing applied to forearm and NOVAPAK nasal packing applied to nasal cavity in Shellfish Hypersensitivity and Epistaxis, sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-09-11.

Sponsored by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's · Phase 4, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Dec 2024, 1 year 10 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

NOVAPAK is a sponge-like material made from materials found in shellfish. It is commonly used after nasal surgery or in nasal bleeding, as it promotes healing, decreases bleeding, and has antibacterial properties. Although NOVOPAK does not contain proteins or compounds known to be responsible for allergic reactions in people with a known allergy to shellfish, out of an abundance of caution, the manufacturer (Medtronic) has recommended avoidance in those with known shellfish allergy. There have been no reported allergic reactions in patients with shellfish allergy who were given chitosan bandages in emergencies (e.g. military applications). The study aims to investigate the safety of its use in patients with known shellfish allergy to improve healthcare quality and patient care support.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective interventional study to assess whether the tested product triggers an allergic reaction in patients with known-shellfish allergies.

The primary objective is to assess the safety of Novapak, a chitosan-containing nasal packing material, in patients with known shellfish allergy.

The study will be conducted in two phases. First, participants will undergo an allergy test - Skin prick test (SPT) to crab, lobster, shrimp, oyster, clam, scallop, squid, and octopus -, and antibody levels analysis. Second, in a controlled setting (i.e., in a hospital clinic that includes a resuscitation cart and doctors monitoring - allergist and otolaryngologist), Novapak packing will be applied to the patient's skin for 30 minutes (on the anterior aspect of the patients' non-dominant arm). Then, provided that no allergic symptoms are observed in stage 1, the patient's nose will be anesthetized with topical lidocaine, and a piece of Novapak material will be applied to the participant's nasal cavity at the level of the inferior turbinate for 15 minutes. After removal, the participant will be monitored in the clinic for an hour. Any allergic reaction will be documented, including increased nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, or pruritis.

Since Novapak contains purified chitosan, the investigators hypothesizes that no allergic reactions will be demonstrated.

02

Conditions studied

  • Shellfish Hypersensitivity
  • Epistaxis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • nasal bleedings
  • Post-surgical healing
  • chitosan-based films
03

In context

Epistaxis

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Epistaxis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 64 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Epistaxis.

Browse Epistaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's is the lead sponsor of 331 studies on the registry; 137 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-60
  • Positive history of shellfish allergy
  • Confirmation of allergy via previous reaction during oral challenge or convincing clinical history and testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe lung diseases: severe asthma, obstructive lung disease
  • Severe cardiovascular disease: history of congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, valvulopathy, or unstable tachy-or-bradyarrhythmia.
  • Severe cerebrovascular disease: history of stroke or severe carotid stenosis.
  • Presence of beta-blocker mediations.
  • Patients unable to discontinue antihistamine medications or prednisone.
  • Patients with severe or anaphylaxis during prior oral challenge to shellfish, or those with documented systemic mastocytosis.
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Study arm

    Stage 1 After shellfish allergy is confirmed through the skin prick test and IgE analysis, Novapak packing will be applied to the patient's skin for 30 minutes on the anterior aspect of the patients' non-dominant arm. In case of pre-existing wounds, it will be applied to the other forearm. Participants will then be monitored for 1 hour, and any- reaction will be documented. In case of any symptoms of an allergic reaction, their study participation will be terminated. Stage 2 If no allergic symptoms are observed in stage 1, the patient's nose will be anesthetized with topical lidocaine. A piece of Novapak material will be applied to the participant's nasal cavity at the level of the inferior turbinate for 15 minutes. After removal, the participant will be monitored in the clinic for an hour. Any allergic reaction will be documented, including increased nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, or pruritis.

    Device: NOVAPAK nasal packing applied to forearm · Device: NOVAPAK nasal packing applied to nasal cavity

Interventions

  • DeviceNOVAPAK nasal packing applied to forearm

    Novapak packing will be applied to the patient's skin for 30 minutes on the anterior aspect of the patients' non-dominant arm. In case of pre-existing wounds, it will be applied to the other forearm.

  • DeviceNOVAPAK nasal packing applied to nasal cavity

    A piece of Novapak material will be applied to the participant's nasal cavity at the level of the inferior turbinate for 15 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. First stage - Skin test

    The occurrence of an Allergic reaction to Novapak packing in the anterior aspect of the patients' non-dominant arm will be tested.

    Time frame: Until one hour after the test.

  2. Second stage - Novapak in the nasal cavity (1 hour)

    The occurrence of Allergic reaction to Novapak packing on the participant's nasal cavity at the level of the inferior turbinate.

    Time frame: Until one hour after the test

  3. Second stage - Novapak in the nasal cavity (48 hours)

    The occurrence of Allergic reaction to Novapak packing on the participant's nasal cavity at the level of the inferior turbinate.

    Time frame: 48 hours after the test.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Nasal congestion score - (1 hour)

    Change on the nasal congestion score 1 hour after the provocation challenge in the nose using NOVAPAK 0 =No congestion 1. =Mild congestion 2. =Moderate congestion 3. =Severe congestion

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 hour after the provocation challenge.

  2. Change in Nasal congestion score - (48 hours)

    Change on the nasal congestion score 48 hours after the provocation challenge in the nose using NOVAPAK 0 =No congestion 1. =Mild congestion 2. =Moderate congestion 3. =Severe congestion

    Time frame: Baseline, 48 hours after the provocation challenge.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kurita K. Chitin and chitosan: functional biopolymers from marine crustaceans. Mar Biotechnol (NY). 2006 May-Jun;8(3):203-26. doi: 10.1007/s10126-005-0097-5. Epub 2006 Mar 17. PubMed 16532368 ↗
  • Chou TC, Fu E, Wu CJ, Yeh JH. Chitosan enhances platelet adhesion and aggregation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003 Mar 14;302(3):480-3. doi: 10.1016/s0006-291x(03)00173-6. PubMed 12615058 ↗
  • Rao SB, Sharma CP. Use of chitosan as a biomaterial: studies on its safety and hemostatic potential. J Biomed Mater Res. 1997 Jan;34(1):21-8. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4636(199701)34:13.0.co;2-p. PubMed 8978649 ↗
  • Winebrake JP, Mahrous A, Kacker A, Tabaee A, Levinger JI, Pearlman AN, Stewart MG, Lelli GJ Jr. Postoperative Bioresorbable Chitosan-Based Dressing for Endoscopic Middle Meatal Dacryocystorhinostomy With Balloon Dilation. Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Jul;100(6):425-429. doi: 10.1177/0145561319866822. Epub 2019 Sep 26. PubMed 31558059 ↗
  • Zhou JC, Zhang JJ, Zhang W, Ke ZY, Zhang B. Efficacy of chitosan dressing on endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Sep;274(9):3269-3274. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4584-x. Epub 2017 Apr 29. PubMed 28456847 ↗
  • Kourelis K, Shikani AH. Effectiveness of chitosan-based packing in 35 patients with recalcitrant epistaxis in the context of coagulopathy. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Aug;37(4):309-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2012.02488.x. No abstract available. PubMed 22925096 ↗
  • Valentine R, Athanasiadis T, Moratti S, Hanton L, Robinson S, Wormald PJ. The efficacy of a novel chitosan gel on hemostasis and wound healing after endoscopic sinus surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010 Jan-Feb;24(1):70-5. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2010.24.3422. PubMed 20109331 ↗
  • HemCon® Bandage PRO - Tricol Biomedical [Internet]. [cited 2021 Dec 28]. Available from: https://tricolbiomedical.com/product/hemcon-bandage-pro/
  • Waibel KH, Haney B, Moore M, Whisman B, Gomez R. Safety of chitosan bandages in shellfish allergic patients. Mil Med. 2011 Oct;176(10):1153-6. doi: 10.7205/milmed-d-11-00150. PubMed 22128651 ↗
  • Amaral L, Silva D, Couto M, Nunes C, Rocha SM, Coimbra MA, Coimbra A, Moreira A. Safety of chitosan processed wine in shrimp allergic patients. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 May;116(5):462-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Mar 19. No abstract available. PubMed 27009439 ↗
  • Sicherer SH, Munoz-Furlong A, Sampson HA. Prevalence of seafood allergy in the United States determined by a random telephone survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Jul;114(1):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.04.018. PubMed 15241360 ↗
  • Moonesinghe H, Mackenzie H, Venter C, Kilburn S, Turner P, Weir K, Dean T. Prevalence of fish and shellfish allergy: A systematic review. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2016 Sep;117(3):264-272.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2016.07.015. PubMed 27613460 ↗
  • Lopata AL, Jeebhay MF. Airborne seafood allergens as a cause of occupational allergy and asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2013 Jun;13(3):288-97. doi: 10.1007/s11882-013-0347-y. PubMed 23575656 ↗
  • Gelis S, Rueda M, Pascal M, Fernandez-Caldas E, Fernandez EA, Araujo-Sanchez G, Bartra J, Valero A. Usefulness of the Nasal Allergen Provocation Test in the Diagnosis of Shellfish Allergy. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2022 Dec 15;32(6):460-470. doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0736. Epub 2022 Sep 7. PubMed 34489219 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Mar 2024; primary completion for Dec 2024, 9 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 5, 2022
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
StartEst.
Mar 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Dec 24, 2024
CompletionEst.
May 15, 2025
Last update
Sep 11, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05343650
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2022
Start date
Mar 15, 2024 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 24, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
May 15, 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2023

Study contacts

Leigh J Sowerby, MD
Contact
rhinologyclinic@sjhc.london.on.ca
+15196466143
Taciano Rocha, Ph.D.
Contact
taciano.rocha@sjhc.london.on.ca
+15196466100 ext. 61125

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion