ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05327023Updated Nov 9, 2026

Donor Lymphocyte Infusion After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Hematologic Malignancies

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of donor lymphocyte infusion and Cyclophosphamide in Hematologic Neoplasms, sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI). Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 120 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by National Cancer Institute (NCI) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2022; still recruiting 4 years 5 months later.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
430
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
12 Years to 120 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background:

People with blood cancers often receive blood or bone marrow transplants. But even with these treatments, the risk of relapse is high. Researchers want to see if giving the transplant recipient an infusion of lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell) from their transplant donor early after the transplant can reduce that risk.

Objective:

To learn if giving donor lymphocytes early after a transplant will help reduce the risk of relapse for people with certain blood cancers.

Eligibility:

Adults aged 18-65 with high-risk leukemia, lymphoma, myelodysplastic syndrome, or multiple myeloma that does not respond well to standard treatments and/or has a high risk of relapse. Healthy potential bone marrow and lymphocyte donor relatives aged 12 and older are also needed.

Design:

Participants will be screened with:

Physical exam

Blood and urine tests

Spinal tap

Eye exam

Dental exam

Heart and lung tests

Imaging scans. A radioactive substance may be injected in their arm if a PET scan is needed.

Bone marrow aspiration and biopsy

Some screening tests will be repeated during the study.

Participants will stay at the NIH hospital for about 4 weeks. They will receive a central venous catheter. They will get chemotherapy and other drugs starting 6 days before transplant. Then they will have their transplant. They will receive donor white blood cells 7 days later. They will give blood, bone marrow, urine, and stool samples for research. They must stay near NIH for at least 100 days after transplant.

Participants will have periodic follow-up visits for 5 years.

Healthy donors will have 2-3 visits. They will give blood, bone marrow, white blood cells, and stool samples for research.

Participation will last for 5 years....

Read the detailed description

Background:

  • High-risk hematologic malignancies generally are incurable without an allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT), but even HCT is associated with high risk of relapse and very poor overall survival.
  • Prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) have been used to prevent relapse in high-risk diseases; preemptive DLIs have been used for MRD positivity or decreasing donor chimerism post-transplant; and, therapeutic DLIs have been used to treat overt morphologic relapse post-transplant.
  • Prophylactic, preemptive, and therapeutic DLIs can cause significant graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), both acute and chronic, based on the dose of lymphocytes, timing of the infusion, and use of preparative chemotherapy, although these same factors also may impact on the therapeutic efficacy (graft-versus-tumor immunity of the DLI).
  • Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) reduces rates of severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and the immunosuppressive burden after HCT.
  • In pre-clinical HCT models, very large DLI doses can be given after PTCy, even as early as 24 hours after PTCy treatment, and significant GVHD is not induced, different from that seen for DLI infusions in mice treated with T-cell-depleted HCT, in which fatal GVHD is rapidly induced. This effect in PTCy-treated mice is dependent on Foxp3+ regulatory T cells.
  • In patients treated at the NIH Clinical Center, DLI has been given for clinical reasons as early as 1 month post-transplant in PTCy-treated patients for infection, falling chimerism, or relapse and did not cause GVHD in these settings when additional conditioning was not given and T-cell-depleting antibodies were not used, both of which may disrupt the regulatory mechanisms induced after PTCy that are needed to control GVHD.
  • The early integration of immunotherapeutic strategies, such as DLIs, after PTCy has the potential to prevent relapse in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies, which may result in improved survival in such patients.

Objectives:

-To determine the maximally tolerated dose of DLI that can be safely administered after HLA-matched-related HCT and after HLA-haploidentical HCT

Eligibility:

-Recipient Participant:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed hematologic malignancy classified as high or very high disease risk by the Refined Disease Risk Index for HCT
  • Age 18-65
  • At least one potentially suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related or HLA-haploidentical donor.
  • Karnofsky performance score >=60
  • Adequate organ function

Design:

  • Open-label, single-center, non-randomized, phase I/II study
  • All recipient participants will receive myeloablative conditioning, HLA-matched-related or HLA-haploidentical bone marrow HCT, GVHD prophylaxis including post- transplantation cyclophosphamide, and prophylactic donor lymphocyte infusion
  • There will be 2 cohorts of recipient participants: one with HLA-matched-related donors and one with HLA-haploidentical donors
  • For HLA-matched HCT, the study will proceed to a small, three-level [1) DLI: 1 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7, 2) DLI: 3 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7, 3) DLI: 1 x 10\^7 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7] phase I dose escalation study based on the standard 3+3 approach
  • For HLA-haploidentical HCT, the study will proceed to a small, three-level [1) DLI: 1 x 10\^5 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7, 2) DLI: 3 x 10\^5 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7, 3) DLI: 1 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg on day +7] phase I dose escalation study based on the standard 3+3 approach
  • Recipient participants will be evaluated for development of steroid-refractory grade III- IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day +60 as the dose-limiting toxicity.
  • Phase II will proceed with DLI at the dose level (separately determined for each HLA cohort) which is associated with 0-1 of 6 recipient participants with steroid refractory grade III-IV aGVHD at day +60 and the least amount of toxicity.
  • Simon optimal two-stage phase II trial design, to rule out excess steroid refractory grade III-IV aGVHD with the addition of prophylactic DLI, will be used in the phase II portion of the study which will enroll an additional 14 evaluable subjects in each cohort.
02

Conditions studied

  • Hematologic Neoplasms

Keywords

  • Prophylactic Donor Lymphocyte Infusions
  • Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease
  • Immunotherapeutic Strategies
  • myeloablative conditioning
  • Steroid-Refractory Grade
03

In context

Hematologic Neoplasms

1,444 studies on the registry are indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms; 420 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 430 is above the median of 46 across 1,044 interventional studies indexed under Hematologic Neoplasms.

Browse Hematologic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

National Cancer Institute (NCI) is the lead sponsor of 3,556 studies on the registry; 336 are open to participants now.

Of its 411 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 373 (91%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 120 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

  • INCLUSION CRITERIA:

Inclusion Criteria - Recipient:

  • or cytologically confirmed hematologic classified as high or very high disease risk by the Refined Disease Risk Index for HCT including one of the following:

    • Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with favorable cytogenetics (t(8;21), inv(16), t(15,17)) with induction failure (persistent disease without first achieving remission of any type) or active relapse
    • AML with intermediate cytogenetics (not classified as favorable or adverse) with induction failure or active relapse (AML with intermediate cytogenetics in morphologic complete remission [CR] with minimal residual disease detectable by any modality also will be eligible)
    • AML with adverse cytogenetics (complex karyotype with >= 4 abnormalities) regardless of remission status
    • Low risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (\<= 5% blasts, including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia) with adverse cytogenetics (abnormal chromosome 7 or >= 4 abnormalities) with induction failure or active relapse
    • High risk MDS (RAEB-1 or RAEB-2) with intermediate-risk cytogenetics (no abnormal chromosome 7 or \< 4 abnormalities) with induction failure or active relapse
    • High risk MDS (RAEB-1 or RAEB-2) with adverse cytogenetics (abnormal chromosome 7 or \< 4 abnormalities) regardless of remission status
    • Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in CR >= 2 or with induction failure or active relapse (ALL in CR1 with minimal residual disease detected also will be eligible)
    • Chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) in blast crisis phase
    • Hodgkin lymphoma with stable or progressive disease
    • Mantle cell lymphoma with stable or progressive disease
    • Burkitt lymphoma in CR or partial remission (PR)
    • Aggressive B-cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) (e.g., diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, transformed indolent B-cell lymphoma) with stable or progressive disease
    • T-cell NHL with stable or progressive disease
    • Multiple myeloma (MM) with induction failure as defined by failure to achieve minimal response (CR, Very Good Partial Response [VGPR], or PR) or the development of progressive disease on primary therapy, or MM with active relapse as defined by previously treated myeloma that achieved a molecular response or better that then progressed
  • Age 18-65 years.
  • At least one potentially suitable HLA-haploidentical or HLA-matched donor
  • performance score >60%, see Appendix A
  • Recipient participants must have adequate organ function as defined below:

    • Cardiac >=45% by 2D ECHO;
    • Forced expiratory volume-1 (FEV-1), forced vital capacity (FVC), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for ) all of >=50% predicted;
    • Estimated serum of >=60 ml/minute/1.73m\^2 calculated using in the clinical lab;
    • Total \<=2X the ;
    • (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \<=3X the upper limit of normal.
  • Myeloablative conditioning is toxic to the developing human fetus and is teratogenic. For this reason, the following measures apply:

    --Women of (WOCBP) and men must agree to use effective (hormonal, surgical, IUD or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) from the start of conditioning regimen through at least one-year posttransplant. For the HLA haploidentical cohort the requirements are the same, however while taking sirolimus and for 12 weeks after the last dose, the birth control must be highly effective (hormonal, surgical, IUD, abstinence).

  • WOCBP must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to enrollment.

Inclusion Criteria - Donor:

-Related donor (age >=12) deemed suitable, eligible, and willing to donate, per clinical evaluations, who are additionally willing to donate blood, bone marrow, and stool for research. Related donors will be evaluated in accordance with existing Standard Policies and Procedures for determination of eligibility and suitability for clinical donation.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA:

Exclusion Criteria - Recipient:

  • Subjects who are receiving any other agents. Prior experimental therapies must have been completed at least 3 weeks prior to the date of beginning conditioning.
  • Prior myeloablative conditioning for or allogeneic HCT.
  • Active breastfeeding.
  • Active malignancy of non-hematopoietic type (excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) which is , relapsed/refractory to treatment, or locally advanced and not amenable to curative treatment. This excludes non-melanoma skin cancers.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness (e.g. severe endocrinopathy, disseminated intravascular coagulation, profound electrolyte disturbance, active hepatitis, uncontrolled dental infection) that in the opinion of the PI would make it unsafe to proceed with transplantation.

Exclusion Criteria - Donor:

None.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(16)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Relapsed and refractory

Relapsed: the illness came back after treatment had worked. Refractory: it did not respond to treatment, or stopped responding while still on it.

Karnofsky performance status (KPS)

A 0–100 scale of how well someone can carry out everyday activities. 100 is no complaints and no signs of illness; 70 is able to look after yourself but not to work or keep up normal activity; 50 is needing considerable help and frequent medical care.

Studies often ask for 60 or 70 and above. Your doctor gives the score.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Allogeneic and autologous transplant

Stem cell (bone marrow) transplants. Allogeneic uses cells from a donor; autologous uses your own cells, collected earlier and given back.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
430 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Donor Arm

    Donors for Recipients in Arms 1-4

  • Experimental
    Phase I Dose Escalation, Cohort 1 (matched)

    DLI at escalating doses (1 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg, 3 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg, and 1 x 10\^7 CD3+ cells/kg) on day +7 or +21 to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 18 evaluable patients)

    Procedure: donor lymphocyte infusion · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Busulfan · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Sirolimus

  • Experimental
    Phase I Dose Escalation, Cohort 2 (haploidentical)

    DLI at escalating doses (1 x 10\^5 CD3+ cells/kg, 3 x 10\^5 CD3+ cells/kg, and 1 x 10\^6 CD3+ cells/kg) on day +7 or +21 to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 18 evaluable patients)

    Procedure: donor lymphocyte infusion · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Busulfan · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Sirolimus

  • Experimental
    Phase II Efficacy, Cohort 1 (matched)

    DLI at maximally tolerated, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess secondary clinical outcomes at this dosing level (up to 14 additional evaluable patients in each cohort)

    Procedure: donor lymphocyte infusion · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Busulfan · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Sirolimus

  • Experimental
    Phase II Efficacy, Cohort 2 (haploidentical)

    DLI at maximally tolerated, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess secondary clinical outcomes at this dosing level (up to 14 additional evaluable patients in each cohort)

    Procedure: donor lymphocyte infusion · Drug: Cyclophosphamide · Drug: Busulfan · Drug: Mycophenolate mofetil · Drug: Fludarabine · Drug: Sirolimus

Interventions

  • Proceduredonor lymphocyte infusion

    The DLI will be given on Day +7 (Day +21 for dose level -1). If a recipient participant is deemed too critically ill/unstable to receive DLI on the protocol specified day, the DLI will be delayed up to 4 days at the discretion of the PI and given within this time frame once the recipient participant s clinical status has stabilized or improved. If the DLI cannot be given during this time frame, the recipient participant will be taken off study and not considered evaluable for DLT, outcomes, or adverse events since the experimental intervention will not have been given.

  • HLA-matched: 50 mg/kg IV once daily over 2 hours on days +3 and +4a Cyclophosphamide will be dosed according to ideal body weight. HLA haploidentical: 25 mg/kg IV once daily over 2 hours on days +3 and +4a Cyclophosphamide will be dosed according to ideal body weight.

  • AUC targeted dose based on busulfan test dose, with a default dose of 130 mg/m2/day, given as IV infusion over 3 hours each day for 4 days Transplant days -6 through day -3

  • 15 mg/kg orally or IV three times daily (max 1000 mg/dose) starting on day +5, continued through day +35. Dosing will be according to actual body weight.

  • 40 mg/m2 IV infusion over 30-60 minutes once daily for 4 days Transplant days -6 through -3

  • Loading dose of 6 mg orally given on day +5 (calculated based on actual body weight, maximum initial dose 6 mg), then maintenance dose starting at 2 mg orally daily on day +6 with dose adjustments to maintain a trough of 5-12 ng/ml, continued through day +70 with no taper. Doses should be modified as appropriate for drug interactions.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. determine the maximally tolerated dose of DLI that can be safely administered after HLA-matched-related HCT and after HLA-haploidentical HCT

    fraction of evaluable patients who experience steroid-refractory grade III-IV aGVHD at day +60 will be determined and reported along with 80% and 95% two-sided confidence intervals.

    Time frame: 60 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of Steroid-refractory Grades II-IV and Grades III-IV aGVHD at days +100 and +200 for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate steroid-refractory grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 and 200.

    Time frame: Day 100 and 200

  2. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD at 1 year for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate chronic GVHD

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of Grades II-IV and Grades III-IV aGVHD at days +100 and +200 for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate grade II-IV and grade III-IV acute GVHD at day 100 and 200.

    Time frame: Day 100 and 200

  4. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of non-relapse mortality at 100 days and 1 year for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate non-relapse mortality

    Time frame: Day 100 and 1 year

  5. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of relapse at 1 year for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate relapse

    Time frame: 1 year

  6. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    To evaluate survival

    Time frame: 1 year

  7. determine, at the maximally tolerated dose in the phase II portion of the study, the cumulative incidences of primary engraftment (including time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment) for HLA-matched-related and HLA-haploidentical

    Rate and timing of neutrophil and platelet engraftment reported as median engraftment times for each and cumulative incidences of each at days +28 and +100

    Time frame: Day 28 and 100

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • National Institutes of Health Clinical Center
    Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
    Recruiting
    • For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact National Cancer Institute Referral Office · Contact888-624-1937
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All IPD recorded in the medical record will be shared with intramural investigators upon request. @@@@@@@@@@@@In addition, all large scale genomic sequencing data will be shared with subscribers to dbGaP

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Clinical data available during the study and indefinitely.@@@@@@@@@@@@Genomic data are available once genomic data are uploaded per protocol GDS plan for as long as database is active.

Access criteria: Clinical data will be made available via subscription to BTRIS and with the permission of the study PI.@@@@@@@@@@@@Genomic data are made available via dbGaP through requests to the data custodians.

09

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started May 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 73 months after the start.

Of 64 phase 1/2 interventional studies under Hematologic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 76 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 51 and three quarters within 127. This study's planned 73 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 7, 2022
First posted
Apr 14, 2022
StartActual
May 23, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Jul 3, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 2, 2029
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Minor edits
Nothing that changes what the study is or who can join. Edited: verification date
2 updates, last Nov 9, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05327023
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 14, 2022
Start date
May 23, 2022
Primary completion
Jul 3, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Amy H Chai
Contact
amy.chai@nih.gov
(240) 858-3755
Christopher G Kanakry, M.D.
Contact
christopher.kanakry@nih.gov
(240) 760-6171
Christopher G Kanakry, M.D.
principal investigator · National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclophosphamide

Start the discussion