ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05308056ACDCUpdated Mar 30, 2023

Depth of Anesthesia During Electroconvulsive Therapy

An observational study in Mood Disorders and Psychotic Disorders, sponsored by Region Örebro County. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-30.

Sponsored by Region Örebro County · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Aim: To describe anesthetic depth using spectal edge frequency (SEF) and density spectral array (DSA) and its relation to treatment effect of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Study design: Observational study Primary outcomes: SEF, DSA and treatment effect of ECT. Method: SEF and DSA si measured using a commercially available monitor for depth of anesthesia. Treatment effect of ECT will be evaluated using hemodynamic, electroencephalographic and clinical variables.

Read the detailed description

Background Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective therapy for severe depression where an electric current is applied to the brain to induce an epileptic seizure (1). The success of ECT is dependent upon the degree and quality of epileptic activity (2). ECT is normally administered after administering a muscle relaxant to prevent the seizure activity from causing muculoskeletal injuries. To tolerate the muscle relaxant the entire procedure is performed under general anesthesia. Most hypnotics have anti-convulsant effects and therefore counteract the effects of ECT (3). This implies that deep anesthesia hinders an optimal treatment effect of ECT which is supported by observational data (4). This relation has been proven with lighter anesthesia measured through bispectral index (BIS) correlating to longer seizure duration (5). BIS is not optimized to estimate the depth of anesthesia under very dynamic anesthetic protocols as there is an inherent latency in the computation of the BIS value. Anesthesia for ECT generally consists only of induction and recovery with no stable anesthetic phase making BIS an inappropriate measure of anesthetic depth. Indices of anesthetic depth that are derived directly from the processed EEG-signal have a negligent latency and can therefore be used with more precision during anesthesia for ECT. Spectral edge frequency (SEF) is the frequency under which 95 % of the total amplitude of the EEG-signal is found and it decreases with increasing depths of anesthesia. The density spectral array (DSA) is a graphic representation of the frequency and amplitude of the EEG signal over time and it is possible to interpret the DSA in real time without extensive training. The SEF and DSA have not, to our knowledge, been previously tested during general anesthesia for ECT. In the postictal phase during recovery from ECT some patients become agitated and confused (6). This condition is not clearly defined in the literature but is commonly referred to as postictal agitation (PIA) and due to differing definitions the incidence is difficult to estimate. Incidences in the range of 10-20 % have been reported (7). In the post-operative period after cardiac surgery decreased regional cerebral oxygen saturation (SrcO2) has been linked to post-operative confusion (8). A possible link between decreased SrcO2 and PIA has not been studied before.

Aim

The aim of this research project is two-fold:

  1. To study the relation between anesthetic depth measured with SEF and DSA and the quality of epileptic activity during ECT.
  2. To study the relation between SrcO2 and PIA during ECT.

Hypotheses

  1. Lighter depths of anesthesia as measured by SEF and DSA have a positive correlation with epileptic seizure quality during ECT.
  2. SrcO2 during ECT has an inverse correlation with the incidence of PIA. Method Setting and recruitment The study will be performed at the ECT-unit of the university hospital in Örebro. General anesthesia is provided by a nurse specially trained in anesthesia and an anesthesiologist. ECT is provided by specially trained nurses and staff at the ECT-unit. Patients recover from the postictal phase in an adjacent recovery room. Patients undergoing ECT through the outpatient clinic will be recruited to the study.

Anesthetic protocol The protocol for anesthesia and ECT will be the same as is being used clinically at the ECT-unit. After preoxygenation anesthesia is induced using thiopental. After confirmation of adequate anesthetic depth (failure to respond to verbal command) suxamethonium is administered. Doses are chosen by the anesthesiologist. Patients are admitted to the recovery room when breathing spontaneously and can maintain a patent airway.

Data collection SEF and DSA will be measured continuously from before pre-oxygenation to admittance to the recovery room using a SedLine® (Masimo, Irvine, CA, USA) monitor. The monitor will be blinded during the procedure so as not to affect the staff in any way. SrcO2 will be measured using the same monitor during the same period. Data regarding the seizure duration will be gathered from the electronic patient records. The staff caring for the postictal patients will estimate the degree of PIA according to previously used numerical scale (9).Data will be presented as mean ± SD or median (IQR) according to their distribution. Statistical analysis will be performed using a logistic regression model adjusted for potential confounders such as type of psychiatric medication, age, bilateral or unilateral stimulation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mood Disorders
  • Psychotic Disorders

Keywords

  • General anesthesia
  • Electroencephalogram
  • Awareness
  • Depth of anesthesia
  • Depression
03

In context

Mood Disorders

595 studies on the registry are indexed under Mood Disorders; 119 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 37 is below the median of 180 across 147 observational studies indexed under Mood Disorders.

Browse Mood Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Örebro County is the lead sponsor of 124 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

All patients admitted for ECT during the study period

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Admitted for a course of ECT

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not able to attach electrodes for measurement of depth of anesthesia due to eg. skin condition.
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
37 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ECT-patients

    Patients receiving routine ECT.

    Device: Depth of anesthesia monitor, SedLine® (Masimo, Irvine, CA, USA)

Interventions

  • DeviceDepth of anesthesia monitor, SedLine® (Masimo, Irvine, CA, USA)

    The device monitors the patient's electroencephalogram using electrodes applied to the forehead.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in spectral edge frequency

    The spectral edge frequency of the patients electroencephalogram

    Time frame: Monitored before, during and after ECT. Total monitoring time is apporximately 30 minutes per patient.

  2. Change in density spectral array

    The density spectral array of the patients electroencephalogram

    Time frame: Monitored before, during and after ECT. Total monitoring time is approximately 30 minutes per patient.

  3. Duration of convulsive activity

    Measures the duration of both motor and encephalographic convulsions directly following ECT.

    Time frame: Monitored immediately after administration of ECT.

  4. Postictal supression

    Measures the degree of encephalographic supression directly following ECT

    Time frame: Monitored immediately after administration of ECT.

  5. Need for restimulation

    Measures if there is a need for restimulation directly after evaluating the effect of an administered ECT.

    Time frame: Monitored immediately after administration of ECT.

  6. Change in heart rate.

    Mesaures the increase in heart rate directly following ECT.

    Time frame: Monitored immediately after administration of ECT.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Awareness

    Patients will be asked if they can recall any part of the tratment from induction of anesthesia until administration of ECT.

    Time frame: Patients are asked at a follow up visit approximately 1 week after a course of several ECT:s.

  2. Adverse effects of ECT

    Occurence of adverse effects following ECT, evaluated using the CRPS-memory questionnaire.

    Time frame: Patients are asked at a follow up visit approximately 1 week after a course of several ECT:s.

  3. Desaturation

    Occurence of saturation \<92 % at any point during anesthesia and ECT.

    Time frame: Monitored immediately before pre-oxygenation, during the entire ECT and until the patient has recovered. Approximately 1 hours of total monitoring time.

  4. End-tidal CO2

    Measurement of end-tidal CO2

    Time frame: During induction of general anesthesia

  5. Change in depressive symtoms

    Effect of ECT on patients' symptoms and quality of life. Evaluated using the self-asessed Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS-S), 0-57 points. A higher score indicate more severe disease.

    Time frame: Patients are asked at a follow up visit approximately 1 week after a course of several ECT:s and before ECT.

  6. Clinical assessment of depth of anesthesia

    The treating anesthesiologist will be asked to asses the depth of anesthesia. The anesthesiologist is asked after induction of general anesthesia. The terms too heavily sedated, too lightly sedated and adequate level of sedation is used.

    Time frame: Monitored immediately before pre-oxygenation, during the entire ECT and until the patient leaves the recovery ward. Approximately 1 hour of total monitoring time.

  7. Regional cerebral oxygen saturation

    Measured using near-infrared spectroscopy

    Time frame: Before, during and after anesthesia and ECT

  8. Occurence of post-ictal agitation

    Registered in the recovery ward following ECT. A scale using three levels of agitation is used by the recovery staff. Higher scores indicate increasing levels of agitation.

    Time frame: Monitored in the recovery suite

  9. Change in quality of life

    Effect of ECT on patients' symptoms and quality of life. Evaluated using EruroQol 5-Dimensions score (EQ-5D), each quiestion is scored 1-3 or 1-5 points. A higher score indicates worse health related problems.

    Time frame: Patients are asked at a follow up visit approximately 1 week after a course of several ECT:s and before ECT.

  10. Change in illness severity

    Effect of ECT on patients' symptoms and quality of life. Evaluated using Clinial global impressions scale (CGI), each question is scored 1-7 points. A higher score indicates higher illness severity.

    Time frame: Patients are asked at a follow up visit approximately 1 week after a course of several ECT:s and before ECT.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Universitetssjukhuset Örebro
    Örebro, Bok 1613 70116, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • UK ECT Review Group. Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2003 Mar 8;361(9360):799-808. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12705-5. PubMed 12642045 ↗
  • Minelli A, Abate M, Zampieri E, Gainelli G, Trabucchi L, Segala M, Sartori R, Gennarelli M, Conca A, Bortolomasi M. Seizure Adequacy Markers and the Prediction of Electroconvulsive Therapy Response. J ECT. 2016 Jun;32(2):88-92. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000274. PubMed 26397151 ↗
  • Zolezzi M. Medication management during electroconvulsant therapy. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2016 Apr 19;12:931-9. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S100908. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27143894 ↗
  • Kronsell A, Nordenskjold A, Bell M, Amin R, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Tiger M. The effect of anaesthetic dose on response and remission in electroconvulsive therapy for major depressive disorder: nationwide register-based cohort study. BJPsych Open. 2021 Mar 23;7(2):e71. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.31. PubMed 33752777 ↗
  • Guerrier G, Gianni MA. The effectiveness of BIS monitoring during electro-convulsive therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2019 Dec;58:100-104. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 May 28. PubMed 31151038 ↗
  • Li X, Cheng N, Deng Y, Du J, Zhang M, Guo Y, Hei Z. Incidence and risk factors for postictal delirium in patients after electroconvulsive therapy in China. Asian J Psychiatr. 2020 Oct;53:102361. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102361. Epub 2020 Aug 25. No abstract available. PubMed 32890981 ↗
  • Tsujii T, Uchida T, Suzuki T, Mimura M, Hirano J, Uchida H. Factors Associated With Delirium Following Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Systematic Review. J ECT. 2019 Dec;35(4):279-287. doi: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000606. PubMed 31764452 ↗
  • Eertmans W, De Deyne C, Genbrugge C, Marcus B, Bouneb S, Beran M, Fret T, Gutermann H, Boer W, Vander Laenen M, Heylen R, Mesotten D, Vanelderen P, Jans F. Association between postoperative delirium and postoperative cerebral oxygen desaturation in older patients after cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Feb;124(2):146-153. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.09.042. Epub 2019 Dec 18. PubMed 31862160 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05308056
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 1, 2022
Start date
Apr 19, 2022
Primary completion
Feb 6, 2023
Completion
Feb 6, 2023
Last update
Mar 30, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion