ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05297734Updated Apr 30, 2026

Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Two Supportive Cancer Care Delivery Models for Adults With Cancer

An interventional study of Receive technology-based supportive cancer care and Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care in End of Life and Cancer, sponsored by Stanford University. Recruiting at 17 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-30.

Sponsored by Stanford University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2022; still recruiting 4 years 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,996
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cluster-randomized comparative effectiveness trial compares a technology-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach with a redesigned team-based supportive cancer care (SCC) approach.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Greater intervention effects on health-related quality of life

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Greater intervention effects on patient activation II. Greater satisfaction with care and decision-making III. Greater documentation of goals of care and symptoms IV. To lower acute care V. Greater palliative care and hospice

OUTLINE: Sites are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM A: Patients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.

ARM B: Patients are paired with a lay health worker who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.

All participants complete a baseline interview upon enrollment during the initial consent phone contact and then a survey at 3-, 6-and 12-months post enrollment.

02

Conditions studied

  • End of Life
  • Cancer

Keywords

  • Carcinoma
  • Lung Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
  • Melanoma
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms
  • Sarcoma
  • Ovarian Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial
  • Stomach Neoplasms
  • Glioblastoma
  • Rectal Neoplasms
  • Colonic Neoplasms
  • Esophageal Neoplasms
  • Breast Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell
  • Skin Neoplasms
  • Small Cell Lung Carcinoma
  • Osteosarcoma
  • Myelodysplastic Syndromes
  • Disease Progression
  • Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
  • Neoplasms by Histologic Type
  • Neoplasms
  • Respiratory Tract Neoplasms
  • Thoracic Neoplasms
  • Neoplasms by Site
  • Lung Diseases
  • Respiratory Tract Diseases
  • Urogenital Neoplasms
  • Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
03

In context

Death

456 studies on the registry are indexed under Death; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 2,996 is above the median of 163 across 210 interventional studies indexed under Death.

Browse Death studies →

Lead sponsor

Stanford University is the lead sponsor of 2,168 studies on the registry; 431 are open to participants now.

Of its 267 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 207 (78%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Newly diagnosed patients with solid tumor cancer diagnosis or recurrence of the disease.
  2. Patients must have the ability to understand and willingness to provide verbal consent.
  3. Participants must speak English, Spanish, Chinese, or Vietnamese.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Inability to consent to the study
  2. Plans to change oncologist within 12 months
  3. Employed by the practice site
  4. Patients who anticipate moving from the area within 12 months
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
2,996 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Technology-based supportive cancer care

    Patients receive educational materials to assist with advance care planning and symptom management through a technology-based supportive cancer care weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.

    Other: Receive technology-based supportive cancer care

  • Experimental
    Redesigned team-based supportive cancer care

    Patients are paired with a health educator who will discuss the same educational materials from ARM A either in person or by telephone discussions weekly during months 1-4 and every other week during months 5-12.

    Behavioral: Receive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care

Interventions

  • OtherReceive technology-based supportive cancer care

    All participants will receive an electronic health record message or email with standardized information provided regarding advance care planning and symptom management.

    Also known as: Technology-based SCC approach

  • BehavioralReceive redesigned team-based supportive cancer care

    Lay Health Workers will meet with 1:1 with participants over 12 months to discuss advance care planning, surrogate decision-makers, advance directives and physician orders for life sustaining treatment.

    Also known as: Patients Activated in Cancer care through Teams (PACT), Redesigned SCC team-based approach

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).

    Each patient will receive a health-related quality of life survey (FACT-G) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in health-related quality of life as assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G).

    Each patient will receive a health-related quality of life survey (FACT-G) at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 6, and 12 months

  2. Change in patient activation using the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13).

    Each patient will receive a validated patient activation survey (PAM-13) to assess their activation at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: Change in patient activation from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months

  3. Change in satisfaction with care using the Consumer Assessment of Health Care (Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Cancer Care Survey Questions #39 and #42.

    Each patient will receive a validated satisfaction with care survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: Change in satisfaction with care from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months

  4. Change in satisfaction with decision using the Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD)

    Each patient will receive a validated satisfaction with decision survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.

    Time frame: Change in satisfaction with decision from baseline to 3, 6, and 12 months

  5. Palliative Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)

    Palliative care use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6 and 12 months after patient enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  6. Hospice Care Use (Self-reported and Chart Review)

    Hospice care use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  7. Emergency Department Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)

    Emergency Department use will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  8. Hospitalization Visits (Self-reported and Chart Review)

    Hospital use for each patient will be self-reported by each patient or abstracted by electronic medical record at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  9. Documentation of goals of care discussions (Chart Review)

    Documentation of goals of care discussions will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  10. Documentation of symptom discussions (Chart Review)

    Documentation of symptom discussions will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 3, 6, and 12 months after enrollment.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

Other outcomes

  1. Time Toxicity

    Each patient will receive a time toxicity survey at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

  2. Financial Toxicity

    Each patient will receive the validated COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST)-Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (COST-FACIT) questionnaire at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months.

    Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after patient enrollment

07

Study locations

12 of 17 sites recruiting
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    Birmingham, Alabama 35294, United States
    Recruiting
    • Gabrielle Rocque, MD · Contact
  • University of South Alabama
    Mobile, Alabama 36688, United States
    Recruiting
    • Jennifer Y Pierce, MD · Contact
  • Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
    Recruiting
    • Finly Zachariah, MD · Contact800-826-4673
  • VA Medical Center, Fresno
    Fresno, California 93703, United States
    Recruiting
  • Santa Clara Valley Medical Center
    Fruitdale, California 95128, United States
    Recruiting
    • Sangeeta Aggarwal, MD · Contact
  • St Jude Heritage Medical Group
    Fullerton, California 92835, United States
    Recruiting
    • David Park, MD · Contact
  • Oncology Institute for Hope and Innovation
    Los Angeles, California 90017, United States
    Recruiting
    • Richy Agajanian, MD · Contact
  • Sacramento VA Medical Center - VA Northern California Health Care System
    Mather, California 95655, United States
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Pacific Cancer Care
    Monterey, California 93940, United States
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • VA Palo Alto
    Palo Alto, California 94305, United States
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Zuckerberg San Francisco General
    San Francisco, California 94110, United States
    Recruiting
    • Niharika Dixit, MD · Contact
  • Kaiser Foundation Research Institute
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
    Recruiting
    • Raymond Liu, MD · Contact
  • University of San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94117, United States
    Recruiting
    • Kim Rhoads, MD · Contact
  • San Francisco VA Medical Center
    San Francisco, California 94121, United States
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • Spark M. Matsunaga VA Medical Center
    Honolulu, Hawaii 96819, United States
    Recruiting
  • North Las Vegas VA Medical Center
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89086, United States
    Active, not recruiting

    Not enrolling at this site.

  • George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84148, United States
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05297734
Collaborators
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Responsible party
Manali Indravadan Patel (Assistant Professor of Medicine, Stanford University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 28, 2022
Start date
Jun 24, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 30, 2026

Study contacts

Manali I Patel, MD MPH MS
Contact
manalip@stanford.edu
6507234000

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion