ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07728539Updated Jul 27, 2026

Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency Ablation and Standard Low-Power Ablation in Catheter Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

An interventional study of Technique of radiofrequency ablation using very high-power short-duration ablation parameters and Technique of radiofrequency ablation using low-power settings in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), Stroke and Acute Cerebrovascular Accident, sponsored by Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery. Recruiting at 1 site in Russia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-27.

Sponsored by Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
196
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia and represents one of the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. According to current data, AF is associated with approximately 20% of all ischemic strokes, while the risk of stroke in patients with this arrhythmia is increased fivefold. Ischemic stroke in patients with AF is characterized by a more severe clinical course, more frequently results in death, is associated with significant disability, and carries a higher risk of recurrence compared with strokes of other etiologies. Consequently, the risk of death in patients with AF-associated stroke is doubled, while the economic costs of treatment increase by an average of 1.5 times.

The aim of the present study is to perform a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of two interventional treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation: very high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation (90 W) and conventional low-power radiofrequency ablation (35-45 W) for pulmonary vein isolation using the "CLOSE protocol" approach with a non-fluoroscopic navigation system. The efficacy of the interventions will be assessed both in the early postoperative period and during long-term follow-up over 12 months.

Read the detailed description

The study is designed to involve highly specialized centers with substantial clinical experience in the interventional treatment of atrial fibrillation (at least 300 procedures annually) and equipment enabling both conventional low-power radiofrequency ablation (35-45 W) and very high-power short-duration ablation (vHPSD) using the QMODE Plus mode (90 W) for pulmonary vein isolation performed according to the "CLOSE protocol" strategy with non-fluoroscopic navigation systems. The study population will include patients with paroxysmal and persistent forms of atrial fibrillation.

This randomized open-label controlled trial will be conducted with allocation of patients into two groups according to the interventional treatment strategy applied. In the first group, pulmonary vein isolation will be performed using conventional low-power settings (35-45 W), whereas in the second group, pulmonary vein isolation will be carried out using very high-power short-duration ablation (vHPSD) with 90 W energy delivery. Patient randomization will be performed using the sealed-envelope method with a restricted block randomization scheme (block size of 10 patients, with equal allocation of 5 patients to each group). The study is expected to be completed after enrollment of 196 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
  • Stroke
  • Acute Cerebrovascular Accident
  • Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent
  • Death

Keywords

  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • high-power short-duration ablation
  • very high-power short-duration ablation
  • atrial fibrillation
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

4,009 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 961 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 196 is above the median of 150 across 2,476 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18 years old;
  • Atrial fibrillation resistant to antiarrhythmic therapy;
  • Paroxysmal form of atrial fibrillation;
  • Persistent form of atrial fibrillation;
  • The patient's consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age under 18 and over 80 years old;
  • The presence of another cardiac pathology requiring surgical treatment;
  • Congenital heart defects;
  • Previous "open" cardiac surgery;
  • Bone marrow diseases;
  • Pathology of the blood coagulation system;
  • The is less than 40%;
  • Moderate to severe renal insufficiency ( \<50 ml/min);
  • Drug-resistant hypertension (despite hypotensive therapy);
  • Organically altered mitral valve;
  • There are reasons to assume that the patient will not show up for subsequent visits (control points of the study) for various reasons;
  • The patient's participation in another clinical trial.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Creatinine clearance (CrCl)

How quickly the kidneys clear creatinine, a waste product, from the blood. A study may estimate it from a blood test with age, weight and sex (often by the Cockcroft–Gault formula), or measure it using blood and urine collected over a set time. Given in mL/min; higher is better.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
196 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Technique of radiofrequency ablation using very high-power short-duration ablation parameters

    Technique of radiofrequency ablation using very high-power short-duration ablation parameters

    Procedure: Technique of radiofrequency ablation using very high-power short-duration ablation parameters

  • Active comparator
    Technique of radiofrequency ablation using low-power settings

    Technique of radiofrequency ablation using low-power settings

    Procedure: Technique of radiofrequency ablation using low-power settings

Interventions

  • ProcedureTechnique of radiofrequency ablation using very high-power short-duration ablation parameters

    Radiofrequency ablation is performed in QMODE Plus mode (90 W, 4 s per application) with esophageal temperature monitoring (not exceeding 38.5 °C), using a steerable introducer and a contact force of 5-15 g.

  • ProcedureTechnique of radiofrequency ablation using low-power settings

    Radiofrequency ablation is performed at a power of 35 W and an application duration of 10-15 s with monitoring of the ablation index (400-550 depending on the anatomical zone), esophageal temperature (not exceeding 38.5 °C), and a contact force of 5-15 g.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Recurrence of AF

    The number of patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation after surgery

    Time frame: From the date of ablation until the date of recurrent atrial fibrillation, assessed up to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital mortality

    The number of patients who died in the hospital

    Time frame: From the date of ablation until the date of death, assessed up to 5 days

  2. Non-lethal events

    Number of participants with non-lethal events. The main hospital non-lethal events (bleeding, tamponade, perforation of the walls of the heart, damage to the esophagus)

    Time frame: From the date of ablation to the date of any of the listed events, assessed up to 5 days

  3. Long-term mortality

    The number of patients who died during the follow-up period

    Time frame: From the date of ablation until the date of death, assessed up to 12 months

  4. Cerebral events

    The number of patients who had a stroke or acute cerebrovascular accident or a transient ischemic attack within 12 months after ablation

    Time frame: From the date of ablation until the date of the event, assessed up to 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Bakulev National Medical Research Center for Cardiovascular Surgery
    Moscow, 121552, Russia
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07728539
Lead sponsor
Bakulev Scientific Center of Cardiovascular Surgery
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 27, 2026

Study contacts

Andrey Filatov
Contact
agfilatov@bakulev.ru
+7(495) 414-77-02
Andrey Filatov
principal investigator · Bakulev Scientific Center for Cardiovascular Surgery

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion