CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05295277Updated Aug 7, 2023

Validation of Optical Genome Mapping for the Identification of Constitutional Genomic Variants in a Postnatal Cohort

An observational study in Developmental Disability, Intellectual Disability and Autism Spectrum Disorder, sponsored by Bionano Genomics. Recruiting at 8 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-08-07.

Sponsored by Bionano Genomics · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Mar 2024, 2 years 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2020; still recruiting 5 years 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research use only (RUO) study is to detect genomic structural variants (SVs) in human DNA by Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) using the Bionano Genomics Saphyr system. SVs are a type of genetic alternation that includes deletions, duplications, and both balanced and unbalanced rearrangements (ex: inversions or translocations), as well as specific repeat expansions and contractions. The results of OGM analysis will be compared to prior clinical genetic test results to determine how OGM compares to current standard of care (SOC) clinical test methods such as chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or next generation sequencing (NGS), etc.

Read the detailed description

Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging next-generation cytogenomic tool that enables a comprehensive analysis of structural variants (SVs) in the genome. OGM, in its current iteration, is performed on the Saphyr system, which is developed and marketed by Bionano Genomics (San Diego, CA). OGM employs imaging of ultra-long DNA molecules (>150 kbp) that are labeled at a unique 6 base-pair sequence motif (CTTAAG) that occurs throughout the genome. The images of the labeled DNA molecules are used to generate a de novo assembly that can be compared to a reference genome to identify all classes of SVs, such as deletions, duplications, balanced/ unbalanced genomic rearrangements (insertions, inversions, and translocations), and repeat array expansions/contractions). In addition, a separate coverage-based algorithm enables the detection of genome-wide copy number analysis (similar to CMA), and the absence of heterozygosity (AOH) analysis. In the same assay, a concurrent or stepwise data analysis pipeline allows for sizing pathogenic CGG repeat expansions (consistent with fragile X syndrome) as well as D4Z4 repeat contractions which are consistent with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy type 1 (FSHD1). Recently, in several studies, OGM has demonstrated excellent concordance with standard-of-care testing. Importantly, the OGM workflow can provide results within three-five days.

The aim of this double-blinded, multi-site, retrospective, observational, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study is to evaluate the concordance of structural variant detection by OGM compared to standard of care tests (such as CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS, etc.), in a large cohort containing a variety of SVs including aneuploidies, intragenic and contiguous deletions, duplications, balanced and unbalanced translocations, inversions, isochromosomes, ring chromosomes, repeat expansions, repeat contractions, and more. This study is also designed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility of OGM analysis conducted at multiple sites, by numerous operators, and on different Saphyr instruments. Consensus testing and interpretation protocols were developed and implemented at all sites.

02

Conditions studied

  • Developmental Disability
  • Intellectual Disability
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder
  • Congenital Anomaly
  • Fragile X Syndrome
  • Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy 1

Keywords

  • Validation study
  • Comparison study
  • New technology compared to standard of care
03

In context

Muscular Dystrophies

548 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Dystrophies; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,000 is above the median of 69 across 179 observational studies indexed under Muscular Dystrophies.

Browse Muscular Dystrophies studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Bionano Genomics as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Individuals will be recruited if they have standard of care genetic test results (such as CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS, etc.) to compare to optical genome mapping results.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Individual with a genomic aberration identified by CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS or other standard of care (SOC) genetic testing technology whose clinical test results are available to compare with results from OGM.
  2. Patients with prior negative SOC genetic testing results whose results are available to compare with results from OGM.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any individual who opted-out of research at the testing laboratory.
  2. An individual whose genetic test contains the following variants: pathogenic sequence variants, abnormalities involving acrocentric p-arms and centromeres, below 20% for mosaicism, and tetraploidy.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
1,000 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Standard of care genetic testing group

    Individuals with genomic test results from a standard of care (SOC) test (such as CMA, karyotyping, Southern blot analysis, PCR, FISH, and/or NGS, etc.) will be enrolled in the study to compare the SOC result to results from optical genome mapping.

    Other: Standard of care genetic testing group

Interventions

  • OtherStandard of care genetic testing group

    N/A - no intervention as this is an observational study.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity/Concordance and specificity of OGM with standard of care testing for detection of structural variants.

    OGM results are evaluated against the standard of care test and concordance (sensitivity and specificity) will be determined.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reproducibility and identification of structural variants beyond the limit of detection of standard of care methods.

    Inter-site as well as inter and intra-run variability of OGM will be assessed by reproducibility studies.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

07

Study locations

2 of 8 sites recruiting
  • Praxis Genomics
    Atlanta, Georgia 30328, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Augusta University Research Institute
    Augusta, Georgia 30912, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Molecular Pathology
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center
    New York, New York 10032, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • DNA Microarray CGH Laboratory, Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center
    W. Henrietta, New York 14586, United States
    Active, not recruiting
  • Greenwood Genetic Center
    Greenwood, South Carolina 29646, United States
    • Steven A. Skinner, MD · Principal investigator
    Recruiting
  • Lineagen (A Bionano Genomics Company)
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84109, United States
    Recruiting
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
    Active, not recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shieh JT, Penon-Portmann M, Wong KHY, Levy-Sakin M, Verghese M, Slavotinek A, Gallagher RC, Mendelsohn BA, Tenney J, Beleford D, Perry H, Chow SK, Sharo AG, Brenner SE, Qi Z, Yu J, Klein OD, Martin D, Kwok PY, Boffelli D. Application of full-genome analysis to diagnose rare monogenic disorders. NPJ Genom Med. 2021 Sep 23;6(1):77. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00241-5. Erratum In: NPJ Genom Med. 2021 Oct 12;6(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s41525-021-00251-3. PubMed 34556655 ↗
  • Stence AA, Thomason JG, Pruessner JA, Sompallae RR, Snow AN, Ma D, Moore SA, Bossler AD. Validation of Optical Genome Mapping for the Molecular Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy. J Mol Diagn. 2021 Nov;23(11):1506-1514. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.07.021. Epub 2021 Aug 9. PubMed 34384893 ↗
  • Mantere T, Neveling K, Pebrel-Richard C, Benoist M, van der Zande G, Kater-Baats E, Baatout I, van Beek R, Yammine T, Oorsprong M, Hsoumi F, Olde-Weghuis D, Majdali W, Vermeulen S, Pauper M, Lebbar A, Stevens-Kroef M, Sanlaville D, Dupont JM, Smeets D, Hoischen A, Schluth-Bolard C, El Khattabi L. Optical genome mapping enables constitutional chromosomal aberration detection. Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Aug 5;108(8):1409-1422. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.05.012. Epub 2021 Jul 7. PubMed 34237280 ↗
  • Chaisson MJP, Sanders AD, Zhao X, Malhotra A, Porubsky D, Rausch T, Gardner EJ, Rodriguez OL, Guo L, Collins RL, Fan X, Wen J, Handsaker RE, Fairley S, Kronenberg ZN, Kong X, Hormozdiari F, Lee D, Wenger AM, Hastie AR, Antaki D, Anantharaman T, Audano PA, Brand H, Cantsilieris S, Cao H, Cerveira E, Chen C, Chen X, Chin CS, Chong Z, Chuang NT, Lambert CC, Church DM, Clarke L, Farrell A, Flores J, Galeev T, Gorkin DU, Gujral M, Guryev V, Heaton WH, Korlach J, Kumar S, Kwon JY, Lam ET, Lee JE, Lee J, Lee WP, Lee SP, Li S, Marks P, Viaud-Martinez K, Meiers S, Munson KM, Navarro FCP, Nelson BJ, Nodzak C, Noor A, Kyriazopoulou-Panagiotopoulou S, Pang AWC, Qiu Y, Rosanio G, Ryan M, Stutz A, Spierings DCJ, Ward A, Welch AE, Xiao M, Xu W, Zhang C, Zhu Q, Zheng-Bradley X, Lowy E, Yakneen S, McCarroll S, Jun G, Ding L, Koh CL, Ren B, Flicek P, Chen K, Gerstein MB, Kwok PY, Lansdorp PM, Marth GT, Sebat J, Shi X, Bashir A, Ye K, Devine SE, Talkowski ME, Mills RE, Marschall T, Korbel JO, Eichler EE, Lee C. Multi-platform discovery of haplotype-resolved structural variation in human genomes. Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 16;10(1):1784. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08148-z. PubMed 30992455 ↗
  • Chan S, Lam E, Saghbini M, Bocklandt S, Hastie A, Cao H, Holmlin E, Borodkin M. Structural Variation Detection and Analysis Using Bionano Optical Mapping. Methods Mol Biol. 2018;1833:193-203. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-8666-8_16. PubMed 30039375 ↗
  • Barseghyan H, Tang W, Wang RT, Almalvez M, Segura E, Bramble MS, Lipson A, Douine ED, Lee H, Delot EC, Nelson SF, Vilain E. Next-generation mapping: a novel approach for detection of pathogenic structural variants with a potential utility in clinical diagnosis. Genome Med. 2017 Oct 25;9(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s13073-017-0479-0. PubMed 29070057 ↗
  • Lam ET, Hastie A, Lin C, Ehrlich D, Das SK, Austin MD, Deshpande P, Cao H, Nagarajan N, Xiao M, Kwok PY. Genome mapping on nanochannel arrays for structural variation analysis and sequence assembly. Nat Biotechnol. 2012 Aug;30(8):771-6. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2303. PubMed 22797562 ↗
  • Iqbal MA, Broeckel U, Levy B, Sinner S, Sahajpal N, Rodriguez V, Stence A, Awayda K, Scharer G, Skinner C, Stevenson R, Bossler A, Nagy PL, Kohle R. Multi-site technical performance and concordance of optical genome mapping: constitutional postnatal study for SV, CNV, and repeat array analysis. MedRxiv (pre-print). 2021 Dec 30; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.12.27.21268432

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05295277
Lead sponsor
Bionano Genomics
Collaborators
University of Rochester, Columbia University, Greenwood Genetic Center, Praxis Genomics, Augusta University, Medical College of Wisconsin, University of Iowa
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 25, 2022
Start date
Nov 30, 2020
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2024 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2023

Study contacts

Alex Hastie, PhD
Contact
ahastie@bionanogenomics.com
267-315-0914
Megan Martin, MS
Contact
mmartin@bionano.com
801-931-6203
Alka Chaubey, PhD, FACMG
principal investigator · Bionano Genomics

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion