ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05294471Updated Nov 9, 2026

Fully Automated High-Throughput Quantitative MRI of the Liver

An observational study in Healthy, Iron Overload and Liver Fat, sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 7 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by University of Wisconsin, Madison · Observational

Updated Nov 9, 2026Now CompletedStudy documents posted+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94
Ages
7 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research is to see if a new automated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method will be able to improve the images taken of the liver. Participants will have either known or suspected liver disease, known or suspected iron overload syndrome, or be a healthy adult. Participants will be in the research study for one day.

Read the detailed description

The overall purpose of this work is to develop, implement and test a "single-button push", integrated combination of innovative MRI solutions to enable low-cost quantitative evaluation of chronic liver disease in less than 5 minutes of true MRI suite time. The aim is to design a reliable, low variability, fully automated, highly efficient MRI exam.

The primary objective is to demonstrate a free-breathing 2D CSE-MRI method that is robust to motion and free of bias when compared to the reference 3D CSE-MRI method.

Secondary objectives include optimization of the methods in healthy volunteers, and technical success and throughput of the single-button push exam:

  1. Repeatability: we will calculate the squared difference between each pair of repeated proton density fat fraction (PDFF) / R2* measurements, and will model this value including the acquisition/reconstruction method as a covariate using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE)
  2. Reproducibility of the proposed method between 1.5T and 3T using the reproducibility coefficient and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
  3. Technical success of the single-push button exam (completion of exam, acceptable automated prescription as determined through radiologist evaluation, image quality, and automated analysis accuracy compared to manual analysis)
  4. Mean and standard deviation of total two-door suite time for the single-push button exam

Specific Aims:

Aim 1: Develop and optimize motion-insensitive, high-SNR (signal-to-noise ratio), free-breathing "error-proof" CSE-MRI for accurate and precise measurement of PDFF and R2* as biomarkers of liver fat and iron.

Aim 2: Confirm the accuracy (ie: bias) and precision (ie: repeatability, and reproducibility across field strength) of the proposed CSE-MRI method in patients with liver steatosis and in patients with liver iron overload.

Aim 3: Implement and validate an integrated single-button push, fully automated CSE-MRI protocol in \< 5 minutes of MR room time, using i) Artificial intelligence (AI)-based automated image prescription, ii) an innovative MRI "Smart Suite" design, and iii) automated quantitative image analysis and reporting.

To accomplish these aims, participants will be recruited for 6 substudies:

  1. Substudy 1: Optimization of free breathing 2D CSE method in healthy volunteers
  2. Substudy 2: Validation of free breathing 2D CSE method in healthy volunteers
  3. Substudy 3: Validation in patients with known or suspected iron overload or fatty liver
  4. Substudy 4: Evaluation of auto-prescription in healthy volunteers
  5. Substudy 5: Round-robin evaluation of single-push button exam in healthy volunteers
  6. Substudy 6: Throughput evaluation in patients scheduled for clinical abdominal MRI

For substudies 1, 2, and 4 participants will be asked to complete one research visit lasting approximately 1.5 hours. Participants will be scanned at a single field strength for up to 1 hour. To assess test-retest repeatability, subjects may be asked to sit up on the MRI scanner bed, or step off then back on to the scanner.

In substudy 3, participants will be asked to complete one research visit lasting approximately 1.5 hours. Participants will be scanned on a 1.5T system for up to 1 hour. In order to demonstrate the reproducibility across field strength of CSE MRI to measure liver iron and fat, 10 participants with liver fat and 10 participants with liver iron will be scanned a second time on the same day at 3T. For these 20 participants, total scan time be less than 2 hours and the study visit will last approximately 3 hours.

In substudy 5, the study visit will last approximately 3.5 hours. Participants will participate in groups of 10. After consenting, MRI screening, and anthropometric measurements, participants will form a queue and be scanned consecutively. After scanning, each participant will rejoin the end of the queue. Each participant will be scanned 3 times. Each individual scanning "session" will last approximately 5 minutes, and each participants total scan time will be less than 20 minutes.

Each participant in substudy 5 will be equipped with a Smart Suite RFID (radio frequency identification) or Bluetooth bracelet system to track MRI suite time for each participant and scan. The bracelets are also used in clinical imaging visits to track patient workflow. The bracelet will be used to track when participants enter and leave the MRI suite. The relative timings from baseline will be recorded automatically, entered into the study RedCap and linked with other study data via the participant's Study ID.

For substudy 6, prior to their clinical exam, participants will be scanned with the single-button push protocol. The research scan time will be less than 10 minutes and the total research visit will last approximately 20 minutes. Each participant in this substudy will also be equipped with a Smart Suite RFID or Bluetooth bracelet system to track MRI suite time for each participant and scan, as described for substudy 5.

02

Conditions studied

  • Healthy
  • Iron Overload
  • Liver Fat
03

In context

Iron Overload

156 studies on the registry are indexed under Iron Overload; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 94 is close to the median of 94 across 49 observational studies indexed under Iron Overload.

Browse Iron Overload studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Wisconsin, Madison is the lead sponsor of 1,188 studies on the registry; 181 are open to participants now.

Of its 157 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 118 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
7 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy volunteers will be recruited from the "MRI Volunteer Database", and/or UW - Madison employees.

Participants with liver fat or liver iron will be recruited from relevant UW Clinics.

Eligibility criteria

Eligibility Criteria for Substudies 1, 2, 4, 5

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with to MRI (e.g. pacemaker, contraindicated metallic implants, claustrophobia, etc)
  • Pregnant or trying to become pregnant (as determined by self-report during MRI safety screening)

Eligibility Criteria for Substudy 3

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 7 years or older
  • One of:

    • Known or suspected liver iron overload
    • Known or suspected elevated liver fat

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindication to MRI (e.g. pacemaker, contraindicated metallic implants, claustrophobia, etc)
  • Patients requiring intravenous (IV) conscious sedation for imaging are not eligible; patients requiring mild, oral anxiolytics for the MRI will be allowed to participate as long as the following criteria are met:

    • The subject has their own prescription for the medication.
    • The process is conducted prior to the self-administration of this medication
    • They come to the research visit with a driver
  • Pregnant or trying to become pregnant (as determined by self-report during MRI safety screening)

Eligibility Criteria for Substudy 6

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 7 years or older
  • Scheduled for a clinical abdominal MRI exam

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with contraindication to MRI (e.g. pacemaker, contraindicated metallic implants, claustrophobia, etc)
  • Sedation required for MRI
  • Pregnant or trying to become pregnant (as determined by self-report during MRI safety screening)
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
94 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy participants

    70 healthy participants will be recruited, across substudies 1, 2, 4, and 5

    Device: Non-contrast MRI with novel MRI software

  • Participants with known or suspected iron overload

    30 Participants with known or suspected iron overload will be recruited, to substudy 3

    Device: Non-contrast MRI with novel MRI software

  • Participants with elevated levels of liver fat

    30 participants with elevated levels of liver fat will be recruited, to substudy 3

    Device: Non-contrast MRI with novel MRI software

  • Participants referred for clinical abdominal MRI

    60 participants referred for clinical abdominal MRI will be recruited, to substudy 6

    Device: Non-contrast MRI with novel MRI software

Interventions

  • DeviceNon-contrast MRI with novel MRI software

    The investigational software being used in automatic prescription of the imaging is an application of an AI algorithm. This software prescribes where the MRI system will take images by finding the liver within a set of localizer scans. The software gives coordinates to the scanner.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Confirm the accuracy (ie: bias) of the proposed CSE-MRI method in patients with liver steatosis and in patients with liver iron overload

    For each liver segment, and for whole-liver PDFF and R2\* measurements, we will determine bias of CSE 2D using CSE 3D BH as the reference from Bland-Altman analysis. The range of R2\* values leading to reliable measurements of PDFF and R2\* will be determined using a two-segment piecewise linear model with the change point estimated from the data.

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Image quality of free breathing 2D chemical shift encoded (CSE) method

    Image quality for each acquisition will be evaluated by 3 radiologists, using a Likert scale between 0 (worst/non-diagnostic) and 3 (best) for criteria including: motion artifacts, spatial resolution, SNR (signal- to-noise ratio), and overall image quality.

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

  2. Measure the repeatability of the proposed CSE-MRI method in patients with liver steatosis and in patients with liver iron overload

    To compare repeatability for various acquisition/reconstruction methods, we will calculate the squared difference between each pair of repeated PDFF / R2\* measurements, and will model this value including the acquisition/reconstruction method as a covariate using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE), with subject as a random factor to account for within-subject correlation. This analysis will be performed for all liver segments and whole-liver measurements. Further, the repeatability coefficient will also be assessed separately for each method. Bland-Altman plots will also be used to visualize the repeatability profile over the PDFF / R2\* range. The automated vs manual PDFF / R2\* measurements will be evaluated for each acquisition.

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

  3. Confirm the reproducibility of the proposed CSE-MRI method across field strengths

    The reproducibility of the proposed method between 1.5T and 3T will be evaluated in two ways. First, at each field strength, PDFF and R2\* will each be compared between FB FAM CSE and BH CSE 3D (as the reference), using Bland Altman analysis to assess the bias. Second, PDFF will be compared between 1.5T and 3T using Bland Altman analysis for each method, based on the expected field strength independence of PDFF. R2\* will also be compared between 1.5T and 3T for each method, after converting to liver iron concentration (LIC, mg/g) using the 1.5T and 3T calibrations determined by our group, to compensate for the effect of field strength on R2\*. In all comparisons, the reproducibility coefficient, and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals will be calculated to quantify the degree of reproducibility.

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

  4. Technical success rate of the integrated single-button push, fully automated CSE-MRI protocol in < 5 minutes of MR room time

    The technical success rate of the integrated single-button push, fully automated CSE-MRI exam will be determined through completion rate of the exam in less than 5 minutes, radiologist evaluation of image quality using a Likert scale, and accuracy of the automated analysis compared to manual evaluation.

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

  5. Mean and standard deviation of total two-door suite time for the single-push button exam

    Throughput of the single-button push exam will be quantified by: throughput (subjects/hour), suite time per subject (mean, standard deviation, median, and quartiles) and suite time components (eg: room turnaround time, prescan/scan time for each series).

    Time frame: 1 day (1 study visit, up to 3.5 hours)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2023 to primary completion in Oct 2026, 35 months.

Of 13 observational studies under Iron Overload, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 27 and three quarters within 71. This study's 35 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 15, 2022
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
StartActual
Oct 16, 2023
Primary completionActual
Oct 15, 2026
CompletionActual
Oct 15, 2026
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Recruiting→Completed
changed Nov 9, 2026
Enrollment
204 (estimated)→94 (actual)
Nov 9, 2026
Documents
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Recruiting→Completed
    Documents Informed consent form ↗ posted
    Enrollment 204 (estimated)→94 (actual)
    + 3 other changes: date precision, contact details and site details

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05294471
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2022
Start date
Oct 16, 2023
Primary completion
Oct 15, 2026
Completion
Oct 15, 2026
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Scott Reeder, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Wisconsin, Madison

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion