ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT05285878Updated Mar 14, 2025

Fingolimod for the Abrogation of Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy Following Kidney Transplantation

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fingolimod and Placebo in Interstitial Fibrosis, Kidney Transplant; Complications and Kidney Transplant Rejection, sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-03-14.

Sponsored by The Methodist Hospital Research Institute · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in de novo kidney transplant patients to determine if the addition of fingolimod (brand name Gilenya®, candidate name- FTY720) on the background of standard immunosuppression will prevent expansion of the interstitial compartment of the transplanted kidney. Interstitial expansion is the precursor of interstitial fibrosis and graft loss. The study will test the hypothesis that abgrogating the fibrogenic effects of both the RhoA and mTOR pathways with fingolimod will reduce structural damage in transplanted kidneys and possible subsequent transplant failure.

Read the detailed description

Prevention of, or slowing the progression of, the development of allograft fibrosis has not been successful in previous efforts. This study will to evaluate the potential of fingolimod (Gilenya®, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) (1), a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator and a RhoA inhibitor (2), to abrogate the presence of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) after kidney transplantation. The study may provide important information for future clinical trials for prevention of IF/TA in kidney transplant recipients.

Interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy almost invariably occur together (10) and are present in approximately 45% of kidney allografts by the first year posttransplant (11). Naesens et al (11) demonstrated that any positive chronic interstitial fibrosis score is associated with graft loss after the first year post transplant with a more rapidly declining slope than those without interstitial fibrosis. Furthermore, they demonstrated that a tubular atrophy score of 2-3 was associated with 20% graft loss during the 2nd year posttransplant, >30% graft loss by 5 years and \~60% graft loss by 10 years posttransplant. Combined, IF/TA contributes to renal graft dysfunction or the decline in kidney function after transplantation and may be a factor in the 20.6% of total grafts lost (including death) by 5 years post-transplant (11,12).

Expansion of the interstitial compartment is a major component of IF/TA. Protocol (12,13) and for-cause (10,11) biopsies have provided evidence of the worsening of IF/TA with time in kidney transplant recipients and demonstrated a direct relationship between interstitial expansion and renal allograft functional decline and graft failure (11-14). Assessing the interstitial expansion by quantifying the fraction of renal cortical volume:interstitial compartment changes over time standardizes the assessment of IF/TA (15,16) and will be used in the current protocol (Section 10.2.1).

Fingolimod was originally intended as a prophylaxis against acute rejection in transplant recipients (17). A full development program was produced beginning with pharmacokinetics of single dose (18) and multiple doses (19) in healthy volunteers and evaluations of the effect of FTY720 on T-lymphocytes to better understand the immunosuppressive properties of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator (20). Development proceeded with several studies where fingolimod was compared to standard immunosuppression regimens as an adjunct therapy with calcineurin inhibitors for prevention of kidney transplant acute rejection. After two cardiac events occurred in an open-label trial and lack of efficacy for prevention of acute rejection was demonstrated, the development of fingolimod as a therapeutic agent for rejection prophylaxis in transplantation ceased. Whereas the current study is not proposed to prevent acute rejection and will be using a smaller dose than those evaluated in phase 3 trials for acute rejection prophylaxis, a summary of these studies is important to the understanding of the safety of fingolimod in kidney transplant recipients.

Studies of de novo kidney transplant recipients report a reduction in absolute lymphocyte counts of approximately 25-35% in the lower dose groups (0.25mg and 0.5mg FTY720, respectively) that corrects to within approximately 20% of baseline (day of transplant surgery) level (22-28). Additionally, asymptomatic bradycardia or reduced heart rate was reported and responded to treatment when required or resolved on its own (23-26,28). Prudent exclusion criteria of patients who have heart rate \<50bpm at baseline is warranted for the current study. Macular edema occurred more often in kidney transplant patients taking ≥2.5mg FTY720 (15/667, 2.2%) compared to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 5/373, 1.3%; 25,26,28); thus, the current study will exclude patients with a history of macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy. Only one report indicated that liver enzymes were elevated in participants taking FTY720 (25) and the increase was mild (\<2x upper limit of normal [ULN]).

Controlling hypertension and prevention and treatment of acute rejection are standard approaches to kidney function preservation in kidney transplant recipients. Additionally, the use of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-sparing protocols has been reported with various approaches but data are insufficient to equivocally demonstrate consistently lower IF/TA in the approaches reported to date (7). Thus, it is important to examine additional approaches for prevention of IF/TA in this population.

Preliminary data from Chen W et al strongly suggests that fingolimod is able to inhibit chronic rejection of transplanted hearts in a rat and mouse model by inhibiting RhoA and down-regulating mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) Complex 2 (mTORC2)/Regulatory Associated Protein Of MTOR Complex 1 Independent Companion Of MTOR Complex 2 (RICTOR; 30,31). Therefore, this study will test the hypothesis that abrogating the fibrogenic effects of both RhoA and mTOR pathways with fingolimod would abrogate IF/TA and that reducing this structural damage in transplanted kidneys would result in improved or preserved kidney function and reduced graft loss.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that 0.5mg/day of fingolimod for 3 months administered to de novo kidney transplant recipients will be safe and to examine the course of IF/TA over a 1-year period by testing the ability of 0.5mg/day fingolimod for 3 months to abrogate the development of IF/TA in de novo kidney transplant recipients compared to placebo.

02

Conditions studied

  • Interstitial Fibrosis
  • Kidney Transplant; Complications
  • Kidney Transplant Rejection
  • Kidney Transplant Failure and Rejection
  • Kidney Transplant Failure
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic
  • Graft Rejection

Keywords

  • Fingolimod Hydrochloride
  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Kidney
  • Fibrosis
  • Immunosuppression Therapy
  • TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases
  • Graft Survival
  • Transplantation
  • Transplant Recipients
  • Organ Transplant
  • Tubular Atrophy
  • Interstitial Fibrosis and Tubular Atrophy
03

In context

Pulmonary Fibrosis

342 studies on the registry are indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis; 98 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 59 across 212 interventional studies indexed under Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Browse Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

The Methodist Hospital Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 160 studies on the registry; 59 are open to participants now.

Of its 28 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 18 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Provision of signed and dated form
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
  • Receiving a first or second kidney transplant
  • Male or female, aged ≥18 to ≤65
  • Women of child bearing potential who have a negative serum pregnancy test prior to treatment
  • Women of child bearing potential (including perimenopausal women who have had a menstrual period within the previous 1 year) who agree to use 2 forms of effective regimen (at least one of which is a barrier method) throughout the study period and for 6 weeks following the end of the study or the last dose of mycophenolic acid, whichever comes first.
  • Panel of reactive antibodies \<50%
  • Able to take oral medication
  • Agreement to adhere to Lifestyle Considerations throughout study duration: refraining from the consumption of grapefruit or grapefruit juice and stopping any anticoagulation therapy, including ASA, one week prior and one week post kidney procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Transplantation of any organ other than kidney
  • History or presence of second degree AV block, third degree AV block, symptomatic bradycardia, or an arrhythmia requiring current treatment with Class Ia or III antiarrhythmic drugs.
  • Heart rate \<60 beats per minute
  • Presence of an increased > 500 ms on screening .
  • Presence of a cardiac pacemaker.
  • History of any major cardiac events, including heart attack within the last six months of enrollment, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, or any severe cardiac disease as determined by investigator
  • Known macular degeneration
  • Diagnosed with any significant coagulopathy or medical condition requiring long-term systemic anticoagulation after transplantation, which would interfere with obtaining biopies.
  • Diagnosed with chronic immune system disease
  • Diagnosed with acute pulmonary disease
  • Diagnosed with severe liver disease, including abnormal liver enzymes or total greater than three times .
  • Diagnosed with any past or present except squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin excised at least two years prior to randomization.
  • Diagnosed with active acute or chronic infection, or febrile illness within two weeks prior to randomization.
  • Recent history of strokes in the preceding 6 months
  • Use of ketoconazole for more than 2 weeks
  • Use of any drug during the 4 weeks prior to enrolling in this study
  • Women of child bearing potential who are breastfeeding
  • Women of not practicing reliable methods of . Reliable methods for contraception include surgical sterilization (hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation), double-barrier method (such as condom and diaphragm). To be considered as and not of childbearing potential, female participants must have experienced 12 consecutive months of amenorrhea.
  • Known allergic reactions to components of Gilenya®, specifically fingolimod, gelatin, magnesium stearate, mannitol, titanium dioxide, and/or yellow iron oxide
  • Presence of any medical or psychosocial condition, which the investigator believes, would hinder adherence to the study requirements.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Participants will take a placebo capsule daily for 3 months. Placebo will be methylcellulose encapsulated into an opaque closed gelatin capsule for blinding. Capsules will be placed in a labeled bottle, with the contents only identifiable by a code on the package label and only the compounding pharmacy and the unblinded pharmacist at Houston Methodist Investigational Drug Service will know the code definition.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Fingolimod

    Participants will take a 0.5 mg fingolimod capsule each day for 3 months. The fingolimod capsule will be placed inside an opaque closed gelatin capsule without transformation of the manufacteror's fingolimod capsule. The fingolimod blinded product and the placebo capsule will be identical in size, color, appearance, and weight.

    Drug: Fingolimod

Interventions

  • 0.5 mg daily

    Also known as: GILENYA®, FTY720

  • DrugPlacebo

    0.5 mg daily

    Also known as: methylcellulose

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Emergent and Adverse Events

    The difference in the proportion of cumulative treatment-emergent (TE) adverse events (AE) determined to be ≥ grade 3 severity that occur during 12 months from the first dose of FTY720 compared to the placebo group.

    Time frame: Baseline (day of kidney transplant surgery); 3, 14, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days after starting study drug or placebo

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fraction of Renal Cortical Volume Occupied by Interstitium

    A doubling of the fraction of renal cortical volume occupied by interstitium (VvInt/cortex) compared to the baseline biopsy in participants taking 0.5mg/day fingolimod (experimental group) or placebo (control group) for 3 months

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after kidney transplant, 1 year after kidney transplant

  2. MCP1 Biomarker

    Measurement of Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  3. Procollagen 3 Peptide Biomarker

    Measurement of Procollagen 3 Peptide

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  4. BMP-7 Protein Biomarker

    Measurement of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  5. TGF-beta Biomarker

    Measurement of Transforming Growth Factor beta

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  6. RhoA of Blood Monocytes

    Measurement of Ras homolog family member A protein

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  7. RICTOR Biomarker

    Measurement of RPTOR Independent Companion Of MTOR Complex 2

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days, and 1 year after the first dose of fingolimod or placebo

  8. Urinary Albumin:Creatinine Ratio

    The ratio of albumin to creatinine in a urine sample from the patient

    Time frame: Baseline; 3, 14, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days after starting study drug or placebo

  9. Change in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

    Estimated glomerular filtration rate relative to the baseline value or previous endpoints

    Time frame: Baseline; 3, 14, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days after starting study drug or placebo

  10. Causes of End-Stage Renal Disease

    Recording the cause of end-stage renal disease, if it develops

    Time frame: Up to 1 year after taking the first dose of the study drug or placebo

  11. Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection

    Biopsy-proven acute rejection as diagnosed by a qualified pathologist

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months after kidney transplant, 1 year after kidney transplant

  12. Patient Survival

    Whether the patient is deceased or alive

    Time frame: Baseline; 3, 14, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days after starting study drug or placebo

  13. Graft Survival

    Whether the patient required a new kidney graft or the patient is deceased

    Time frame: Baseline; 3, 14, 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days after starting study drug or placebo

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gilenya [package insert]. East Hanover, NJ: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; 2019.
  • Chen W, Chen W, Li XC, Ghobrial RM, Kloc M. Coinhibition of mTORC1/mTORC2 and RhoA/ROCK pathways prevents chronic rejection of rat cardiac allografts. Transplant Reports. 2018;3(4):21-28.
  • Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK, Stewart DE, Cherikh WS, Wainright JL, Kucheryavaya A, Woodbury M, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK. OPTN/SRTR 2015 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2017 Jan;17 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):21-116. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14124. PubMed 28052609 ↗
  • Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Gustafson SK, Wilk AR, Castro S, Robinson A, Wainright JL, Snyder JJ, Kasiske BL, Israni AK. OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19 Suppl 2:19-123. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15274. PubMed 30811893 ↗
  • Matas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, Thompson B, Gustafson SK, Stewart DE, Cherikh WS, Wainright JL, Boyle G, Snyder JJ, Israni AK, Kasiske BL. OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: kidney. Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15 Suppl 2:1-34. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13195. PubMed 25626344 ↗
  • OPTN/SRTR Annual Data Report - 2011. 2011; https://srtr.transplant.hrsa.gov/annual_reports/2011/Default.aspx. Accessed July 29, 2020.
  • Vanhove T, Goldschmeding R, Kuypers D. Kidney Fibrosis: Origins and Interventions. Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4):713-726. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001608. PubMed 27941433 ↗
  • Nankivell BJ, Chapman JR. Chronic allograft nephropathy: current concepts and future directions. Transplantation. 2006 Mar 15;81(5):643-54. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000190423.82154.01. PubMed 16534463 ↗
  • Meng XM, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY. Inflammatory processes in renal fibrosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014 Sep;10(9):493-503. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.114. Epub 2014 Jul 1. PubMed 24981817 ↗
  • Sis B, Einecke G, Chang J, Hidalgo LG, Mengel M, Kaplan B, Halloran PF. Cluster analysis of lesions in nonselected kidney transplant biopsies: microcirculation changes, tubulointerstitial inflammation and scarring. Am J Transplant. 2010 Feb;10(2):421-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02938.x. Epub 2010 Jan 6. PubMed 20055794 ↗
  • Naesens M, Kuypers DR, De Vusser K, Vanrenterghem Y, Evenepoel P, Claes K, Bammens B, Meijers B, Lerut E. Chronic histological damage in early indication biopsies is an independent risk factor for late renal allograft failure. Am J Transplant. 2013 Jan;13(1):86-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04304.x. Epub 2012 Nov 8. PubMed 23136888 ↗
  • Nankivell BJ, Fenton-Lee CA, Kuypers DR, Cheung E, Allen RD, O'Connell PJ, Chapman JR. Effect of histological damage on long-term kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation. 2001 Feb 27;71(4):515-23. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200102270-00006. PubMed 11258430 ↗
  • Cosio FG, Grande JP, Larson TS, Gloor JM, Velosa JA, Textor SC, Griffin MD, Stegall MD. Kidney allograft fibrosis and atrophy early after living donor transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005 May;5(5):1130-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.00811.x. PubMed 15816896 ↗
  • Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CL, O'Connell PJ, Allen RD, Chapman JR. The natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2003 Dec 11;349(24):2326-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa020009. PubMed 14668458 ↗
  • Fioretto P, Steffes MW, Sutherland DE, Mauer M. Sequential renal biopsies in insulin-dependent diabetic patients: structural factors associated with clinical progression. Kidney Int. 1995 Dec;48(6):1929-35. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.493. PubMed 8587254 ↗
  • Ibrahim HN, Jackson S, Connaire J, Matas A, Ney A, Najafian B, West A, Lentsch N, Ericksen J, Bodner J, Kasiske B, Mauer M. Angiotensin II blockade in kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Feb;24(2):320-7. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2012080777. Epub 2013 Jan 10. PubMed 23308016 ↗
  • Budde K, Schmouder RL, Brunkhorst R, Nashan B, Lucker PW, Mayer T, Choudhury S, Skerjanec A, Kraus G, Neumayer HH. First human trial of FTY720, a novel immunomodulator, in stable renal transplant patients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Apr;13(4):1073-1083. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V1341073. PubMed 11912269 ↗
  • Kovarik JM, Schmouder R, Barilla D, Wang Y, Kraus G. Single-dose FTY720 pharmacokinetics, food effect, and pharmacological responses in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 May;57(5):586-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2003.02065.x. PubMed 15089811 ↗
  • Kovarik JM, Schmouder R, Barilla D, Riviere GJ, Wang Y, Hunt T. Multiple-dose FTY720: tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and lymphocyte responses in healthy subjects. J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 May;44(5):532-7. doi: 10.1177/0091270004264165. PubMed 15102874 ↗
  • Bohler T, Waiser J, Schuetz M, Neumayer HH, Budde K. FTY720 exerts differential effects on CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocyte subpopulations expressing chemokine and adhesion receptors. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004 Mar;19(3):702-13. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfg599. PubMed 14767029 ↗
  • Kahan BD, Karlix JL, Ferguson RM, Leichtman AB, Mulgaonkar S, Gonwa TA, Skerjanec A, Schmouder RL, Chodoff L. Pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and safety of multiple doses of FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients: a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase I study. Transplantation. 2003 Oct 15;76(7):1079-84. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000084822.01372.AC. PubMed 14557756 ↗
  • Park SI, Felipe CR, Machado PG, Garcia R, Skerjanec A, Schmouder R, Tedesco-Silva H Jr, Medina-Pestana JO. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships of FTY720 in kidney transplant recipients. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2005 May;38(5):683-94. doi: 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000500005. Epub 2005 May 25. PubMed 15917949 ↗
  • Skerjanec A, Tedesco H, Neumayer HH, Cole E, Budde K, Hsu CH, Schmouder R. FTY720, a novel immunomodulator in de novo kidney transplant patients: pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship. J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Nov;45(11):1268-78. doi: 10.1177/0091270005279799. PubMed 16239360 ↗
  • Mulgaonkar S, Tedesco H, Oppenheimer F, Walker R, Kunzendorf U, Russ G, Knoflach A, Patel Y, Ferguson R; FTYA121 study group. FTY720/cyclosporine regimens in de novo renal transplantation: a 1-year dose-finding study. Am J Transplant. 2006 Aug;6(8):1848-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01404.x. Epub 2006 Jun 12. PubMed 16771816 ↗
  • Salvadori M, Budde K, Charpentier B, Klempnauer J, Nashan B, Pallardo LM, Eris J, Schena FP, Eisenberger U, Rostaing L, Hmissi A, Aradhye S; FTY720 0124 Study Group. FTY720 versus MMF with cyclosporine in de novo renal transplantation: a 1-year, randomized controlled trial in Europe and Australasia. Am J Transplant. 2006 Dec;6(12):2912-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01552.x. PubMed 17061999 ↗
  • Tedesco-Silva H, Szakaly P, Shoker A, Sommerer C, Yoshimura N, Schena FP, Cremer M, Hmissi A, Mayer H, Lang P; FTY720 2218 Clinical Study Group. FTY720 versus mycophenolate mofetil in de novo renal transplantation: six-month results of a double-blind study. Transplantation. 2007 Oct 15;84(7):885-92. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000281385.26500.3b. PubMed 17984842 ↗
  • Tedesco-Silva H, Lorber MI, Foster CE, Sollinger HW, Mendez R, Carvalho DB, Shapiro R, Rajagopalan PR, Mayer H, Slade J, Kahan BD; FTY720A2202 clinical study group. FTY720 and everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients at risk for delayed graft function: results of an exploratory one-yr multicenter study. Clin Transplant. 2009 Sep-Oct;23(5):589-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01070.x. Epub 2009 Aug 27. PubMed 19719728 ↗
  • Hoitsma AJ, Woodle ES, Abramowicz D, Proot P, Vanrenterghem Y; FTY720 Phase II Transplant Study Group. FTY720 combined with tacrolimus in de novo renal transplantation: 1-year, multicenter, open-label randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011 Nov;26(11):3802-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfr503. Epub 2011 Sep 12. PubMed 21911597 ↗
  • Kappos L, Antel J, Comi G, Montalban X, O'Connor P, Polman CH, Haas T, Korn AA, Karlsson G, Radue EW; FTY720 D2201 Study Group. Oral fingolimod (FTY720) for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1124-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052643. PubMed 16971719 ↗
  • Chen W, Chen S, Chen W, Li XC, Ghobrial RM, Kloc M. Screening RhoA/ROCK inhibitors for the ability to prevent chronic rejection of mouse cardiac allografts. Transpl Immunol. 2018 Oct;50:15-25. doi: 10.1016/j.trim.2018.06.002. Epub 2018 Jun 6. PubMed 29885441 ↗
  • Chen W, Ghobrial RM, Li XC, Kloc M. Inhibition of RhoA and mTORC2/Rictor by Fingolimod (FTY720) induces p21-activated kinase 1, PAK-1 and amplifies podosomes in mouse peritoneal macrophages. Immunobiology. 2018 Nov;223(11):634-647. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 7. PubMed 30005970 ↗
  • CONSORT Group. CONSORT Transparent reporting of trials. 2010; http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010. Accessed July 29, 2020.
  • Budde K, L Schmouder R, Nashan B, Brunkhorst R, W Lucker P, Mayer T, Brookman L, Nedelman J, Skerjanec A, Bohler T, Neumayer HH. Pharmacodynamics of single doses of the novel immunosuppressant FTY720 in stable renal transplant patients. Am J Transplant. 2003 Jul;3(7):846-54. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00130.x. PubMed 12814476 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 14, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05285878
Responsible party
Ahmed Osama Gaber, MD (Chair, Department of Surgery, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 18, 2022
Start date
Jul 28, 2022
Primary completion
Jun 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 14, 2025

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fingolimod

Start the discussion