CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07284602SURPASS-IPFUpdated Sep 3, 2026

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of LYT-100 (Deupirfenidone) Compared to Pirfenidone in Adults With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Deupirfenidone and Pirfenidone (PFD) in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), sponsored by PureTech. Recruiting at 10 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 40 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-03.

Sponsored by PureTech · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a study for adults with a lung disease called idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The main purpose of this study is to look at how well deupirfenidone improves lung function and how safe it is for people with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) when compared with pirfenidone. Participants may have been treated with an approved antifibrotic drug for up to a year in the past, but they cannot be on background antifibrotic treatment during this study. Participants will be randomly assigned (meaning by chance) to take either deupirfenidone or pirfenidone 3 times a day, and neither a participant nor their study team will know which study drug participants are on. Participants will be in the study for up to approximately 3 years. During the first year, participants visit the study site up to ten times and afterwards they visit the site every three months. All participants will remain on blinded study drug until the last participant has completed Week 52 Visit. They will have lung function tests, a check of their health, and will tell the study team about any unfavorable effects.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, head-to-head study comparing deupirfenidone 825 mg TID to pirfenidone 801 mg TID over 52 weeks of treatment in participants with IPF who are not on background therapy. This study is designed to demonstrate superior efficacy of deupirfenidone over pirfenidone as well as support the overall safety profile of deupirfenidone. Prospective participants will initially enter the Screening Period to determine study eligibility (Section 5). Eligible participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either blinded deupirfenidone 825 mg TID or pirfenidone 801 mg TID as part of the Double-Blind Treatment Period for at least 52 weeks (Period 1). Depending on when participants enter the study, they may continue being treated for up to two more years (Period 2).

02

Conditions studied

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Keywords

  • Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • IPF
  • Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Deupirfenidone
  • Pirfenidone
  • Lung Disease
03

In context

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

551 studies on the registry are indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis; 117 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,100 is above the median of 54 across 376 interventional studies indexed under Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.

Browse Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

PureTech is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (50%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Is ≥40 years of age at the time of informed consent.
  • Meets the diagnostic criteria of IPF American Thoracic Society (ATS)/European Respiratory Society (ERS)/Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS)/Latin American Thoracic Society (ALAT) 2022 guidelines.
  • Has a maximum time from initial IPF diagnosis of 7 years.
  • Has no prior exposure to pirfenidone or LYT-100.
  • Has definite or probable unusual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) on HRCT, performed within 12 months prior to Visit 1 and confirmed by the central reader.
  • Has an FVC ≥45% of predicted normal at Visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has, in the opinion of the Investigator, significant clinical worsening of IPF between Visit 1 and Visit 2 (eg, clinically significant hospitalization, clinically significant respiratory event).
  • Has been hospitalized within 3 months prior to Visit 1 for acute exacerbation of IPF or other significant respiratory complication.
  • Has prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/FVC \<0.7 at Visit 1.
  • Has a greater extent of emphysema vs fibrosis on the most recent HRCT scan as confirmed by the central reader.
  • Has a diagnosis of any condition that could be an explanation for interstitial lung disease (ILD).
  • Has a major extrapulmonary condition that could affect spirometry.
  • Has a current diagnosis of other relevant respiratory disorders.
  • Has significant pulmonary hypertension (PH).
  • Has had a lung transplant.
  • Has cardiovascular disease.
  • Has underlying chronic liver disease/impairment.
  • Has relevant chronic or acute infections including active viral hepatitis or poorly controlled HIV.
  • Has had any major surgical procedures performed within 6 weeks prior to Visit 1 or is planning to have a major surgical procedure during the study.
  • Has any documented active or suspected malignancy or history of malignancy within 5 years prior to Visit 1.
  • Has any of the following laboratory abnormalities at Visit 1:

    • Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN).
    • Total bilirubin >1.5 × ULN. Exceptions may be made on a case-by-case basis for participants with Gilbert's syndrome in consultation with the Medical Monitor.
    • Creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min calculated by Cockcroft-Gault formula.
  • Is currently taking prednisone at a steady dose >10 mg/day or equivalent (a steady dose ≤10 mg/day is not exclusionary but the individual must be on a stable dose for at least 30 days prior to Visit 2).
  • Use of any tobacco or combustible cannabis products within 3 months prior to Visit 1 or is unable to refrain from use during the trial.
  • Has known symptoms of dysphagia, difficulty in swallowing capsules or tablets, or has had a total gastrectomy.
  • Is currently enrolled in another clinical study (except observational/registry or biobank studies) or has used any investigational drug or device within 90 days prior to Visit 1.
  • Has ever received stem cell therapy for the treatment of pulmonary fibrosis.
  • Is currently pregnant, breastfeeding, or is planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Has had any prior exposure to LYT-100 or pirfenidone (even one dose).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
1,100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active

    deupirfenidone 825 mg TID

    Drug: Deupirfenidone

  • Active comparator
    Active Comparator

    pirfenidone 801 mg TID

    Drug: Pirfenidone (PFD)

Interventions

  • DrugDeupirfenidone

    size AA Swedish orange capsule

  • DrugPirfenidone (PFD)

    size AA Swedish orange capsule

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in forced vital capacity (FVC) measured in mL

    Evaluate the efficacy of deupirfenidone compared with pirfenidone on reduction in lung function decline in participants with IPF

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

Secondary outcomes

  1. Absolute change in FVC percent predicted (FVCpp)

    Evaluate the efficacy of deupirfenidone compared with pirfenidone on reduction in lung function decline relative to individual predicted normal lung function

    Time frame: Baseline to Week 52

07

Study locations

10 of 10 sites recruiting
  • Palmtree Clinical Research Inc.
    Palm Spring, California 92262, United States
    Recruiting
  • Paradigm Clinical Research Centers LLC
    Redding, California 96001, United States
    Recruiting
  • Infinity Medical Research
    North Dartmouth, Massachusetts 02747, United States
    Recruiting
  • Renown Regional Medical Center
    Reno, Nevada 89502, United States
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research Associates of Central PA
    DuBois, Pennsylvania 15801, United States
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Research of Rock Hill
    Rock Hill, South Carolina 29732, United States
    Recruiting
  • Clinical Trials Center of Middle Tennesee LLC
    Franklin, Tennessee 37067, United States
    Recruiting
  • Premier Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine
    Denison, Texas 75020, United States
    Recruiting
  • Renovatio Clinical
    The Woodlands, Texas 77380, United States
    Recruiting
  • Renovatio Clinical
    Webster, Texas 77598, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maher TM, Hamblin MJ, Choi WI, Case AH, Tomos IP, Tzouvelekis AE, Shore JE, Bergna MA, Golod D, Elenko E, Zhang Y, Graham CS, Song JW, Kulkarni T; and the ELEVATE IPF Investigators. Deupirfenidone compared with pirfenidone and placebo in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (ELEVATE-IPF): a phase 2b randomized placebo-controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2026 Aug 1;212(8):1761-1769. doi: 10.1093/ajrccm/aamag155. PubMed 42085224 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Patient data protection laws in participating countries do not allow for IPD data sharing.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07284602
Lead sponsor
PureTech
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 16, 2025
Start date
Jun 26, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion