ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT05240924Updated Jun 8, 2026

ERP to Improve Functioning in Veterans With OCD

An interventional study of Exposure and Response Prevention and Stress Management Training in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) and Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and OCD, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Recruiting at 19 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2022; still recruiting 4 years 1 month later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating psychiatric illness impacting work, social, and family functioning. Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) is the sole evidence-based psychotherapy for OCD; however, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have examined the effectiveness of ERP among Veterans or individuals with both OCD and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This 4-year Hybrid Type I trial will compare outcomes of ERP to those of a control condition among Veterans with OCD. Primary and secondary aims will examine whether Veterans' functioning, quality of life, and OCD symptoms differ between the ERP and control in the full sample of Veterans with OCD, and in the half of the sample with both OCD and PTSD. The tertiary aim is to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation of the implementation potential of ERP in VA mental health settings.

Read the detailed description

The proposed 4-year multisite RCT will compare outcomes of VTH-delivered ERP to those of a stress management training control condition among 160 Veterans with OCD. Half of the sample with have comorbid PTSD. The primary aim will examine whether participants' functioning, quality of life, and OCD symptoms differ as a function of the intervention (ERP vs. control). The secondary aim will examine these outcomes among the half of the sample with comorbid OCD and PTSD. The tertiary aim is to conduct a mixed-methods formative evaluation of the implementation potential of ERP in VA mental health settings.

Eligible Veteran participants will be randomized to ERP or to the control condition. Veterans randomized to ERP will receive 16 weekly ERP sessions delivered via VTH. Control participants will receive 16 weekly sessions of a stress management training intervention delivered via VTH. Participants in both conditions will complete assessments at post-treatment and 6 months after completing treatment. Participants in the ERP condition will also complete an assessment of treatment satisfaction and a qualitative exit interview assessing the Veterans' perceptions of the impact of treatment on multiple domains of functioning, including the impact on PTSD symptoms. Providers and VA administrators will participate in qualitative interviews regarding the implementation potential of ERP in VA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)
  • Comorbid Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder and OCD

Keywords

  • Obsessive Compulsive Disorder
  • OCD
  • Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • PTSD
  • Worry
  • Compulsion
  • Stress
03

In context

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

635 studies on the registry are indexed under Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 45 across 520 interventional studies indexed under Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Browse Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,771 studies on the registry; 392 are open to participants now.

Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 185 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Veterans having a primary diagnosis of Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)(50% of sample) and comorbid OCD and Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (50% of sample) who are receiving care from the Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center (MEDVAMC) in Houston, TX; the Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center in Charleston, SC; the VISN 20 Clinical Resource Hub which provides telehealth services to Washington, Oregon, and Alaska: the VISN 2 Clinical Resource Hub which provides telehealth services to New Jersey, New York, and northern Pennsylvania, and the VISN 6 Clinical Resource Hub which provides telehealth services to North Carolina and Virginia.
  • Willingness to participate in Exposure and Response Prevention(ERP)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant cognitive impairment or conditions that threaten safety (current psychosis, mania, imminent suicidality including plan or intent, and treatment-interfering moderate to severe substance use).
  • Potential participants taking psychotropic medications must be on a stable dose of these medications for at least 6 weeks prior to study enrollment.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP)

    ERP will be based upon the Treatments That Work series, which contains both a provider manual and client workbook. Sessions will last 90 minutes and occur weekly for 16 sessions. All ERP treatment will be delivered via VTH. Participants will receive instructions on accessing the VTH platform and take part in a brief practice run connecting to the VTH appointment with guidance from an RA. ERP treatment content includes psychoeducation about OCD, assessment of OCD symptoms, the rationale for treatment, construction of a hierarchy or a list of feared or avoided situations, and in-session in-vivo and imaginal exposures. Weekly homework assignments will include self-monitoring, reading chapters about the treatment, and practicing exposures daily. All therapy sessions will be audio-recorded. Although sessions are expected to occur weekly, accounting for delays due to scheduling, holidays, and missed appointments, the investigators will allow up to 6 months to complete the treatment.

    Behavioral: Exposure and Response Prevention

  • Other
    Control Condition

    Participants randomized to the control condition will receive 16 weekly sessions of stress management training via video telehealth. This control condition was chosen because it is expected to provide the therapeutic alliance and common factors associated with therapy generally and some specific effects in anxiety reduction.

    Other: Stress Management Training

Interventions

  • BehavioralExposure and Response Prevention

    ERP is a specialized cognitive behavioral intervention conducted over the course of 8-16 therapy sessions. ERP is based upon exposure principles and the idea that people can habituate to the distress caused by OCD triggers and learn to cope with anxiety about feared consequences without engaging in compulsive behaviors to 'neutralize' the obsession. ERP begins with psychoeducation about OCD and exposure, followed by construction of a hierarchy, or list, of situations that are feared, avoided, or trigger OCD rituals such as washing or checking. Then, the therapist and client begin in-session exposures to hierarchy items utilizing response or ritual prevention techniques to avoid reinforcing the ritual. Exposures can be in vivo, such as touching a contaminated item, or imaginal, such as visualizing a feared consequence happening.

    Also known as: ERP

  • OtherStress Management Training

    The stress management training intervention will be based on that delivered by Simpson in an ERP trial. It will be delivered by PhD and Master's level therapists from each site's clinics. The stress management training intervention will begin with an introductory session providing psychoeducation about OCD, followed by 15 sessions covering stress management skills such as deep breathing progressive muscle relaxation, positive imagery, assertiveness training, and problem solving. Each session will contain an extended practice of the selected skill and will end with homework assignments to practice the stress management skills and monitor symptoms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) - Change

    The WSAS is a 5-item, self-report measure of impairment and functioning across five domains: work, household tasks, relationships, social, and leisure functioning. Respondents rate the impairment due to a specified problem; study participants will be directed to respond regarding impairment caused by OCD. Each item is rated on a 0-8 scale; total scores range from 0 to 40. The WSAS has good internal consistency reliability and validity and has been used to assess changes in functioning in OCD and anxiety disorders in psychotherapy trials. A score of 0-9 (Low impairment), 10-19 (Moderate impairment), and 20-40 (Severe impairment).

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, short form (QLESQ-SF) - Change

    The QLESQ-SF is a 16-item scale assessing quality of life, enjoyment, and satisfaction across a broad range of domains, including physical health, mood, leisure activities, relationships, and overall sense of well-being. Respondents rate each item on a scale of 1-5. Because the last two items, about medication and overall life enjoyment, are scored separately, scores range from 14 to 70. The QLESQ-SF has good internal consistency reliability and validity and has been used to examine quality of life in OCD and anxiety disorders. Each item uses a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (very poor) to 5 (very good). A total score is derived from 14 items with a maximum score of 70 and with higher scores indicating greater life satisfaction and enjoyment.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  2. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale, self-report form (Y-BOCS) - Change

    This 10-item questionnaire asks about the frequency and severity of obsessions and compulsions, ability to resist them, and interference from symptoms. Scores can range from 0-40. A score of 8-15 represents mild OCD; 16-23, moderate; 24-31, severe, and above 32, extreme. The self-report Y-BOCS has excellent reliability and validity, and correlates highly with the original clinician-administered interview version. It is frequently used as an outcome measure in randomized controlled trials of ERP. A clinically significant improvement in Y-BOCS score is a 35% reduction.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

Other outcomes

  1. Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory, Revised (OCI-R) - Change

    The OCI-R is included as a secondary assessment of OCD symptoms. It contains 18 items rated on a 0-4 scale from "not at all" to "extremely." The recommended cutoff for a likely OCD diagnosis is 21, and it has excellent internal consistency and validity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  2. Adult OCD Impact Scale (AOIS) - Change

    The AOIS is a 48-item measure that assesses level of difficulty completing activities due to OCD in four different areas: work/school, home/family, intimate relationships, and social situations. Questions are rated on a five-point scale; total scores range from 0 - 182 with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment due to OCD. This scale has excellent internal consistency (alpha = .96) and scores correlation with other measures of general functioning and disability.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) - Depression - Change

    The PHQ-9 is a psychometrically strong, 9-item measure of depressive symptoms that taps each of the DSM-5 depression symptoms. Scores range from 0-27 with scores greater than or equal to 10 suggesting the presence of clinically significant depression. PHQ-9 comprises five categories, where a cut-off point of 0-4 indicates no depressive symptoms, 5-9 mild depressive symptoms, 10-14 moderate depressive symptoms, 15-19 moderately-severe depressive symptoms, and 20-27 severe depressive symptoms. The PHQ-9 has excellent internal consistency and validity with other measures of depression.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  4. Quality of Life and Functional Status (SF-12V) - Change

    The SF-12 is a self-reported outcome measure assessing the impact of health on an individual's everyday life. Physical and mental health composite scores are computed using the score of 12 questions and range from 0 to 100, where are zero score indicates the lowest level of health measure by the scales and 100 indicates the highest level of health. The investigators will assess quality of life using the 12-tiem short form health survey for Veterans, an instrument adopted by VHA as a measure of functional status. SF-12V responses can be summarized in component scores for physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) functioning.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 months after randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  5. PTSD Checklist (PCL-5) - PTSD Symptoms - Change

    The PCL-5 will be used to determine severity of PTSD symptoms. This 20-item questionnaire assesses each DSM-5 criterion for PTSD. The recommended cutoff for probable PTSD is 33. It has excellent internal consistency and correlation with other measures of PTSD.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  6. Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scale (GAD-7) - Anxiety Symptoms - Change

    The GAD-7 is a 7-item measure of generalized anxiety symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 21, with scores greater than or equal to 10 suggesting the presence of generalized anxiety disorder. Cut points of 5, 10, and 15 might be interpreted as representing mild, moderate, and severe levels of anxiety on the GAD-7. The GAD-7 has good internal consistency reliability and validity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

  7. Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) - Suicidality - Change

    The C-SSRS assesses severity of suicidal ideation, intensity of ideation, behaviors such as preparation, and lethality of attempts. Internal consistency is very good (alpha = .94) and the scale shows good convergent validity with other scales assessing suicidality. For the current study, the investigators use the 'current' version which assesses suicide risk in the past month.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post Treatment (4-6 Months after Randomization), 6 Months Post Treatment

07

Study locations

19 of 19 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ponzini GT, Hundt NE, Christie IC, Chen PV, Ecker AH, Lindsay JA, Teng EJ, Storch EA, Myers US, Roussev MS, Fletcher TL. A protocol for a randomized controlled trial of exposure and response prevention for veterans with obsessive compulsive disorder. Contemp Clin Trials. 2024 Mar;138:107445. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107445. Epub 2024 Jan 17. PubMed 38237674 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 55 months after the start.

Of 234 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 65. This study's planned 55 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 237 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 65.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2022
First posted
Feb 15, 2022
StartActual
Oct 3, 2022
Primary completionEst.
May 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
May 31, 2027
Last update
Jun 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05240924
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 15, 2022
Start date
Oct 3, 2022
Primary completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Terri L Fletcher, PhD
Contact
Terri.Fletcher@va.gov
(713) 440-4400
Matthew G Escamilla, BS
Contact
matthew.escamilla@va.gov
(713) 440-4461
Terri L. Fletcher, PhD
principal investigator · Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion