ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05239130Updated Oct 25, 2022

Evaluating the Performance and Safety of the Medical Device Auralya® in the Treatment of Facial Dermal Tissue Defects

An interventional study of Auralya in Cicatrix, Lipodystrophy and Plaque, sponsored by I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A.. Status unknown at 1 site in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Research Question of the present study is the following: in a population of men and women presenting facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) will cross-linked hyaluronic acid (Auralya®) significantly decrease and / or improve their appearance, results observed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks?

Read the detailed description

Auralya® action is to increase the volume of dermal-epidermal tissue based on the natural ability of hydrophilic hyaluronic acid molecules to bind to an amount of water many times greater than their weight. This allows to fill the intradermal spaces and integrate the intercellular matrix, conferring turgidity to the tissues. The cross-linking of the hyaluronic acid contained in the product has the effect of more stable and durable filling over time. These characteristics allow Auralya® to be used as a temporary filler for subcutaneous areas to correct small defects in the dermal tissue due to lipodystrophies or the presence of fibrotic tissues as scars, caused by pathologies or trauma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cicatrix
  • Lipodystrophy
  • Plaque
03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is above the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men or women with age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years.
  2. Patients with facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects), caused by both pathologies or trauma, seeking tissue augmentation and skin imperfections treatment and willing to receive Hyaluronic Acid Filler.
  3. Patients who agree to discontinue any other dermatological treatment and procedures during the study.
  4. Patients willing to provide signed to clinical investigation participation.
  5. Patients able to communicate adequately with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Past or current bleeding disorders.
  2. Use of aspirin and antiplatelet agents a week prior to treatment.
  3. Prior or planned use of topical injection to the face (, retinoid: applicable only to drugs, not applicable to cosmetics), within 4 weeks prior to screening or during this study (steroid ointment for therapeutic objectives is allowed for short -term use of ≤14 consecutive days.).
  4. Use of , chemotherapies, or systemic corticosteroids within 12 weeks from screening.
  5. History of anaphylaxis or severe complicated allergy symptoms.
  6. cardiovascular, digestive, respiratory, endocrine, or central nervous system disorders or previous mental disorders that may significantly affect the study.
  7. Known skin reaction to hyaluronic acid or hypersensitivity skin reaction to the device based on intradermal test results at visit 1.
  8. Evidence or history of disease or compromised immune system.
  9. Treatment with anticoagulants, thrombolytics, or inhibitors within 1 week prior to study participation.
  10. Prior permanent fillers or fat graft procedures around facial dermal tissue defects.
  11. Facial dermal tissue defects correction procedures (e.g., botulinum toxin A injection, face lift, soft tissue augmentation, medium-depth peel, dermal photo-rejuvenation, etc.) around infraorbital region within 6 months prior to study participation.
  12. History of hypersensitivity to local anaesthetic of amide type or HA.
  13. History of keloid formation or hypertrophic scar on the face.
  14. Evidence of active infection on the face.
  15. Wound, skin disorder or infection around facial dermal tissue defects that may affect the efficacy assessment.
  16. Pregnant woman, lactating woman, and man or woman of who is planning a pregnancy or is unwilling to use appropriate methods of * during the study. *Methods of contraception: hormonal contraceptive, intrauterine device or intrauterine system, double barrier method (condom with spermicide/diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide), surgical sterilization (vasectomy, tubal ligation, etc.).
  17. Need to exposure to the sun, UV rays and extreme conditions of heat for at least a week after the treatment.
  18. Need to have direct or indirect contact with quaternary ammonium salts during the study.
  19. As with all dermal filler procedures, the product should not be used in vascular rich areas. Using the product at sites such as Glabella and nose may inadvertently be injected into the blood vessels, resulting in symptom of vessel occlusion such as colour vision deficiency and blindness.
  20. Patients with illness, or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise participation or be likely to lead to hospitalization during the study.
  21. Participation in an interventional clinical study or administration of any investigational agents in the previous 30 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Auralya 1

    Sixteen patients will be administered Auralya® 1 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) for the treatment of minor facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Auralya

  • Experimental
    Auralya 2

    Sixteen patients will be administered Auralya® 2 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) for the treatment of medium-sized facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Auralya

  • Experimental
    Auralya 3

    Sixteen patients will be administered Auralya® 3 (Cross-linked Hyaluronic Acid) for the treatment of major facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Auralya

Interventions

  • DeviceAuralya

    Auralya® is a sterile, injectable, non-pyrogenic, re-absorbable medical product made of reticulated hyaluronic acid of non-animal origin, produced via bacterial fermentation. Auralya® is a colourless gel contained in a pre-filled, graduated, disposable, and sterile glass syringe with a Luer adapter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Auralya® in treating facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients 8 weeks (56 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Auralya® in treating facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients at 4 weeks (28 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Auralya® in treating facial dermal tissue defects (scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients at 12 weeks (84 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP)

    To evaluate the global performance of product assessed by Investigator through photos taken at each visit (IGAP), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Adverse Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Adverse Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Serious Adverse Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Serious Adverse Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Adverse Device Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Adverse Device Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Serious Adverse Device Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Serious Adverse Device Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale evaluated by the patient (GAIS)

    To evaluate general appearance after treatment assessed by the patient at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (28, 56 and 84 days) using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) \[Kim, 2016\], \[Kopera, 2015 - 2018\], \[McCall-Perez, 2011\], \[Savoia, 2015\]. The scale evaluates the appearance from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse than original condition) .

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Treatment satisfaction assessment by the patient

    To assess the patient satisfaction at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (28, 56 and 84 days), providing their degree of satisfaction with the treatment on a four-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, moderately satisfied, or not satisfied) \[Few, 2015\]

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Investigator Global Assessment of Safety (IGAS)

    To evaluate the global safety of product assessed by Investigator (IGAS), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0) , providing the safety on a four point scale from 4 meaning poor safety to 1 meaning very good safety.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Patient Global Assessment of Safety (PGAS)

    To evaluate the global safety of product assessed by the patient (PGAS), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0), providing the safety on a four point scale from 4 meaning poor safety to 1 meaning very good safety.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SCM Dr. Rosu
    Timişoara, Timis 300425, Romania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Almeida A, Sampaio G. Hyaluronic acid in the rejuvenation of the upper third of the face: review and update - Part 1. 2018.
  • Ascher B, Bayerl C, Brun P, Kestemont P, Rzany B, Poncet M, Guennoun M, Podda M. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines - 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011 Jun;10(2):94-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00550.x. PubMed 21649813 ↗
  • Barnes LA, Marshall CD, Leavitt T, Hu MS, Moore AL, Gonzalez JG, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Mechanical Forces in Cutaneous Wound Healing: Emerging Therapies to Minimize Scar Formation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Feb 1;7(2):47-56. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0709. PubMed 29392093 ↗
  • Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):117. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663. No abstract available. PubMed 23125964 ↗
  • Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A. Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(1):153-9. doi: 10.2147/cia.s2135. PubMed 18488885 ↗
  • Bukhari SNA, Roswandi NL, Waqas M, Habib H, Hussain F, Khan S, Sohail M, Ramli NA, Thu HE, Hussain Z. Hyaluronic acid, a promising skin rejuvenating biomedicine: A review of recent updates and pre-clinical and clinical investigations on cosmetic and nutricosmetic effects. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Dec;120(Pt B):1682-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.188. Epub 2018 Oct 1. PubMed 30287361 ↗
  • Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013. PubMed 23687448 ↗
  • Rippa AL, Kalabusheva EP, Vorotelyak EA. Regeneration of Dermis: Scarring and Cells Involved. Cells. 2019 Jun 18;8(6):607. doi: 10.3390/cells8060607. PubMed 31216669 ↗
  • Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):79-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00079.x. PubMed 10231509 ↗
  • De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25926750 ↗
  • Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313. PubMed 28040813 ↗
  • Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PubMed 15253184 ↗
  • Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(265):265sr6. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337. PubMed 25473038 ↗
  • Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11. PubMed 25964628 ↗
  • Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696. PubMed 20844296 ↗
  • Freedberg et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology In General Medicine (Two Vol. Set) 6th edition (May 23, 2003
  • Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087. PubMed 25730536 ↗
  • Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817. PubMed 27453830 ↗
  • Gottfried Lemperle, M.D., Ph.D., Ralph E. Holmes, M.D., Steven R. Cohen, M.D., and Stefan M. Lemperle, M.D., A Classification of Facial Wrinkles, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California, and FACESplus, Inc. Received for publication September 15, 2000; revised January 5, 2001.
  • Grablowitz D, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Federspiel IG, Gehl B, Kopera D, Prinz M. Long-term effectiveness of a hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler in patients with facial lipoatrophy, morphological asymmetry, or debilitating scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Oct;19(10):2536-2541. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13454. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PubMed 32333705 ↗
  • Jiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10. PubMed 23750828 ↗
  • Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25. PubMed 27274627 ↗
  • Kopera D, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Federspiel IG, Grablowitz D, Gehl B, Prinz M. Treatment of facial lipoatrophy, morphological asymmetry, or debilitating scars with the hyaluronic acid dermal filler Princess(R) FILLER. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018 Nov 27;11:621-628. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S181964. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30568476 ↗
  • Kopera D, Palatin M, Bartsch R, Bartsch K, O'Rourke M, Holler S, Baumgartner RR, Prinz M. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the dermal filler Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:195328. doi: 10.1155/2015/195328. Epub 2015 Mar 3. PubMed 25821787 ↗
  • Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27799807 ↗
  • Lorenc ZP, Bank D, Kane M, Lin X, Smith S. Validation of a four-point photographic scale for the assessment of midface volume loss and/or contour deficiency. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Dec;130(6):1330-1336. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31826d9fa6. PubMed 23190816 ↗
  • Mashiko T, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Feng J, Yoshimura K. Perpendicular Strut Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Deep Wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 9;3(11):e567. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000552. eCollection 2015 Nov. PubMed 26893992 ↗
  • McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4. PubMed 21779421 ↗
  • Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27621659 ↗
  • Rumsey N. Psychosocial adjustment to skin conditions resulting in visible difference (disfigurement): What do we know? Why don't we know more? How shall we move forward? Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Dec 15;4(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.09.005. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 29872669 ↗
  • Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x. PubMed 22759252 ↗
  • Savoia A., Onori N., Bladi A., Efficacy of Skinfill plus filler in the management of facial aging: a multicenter, post-marketing clinical study, Biomedical Dermatology volume 2, Article number: 2 (2018).
  • Stephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27042135 ↗
  • Sudha PN, Rose MH. Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;72:137-176. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00009-9. PubMed 25081082 ↗
  • van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6. PubMed 16079683 ↗
  • Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5. PubMed 20725567 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05239130
Lead sponsor
I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A.
Collaborators
Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
Start date
Mar 21, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 11, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 11, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

Mihaela Fratila
principal investigator · SCM Dr. Rosu

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion