ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05239117Updated Oct 25, 2022

Evaluating the Performance and Safety of the Medical Device Plenhyage® in the Treatment of Dermal Tissue Defects

An interventional study of Plenhyage in Cicatrix, Lipodystrophy and Plaque, sponsored by I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A.. Status unknown at 1 site in Romania. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-25.

Sponsored by I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2022), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Research Question of the present study is the following: in a population of men and women presenting dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) will Plenhyage® significantly improve the appearance of treated areas, results observed after 4, 8 and 12 weeks?

Read the detailed description

Plenhyage® is a different type of dermal filler, an innovative course of polynucleotides to restore skin damage. The polynucleotide chain attracts water molecules, protecting against free radicals, acting as an absorber of hydroxyl radicals OH, which accumulate from stress, cell damage and UV rays. It also guarantees moisturising action and protection against free radicals. Nucleotides, natural fractions of DNA and RNA, are components of Plenhyage® with an antioxidant, protective effect. These characteristics allow Plenhyage® to be used as a temporary filler for subcutaneous areas to correct small defects in the dermal tissue due to lipodystrophies or the presence of fibrotic tissues as scars, caused by pathologies or trauma.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cicatrix
  • Lipodystrophy
  • Plaque
03

In context

Cicatrix

611 studies on the registry are indexed under Cicatrix; 114 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is above the median of 40 across 512 interventional studies indexed under Cicatrix.

Browse Cicatrix studies →

Lead sponsor

I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A. is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Men or women with age ≥ 18 and ≤ 65 years.
  2. Patients presenting dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects), seeking tissue augmentation treatment and willing to receive Polymerized Polynucleotides Filler.
  3. Patients who agree to discontinue any other dermatological treatment and procedures during the study.
  4. Patients willing to provide signed to clinical investigation participation.
  5. Patients able to communicate adequately with the Investigator and to comply with the requirements for the entire study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Use of aspirin and antiplatelet agents a week prior to treatment.
  2. Patients with history of allergy or to polymerised polynucleotides or to other ingredients of the dermal filler or hypersensitivity skin reaction to the device based on intradermal test results at visit 1.
  3. Patients with any dermal systemic pathologies, such as systemic lupus erythematosus, psoriasis, scleroderma etc..
  4. Patients presenting bleeding disorders in the past or present.
  5. Patients taking or having indications for anticoagulant therapy.
  6. Use of concomitant treatments or procedures aimed to improve skin appearance over the last six months before the clinical investigation enrolment, such as chemical peeling, dermabrasion, laser resurfacing.
  7. Patients suffering from infectious diseases including herpes simplex virus infection, active hepatitis or .
  8. Patients suffering from active eczema, acne and keloids.
  9. Patients with any cutaneous manifested infection, disease or alteration.
  10. Patients at risk in term of precautions, warnings and referred in the package insert of the clinical investigation device.
  11. Patients with any facial aesthetic surgery in the preceding 12 months before the clinical investigation enrolment
  12. Patients with any active irritation or inflammation in the target areas of injection.
  13. Patients who received botulinum toxin A injections in the face in the preceding 6 months.
  14. Patients unlikely to cooperate in the clinical investigation or to comply with the treatment or with the clinical investigation visits.
  15. Pregnant woman, lactating woman, and man or woman of who is planning a pregnancy or is unwilling to use appropriate methods of * during the study.

    *Methods of contraception: hormonal contraceptive, intrauterine device or intrauterine system, double barrier method (condom with spermicide/diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide), surgical sterilization (vasectomy, tubal ligation, etc.).

  16. Patients with illness, or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise participation or be likely to lead to hospitalization during the study.
  17. Participation in an interventional clinical study or administration of any investigational agents in the previous 30 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Plenhyage Thin

    Sixteen patients will be administered Plenhyage® Thin for the treatment of minor -sized dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Plenhyage

  • Experimental
    Plenhyage Medium

    Sixteen patients will be administered Plenhyage® Medium for the treatment of medium-sized dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Plenhyage

  • Experimental
    Plenhyage Strong

    Sixteen patients will be administered Plenhyage® Strong for the treatment of major-sized dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects).

    Device: Plenhyage

Interventions

  • DevicePlenhyage

    Plenhyage® is an elastic, sterile, injectable, non-pyrogenic, re-absorbable gel made with polymerised polynucleotides (PDRN) of animal origin (fish). Due to its hydrophilic and polyanionic nature, PDRN binds water molecules, thereby filling intradermal spaces and making tissues firmer and more hydrated. The polynucleotide chain binds water molecules, has an anti-free radical action, and serves as a scavenger of hydroxyl radicals (OH), which accumulate under stress or due to foreign agents, such as UV radiation. Its hydration and anti-free radical activity help create the optimal environment for fibroblast growth, thereby restoring tissue elasticity. Plenhyage® is a colourless gel contained in a pre-filled, graduated, disposable, and sterile syringe with a Luer Lok adapter.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Plenhyage® in treating dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients at 8 weeks ( 56 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Plenhyage® in treating dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients at 4 (28 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. POSAS score assessed by Investigator and patient

    To evaluate the overall performance of the medical dermal filler Plenhyage® in treating dermal tissue defects (scars, atrophic scars, depressed plaques, and lipodystrophy defects) in terms of change in Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) score \[Draaijers, 2004; van de Kar, 2005\], assessed by Investigators and patients at 12 weeks (84 days) after the initiation of treatment, compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Investigator Global Assessment of Performance (IGAP)

    To evaluate the global performance of product assessed by Investigator through photos taken at each visit (IGAP), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Adverse Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Adverse Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Serious Adverse Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Serious Adverse Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Adverse Device Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Adverse Device Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Serious Adverse Device Event incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Serious Adverse Device Event incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Device deficiency incidence

    To evaluate the safety of the device through Device deficiency incidence assessed by Investigators at all visits and reported according to the current legislation

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale evaluated by the patient (GAIS)

    To evaluate general appearance after treatment assessed by the patient at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (28, 56 and 84 days) using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) \[Kim, 2016\], \[Kopera, 2015 - 2018\], \[McCall-Perez, 2011\], \[Savoia, 2015\]. The scale evaluates the appearance from 1 (very much improved) to 5 (worse than original condition) .

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Treatment satisfaction assessment by the patient

    To assess the patient satisfaction at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (28, 56 and 84 days), providing their degree of satisfaction with the treatment on a four-point scale (very satisfied, satisfied, moderately satisfied, or not satisfied)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Investigator Global Assessment of Safety (IGAS)

    To evaluate the global safety of product assessed by Investigator (IGAS), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0), providing the safety on a four point scale from 4 meaning poor safety to 1 meaning very good safety.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Patient Global Assessment of Safety (PGAS).

    To evaluate the global safety of product assessed by the patient (PGAS), at week 12 (day 84), compared to Visit 1 (day 0), providing the safety on a four point scale from 4 meaning poor safety to 1 meaning very good safety.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SCM Dr. Rosu
    Timişoara, Timis 300425, Romania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ascher B, Bayerl C, Brun P, Kestemont P, Rzany B, Poncet M, Guennoun M, Podda M. Efficacy and safety of a new hyaluronic acid dermal filler in the treatment of severe nasolabial lines - 6-month interim results of a randomized, evaluator-blinded, intra-individual comparison study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2011 Jun;10(2):94-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1473-2165.2011.00550.x. PubMed 21649813 ↗
  • Barnes LA, Marshall CD, Leavitt T, Hu MS, Moore AL, Gonzalez JG, Longaker MT, Gurtner GC. Mechanical Forces in Cutaneous Wound Healing: Emerging Therapies to Minimize Scar Formation. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2018 Feb 1;7(2):47-56. doi: 10.1089/wound.2016.0709. PubMed 29392093 ↗
  • Beasley KL, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Hyaluronic acid fillers: a comprehensive review. Facial Plast Surg. 2009 May;25(2):86-94. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1220647. Epub 2009 May 4. PubMed 19415575 ↗
  • Bhatt A. Protocol deviation and violation. Perspect Clin Res. 2012 Jul;3(3):117. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.100663. No abstract available. PubMed 23125964 ↗
  • Bogdan Allemann I, Baumann L. Hyaluronic acid gel (Juvederm) preparations in the treatment of facial wrinkles and folds. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(4):629-34. doi: 10.2147/cia.s3118. PubMed 19281055 ↗
  • Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A. Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(1):153-9. doi: 10.2147/cia.s2135. PubMed 18488885 ↗
  • Bukhari SNA, Roswandi NL, Waqas M, Habib H, Hussain F, Khan S, Sohail M, Ramli NA, Thu HE, Hussain Z. Hyaluronic acid, a promising skin rejuvenating biomedicine: A review of recent updates and pre-clinical and clinical investigations on cosmetic and nutricosmetic effects. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018 Dec;120(Pt B):1682-1695. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.09.188. Epub 2018 Oct 1. PubMed 30287361 ↗
  • Callan P, Goodman GJ, Carlisle I, Liew S, Muzikants P, Scamp T, Halstead MB, Rogers JD. Efficacy and safety of a hyaluronic acid filler in subjects treated for correction of midface volume deficiency: a 24 month study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2013 Mar 20;6:81-9. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S40581. Print 2013. PubMed 23687448 ↗
  • Rippa AL, Kalabusheva EP, Vorotelyak EA. Regeneration of Dermis: Scarring and Cells Involved. Cells. 2019 Jun 18;8(6):607. doi: 10.3390/cells8060607. PubMed 31216669 ↗
  • Chen WY, Abatangelo G. Functions of hyaluronan in wound repair. Wound Repair Regen. 1999 Mar-Apr;7(2):79-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00079.x. PubMed 10231509 ↗
  • De Boulle K, Heydenrych I. Patient factors influencing dermal filler complications: prevention, assessment, and treatment. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2015 Apr 15;8:205-14. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S80446. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25926750 ↗
  • Dong J, Gantz M, Goldenberg G. Efficacy and safety of new dermal fillers. Cutis. 2016 Nov;98(5):309-313. PubMed 28040813 ↗
  • Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56. PubMed 15253184 ↗
  • Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014 Dec 3;6(265):265sr6. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009337. PubMed 25473038 ↗
  • Fakhari A, Berkland C. Applications and emerging trends of hyaluronic acid in tissue engineering, as a dermal filler and in osteoarthritis treatment. Acta Biomater. 2013 Jul;9(7):7081-92. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.03.005. Epub 2013 Mar 15. PubMed 23507088 ↗
  • Few J, Cox SE, Paradkar-Mitragotri D, Murphy DK. A Multicenter, Single-Blind Randomized, Controlled Study of a Volumizing Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Midface Volume Deficit: Patient-Reported Outcomes at 2 Years. Aesthet Surg J. 2015 Jul;35(5):589-99. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjv050. Epub 2015 May 11. PubMed 25964628 ↗
  • Fitzgerald R, Graivier MH, Kane M, Lorenc ZP, Vleggaar D, Werschler WP, Kenkel JM. Update on facial aging. Aesthet Surg J. 2010 Jul-Aug;30 Suppl:11S-24S. doi: 10.1177/1090820X10378696. PubMed 20844296 ↗
  • Freedberg et al. Fitzpatrick's Dermatology In General Medicine (Two Vol. Set) 6th edition (May 23, 2003
  • Funt D, Pavicic T. Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Plast Surg Nurs. 2015 Jan-Mar;35(1):13-32. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000087. PubMed 25730536 ↗
  • Ghooi RB, Bhosale N, Wadhwani R, Divate P, Divate U. Assessment and classification of protocol deviations. Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;7(3):132-6. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.184817. PubMed 27453830 ↗
  • Grablowitz D, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Federspiel IG, Gehl B, Kopera D, Prinz M. Long-term effectiveness of a hyaluronic acid soft tissue filler in patients with facial lipoatrophy, morphological asymmetry, or debilitating scars. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Oct;19(10):2536-2541. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13454. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PubMed 32333705 ↗
  • Jiang LI, Stephens TJ, Goodman R. SWIRL, a clinically validated, objective, and quantitative method for facial wrinkle assessment. Skin Res Technol. 2013 Nov;19(4):492-8. doi: 10.1111/srt.12073. Epub 2013 Jun 10. PubMed 23750828 ↗
  • Kim BW, Moon IJ, Yun WJ, Chung BY, Kim SD, Lee GY, Chang SE. A Randomized, Evaluator-Blinded, Split-Face Comparison Study of the Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Mannitol Containing Monophasic Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Filler for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds. Ann Dermatol. 2016 Jun;28(3):297-303. doi: 10.5021/ad.2016.28.3.297. Epub 2016 May 25. PubMed 27274627 ↗
  • Kim JH, Kwon TR, Lee SE, Jang YN, Han HS, Mun SK, Kim BJ. Comparative Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Novel Hyaluronic Acid-Polynucleotide Complex Dermal Filler. Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 20;10(1):5127. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61952-w. PubMed 32198443 ↗
  • Kopera D, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Federspiel IG, Grablowitz D, Gehl B, Prinz M. Treatment of facial lipoatrophy, morphological asymmetry, or debilitating scars with the hyaluronic acid dermal filler Princess(R) FILLER. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2018 Nov 27;11:621-628. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S181964. eCollection 2018. PubMed 30568476 ↗
  • Kopera D, Palatin M, Bartsch R, Bartsch K, O'Rourke M, Holler S, Baumgartner RR, Prinz M. An open-label uncontrolled, multicenter study for the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the dermal filler Princess VOLUME in the treatment of nasolabial folds. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:195328. doi: 10.1155/2015/195328. Epub 2015 Mar 3. PubMed 25821787 ↗
  • Kuhne U, Esmann J, von Heimburg D, Imhof M, Weissenberger P, Sattler G. Safety and performance of cohesive polydensified matrix hyaluronic acid fillers with lidocaine in the clinical setting - an open-label, multicenter study. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Oct 20;9:373-381. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S115256. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27799807 ↗
  • Laurent TC, Fraser JR. Hyaluronan. FASEB J. 1992 Apr;6(7):2397-404. PubMed 1563592 ↗
  • Lemperle G, Holmes RE, Cohen SR, Lemperle SM. A classification of facial wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Nov;108(6):1735-50; discussion 1751-2. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00048. PubMed 11711957 ↗
  • Mashiko T, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Feng J, Yoshimura K. Perpendicular Strut Injection of Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Deep Wrinkles. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 Dec 9;3(11):e567. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000552. eCollection 2015 Nov. PubMed 26893992 ↗
  • McCall-Perez F, Stephens TJ, Herndon JH Jr. Efficacy and tolerability of a facial serum for fine lines, wrinkles, and photodamaged skin. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2011 Jul;4(7):51-4. PubMed 21779421 ↗
  • Park KY, Seok J, Rho NK, Kim BJ, Kim MN. Long-chain polynucleotide filler for skin rejuvenation: efficacy and complications in five patients. Dermatol Ther. 2016 Jan-Feb;29(1):37-40. doi: 10.1111/dth.12299. Epub 2015 Nov 2. PubMed 26814448 ↗
  • Poetschke J, Gauglitz GG. Current options for the treatment of pathological scarring. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016 May;14(5):467-77. doi: 10.1111/ddg.13027. PubMed 27119465 ↗
  • Rivkin AZ. Volume correction in the aging hand: role of dermal fillers. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Aug 30;9:225-32. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S92853. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27621659 ↗
  • Rumsey N. Psychosocial adjustment to skin conditions resulting in visible difference (disfigurement): What do we know? Why don't we know more? How shall we move forward? Int J Womens Dermatol. 2017 Dec 15;4(1):2-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijwd.2017.09.005. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 29872669 ↗
  • Rzany B, Cartier H, Kestemont P, Trevidic P, Sattler G, Kerrouche N, Dhuin JC, Ma YM. Full-face rejuvenation using a range of hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction over 6 months. Dermatol Surg. 2012 Jul;38(7 Pt 2):1153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2012.02470.x. PubMed 22759252 ↗
  • Savoia A., Onori N., Bladi A., Efficacy of Skinfill plus filler in the management of facial aging: a multicenter, post-marketing clinical study, Biomedical Dermatology volume 2, Article number: 2 (2018).
  • Stephens TJ, Sigler ML, Herndon JH Jr, Dispensa L, Le Moigne A. A placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of Imedeen((R)) Time Perfection((R)) for improving the appearance of photodamaged skin. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2016 Mar 15;9:63-70. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S98787. eCollection 2016. PubMed 27042135 ↗
  • Sudha PN, Rose MH. Beneficial effects of hyaluronic acid. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2014;72:137-176. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800269-8.00009-9. PubMed 25081082 ↗
  • van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6. PubMed 16079683 ↗
  • Van Dyke S, Hays GP, Caglia AE, Caglia M. Severe Acute Local Reactions to a Hyaluronic Acid-derived Dermal Filler. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2010 May;3(5):32-5. PubMed 20725567 ↗
  • van Eijk T, Braun M. A novel method to inject hyaluronic acid: the Fern Pattern Technique. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007 Aug;6(8):805-8. PubMed 17763611 ↗
  • Zaleski-Larsen LA, Fabi SG, McGraw T, Taylor M. Acne Scar Treatment: A Multimodality Approach Tailored to Scar Type. Dermatol Surg. 2016 May;42 Suppl 2:S139-49. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000746. PubMed 27128240 ↗
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2022 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2022, 9 months after the start.

Of 173 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cicatrix, half reached primary completion within 20 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 206 studies reached it within 18 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 17, 2022
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
StartActual
Mar 30, 2022
Primary completionEst.
Dec 30, 2022
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2022
Last update
Oct 25, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 25, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05239117
Lead sponsor
I.R.A. Istituto Ricerche Applicate S.p.A.
Collaborators
Opera CRO, a TIGERMED Group Company
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
Start date
Mar 30, 2022
Primary completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2022 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 25, 2022

Study contacts

Mihaela Fratila
principal investigator · SCM Dr. Rosu

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion