CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05237622FunkFlowUpdated Jul 9, 2024

Functional Residual Capacity During Different Levels of High-flow in Preterm Infants

An interventional study of High Flow in Infant, Premature, Diseases and Respiratory Distress Syndrome, sponsored by University of Zurich. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 73 Hours and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-07-09.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
73 Hours and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Although there is a widespread use of HighFlow therapy around the world, there is still uncertainty about the most appropriate initial HighFlow level after nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Higher levels might produce excessive and harmful intra-alveolar pressures exceeding those reached during nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy. Low levels may not generate sufficient distending pressures, which may result in a loss of functional residual capacity and an increased risk of respiratory failure. Therefore, the aim of this study is to assess the effect of different HighFlow levels on the functional residual capacity and to compare these findings to the functional residual capacity during nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infant, Premature, Diseases
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Keywords

  • Non-invasive respiratory support
  • HighFlow
  • continuous positive airway pressure
  • functional residual capacity
03

In context

Respiratory Distress Syndrome

1,597 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 312 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 60 across 961 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Distress Syndrome.

Browse Respiratory Distress Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Zurich is the lead sponsor of 1,030 studies on the registry; 130 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
73 Hours and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Written Informed Consent by one or both parents or legal guardians as documented by signature
  • 30 - 35 weeks postmenstrual age
  • Respiratory support with nCPAP PEEP 5mbar and FiO2 \< 0.30
  • > 72 hours old

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability of the parents to understand the study concept or procedures due to cognitive or linguistic reasons
  • Congenital malformations adversely affecting lung aeration or pulmonary perfusion (e.g. congenital heart or lung defects)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    High Flow

    Standard HighFlow therapy after weaning from continuous positive airway pressure therapy will be applied on different flow levels. Starting with a flow level of 8l/min, the flow-rates will be changed every 30 minutes subsequently from 8-6-4-2-4-6-8 l/min. Meanwhile, data lung volume changes will be measured using electrical impedance tomography.

    Device: High Flow

Interventions

  • DeviceHigh Flow

    Standard HighFlow therapy after weaning from continuous positive airway pressure therapy will be applied on different flow levels. Starting with a flow level of 8l/min, the flow-rates will be changed every 30 minutes subsequently from 8-6-4-2-4-6-8 l/min. Meanwhile, data on lung volume changes will be measured using electrical impedance tomography.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in global end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in global EELI over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in mean respiratory rate (RR) during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in RR over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  2. Change in regional end-expiratory lung impedance (EELI) during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in regional EELI over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  3. Change in mean minute volume during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in mean minute volume over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), (AU/kg/min)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  4. Change in mean ventilation distribution during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in mean ventilation distribution over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), (%, left/right and ventral/dorsal)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  5. Change in mean silent spaces during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in mean silent spaces over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), (%, dependent, non-dependent lung)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  6. Change in mean tidal volume during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in mean tidal volume over time using electrical impedance tomography (EIT), (AU/kg)

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  7. Change in number of apnoea that required stimulation during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in number of apnoea over time

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  8. Change in heart rate during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in heart rate over time

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  9. Change in oxygen saturation during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in oxygen saturation over time, SpO2, %

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  10. Change in fraction of inspired oxygen during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Change in fraction of inspired oxygen over time

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

  11. Change in reaching 'failure criteria' to stop HighFlow therapy during the weaning procedure from nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) to HighFlow (HF)

    Definition of failure criteria: * Respiratory rate \> 100/min for at least 30 minutes during the intervention * Increase in FiO2 by ≥ 0.25 from baseline to maintain oxygen saturation level within physician-ordered parameters * \> 2 apnoea requiring stimulation per 30-minute-intervention

    Time frame: 230-minute recording period per patient, 30 minutes on each HF level

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Newborn Research, Department of Neonatology, University Hospital Zurich
    Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, Davis PG. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr. 2013 May;162(5):949-54.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.016. Epub 2012 Dec 20. PubMed 23260098 ↗
  • Frerichs I, Amato MB, van Kaam AH, Tingay DG, Zhao Z, Grychtol B, Bodenstein M, Gagnon H, Bohm SH, Teschner E, Stenqvist O, Mauri T, Torsani V, Camporota L, Schibler A, Wolf GK, Gommers D, Leonhardt S, Adler A; TREND study group. Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. Thorax. 2017 Jan;72(1):83-93. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-208357. Epub 2016 Sep 5. PubMed 27596161 ↗
  • van der Burg PS, Miedema M, de Jongh FH, Frerichs I, van Kaam AH. Cross-sectional changes in lung volume measured by electrical impedance tomography are representative for the whole lung in ventilated preterm infants. Crit Care Med. 2014 Jun;42(6):1524-30. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000230. PubMed 24561568 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05237622
Lead sponsor
University of Zurich
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 14, 2022
Start date
Feb 19, 2022
Primary completion
Jan 13, 2023
Completion
Jan 13, 2023
Last update
Jul 9, 2024

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion