CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT05235529ARTiCOUpdated Feb 11, 2022

Neuropsychological and Neuroimaging Evaluation of the Cognitive Impairment in Aortic Valve Replacement (ARTiCO)

An observational study in Aortic Valve Stenosis, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Surgical Treatment, sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 70 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-11.

Sponsored by Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Nov 2021), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72
Ages
70 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in cognitive performance in the early postoperative (1 month) and late (1 year) postoperative period in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (SVAo) with surgery (SVA_Q) or transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI), by neuropsychological study (NRP), structural Brain Magnetic Resonance (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). The specific objectives are: (1) to compare the early and late clinical-functional consequences with NRP study in both groups; (2) to compare the occurrence of cerebral clinical events during follow-up; (3) to quantify and compare the appearance of silent lesions in the early postoperative period and late of SVAo with sMRI with respect to the baseline MRI in both groups; (4) study with fMRI changes in the activity and functional connectivity and correlate them with the NRP findings in all patients in the early and late phase in comparison with the basal MRI. METHODOLOGY: Prospective longitudinal, unicentric, nonrandomized cohort study of consecutive patients> 70 years, with indication for SVAo and intermediate and high surgical risk. One month before surgery will be performed an sMRI and fMRI and a baseline NRP study. One month after surgery, sMRI, fMRI and NRP study will be performed to assess the appearance of new lesions, as well as changes in cognitive performance with respect to baseline cognitive status. One year later, sMRI, fMRI and NRP study will be performed to assess changes in cognitive status with respect to baseline and early postoperative. Response variables: changes in cognitive performance measured by a Global Cognitive Impairment Index and in cognitive status (normal vs. Mild Cognitive Impairment vs Moderate Impairment), number, size and location of new silent brain lesions, cerebral vascular clinical events, and changes in advanced neuroimaging (image by diffusion tensor (DTI), resting-state fMRI) and its relationship with cognitive changes.

Read the detailed description

Design: Prospective, single-center, longitudinal cohort study with consecutive inclusion of patients older than 70 years of intermediate or high surgical risk who present Aortic Stenoses (AoS) that requires Aortic Valve Replacement (AVS). Two groups will be compared based on the type of treatment received, surgical valve replacement (SVA_Q) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The choice of treatment will be made according to medical criteria decided by the "heart team" in which clinical cardiologists, hemodynamics and cardiac surgeons participate who follow the recommendations of the European Society Cardiology (ESC / EACTS) 2017 Guidelines. However, only those patients susceptible to treatment with both techniques, will be included. The decision will be agreed with the patient. A complete neuropsychological study and structural and functional MRI will be carried out, one month prior to treatment and one month and year after the procedure. Throughout the study, clinical follow-up will be carried out with evaluation of the appearance of clinical cerebrovascular events.

Study investigators will record the following variables; Once the patient is assigned to treatment, a visit will be scheduled where the surgeon in the case of SVA_Q or the cardiologist in the case of TAVI will assess whether the patient meets the eligibility criteria for the study. If patient fullfill all inclusion and none of exclusion criteria, study investigators will request the Informed Consent.

Baseline clinical variables:

  • Age and sex
  • Vascular risk factors
  • Dyspnea: Functional class (New York Heart Association)
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • Preoperative Renal Insufficiency
  • EuroScore II scale score
  • Barthel scale score
  • MMSE. The NRP study and neuroimaging will be scheduled for a maximum of one month before the procedure

Intraoperative characteristics:

  • Time of extracorporeal circulation, coronary ischemia and orotracheal intubation
  • Bleeding from drains
  • Blood products transfusion
  • Types of prostheses and approach
  • Type and anesthetic drugs

During hospital admission:

Defined morbidity at discharge:

  • ICU stay> 48 hours, in ward> 10 days
  • Respiratory, kidney (RIFLE criteria), infectious, heart rhythm complications (endocavitary pacemaker implant)
  • Neurological complications: stroke, transient ischemic attack, disorientation episodes and seizures
  • Degree of dependency
  • Readmissions (in critical / semi-critical unit)
  • Valvular hemodynamics (echocardiographic data)

Mortality at discharge:

  • Immediate: \<72 hours post-procedure
  • Hospital: during hospitalization and / or first 30 days post-procedure Follow-up clinical variables: All complications and mortality at 6 months and 1 year will be collected, as well as valve hemodynamics and functional class in both groups.

Neuropsychological (NPS) variables:

The NRP study scores will be recorded at three times; basal, early and late phase.

Acquisition, analysis of neuropsychological variables:

Neuropsychological tests:

The NPS evaluation will consist of a battery of tests sensitive to vascular pathology (VCI), with an approximate duration of an hour and a half, by a neuropsychologist blind to the patient's treatment group, and will include:

  • Attention: Direct Digits subtest (Wechsler Memory Scale III;, WMS III); Symbol Digit Modality Test (SDMT); Symbol Search subtest (Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III);
  • Memory: Rey's 15-word verbal learning test (RAVLT) and Rey's complex figure (RCF) 's Alternative versions of the RAVLT will be used to avoid the retest effect
  • Working memory: Digits inverses (WMS III) and Trail Making Test part-B
  • Verbal fluency phonetic (P, A, S) and semantics (Animals)
  • Visuospatial functions: copy of Rey's complex Figure
  • Inhibition: Stroop test
  • Visuospatial Speed: Grooved Pegboard and Trail Making Test part-A
  • Language: Boston Denomination Test (BNT)
  • General cognitive functioning: MMSE and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) tests.

The order in the administration of the tests will be constant to avoid variability between subjects due to fatigue. The tests will be administered and scored according to standardized criteria.

To compute the Global Cognitive Impairment Index (IDCG) or Impairment Index (II), first the direct scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests will be transformed into z scores according to the scales of the normal population and taking into account age and level of schooling. The different tests will be grouped into cognitive domains that have been identified as relevant to detect the cognitive vascular impairment (CVI) to obtain subscripts of speed, attention, memory, language, visuospatial capacity and executive functions. The IDCG will include an average of the different domains evaluated.

In addition, changes in the cognitive status of the patients will also be assessed between the baseline examination, the early and late postoperative period. Specifically, the subjects will be grouped into 3 categories based on performance in the NRP tests: normal, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and moderate cognitive impairment.

The MCI is defined when the results of the cognitive tests in one or more cognitive domains are 1.5 standard deviations below the mean. The degree of cognitive impairment will be considered moderate when the results of the cognitive tests of one, two or three domains are 2 deviations below the mean or when there is a specific neuropsychological function with 3 standard deviations below the mean.

Image variables

Image acquisition, analysis and variables:

Patients will be assessed by structural and functional MRI at three different times during the study: (1) one month before; (2) one month later, and (3) one year after treatment. These evaluations will be carried out at the Center for Comparative Medicine and Bioimaging of Catalonia (CMCiB) with an MRI (Cannon-3020 Vantage Galen 3 Teslas, with 32-channel cranial bovine) dedicated to biomedical research.

Structural MRI acquisitions will include the acquisition of a high resolution T1-weighted image (MPRAGE), as well as T2-weighted images and fluid attenuated inversion recovery image (FLAIR) with the objective of assessing the presence of lesions of the white matter and lacunar infarcts as well as the appearance of silent lesions. Diffusion-weighted images (DWI) will also be included, which will allow us to assess the integrity of the white matter in the main tracts of the brain. The functional MRI (fMRI) images will include the acquisition of images in a resting-state state and the acquisition of images during the execution of an information processing speed task and an interference inhibition and control task.

In the functional MRI task, two cognitive tasks will be used focused on (a) control and interference (STROOP effect), (b) information processing (Symbol Digit Modality Test, SDMT) that represent the neuroradiological counterpart of neuropsychological tests. These images will allow us to visualize the functional brain areas both in a resting state (changes in the basal functioning of the brain) and during the execution of two tasks that assess cognitive functions (processing speed, working memory, and executive functions) that appear impaired. in vascular-type cognitive impairment. For the correction of the geometric distortions of the magnetic field in the images of MRI both in rest and in task, between 2 and 3 acquisitions of field maps will be carried out. The pre-processing of the images will be carried out with the Finite State Language (FSL) v6 program (FMRIB's Software Library, httpp://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/) and with the Statistical Parametric Mapping program, httpp: / /www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/ (SPM12) . Cortical thickness analysis will be carried out using the Freesurfer program. (httpp://www.surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). For the analysis of brain activity at rest, the Analysis of Functional Neuroimages (AFNI) program (httpp://afni.nimh.nih.gov/about_afni) and MELODIC (Multivariate Exploratory Linear Optimized Decomposition into Independent Components) tool included in FSL will be used. For the analysis of fMRI images in task, you wil use (FMRI Expert Analysis tool) v5.98 to explore the functional connectivity between specific brain anatomical regions. The analysis of the diffusion images will be carried out using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS), a tool also included in the FSL program, which allows the quantitative comparison of the integrity of the main white matter tracts. For the analysis of structural connectivity, the probabilistic tractography analysis Probabilistic Tracking (Probtrackx2) will be used, included in the FSL program.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
  • Surgical Treatment
  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Stroke

Keywords

  • Silent stroke
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is below the median of 200 across 424 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 11 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
70 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

The population that will be analyzed in this study are those patients with severe aortic stenosis that are candidates on valve replacement treatment. Those who present an intermediate or high surgical risk, over 70 years and who are candidates for both a surgical replacement and a TAVI and who present a normal cognitive state evaluated by a neurologist will be included.

Inclusion criteria

  1. presence of severe / symptomatic aortic stenosis with indication for elective Aortic Valve Replacement
  2. patients with intermediate or high surgical risk evaluated by EuroScore II 3-10%, susceptible to be treated with both techniques
  3. age> 70 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. contraindication to perform an MRI
  2. severe renal failure
  3. severe psychiatric illnesses
  4. Diagnosed dementia or Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) \<19/35 corrected for age and education
  5. surgical reintervention
  6. patients with preoperative comorbidities that condition difficulties for a one-year clinical follow-up
  7. aortic surgery concomitant to AVS or other than coronary revascularization
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
3 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Aortic valve replacement with surgery (SVAo)

    This group of patients with severe aortic stenosis will be treated with aortic valve replacement with surgery.

    Procedure: Aortic valve replacement

  • Transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI)

    This group of patients with severe aortic stenosis will be treated with transcatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI).

    Device: TAVI

Interventions

  • ProcedureAortic valve replacement

    Surgery replacement od the aortic valve

  • DeviceTAVI

    Transcatheter aortic valve implantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline neuropsychological study at early period (one month) after treatment in both groups

    Compare the mean score in the cognitive status evaluated with the Neuropsychological study (using the Global Cognitive Impairment Index) in the baseline period and at one month after treatment between both treatment groups (SVA_Q or TAVI). To compute the Global Cognitive Impairment Index (IDCG), first the direct scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests will be transformed into z scores according to the scales of the normal population and taking into account age and level of schooling. The different tests will be grouped into cognitive domains that have been identified as relevant to detect the cognitive vascular impairment (CVI) to obtain subscripts of speed, attention, memory, language, visuospatial capacity and executive functions. The IDCG will include an average of the different domains evaluated.

    Time frame: The cognition will be evaluated in two different time frames; at baseline and early period (one month) after the procedures.

  2. Change from baseline neuropsychological study at late period (one year) after treatment in both groups

    Compare the mean score in the cognitive status evaluated with the Neuropsychological study (using the Global Cognitive Impairment Index) in the baseline period and at one year after treatment between both treatment groups (SVA_Q or TAVI). To compute the Global Cognitive Impairment Index (IDCG), first the direct scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests will be transformed into z scores according to the scales of the normal population and taking into account age and level of schooling. The different tests will be grouped into cognitive domains that have been identified as relevant to detect the cognitive vascular impairment (CVI) to obtain subscripts of speed, attention, memory, language, visuospatial capacity and executive functions. The IDCG will include an average of the different domains evaluated.

    Time frame: The cognition will be evaluated in two different time frames; at baseline and late period (one year) after the procedures.

  3. Change from early period (one month) neuropsychological study at late period (one year) after treatment in both groups

    Compare the mean score in the cognitive status evaluated with the Neuropsychological study (using the Global Cognitive Impairment Index) in the early period and at one year after treatment between both treatment groups (SVA_Q or TAVI). To compute the Global Cognitive Impairment Index (IDCG), first the direct scores obtained in the different neuropsychological tests will be transformed into z scores according to the scales of the normal population and taking into account age and level of schooling. The different tests will be grouped into cognitive domains that have been identified as relevant to detect the cognitive vascular impairment (CVI) to obtain subscripts of speed, attention, memory, language, visuospatial capacity and executive functions. The IDCG will include an average of the different domains evaluated.

    Time frame: The cognition will be evaluated in two different time frames; early period (one month) and late period (one year) after the procedures.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison the incidence of number of new clinical ischemic strokes between both groups after procedures between baseline and one year after treatment (end of follow-up).

    Compare the number of new symptomatic ischemic strokes observed in MRI that occur in the postoperative period of aortic valve replacement, between both groups at one year after treatment respect baseline.

    Time frame: The ischemic strokes will be evaluated in both groups during all the postoperative follow-up, so one year after treatment.

  2. Measure and compare the disability due to new clinical strokes in both groups after procedures and till the end of follow-up.

    Describe the clinical strokes that occur in the postoperative period of aortic valve replacement, between both groups till the end of follow-up. To measure the disability due to new clinical strokes the investigators will use mRS. The modified Rankin score (mRS) ranged from 0 to 6. 0 is normal and 6 is dead.

    Time frame: The ischemic strokes will be evaluated in both groups during all the postoperative follow-up, so one year after treatment.

  3. Comparison the number of silent ischemic lesions (MRI) between both groups after procedures in the early respect baseline period..

    Compare the number of silent ischemic lesions that occur in the postoperative period of aortic valve replacement, between both groups in the early respect the baseline period.

    Time frame: The ischemic silent lesions will be evaluated in both groups in the early (one month) and late period of follow-up (one year), after the procedures.

  4. Comparison the number of silent ischemic lesions (MRI) between both groups after procedures in the late respect baseline period.

    Compare the number of silent ischemic lesions that occur in the postoperative period of aortic valve replacement, between both groups in the late respect the baseline period.

    Time frame: The ischemic silent lesions will be evaluated in both groups in the early (one month) and late period of follow-up (one year), after the procedures.

  5. Comparison the size of silent ischemic lesions (MRI) between both groups after procedures

    Compare the total size of all new silent lesions that are observed in the last MRI performed compared to baseline MRI after the aortic valve replacement, between both groups. The size of lesions will be obtained from MRI and calculated in milliliters.

    Time frame: The ischemic silent lesions will be evaluated in both groups in the early (one month) and late period of follow-up (one year), after the procedures

  6. Incidence of patients changing the cognitive status between baseline to end of follow-up in both groups and the correlation between this change and the number of new silent lesions in one year MRI.

    Rate of patients that change the cognitive status (normal; mild cognitive impairment; moderate cognitive impairment) measured with the MMSE between baseline and the end of follow-up in both groups and related with the number of new silent lesions observed in MRI between baseline to one year MRI. The cognitive status is evaluated with MMSE. Normal \>25; mild cognitive impairment 20-24 and moderate cognitive impairment \<15. The new silent lesions will be a number and a correlation will be done.

    Time frame: Cognitive status (MMSE) and silent lesions will be obtained at baseline, one month and one year.

  7. Incidence of patients changing the cognitive status between baseline to end of follow-up in both groups and the correlation between this change with the structural data obtained with MRI

    Rate of patients that change the cognitive status (normal; mild cognitive impairment; moderate cognitive impairment) measured with the MMSE between baseline and the end of follow-up in both groups and related with the neuroanatomical data of the MRI (DTI, T1-weighted image, as well as T2-weighted images and fluid attenuated inversion recovery image (FLAIR) with the objective of assessing the presence of lesions of the white matter and lacunar infarcts as well as the appearance of silent lesions) between baseline to one year MRI. The cognitive status is evaluated with MMSE. Normal \>25; mild cognitive impairment 20-24 and moderate cognitive impairment \<15. The presence in number of lacunar infarcts and the volume in cc of lesions of the white matter will be calculated and a correlation will be done.

    Time frame: The data obtained with structural MRI will be compared with cognitive status one year after the procedures.

  8. Rate of patients changing the cognitive status between baseline to end of follow-up in both groups and the relationship between this change with the functional data obtained with MRI

    Rate of patients that change the cognitive status (normal; mild cognitive impairment; moderate cognitive impairment) measured with the MMSE between baseline and the end of follow-up in both groups and related with the functional data of the MRI (resting state) between baseline to one year MRI. The cognitive status is evaluated with MMSE. Normal \>25; mild cognitive impairment 20-24 and moderate cognitive impairment \<15.

    Time frame: The data obtained with functional MRI will be compared with cognitive status one year after the procedures.

  9. Assess changes in functional networks in those patients that developed cognitive impairment during the study (one year)

    Assess whether there are or not changes in the following functional networks; Default Mode Network (DMN), Salience Network (SN), Central Executive Network (CEN) in subjects who develop cognitive impairment in both groups. Cognitive impairment will be measured with MMSE. It will be considered cognitive impairment if MMSE\<25.

    Time frame: Evaluation of functional networks at baseline and at an average of one year

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Meritxell Gomis Cortina
    Badalona, Barcelona 08917, Spain
    Recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 11, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05235529
Lead sponsor
Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital
Collaborators
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 11, 2022
Start date
Jan 4, 2021
Primary completion
Mar 2022 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2023 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 11, 2022

Study contacts

Meritxell Gomis, MD, PhD
Contact
meritxellgomis@gmail.com
606 22 99 97
Meritxell Gomis, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion