ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05220865Updated Oct 6, 2025

Hall Technique or Modified Hall Technique of Deep Carious Lesions in Primary Molars

An interventional study of Hall Technique and Modified Hall Technique in Dental Caries in Children, Tooth Diseases and Tooth Demineralization, sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 3 Years to 12 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-06.

Primary conditionTooth DemineralizationRegistry: Tooth DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Tooth Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Tooth Demineralization
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Tooth Demineralization, a narrower term within Tooth Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
268
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 12 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the clinical/radiographic success of Hall technique and modified Hall technique in the treatment of primary molars with deep dentine carious lesions in children (3-12-year-old). The secondary aim is to examine the effect of marginal ridge breakdown level on treatment success.

Read the detailed description

Untreated caries in deciduous teeth affect 532 million children worldwide. According to the Turkey Oral and Dental Health Profile study conducted in 2018, the prevalence of untreated caries in 5-year-old children is 64.4%. The traditional treatment of dentine caries is to restore the teeth after removal of the carious tissue. There is increasing evidence for minimally invasive interventions as an alternative to this traditional operative/restorative treatment.

One of the minimally invasive treatment approaches applied in children is the Hall Technique. Local anesthesia and tooth preparation are not required in this technique, and decayed primary molars are covered with stainless steel crowns without removing any carious tissue. The Hall technique has advantages such as preventing aerosol formation, shortening the treatment time, increasing patient cooperation, and reducing the need for general anesthesia and sedation in noncompliant patients. Its popularity has also increased during the Covid-19 process.

The success of the Hall technique in primary teeth with deep caries has been investigated in a limited number of clinical studies, and it has been observed that the technique has lower success rates in teeth with deep caries than in teeth with shallow/medium depth caries. To answer the question of whether modifying the Hall technique (removing the necrotic carious dentin layer manually with excavators before placing a stainless-steel crown) in deeply carious primary molars will increase the success of the original Hall technique (placing stainless steel crown without any intervention to the carious lesion), a randomized study was designed.

268 healthy children between the ages of 3-12 will be recruited from Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Pediatric Dentistry outpatient clinic. Participants who met the inclusion criteria and agreed to participate will be randomly allocated to Group 1 (Modified Hall Technique) or Group 2 (Hall Technique).

The allocation of patients in each group will be carried out by a random list. The sequence will be generated by a computerized random number generator. Enclosed assignments in sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes will be used as allocation concealment mechanism. Group allocation will be performed by an independent researcher, not involved in the study.

Clinical and radiographic success of treatments will be determined at follow-up appointments at 3rd, 6th and 12th months by one blinded examiner. In follow-up appointments; treatments will be recorded as "successful" (restoration appears satisfactory, no intervention required/ no clinical signs or symptoms of pulpal pathology/ no pathology visible on radiographs/ tooth exfoliated), "minor failure" (crown perforation/ new caries (around margins)/ restoration loss; tooth restorable/ reversible pulpitis treated without requiring pulpotomy or extraction) or "major failure" (irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess requiring pulpotomy or extraction/ inter-radicular radiolucency/ restoration loss; tooth unrestorable/ internal root resorption).

02

Conditions studied

  • Dental Caries in Children
  • Tooth Diseases
  • Tooth Demineralization
  • Stomatognathic Diseases

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Hall Technique
  • Deep dentine caries
  • Carious primary molars
03

In context

Tooth Demineralization Reclassified

27 studies on the registry are indexed under Tooth Demineralization; 9 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 268 is above the median of 40 across 27 interventional studies indexed under Tooth Demineralization.

Browse Tooth Demineralization studies →

Lead sponsor

Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.

Compared within Tooth Demineralization, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Tooth Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 12 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Medically healthy children
  • Participants attending follow-up appointments
  • Children having at least one primary molar tooth with deep dentin caries involving occluso proximal surfaces.

Tooth inclusion criteria:

  • Vital pulp with symptom-free or reversible pulpitis
  • Presence of marginal ridge breakdown and accessible cavity with hand instruments,
  • Presence of active cavitated carious lesion (Code 3 with Nyvad criteria for caries lesion activity and severity assessment- Nyvad et al., 1999)
  • Absence of spontaneous or prolonged pain related with irreversible pulpitis
  • Absence of fistula or abscess near the tooth
  • Absence of pathological mobility
  • Absence of pain on percussion
  • Absence of pulp exposure
  • Caries lesion located in ½ inner part of dentin radiographically
  • Presence of sound dentin layer between the deepest part of the carious lesion and the pulp radiographically
  • Absence of periapical or furcation pathologies on radiographs
  • Absence of internal and external root resorption on radiographs
  • More than ½ of root remaining

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any systemic disease, physical or mental disorder
  • Children or parents who doesn't accept to participate and sign the
  • Clinical or radiographic signs of pulpal or peri-radicular pathology
  • Caries cavity which cannot be accessible to hand instruments
  • Physiological root resorption more than 1/2 of the root in primary molars
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
268 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Hall Technique

    A preformed metal crown will be cemented on the carious primary molar tooth without any tooth preparation and local anesthesia.

    Procedure: Hall Technique

  • Experimental
    Modified Hall Technique

    In the Modified Hall technique only infected soft dentin tissue will be removed with hand instruments and a preformed metal crown will be placed with Hall technique.

    Procedure: Modified Hall Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureHall Technique

    * Only food scraps or debris will be removed from the caries cavity. * The smallest crown size will be selected that covers all cusps and approaches the contact points with a slight "springback" feel. * If the contact points are tight, orthodontic elastic separators will be placed through the contacts and the SSC will be placed at the second appointment 3-5 days later. * The SSC will be loaded with glass ionomer luting cement and placed evenly on the tooth. * The child will be asked to bite firmly until the crown is pushed down over the tooth. * If the child is unable or unwilling to bite down on the SSC, finger pressure will be used to seat the crown * The child will continue to bite on a cotton roll until the cement hardens * Excess glass ionomer cement will be removed from the crown margins with hand instruments and dental floss.

  • ProcedureModified Hall Technique

    * Food scraps or debris will be cleaned from the caries cavity and infected soft carious dentin tissue will be excavated with hand instruments. * The smallest crown size will be selected that covers all cusps and approaches the contact points with a slight "springback" feel. * If the contact points are tight, orthodontic elastic separators will be placed through the contacts and the SSC will be placed at the second appointment 3-5 days later. * The SSC will be loaded with glass ionomer luting cement and placed evenly on the tooth. * The child will be asked to bite firmly until the crown is pushed down over the tooth. * If the child is unable or unwilling to bite down on the SSC, finger pressure will be used to seat the crown * The child will continue to bite on a cotton roll until the cement hardens * Excess glass ionomer cement will be removed from the crown margins with hand instruments and dental floss.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical and radiographic success of the treatments

    The clinical evaluation will be performed by one blinded examiner with the criteria as proposed by Innes et al. (2007). Outcome criteria for the clinical and radiographic assessment of restorations and teeth will be as follows: Treatments will be considered as "successful" if the restoration appears satisfactory (no intervention required), no clinical signs or symptoms of pulpal pathology, no pathology visible on radiographs or tooth exfoliated The treatments will be classified as "minor failure" if there is a crown perforation, new caries around margins, restoration loss (tooth restorable) and/or reversible pulpitis treated without requiring pulpotomy or extraction. The treatments will be classified as "major failure" if there is irreversible pulpitis or dental abscess requiring pulpotomy or extraction, inter-radicular radiolucency, restoration loss (tooth unrestorable) and/or internal root resorption (Innes et al., 2007).

    Time frame: Change from baseline up to 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. The effect of the amount of marginal ridge fracture on treatment success

    The extent of marginal ridge breakdown will be determined by the ratio of the amount of fractured marginal ridge to the total marginal ridge of the tooth and will be scored in 4 groups (\<25%, 25-50%, 50-75%, \>75%) (Cho et al.,2018).

    Time frame: Change from baseline up to 3, 6 and 12 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University Faculty of Dentistry
    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Boyd DH, Thomson WM, Leon de la Barra S, Fuge KN, van den Heever R, Butler BM, Leov F, Foster Page LA. A Primary Care Randomized Controlled Trial of Hall and Conventional Restorative Techniques. JDR Clin Trans Res. 2021 Apr;6(2):205-212. doi: 10.1177/2380084420933154. Epub 2020 Jun 19. PubMed 32559403 ↗
  • Boyd DH, Page LF, Thomson WM. The Hall Technique and conventional restorative treatment in New Zealand children's primary oral health care - clinical outcomes at two years. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Mar;28(2):180-188. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12324. Epub 2017 Aug 8. PubMed 28787534 ↗
  • Eden E, Frencken J, Gao S, Horst JA, Innes N. Managing dental caries against the backdrop of COVID-19: approaches to reduce aerosol generation. Br Dent J. 2020 Oct;229(7):411-416. doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2153-y. Epub 2020 Oct 9. PubMed 33037360 ↗
  • GBD 2017 Oral Disorders Collaborators; Bernabe E, Marcenes W, Hernandez CR, Bailey J, Abreu LG, Alipour V, Amini S, Arabloo J, Arefi Z, Arora A, Ayanore MA, Barnighausen TW, Bijani A, Cho DY, Chu DT, Crowe CS, Demoz GT, Demsie DG, Dibaji Forooshani ZS, Du M, El Tantawi M, Fischer F, Folayan MO, Futran ND, Geramo YCD, Haj-Mirzaian A, Hariyani N, Hasanzadeh A, Hassanipour S, Hay SI, Hole MK, Hostiuc S, Ilic MD, James SL, Kalhor R, Kemmer L, Keramati M, Khader YS, Kisa S, Kisa A, Koyanagi A, Lalloo R, Le Nguyen Q, London SD, Manohar ND, Massenburg BB, Mathur MR, Meles HG, Mestrovic T, Mohammadian-Hafshejani A, Mohammadpourhodki R, Mokdad AH, Morrison SD, Nazari J, Nguyen TH, Nguyen CT, Nixon MR, Olagunju TO, Pakshir K, Pathak M, Rabiee N, Rafiei A, Ramezanzadeh K, Rios-Blancas MJ, Roro EM, Sabour S, Samy AM, Sawhney M, Schwendicke F, Shaahmadi F, Shaikh MA, Stein C, Tovani-Palone MR, Tran BX, Unnikrishnan B, Vu GT, Vukovic A, Warouw TSS, Zaidi Z, Zhang ZJ, Kassebaum NJ. Global, Regional, and National Levels and Trends in Burden of Oral Conditions from 1990 to 2017: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease 2017 Study. J Dent Res. 2020 Apr;99(4):362-373. doi: 10.1177/0022034520908533. Epub 2020 Mar 2. PubMed 32122215 ↗
  • Innes NP, Stirrups DR, Evans DJ, Hall N, Leggate M. A novel technique using preformed metal crowns for managing carious primary molars in general practice - a retrospective analysis. Br Dent J. 2006 Apr 22;200(8):451-4; discussion 444. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813466. PubMed 16703041 ↗
  • Innes NP, Evans DJ, Stirrups DR. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health. 2007 Dec 20;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-7-18. PubMed 18096042 ↗
  • Nyvad B, Baelum V. Nyvad Criteria for Caries Lesion Activity and Severity Assessment: A Validated Approach for Clinical Management and Research. Caries Res. 2018;52(5):397-405. doi: 10.1159/000480522. Epub 2018 Mar 5. PubMed 29506010 ↗
  • Konukman Turker S, Cihan AI. Two-year outcomes of hall technique and modified hall technique in deep carious lesions of primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Jan 12;26(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-07667-2. PubMed 41526924 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2022 to primary completion in Sep 2023, 19 months.

Of 16 interventional studies with no phase under Tooth Demineralization, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 21. This study's 19 months is close to that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 22, 2022
First posted
Feb 2, 2022
StartActual
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2023
CompletionActual
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05220865
Responsible party
AYŞE IŞIL CİHAN (Professor, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 2, 2022
Start date
Feb 1, 2022
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2023
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 6, 2025

Study contacts

Ayşe I. Orhan, Assoc. Prof.
study chair · Ankara Yıldırım Beyazit University Faculty of Dentistry

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion