ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07069127CELIADENTUpdated Apr 23, 2026

Hydroxyapatite-Based Home Treatment for Dentin Sensitivity in Celiac Patients

An interventional study of Biorepair Toothpaste and Mousse and Biorepair® Toothpaste in Celiac Disease, Dentin Hypersensitivity and Tooth Demineralization, sponsored by University of Pavia. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-23.

Sponsored by University of Pavia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 3 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This single-center, randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based treatment using hydroxyapatite-based oral care products in adult patients with celiac disease who exhibit enamel demineralization and dentin hypersensitivity. Forty patients will be enrolled and randomly allocated into two parallel groups. The control group will perform home oral hygiene using only a hydroxyapatite-based toothpaste (Biorepair® Total Protection) twice daily. The trial group will follow the same regimen with the toothpaste, but will also apply a hydroxyapatite mousse (Biorepair® Plus Intensive Enamel Repair) once every evening before bedtime throughout the study period.

The primary objective is to assess the reduction in dentin hypersensitivity using the Schiff Air Index. Secondary outcomes include changes in plaque accumulation (Plaque Index), gingival bleeding (Bleeding on Probing), pain perception (Visual Analogue Scale), and caries experience (DMFT and DMFS indices). Enamel demineralization will be analyzed through near-infrared transillumination (DIAGNOcam), laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent), and digital image analysis (ImageJ software).

All clinical parameters will be evaluated at baseline and after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The study seeks to determine whether the addition of a remineralizing mousse to daily oral care provides superior benefits in reducing sensitivity and improving enamel integrity in patients with celiac disease.

02

Conditions studied

  • Celiac Disease
  • Dentin Hypersensitivity
  • Tooth Demineralization

Keywords

  • Celiac Disease
  • Dentin Hypersensitivity
  • Enamel Demineralization
  • Hydroxyapatite
  • Remineralizing Agents
  • Biorepair
  • Toothpaste
  • Oral Mousse
  • Dental Sensitivity
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
03

In context

Celiac Disease

352 studies on the registry are indexed under Celiac Disease; 77 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 50 across 214 interventional studies indexed under Celiac Disease.

Browse Celiac Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pavia is the lead sponsor of 144 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults (≥18 years of age) with a confirmed diagnosis of celiac disease.
  • Presence of enamel defects (hypomineralization or demineralization).
  • Presence of active carious lesions.
  • Self-reported dentin .
  • Willingness to comply with the study protocol and follow-up schedule.
  • Written provided.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age below 18 years.
  • Absence of confirmed celiac disease.
  • Poor compliance or low motivation to participate in a 6-month study.
  • Ongoing treatment with products affecting enamel mineralization.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Participation in another clinical trial within the previous 30 days.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Biorepair Toothpaste + Mousse

    Participants in this group will perform home oral hygiene using Biorepair® Total Protection toothpaste twice daily and apply Biorepair® Plus Intensive Enamel Repair mousse once every evening before bedtime for the duration of the study (6 months).

    Device: Biorepair Toothpaste and Mousse

  • Active comparator
    Biorepair Toothpaste Only

    Participants in this group will perform home oral hygiene using Biorepair® Total Protection toothpaste twice daily, without the use of the additional mousse. This regimen will continue for the entire 6-month study period.

    Device: Biorepair® Toothpaste

Interventions

  • DeviceBiorepair Toothpaste and Mousse

    Participants assigned to the experimental arm will use Biorepair® Total Protection toothpaste twice daily (morning and evening) and apply Biorepair® Plus Intensive Enamel Repair mousse once daily before bedtime, for a total of 6 months. The toothpaste contains microRepair® particles (zinc-substituted hydroxyapatite), designed to occlude dentinal tubules and promote enamel remineralization. The mousse, applied at night, enhances remineralization through higher concentrations of active hydroxyapatite. This combined regimen targets the reduction of dentin hypersensitivity and enamel demineralization in adult patients with celiac disease.

  • DeviceBiorepair® Toothpaste

    Participants assigned to the control arm will use Biorepair® Total Protection toothpaste twice daily (morning and evening) for 6 months. The toothpaste formulation contains microRepair® (zinc hydroxyapatite) to support daily enamel protection and tubule occlusion, without the adjunctive effect of the mousse. This arm is used to assess the baseline efficacy of the toothpaste alone compared to the combined regimen.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in dentin hypersensitivity assessed by Schiff Air Index

    The primary outcome is the variation in dentin hypersensitivity scores measured using the Schiff Air Index at baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4). The Schiff Air Index is a validated clinical scale ranging from 0 to 3, where higher scores indicate greater sensitivity. The primary analysis will compare the change in scores over time between the experimental group (toothpaste + mousse) and the control group (toothpaste only).

    Time frame: Baseline (T0), 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in plaque accumulation assessed by Plaque Index (PI)

    Plaque accumulation will be assessed using the Plaque Index (PI) at each time point. The index evaluates four surfaces per tooth and assigns a score from 0 to 3, where 0 indicates no plaque, 1 denotes plaque detectable only with a disclosing agent, 2 represents plaque visible to the naked eye, and 3 corresponds to abundant plaque covering the tooth surface. The average PI score per patient will be calculated and compared between the two groups over time (T0 to T4) to evaluate the impact of the interventions on daily oral hygiene and biofilm control.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) from the start of treatment.

  2. Change in gingival bleeding assessed by Bleeding on Probing (BoP)

    Gingival bleeding will be evaluated using the Bleeding on Probing (BoP) index, where gentle probing is performed and bleeding is recorded as either absent (score 0) or present (score 1). The percentage of bleeding sites per participant will be calculated, and reductions in this percentage will indicate improvements in periodontal health.

    Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after treatment initiation.

  3. Change in self-reported pain using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Dentin hypersensitivity will be self-assessed by participants using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), consisting of a 10 cm line anchored at 0 (no pain) and 10 (worst imaginable pain). The score, measured in millimeters from the 0 mark, provides a quantitative measure of pain intensity. Changes in VAS scores over time will be analyzed between groups.

    Time frame: Measured at baseline (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) from the beginning of the intervention.

  4. Change in caries experience using DMFT Index

    The DMFT index records the total number of Decayed, Missing, and Filled permanent Teeth per individual. Scores range from 0 (no caries experience) up to 28 or 32, depending on the number of teeth present. A reduction or stabilization of DMFT scores over time will indicate an improvement or prevention of caries progression.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline (T0), and at follow-up visits at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4).

  5. Change in caries experience using DMFS Index

    The DMFS index expands the DMFT to include all tooth surfaces, providing a more sensitive measure of caries experience. Each surface is assessed individually, and scores range from 0 (no affected surfaces) to a maximum depending on the total number of tooth surfaces. Higher values indicate more extensive caries. Scores will be compared across time points between groups.

    Time frame: Recorded at baseline (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) after enrollment.

  6. Change in enamel lesion area assessed by DIAGNOcam and ImageJ software

    The extent of enamel demineralization will be assessed using near-infrared light transillumination with the DIAGNOcam device. The captured images will be processed using ImageJ software to quantify the surface area of enamel lesions in square millimeters. Each lesion will be manually outlined and analyzed by a calibrated examiner. The score assigned will represent the total area (in mm²) of demineralized enamel per tooth. Higher values indicate greater lesion extension. A progressive reduction in lesion surface area over time will be interpreted as a sign of remineralization. Intergroup comparisons will assess the impact of the hydroxyapatite-based intervention on enamel integrity.

    Time frame: Evaluated at baseline (T0), and at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) from treatment initiation.

  7. Change in enamel fluorescence using DIAGNOdent

    Enamel demineralization will be measured using the DIAGNOdent pen, which emits a low-power laser and detects fluorescence from porous enamel. Each site will receive a numerical score ranging from 0 to 99, where 0-10 indicates sound enamel, 11-20 indicates initial demineralization, 21-30 suggests moderate demineralization, and scores above 30 reflect advanced mineral loss. For each lesion, the highest DIAGNOdent value will be recorded, and the average value per participant will be calculated. A reduction in fluorescence values across time points will indicate enamel remineralization and clinical improvement.

    Time frame: Obtained at baseline (T0), and at follow-up evaluations at 1 week (T1), 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) following the start of treatment.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Unit of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry - Section of Dentistry - Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatrics - University of Pavia
    Pavia, Lombardy 27100, Italy
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data will be available upon motivated request to the corresponding authors.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 10 months after the start.

Of 82 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Celiac Disease, half reached primary completion within 28 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 60. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 87 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 5, 2025
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
StartActual
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 10, 2026
Last update
Apr 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07069127
Responsible party
Andrea Scribante (Associate Professor, Principal Investigator, University of Pavia) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 16, 2025
Start date
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 10, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 23, 2026

Study contacts

Andrea Scribante, Associate Professor
Contact
andrea.scribante@unipv.it
+39 0382516223
Andrea Scribante, Associate Professor
principal investigator · University of Pavia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion