ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT05217056GMsUpdated Feb 1, 2022

Associations Between General Movements Assessments and Cognitive Development

An observational study in Cerebral Palsy, Infant Development and Cognitive Dysfunction, sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey. Open to participants aged 25 Weeks to 42 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-01.

Sponsored by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63
Ages
25 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 14 studies in Cerebral Palsy by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University — none open to participants now, none under way, none of them phase 3. Cerebral Palsy · Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University.

Enrollment
8th of 11
63 · median 91
Started
2020
with 1 other
Observational
11 of 14
none open now
Registered
3rd of 14
by date

Among the 14 studies in Cerebral Palsy by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, this one is the 8th largest by enrollment of the 11 observational ones that give a count, is one of 2 that started in 2020, is one of 11 observational ones, and was the 3rd registered.

Cerebral Palsy

1,937 studies on the registry are indexed under Cerebral Palsy; 457 are open to participants now.

Browse Cerebral Palsy studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 14 studies in Cerebral Palsy by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University is open now. The open studies under Cerebral Palsy, anywhere →

Where they have run

Who these studies take

Of the 269 Cerebral Palsy studies recruiting now, 27 (10%) set no upper age limit and 234 (87%) stop at 75 or younger; 254 take children under 18; 51 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 25 Weeks to 42 Weeks · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 14 studies in Cerebral Palsy by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University as a file.
02

Study summary

High risk infant is defined as infant with a negative history of environmental and biological factors, which can lead to neuromotor development problems. It is a heterogeneous group of premature infants born under thirty-seven weeks of age, with infants with low birth weight, term or developmental retardation for various reasons. Therefore, preterm infants with low birth weight can survive with a neurological sequelae such as cerebral palsy (CP), epilepsy, hearing and vision loss, mental retardation, speech and speech problems, and learning difficulties. The clinical diagnosis of CP and learning diffuculties which can be observed in high-risk infants, is based on the combination of some neurological and clinical signs.

Read the detailed description

High-risk of infant follow-up programs provide guidance for the treatment of neurodevelopmental delays and deterioration in terms of early development. Three methods with the best predictable validity that can determine CP before the adjusted age of 5-month is Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Prechtl's Assessment of General Movements (GMs), Hammersmith Infant Neurological Evaluation. In recent years, the diagnosis of high-risk of CP can be detected at 3 months with predictive validity and reliability by evaluating the quality of GMs. GMs are now considered the gold standard for early detection of CP because of its high sensitivity and specificity than MRI, cranial US and neurological evaluations. It was also found that cognitive or language skills may be inadequate in school age in patients with inadequate movement character and in the same postural patterns according to age, although GMs are normal. So new clinical care guidelines and new intervention research for infants with CP and learning diffuculties under the age of 1, needs to be been shown. There a few studies about early detection of learning diffuculties like autism spectrum disorders between GMs and cognitive development tests. So this study aimed to reveal the association between GMs and cogtinive development with a cohort of high risk of infants with one year floow up.

03

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Palsy
  • Infant Development
  • Cognitive Dysfunction
  • Cognitive Developmental Delay
  • Cognitive Impairment, Mild
  • Infant, Small for Gestational Age
  • Infant, Premature, Diseases
  • Infant Asphyxia
  • Infant, Very Low Birth Weight

Keywords

  • General Movements(GMs)
  • Cognitive Development
  • BAYLEY-III Infant and Toddler Development Assessment
  • High Risk of Infants
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Weeks to 42 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

high risk of infanst for cerebral palsy

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Having periventricular hemorrhage, ICH stages 2, 3, 4, cystic PVL, stage 3 HIE, kernicterus, perinatal asphyxia, chronic lung disease, RDS, BPD, long-term oxygen (7 days), >24 hours mechanical ventilator (MV) support, 5th minute Apgar Score \<3, neonatal sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), gestation age \<32 weeks, and prematurity due to preterm/multiple births\<1500 gr.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital malformation (Spina Bifida, Congenital Muscular Torticollis, Arthrogriposis Multiplex Congenita etc.)
  • Infants diagnosed with metabolic and genetic diseases (Down Syndrome,Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy etc.)
  • Infants still intubated and mechanical ventilator dependent at postterm 3 months
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
12 Months
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • 1/Measurement

    All of the infants with high risk of cerebral palsy

    Other: measurements

Interventions

  • Othermeasurements

    All of the infants with high risk of cerebral palsy will be assessed from birth to 12 months age with the assessments of Prechtl's General movements (GMs) until 20 weeks of age. Also BAYLEY-III Infant and Toddler Development Assessment Scale (BAYLEY-III) will be performed at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months for the cognitive development.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Prechtl's General movements (GMs) assessments1

    General movements (GMs) are the spontaneous movement repertoire present from early foetal life until 20 weeks post-term. From birth to 8 post-term weeks, they have a "writhing" character. They will be scored as cs-pr-n-ch. N show normal movement patterns.

    Time frame: Measurement at preterm age (birth to 40weeks)

  2. Prechtl's General movements (GMs) assessments2

    General movements (GMs) are the spontaneous movement repertoire present from early foetal life until 20 weeks post-term. From birth to 8 post-term weeks, they have a "writhing" character. They will be scored as cs-pr-n-ch. N show normal movement patterns.

    Time frame: Measurement between the term age to 9th weeks

  3. Prechtl's General movements (GMs) assessments3

    General movements (GMs) are the spontaneous movement repertoire present from early foetal life until 20 weeks post-term. From birth to 8 post-term weeks, they have a "writhing" character and then till about 20 weeks a "fidgety" character. Two specific abnormal movement patterns reliably predict CP in fidgety term: F (-): the absence of the fidgety character from 8-20 post-term weeks. Fidgety movements (FMs) are classified as (a) normal (F+), (b) absent (AF), when normal FMs are never observed and (c) abnormal (F-).

    Time frame: Measurement at fidgety periods of life (between 10th weeks to 20th weeks)

  4. The Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III)

    The BSID-III is a neurocognitive assessment used to evaluate infants from 0-42 months and to monitor their development with 5 domains: cognitive, language (receptive and expressive communication), motor (fine and gross motor), social-emotional, and adaptive functions (17). The first three domains will be assessed. To allow comparison of results from the 5 domains, a composite score will be calculated for each domain (mean, 100±15). A composite score below -2 standard deviation (SD) (\<70) will be considered a severe delay for all domains.

    Time frame: Change from the baseline of the BAYLEY-III score at 3, 6,12th month of infants

Secondary outcomes

  1. demographic information1

    birth age of the infants will be recorded in weeks

    Time frame: first day of birth

  2. demographic information2

    birth weight of the infants will be recorded in kilograms

    Time frame: first day of birth

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hatice Adıgüzel
    Kahramanmaras, Dulkadiroglu 46100, Turkey
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Aug 2020 to primary completion in Aug 2021, 12 months.

Of 215 non-industry observational studies under Cerebral Palsy, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 60. This study's 12 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 219 studies reached it within 21 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2022
First posted
Feb 1, 2022
StartActual
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completionActual
Aug 30, 2021
CompletionActual
Sep 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 1, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT05217056
Responsible party
Hatice Adiguzel (Assistant Proffessor, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 1, 2022
Start date
Aug 1, 2020
Primary completion
Aug 30, 2021
Completion
Sep 30, 2021
Last update
Feb 1, 2022

Study contacts

hatice adıgüzel, PhD
principal investigator · Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Bulent Elbasan, Proffessor
study director · Gazi University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion