ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07926711Updated Nov 9, 2026

Comparative Effectiveness of Intralesional Injection of Triamcinolone Acetonide vs. Microneedling With Local Application of Triamcinolone Acetonide in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata

A Phase 4 interventional study of Triamcinolone acetonide and Microneedling with topical triamcinolone acetonide in Alopecia Areata, sponsored by Dow University of Health Sciences. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Dow University of Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Nov 2026).
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 10 months later.
Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
276
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which treatment works better for people with alopecia areata, a condition that causes patchy hair loss. The study will compare two commonly used treatments to see which one leads to better hair regrowth and fewer side effects.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does injecting triamcinolone acetonide into the skin lead to better hair regrowth than microneedling with topical triamcinolone acetonide?

Are there any side effects linked to these treatments?

Researchers will compare two groups of participants. One group will receive intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide. The other group will receive microneedling followed by the local application of triamcinolone acetonide. The results will be compared to see which treatment works better for alopecia areata.

Participants will:

Be examined by the research team to confirm the diagnosis of alopecia areata

Receive one of the two treatments as part of the study

Attend follow-up visits so researchers can check hair regrowth and monitor for side effects

Read the detailed description

Alopecia areata is a common autoimmune condition characterized by non-scarring hair loss. Intralesional corticosteroid injection is a widely used treatment; however, alternative methods such as microneedling with topical corticosteroids are increasingly being explored to improve outcomes and reduce treatment-related discomfort.

This randomized clinical trial is designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide versus microneedling with local application of triamcinolone acetonide in the treatment of alopecia areata. Eligible participants diagnosed with alopecia areata will be enrolled after obtaining informed consent.

Participants will be allocated into two treatment groups. One group will receive intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide according to standard clinical practice. The second group will undergo microneedling followed by topical application of triamcinolone acetonide. Treatments will be administered at predefined intervals as outlined in the approved study protocol.

Clinical assessment will be performed at baseline and during follow-up visits to evaluate hair regrowth and treatment response. Participants will also be monitored for local and systemic adverse effects throughout the study period. The findings of this study aim to provide comparative evidence on the efficacy and safety of these two commonly used treatment modalities for alopecia areata.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alopecia Areata

Keywords

  • Alopecia areata, intralesional triamcinolone, microneedling, topical triamcinolone, randomized controlled trial, hair loss
03

In context

Alopecia Areata

220 studies on the registry are indexed under Alopecia Areata; 61 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 276 is above the median of 50 across 171 interventional studies indexed under Alopecia Areata.

Browse Alopecia Areata studies →

Lead sponsor

Dow University of Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 179 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male and female participants aged 18 years and above

Clinically diagnosed alopecia areata involving 25 percent or less of the scalp surface area

Disease duration of up to 12 months

Willingness to participate in the study and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Extensive alopecia areata involving more than 25 percent of the scalp, alopecia totalis, or alopecia universalis

Scarring alopecia or active scalp infection

History of keloid formation or abnormal wound healing

Pregnant or lactating women

Use of systemic or topical therapy within the last 4 weeks

Known to triamcinolone acetonide or local anesthetics

Presence of uncontrolled disorders that may affect treatment response

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
276 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intralesional Triamcinolone Acetonide

    Participants in this arm will receive intralesional injections of triamcinolone acetonide into the affected scalp areas at four-week intervals, according to standard clinical practice.

    Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide · Procedure: Microneedling with topical triamcinolone acetonide

  • Experimental
    Microneedling with Topical Triamcinolone Acetonide

    Participants in this arm will undergo microneedling of the affected scalp areas followed by local application of triamcinolone acetonide at four-week intervals.

    Drug: Triamcinolone acetonide · Procedure: Microneedling with topical triamcinolone acetonide

Interventions

  • Triamcinolone acetonide will be administered as intralesional injections into the affected scalp areas at four-week intervals, according to standard clinical practice.

  • ProcedureMicroneedling with topical triamcinolone acetonide

    Microneedling will be performed on the affected scalp areas followed by local application of triamcinolone acetonide at four-week intervals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hair regrowth

    Hair regrowth will be assessed by the percentage change in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score from baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. treatment success

    Treatment success will be defined as a 50 percent or greater reduction in the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score compared to baseline.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Treatment-related adverse effects

    Local adverse effects including pain, erythema, bleeding, infection, skin atrophy, telangiectasia, and pigmentary changes will be recorded during the study period.

    Time frame: Up to 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Dow University Hospital, Ojha Campus
    Karachi, Sindh 12345, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because this is an investigator-initiated academic study, and no formal data-sharing plan has been approved.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07926711
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Dr Hafsa HAFSA, MBBS, FCPS (IN PROCESS)
Contact
hafsawaqas1997@gmail.com
92-332-38229341

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Triamcinolone Acetonide

Start the discussion