CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07866430DELTAUpdated Oct 8, 2026

De-EscaLaTion of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy: A Randomized Phase II Study of De-escalated Letrozole in Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer

A Phase 2 interventional study of Letrozole in Brest Cancer ER+ and HER2 Negative, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 59 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-08.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 8, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 59 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study is a randomized, open-label, phase II trial designed to evaluate whether alternate-day dosing of letrozole preserves antiproliferative activity compared with standard daily dosing in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.

Read the detailed description

The objective of the study is to determine whether alternate-day dosing maintains suppression of tumor proliferation comparable to standard daily dosing. This study is designed to evaluate a dose de-escalation strategy using alternate-day letrozole dosing in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. By assessing short-term changes in Ki-67 following treatment, this study will determine whether reduced dosing maintains antiproliferative activity comparable to standard daily therapy. Demonstrating similar suppression of tumor proliferation with alternate-day dosing would provide important biological evidence that reduced-dose endocrine therapy may maintain therapeutic activity while potentially improving tolerability. Such findings could support the development of future strategies aimed at optimizing endocrine therapy dosing, improving patient adherence, and ultimately enhancing long-term outcomes for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

In addition, this study will generate important translational data regarding the relationship between endocrine therapy dosing, systemic estrogen suppression, lipid profile panel, and tumor proliferation. By integrating tumor-based biomarkers with pharmacodynamic measurements, the study seeks to better understand whether reduced-dose aromatase inhibition can achieve similar biological effects as standard dosing. If successful, this approach could inform future clinical trials evaluating endocrine therapy optimization and may contribute to more individualized endocrine treatment strategies for patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Brest Cancer ER+ and HER2 Negative

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Patient Reported Outcomes
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 59 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have histologically confirmed breast cancer, clinical stage I-III as per the AJCC 8th edition (Anatomic Prognostic Staging).

Tumors must be estrogen receptor-positive (ER expression ≥ 10%) and HER2 negative (IHC 0-1+, or IHC 2+ with negative FISH). Tumors can be progesterone receptor positive or negative.

Participants must be planned to undergo surgery upfront.

Age ≥18 years.

Participants must be postmenopausal female.

ECOG performance status ≤2 (Karnofsky ≥60%, see Appendix A).

Participants must have an adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

absolute neutrophil count ≥1,000/mcL platelets ≥100,000/mcL total bilirubin ≤ institutional upper limit of normal (ULN) AST(SGOT)/ALT(SGPT) ≤3 × institutional ULN creatinine ≤ institutional ULN

Participants with a prior or concurrent malignancy whose natural history or treatment does not have the potential to interfere with the safety or efficacy assessment of the investigational regimen are eligible for this trial.

Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document. Legally authorized representatives may sign and give informed consent on behalf of study participants.

Participants must not have received prior therapy for current breast cancer.

Participants must be postmenopausal defined as any of the following:

  • Age ≥60 years
  • Age \<60 years with ≥12 months of spontaneous amenorrhea without chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, ovarian suppression, pregnancy, or lactation
  • Prior bilateral oophorectomy
  • Age \<60 years with hysterectomy and laboratory values in the postmenopausal range (elevated FSH and low estradiol)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants who are candidates for neoadjuvant therapy.

Participants who are receiving any other investigation agents.

History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to letrozole.

Participants with uncontrolled intercurrent illness or any other significant condition(s) that would make participation in this protocol unreasonably hazardous.

Male participants at birth

History of severe osteoporosis (T score \< -4 either spine or hip), or presence of vertebral fracture.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Arm A (letrozole standard dosing)

    letrozole 2.5 mg orally once daily

    Drug: Letrozole

  • Experimental
    Arm B (letrozole de-escalated dosing)

    letrozole 2.5 mg orally every other day

    Drug: Letrozole

Interventions

  • DrugLetrozole

    This study is designed as a non-inferiority trial. Prior neoadjuvant endocrine therapy studies have demonstrated that short-term aromatase inhibitor therapy typically produces substantial reductions in tumor proliferation, with Ki-67 reductions of approximately 70-80% after several weeks of treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tumor proliferation measured by ki67

    The primary endpoint is tumor proliferation measured by ki67 and will assess the log-transformed relative change in Ki-67 The mean log relative change will be compared between treatment arms using a linear regression model including treatment arm and the stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and up to 6 weeks of study treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of tumors achieving ≥50% reduction in Ki-67

    The proportion of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in Ki-67 will be summarized within each treatment group. Comparisons between groups will be performed using logistic regression models adjusting for stratification factors, and results will be reported as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  2. Proportion of tumors with post-treatment Ki-67 ≤10%

    The proportion of tumors with post-treatment Ki-67 ≤10% will be summarized within each treatment arm. Differences between groups will be evaluated using logistic regression models adjusting for stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  3. Change from baseline in circulating hormone levels- estradiol

    Serum concentrations of estradiol will be measured using ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays. Hormone levels will be analyzed on the logarithmic scale. The log relative change in hormone levels between baseline and on-treatment measurements will be calculated and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for stratification factors. Results will be presented as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: from baseline and up to 6 weeks of therapy

  4. Change from baseline in circulating hormone levels- estrone

    Serum concentrations of estrone will be measured using ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays. Hormone levels will be analyzed on the logarithmic scale. The log relative change in hormone levels between baseline and on-treatment measurements will be calculated and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for stratification factors. Results will be presented as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  5. Change from baseline in circulating hormone levels- estrone sulfate

    Serum concentrations of estrone sulfate will be measured using ultrasensitive liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assays. Hormone levels will be analyzed on the logarithmic scale. The log relative change in hormone levels between baseline and on-treatment measurements will be calculated and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for stratification factors. Results will be presented as geometric mean ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  6. Change from baseline in lipid profile parameters- total cholesterol

    Total cholesterol will be measured using standard clinical laboratory assays. Changes in lipid parameters will be summarized descriptively and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for baseline lipid levels and stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  7. Change from baseline in lipid profile parameters- LDL cholesterol

    LDL cholesterol will be measured using standard clinical laboratory assays. Changes in lipid parameters will be summarized descriptively and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for baseline lipid levels and stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  8. Change from baseline in lipid profile parameters- HDL cholesterol

    HDL cholesterol will be measured using standard clinical laboratory assays. Changes in lipid parameters will be summarized descriptively and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for baseline lipid levels and stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  9. Change from baseline in lipid profile parameters- triglycerides

    Triglycerides will be measured using standard clinical laboratory assays. Changes in lipid parameters will be summarized descriptively and compared between treatment arms using linear regression models adjusting for baseline lipid levels and stratification factors.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  10. Toxicity profile measured using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 6.0

    Adverse events will be graded according to CTCAE v6.0. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events will be summarized by treatment arm and grade. Comparisons between treatment groups will be conducted using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests, as appropriate.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  11. Change from baseline of quality of life assessed using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 survey

    The PROMIS-29 assesses 7 domains with 4 questions each. There is an additional question that assesses pain intensity 0-10 on numeric rating scale. The researchers will use the two-sample t-test to compare T score in each of the 7 domains between standard dose letrozole and alternate dose letrozole groups. The researchers will also calculate change in each T score in each domain and will compare the change between standard dose letrozole and alternate dose letrozole groups using the two-sample t-test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  12. Change From baseline in TMEM doorway score

    TMEM doorway score will be obtained before letrozole (from diagnostic core biopsy) and after 4-6 week letrozole therapy (from surgical specimen). First, the researchers will use paired t test (Wilcoxon signed rank test if normality violated) to compare the change in TMEM doorway score in the overall population and then will conduct stratified analysis by letrozole dose. We will further use the two-sample t-test (or Mann-Whitney U test if normality violated) to compare change in TMEM doorway score between standard dose letrozole and de-escalated dose letrozole.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  13. Change in proportion of Mena isoform (MenaINV) between study arms

    MenaINV will be measured in formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue samples using immunofluorescence. Upon completion of staining, the slides will be evaluated by pathologists to confirm the quality of the stain; and if deemed acceptable, imaged on an automated digital whole slide scanner. The average intensity of MenaINV will be then quantified across all regions of interest in each slide and defined as the MenaINV score. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  14. Change in proportion of cancer stem cells between study arms

    Stem cells will be identified based on expression of SOX9, a transcription factor associated with pluripotency programs. For detecting SOX9 we will use rabbit anti-SOX9 and DAPI. Alexa Fluor-546 goat anti-rabbit will be used as a secondary antibody. Otherwise, we will use the IF staining, scanning and analysis protocol. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  15. Change in dormant cancer cells between study arms

    Dormant cells will be identified based on expression of NR2F1, a transcription factor associated with cell cycle arrest programs. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  16. Change in number of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) between study arms

    CTCs will be enumerated using the RareCyte platform a selection-free, density-based liquid biopsy system that does not rely on EpCAM capture and therefore avoids the biomarker-expression bias inherent to affinity-based methods. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  17. Change in expression of MenaINV between study arms

    Slides will be stained with the RarePlex immunofluorescence panel in addition to nuclear dye, anti-CD45 and a pan-cytokeratin/EpCAM cocktail and be also stained with our custom-made chicken anti-MenaINV antibody and processed with inclusion of an additional channel in the machine-learning algorithm and then scanned on the CyteFinder automated fluorescence microscope. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  18. Change in stem markers between study arms

    Slides will be stained with the RarePlex immunofluorescence panel in addition to nuclear dye, anti-CD45 and a pan-cytokeratin/EpCAM cocktail and be also stained with anti-SOX9 antibody (Millipore 3205915) and processed with inclusion of an additional channel in the machine-learning algorithm. , then scanned on the CyteFinder automated fluorescence microscope. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  19. Change in pro-inflammatory cytokines between study arms

    The researchers will measure pro-inflammatory cytokines using a soluble factor multiplex bead assay. Given that the researchers are interested in the pro-dormancy response to therapy, and TGF-β2 has been implemented in induction of dormancy we will also measure the levels of TGFβ growth factors using Bio-Plex Pro TGF-β 3-plex Assay. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

  20. Change in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PMBC) profile between study arms

    Using flow cytometry we will determine the changes in the PMBC levels before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Change in proportion would be analyzed using chi-square test.

    Time frame: from baseline and after up to 6 weeks of therapy

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Mauriac L, Llombert-Cussac A, Janicke F, Miller WR, Evans DB, Dugan M, Brady C, Quebe-Fehling E, Borgs M. Letrozole is more effective neoadjuvant endocrine therapy than tamoxifen for ErbB-1- and/or ErbB-2-positive, estrogen receptor-positive primary breast cancer: evidence from a phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18):3808-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.18.3808. PubMed 11559718 ↗
  • Serrano D, Gandini S, Thomas P, Crew KD, Kumar NB, Vornik LA, Lee JJ, Veronesi P, Viale G, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Lazzeroni M, Johansson H, D'Amico M, Guasone F, Spinaci S, Bertelsen BE, Mellgren G, Bedrosian I, Weber D, Castile T, Dimond E, Heckman-Stoddard BM, Szabo E, Brown PH, DeCensi A, Bonanni B. Efficacy of Alternative Dose Regimens of Exemestane in Postmenopausal Women With Stage 0 to II Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):664-672. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2023.0089. PubMed 36951827 ↗
  • Karagiannis GS, Pastoriza JM, Wang Y, Harney AS, Entenberg D, Pignatelli J, Sharma VP, Xue EA, Cheng E, D'Alfonso TM, Jones JG, Anampa J, Rohan TE, Sparano JA, Condeelis JS, Oktay MH. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces breast cancer metastasis through a TMEM-mediated mechanism. Sci Transl Med. 2017 Jul 5;9(397):eaan0026. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aan0026. PubMed 28679654 ↗
  • Verma C, Eremin JM, Robins A, Bennett AJ, Cowley GP, El-Sheemy MA, Jibril JA, Eremin O. Abnormal T regulatory cells (Tregs: FOXP3+, CTLA-4+), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs: monocytic, granulocytic) and polarised T helper cell profiles (Th1, Th2, Th17) in women with large and locally advanced breast cancers undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery: failure of abolition of abnormal treg profile with treatment and correlation of treg levels with pathological response to NAC. J Transl Med. 2013 Jan 15;11:16. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-11-16. PubMed 23320561 ↗
  • Lopes AD, Galdino NAL, Figueiredo AB, Brianese RC, Morais KLP, De Brot M, Osorio CABT, Teixeira-Carvalho A, Calsavara VF, Evangelista GFB, Alves NS, Makdissi FB, Sanches SM, Cordeiro de Lima VC, Carraro DM, Gollob KJ. Systemic immune mediators reflect tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte intensity and predict therapeutic response in triple-negative breast cancer. Immunology. 2023 Jun;169(2):229-241. doi: 10.1111/imm.13627. Epub 2023 Feb 20. PubMed 36703241 ↗
  • Miceli R, Cao C, Maolanon NN, Jacobs R, Wu J, Orlandi R. Plasma Profile of Immune Determinants Predicts Pathological Complete Response in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2022 Oct;22(7):705-714. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 May 23. PubMed 35725806 ↗
  • Bidard FC, Proudhon C, Pierga JY. Circulating tumor cells in breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2016 Mar;10(3):418-30. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 12. PubMed 26809472 ↗
  • Massague J, Obenauf AC. Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):298-306. doi: 10.1038/nature17038. PubMed 26791720 ↗
  • Dasgupta A, Lim AR, Ghajar CM. Circulating and disseminated tumor cells: harbingers or initiators of metastasis? Mol Oncol. 2017 Jan;11(1):40-61. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12022. PubMed 28085223 ↗
  • Carter L, Rothwell DG, Mesquita B, Smowton C, Leong HS, Fernandez-Gutierrez F, Li Y, Burt DJ, Antonello J, Morrow CJ, Hodgkinson CL, Morris K, Priest L, Carter M, Miller C, Hughes A, Blackhall F, Dive C, Brady G. Molecular analysis of circulating tumor cells identifies distinct copy-number profiles in patients with chemosensitive and chemorefractory small-cell lung cancer. Nat Med. 2017 Jan;23(1):114-119. doi: 10.1038/nm.4239. Epub 2016 Nov 21. PubMed 27869802 ↗
  • Smerage JB, Barlow WE, Hortobagyi GN, Winer EP, Leyland-Jones B, Srkalovic G, Tejwani S, Schott AF, O'Rourke MA, Lew DL, Doyle GV, Gralow JR, Livingston RB, Hayes DF. Circulating tumor cells and response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: SWOG S0500. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3483-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.2561. Epub 2014 Jun 2. PubMed 24888818 ↗
  • Kalinich M, Bhan I, Kwan TT, Miyamoto DT, Javaid S, LiCausi JA, Milner JD, Hong X, Goyal L, Sil S, Choz M, Ho U, Kapur R, Muzikansky A, Zhang H, Weitz DA, Sequist LV, Ryan DP, Chung RT, Zhu AX, Isselbacher KJ, Ting DT, Toner M, Maheswaran S, Haber DA. An RNA-based signature enables high specificity detection of circulating tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jan 31;114(5):1123-1128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1617032114. Epub 2017 Jan 17. PubMed 28096363 ↗
  • Rack B, Schindlbeck C, Juckstock J, Andergassen U, Hepp P, Zwingers T, Friedl TW, Lorenz R, Tesch H, Fasching PA, Fehm T, Schneeweiss A, Lichtenegger W, Beckmann MW, Friese K, Pantel K, Janni W; SUCCESS Study Group. Circulating tumor cells predict survival in early average-to-high risk breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 May 15;106(5):dju066. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju066. PubMed 24832787 ↗
  • Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jun;17(6):1471-4. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4. PubMed 20180029 ↗
  • Hayes DF, Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Miller MC, Matera J, Allard WJ, Doyle GV, Terstappen LW. Circulating tumor cells at each follow-up time point during therapy of metastatic breast cancer patients predict progression-free and overall survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 15;12(14 Pt 1):4218-24. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2821. PubMed 16857794 ↗
  • Bidard FC, Peeters DJ, Fehm T, Nole F, Gisbert-Criado R, Mavroudis D, Grisanti S, Generali D, Garcia-Saenz JA, Stebbing J, Caldas C, Gazzaniga P, Manso L, Zamarchi R, de Lascoiti AF, De Mattos-Arruda L, Ignatiadis M, Lebofsky R, van Laere SJ, Meier-Stiegen F, Sandri MT, Vidal-Martinez J, Politaki E, Consoli F, Bottini A, Diaz-Rubio E, Krell J, Dawson SJ, Raimondi C, Rutten A, Janni W, Munzone E, Caranana V, Agelaki S, Almici C, Dirix L, Solomayer EF, Zorzino L, Johannes H, Reis-Filho JS, Pantel K, Pierga JY, Michiels S. Clinical validity of circulating tumour cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Apr;15(4):406-14. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70069-5. Epub 2014 Mar 11. PubMed 24636208 ↗
  • Cristofanilli M, Budd GT, Ellis MJ, Stopeck A, Matera J, Miller MC, Reuben JM, Doyle GV, Allard WJ, Terstappen LW, Hayes DF. Circulating tumor cells, disease progression, and survival in metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Aug 19;351(8):781-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa040766. PubMed 15317891 ↗
  • Roussos ET, Goswami S, Balsamo M, Wang Y, Stobezki R, Adler E, Robinson BD, Jones JG, Gertler FB, Condeelis JS, Oktay MH. Mena invasive (Mena(INV)) and Mena11a isoforms play distinct roles in breast cancer cell cohesion and association with TMEM. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2011 Aug;28(6):515-27. doi: 10.1007/s10585-011-9388-6. Epub 2011 Apr 12. PubMed 21484349 ↗
  • Borriello L, Coste A, Traub B, Sharma VP, Karagiannis GS, Lin Y, Wang Y, Ye X, Duran CL, Chen X, Friedman M, Sosa MS, Sun D, Dalla E, Singh DK, Oktay MH, Aguirre-Ghiso JA, Condeelis JS, Entenberg D. Primary tumor associated macrophages activate programs of invasion and dormancy in disseminating tumor cells. Nat Commun. 2022 Feb 2;13(1):626. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28076-3. PubMed 35110548 ↗
  • Pignatelli J, Goswami S, Jones JG, Rohan TE, Pieri E, Chen X, Adler E, Cox D, Maleki S, Bresnick A, Gertler FB, Condeelis JS, Oktay MH. Invasive breast carcinoma cells from patients exhibit MenaINV- and macrophage-dependent transendothelial migration. Sci Signal. 2014 Nov 25;7(353):ra112. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005329. PubMed 25429076 ↗
  • Parmar P, Karadal-Ferrena B, Shukla S, Miller A, Zhang C, Huang C, D'Alfonso T, Han R, Adler E, Ladak N, Ginter PS, Fineberg S, Ye X, Ginsberg M, Rosenbaum C, Felder M, Lin Y, Chen X, Eddy RJ, Rohan TE, Condeelis JS, Xue X, Anampa J, Sparano JA, Entenberg D, Oktay MH. Racial disparity in pro-metastatic tumor microenvironment in treatment naive breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2026 Jan 6;12(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00865-1. PubMed 41495055 ↗
  • Kim G, Karadal-Ferrena B, Qin J, Sharma VP, Oktay IS, Lin Y, Ye X, Asiry S, Pastoriza JM, Cheng E, Ladak N, Condeelis JS, Adler E, Ginter PS, D'Alfonso T, Entenberg D, Xue X, Sparano JA, Oktay MH. Racial disparity in tumor microenvironment and distant recurrence in residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2023 Jun 13;9(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41523-023-00547-w. PubMed 37311792 ↗
  • Sparano JA, Gray R, Oktay MH, Entenberg D, Rohan T, Xue X, Donovan M, Peterson M, Shuber A, Hamilton DA, D'Alfonso T, Goldstein LJ, Gertler F, Davidson NE, Condeelis J, Jones J. A metastasis biomarker (MetaSite Breast Score) is associated with distant recurrence in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2017 Nov 8;3:42. doi: 10.1038/s41523-017-0043-5. eCollection 2017. PubMed 29138761 ↗
  • Harney AS, Arwert EN, Entenberg D, Wang Y, Guo P, Qian BZ, Oktay MH, Pollard JW, Jones JG, Condeelis JS. Real-Time Imaging Reveals Local, Transient Vascular Permeability, and Tumor Cell Intravasation Stimulated by TIE2hi Macrophage-Derived VEGFA. Cancer Discov. 2015 Sep;5(9):932-43. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-0012. Epub 2015 Aug 12. PubMed 26269515 ↗
  • Gan Y, Lo Y, Makower D, Kleer C, Lu J, Fineberg S. EZH2 Protein Expression in Estrogen Receptor Positive Invasive Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy: An Exploratory Study of Association With Tumor Response. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2022 Oct 1;30(9):614-622. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001055. Epub 2022 Sep 2. PubMed 36048167 ↗
  • Guo S, Li X, Rohr J, Wang Y, Ma S, Chen P, Wang Z. EZH2 overexpression in different immunophenotypes of breast carcinoma and association with clinicopathologic features. Diagn Pathol. 2016 Apr 26;11:41. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0491-5. PubMed 27113214 ↗
  • Anwar T, Gonzalez ME, Kleer CG. Noncanonical Functions of the Polycomb Group Protein EZH2 in Breast Cancer. Am J Pathol. 2021 May;191(5):774-783. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2021.01.013. Epub 2021 Feb 6. PubMed 33556366 ↗
  • Chang CJ, Hung MC. The role of EZH2 in tumour progression. Br J Cancer. 2012 Jan 17;106(2):243-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.551. Epub 2011 Dec 20. PubMed 22187039 ↗
  • Goswami S, Sahai E, Wyckoff JB, Cammer M, Cox D, Pixley FJ, Stanley ER, Segall JE, Condeelis JS. Macrophages promote the invasion of breast carcinoma cells via a colony-stimulating factor-1/epidermal growth factor paracrine loop. Cancer Res. 2005 Jun 15;65(12):5278-83. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1853. PubMed 15958574 ↗
  • Sharma VP, Tang B, Wang Y, Duran CL, Karagiannis GS, Xue EA, Entenberg D, Borriello L, Coste A, Eddy RJ, Kim G, Ye X, Jones JG, Grunblatt E, Agi N, Roy S, Bandyopadhyaya G, Adler E, Surve CR, Esposito D, Goswami S, Segall JE, Guo W, Condeelis JS, Wakefield LM, Oktay MH. Live tumor imaging shows macrophage induction and TMEM-mediated enrichment of cancer stem cells during metastatic dissemination. Nat Commun. 2021 Dec 15;12(1):7300. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27308-2. PubMed 34911937 ↗
  • Robinson BD, Sica GL, Liu YF, Rohan TE, Gertler FB, Condeelis JS, Jones JG. Tumor microenvironment of metastasis in human breast carcinoma: a potential prognostic marker linked to hematogenous dissemination. Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Apr 1;15(7):2433-41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2179. Epub 2009 Mar 24. PubMed 19318480 ↗
  • Roussos ET, Balsamo M, Alford SK, Wyckoff JB, Gligorijevic B, Wang Y, Pozzuto M, Stobezki R, Goswami S, Segall JE, Lauffenburger DA, Bresnick AR, Gertler FB, Condeelis JS. Mena invasive (MenaINV) promotes multicellular streaming motility and transendothelial migration in a mouse model of breast cancer. J Cell Sci. 2011 Jul 1;124(Pt 13):2120-31. doi: 10.1242/jcs.086231. PubMed 21670198 ↗
  • Philippar U, Roussos ET, Oser M, Yamaguchi H, Kim HD, Giampieri S, Wang Y, Goswami S, Wyckoff JB, Lauffenburger DA, Sahai E, Condeelis JS, Gertler FB. A Mena invasion isoform potentiates EGF-induced carcinoma cell invasion and metastasis. Dev Cell. 2008 Dec;15(6):813-28. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.09.003. PubMed 19081071 ↗
  • Roussos ET, Condeelis JS, Patsialou A. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Jul 22;11(8):573-87. doi: 10.1038/nrc3078. PubMed 21779009 ↗
  • Wang W, Wyckoff JB, Goswami S, Wang Y, Sidani M, Segall JE, Condeelis JS. Coordinated regulation of pathways for enhanced cell motility and chemotaxis is conserved in rat and mouse mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 2007 Apr 15;67(8):3505-11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3714. PubMed 17440055 ↗
  • Wang W, Goswami S, Lapidus K, Wells AL, Wyckoff JB, Sahai E, Singer RH, Segall JE, Condeelis JS. Identification and testing of a gene expression signature of invasive carcinoma cells within primary mammary tumors. Cancer Res. 2004 Dec 1;64(23):8585-94. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1136. PubMed 15574765 ↗
  • Roussos ET, Keckesova Z, Haley JD, Epstein DM, Weinberg RA, Condeelis JS. AACR special conference on epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer progression and treatment. Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;70(19):7360-4. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-1208. Epub 2010 Sep 7. PubMed 20823151 ↗
  • Goswami S, Philippar U, Sun D, Patsialou A, Avraham J, Wang W, Di Modugno F, Nistico P, Gertler FB, Condeelis JS. Identification of invasion specific splice variants of the cytoskeletal protein Mena present in mammary tumor cells during invasion in vivo. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2009;26(2):153-9. doi: 10.1007/s10585-008-9225-8. Epub 2008 Nov 5. PubMed 18985426 ↗
  • Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98 Collaborative Group; Thurlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS, Mouridsen H, Mauriac L, Forbes JF, Paridaens R, Castiglione-Gertsch M, Gelber RD, Rabaglio M, Smith I, Wardley A, Price KN, Goldhirsch A. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Dec 29;353(26):2747-57. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa052258. PubMed 16382061 ↗
  • Walsh BW, Schiff I, Rosner B, Greenberg L, Ravnikar V, Sacks FM. Effects of postmenopausal estrogen replacement on the concentrations and metabolism of plasma lipoproteins. N Engl J Med. 1991 Oct 24;325(17):1196-204. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199110243251702. PubMed 1922206 ↗
  • Faltinova M, Vehmanen L, Lyytinen H, Haanpaa M, Hamalainen E, Tiitinen A, Blomqvist C, Mattson J. Effects of letrozole on serum estradiol and estrone in postmenopausal breast cancer patients and tolerability of treatment: a prospective trial using a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS (liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry) method for estrogen measurement. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Oct;201(3):425-435. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-07054-3. Epub 2023 Jul 25. PubMed 37491651 ↗
  • Van Houdt M, Han SN, Pauwels S, Billen J, Neven P. Measurable Serum Estradiol and Estrone in Women 36-56 Years During Adjuvant Treatment With Aromatase Inhibitors for a Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Case Studies and Cross-sectional Study Using an Ultra-sensitive LC-MS/MS-Method. Clin Breast Cancer. 2023 Jan;23(1):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PubMed 36376236 ↗
  • Dowsett M, Smith IE, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Griffith C, Boeddinghaus I, Salter J, Detre S, Hills M, Ashley S, Francis S, Walsh G; IMPACT Trialists. Short-term changes in Ki-67 during neoadjuvant treatment of primary breast cancer with anastrozole or tamoxifen alone or combined correlate with recurrence-free survival. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Jan 15;11(2 Pt 2):951s-8s. PubMed 15701892 ↗
  • Ellis MJ, Coop A, Singh B, Tao Y, Llombart-Cussac A, Janicke F, Mauriac L, Quebe-Fehling E, Chaudri-Ross HA, Evans DB, Miller WR. Letrozole inhibits tumor proliferation more effectively than tamoxifen independent of HER1/2 expression status. Cancer Res. 2003 Oct 1;63(19):6523-31. PubMed 14559846 ↗
  • Smith IE, Dowsett M, Ebbs SR, Dixon JM, Skene A, Blohmer JU, Ashley SE, Francis S, Boeddinghaus I, Walsh G; IMPACT Trialists Group. Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 1;23(22):5108-16. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.005. Epub 2005 Jul 5. PubMed 15998903 ↗
  • Smith I, Robertson J, Kilburn L, Wilcox M, Evans A, Holcombe C, Horgan K, Kirwan C, Mallon E, Sibbering M, Skene A, Vidya R, Cheang M, Banerji J, Morden J, Sidhu K, Dodson A, Bliss JM, Dowsett M. Long-term outcome and prognostic value of Ki67 after perioperative endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with hormone-sensitive early breast cancer (POETIC): an open-label, multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1443-1454. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30458-7. PubMed 33152284 ↗
  • Lashen AG, Toss MS, Ghannam SF, Makhlouf S, Green A, Mongan NP, Rakha E. Expression, assessment and significance of Ki67 expression in breast cancer: an update. J Clin Pathol. 2023 Jun;76(6):357-364. doi: 10.1136/jcp-2022-208731. Epub 2023 Feb 22. PubMed 36813558 ↗
  • Davey MG, Hynes SO, Kerin MJ, Miller N, Lowery AJ. Ki-67 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Invasive Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;13(17):4455. doi: 10.3390/cancers13174455. PubMed 34503265 ↗
  • Sasano H, Sato S, Ito K, Yajima A, Nakamura J, Yoshihama M, Ariga K, Anderson TJ, Miller WR. Effects of aromatase inhibitors on the pathobiology of the human breast, endometrial and ovarian carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer. 1999 Jun;6(2):197-204. doi: 10.1677/erc.0.0060197. PubMed 10731109 ↗
  • DeCensi A, Puntoni M, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Caviglia S, Avino F, Cortesi L, Taverniti C, Pacquola MG, Falcini F, Gulisano M, Digennaro M, Cariello A, Cagossi K, Pinotti G, Lazzeroni M, Serrano D, Branchi D, Campora S, Petrera M, Buttiron Webber T, Boni L, Bonanni B. Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial of Low-Dose Tamoxifen to Prevent Local and Contralateral Recurrence in Breast Intraepithelial Neoplasia. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Jul 1;37(19):1629-1637. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01779. Epub 2019 Apr 11. PubMed 30973790 ↗
  • Meattini I, Tecic Vuger A, Becherini C, Epstein EJ, Garcia JP, Berger ER, Harbeck N. Multimodal De-Escalation Strategies in Early Breast Cancer. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2025 Jun;45(3):e473462. doi: 10.1200/EDBK-25-473462. Epub 2025 Jun 24. PubMed 40554734 ↗
  • Lopez AM, Pruthi S, Boughey JC, Perloff M, Hsu CH, Lang JE, Ley M, Frank D, Taverna JA, Chow HH. Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Alternative Letrozole Dosing Regimens in Postmenopausal Women with Increased Breast Cancer Risk. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2016 Feb;9(2):142-8. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-15-0322. Epub 2015 Dec 14. PubMed 26667449 ↗
  • Pistilli B, Paci A, Ferreira AR, Di Meglio A, Poinsignon V, Bardet A, Menvielle G, Dumas A, Pinto S, Dauchy S, Fasse L, Cottu PH, Lerebours F, Coutant C, Lesur A, Tredan O, Soulie P, Vanlemmens L, Jouannaud C, Levy C, Everhard S, Arveux P, Martin AL, Dima A, Lin NU, Partridge AH, Delaloge S, Michiels S, Andre F, Vaz-Luis I. Serum Detection of Nonadherence to Adjuvant Tamoxifen and Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;38(24):2762-2772. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.01758. Epub 2020 Jun 22. PubMed 32568632 ↗
  • Huiart L, Ferdynus C, Giorgi R. A meta-regression analysis of the available data on adherence to adjuvant hormonal therapy in breast cancer: summarizing the data for clinicians. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Feb;138(1):325-8. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2422-4. Epub 2013 Feb 12. No abstract available. PubMed 23400580 ↗
  • Briot K, Tubiana-Hulin M, Bastit L, Kloos I, Roux C. Effect of a switch of aromatase inhibitors on musculoskeletal symptoms in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer: the ATOLL (articular tolerance of letrozole) study. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):127-34. doi: 10.1007/s10549-009-0692-7. Epub 2009 Dec 25. PubMed 20035381 ↗
  • Henry NL, Azzouz F, Desta Z, Li L, Nguyen AT, Lemler S, Hayden J, Tarpinian K, Yakim E, Flockhart DA, Stearns V, Hayes DF, Storniolo AM. Predictors of aromatase inhibitor discontinuation as a result of treatment-emergent symptoms in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 20;30(9):936-42. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.0261. Epub 2012 Feb 13. PubMed 22331951 ↗
  • Iveson TJ, Smith IE, Ahern J, Smithers DA, Trunet PF, Dowsett M. Phase I study of the oral nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor CGS 20267 in healthy postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993 Aug;77(2):324-31. doi: 10.1210/jcem.77.2.8345035. PubMed 8345035 ↗
  • Sioufi A, Sandrenan N, Godbillon J, Trunet P, Czendlik C, Howald H, Pfister C, Ezzet F. Comparative bioavailability of letrozole under fed and fasting conditions in 12 healthy subjects after a 2.5 mg single oral administration. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1997 Aug;18(6):489-97. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-081x(199708)18:63.0.co;2-p. PubMed 9267682 ↗
  • Demers LM, Lipton A, Harvey HA, Kambic KB, Grossberg H, Brady C, Santen RJ. The efficacy of CGS 20267 in suppressing estrogen biosynthesis in patients with advanced stage breast cancer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1993 Mar;44(4-6):687-91. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(93)90283-3. PubMed 8476785 ↗
  • Dowsett M, Jones A, Johnston SR, Jacobs S, Trunet P, Smith IE. In vivo measurement of aromatase inhibition by letrozole (CGS 20267) in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1995 Dec;1(12):1511-5. PubMed 9815951 ↗
  • Geisler J, Haynes B, Anker G, Dowsett M, Lonning PE. Influence of letrozole and anastrozole on total body aromatization and plasma estrogen levels in postmenopausal breast cancer patients evaluated in a randomized, cross-over study. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Feb 1;20(3):751-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.20.3.751. PubMed 11821457 ↗
  • Geisler J, Helle H, Ekse D, Duong NK, Evans DB, Nordbo Y, Aas T, Lonning PE. Letrozole is superior to anastrozole in suppressing breast cancer tissue and plasma estrogen levels. Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Oct 1;14(19):6330-5. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5221. PubMed 18829517 ↗
  • Dixon JM, Renshaw L, Young O, Murray J, Macaskill EJ, McHugh M, Folkerd E, Cameron DA, A'Hern RP, Dowsett M. Letrozole suppresses plasma estradiol and estrone sulphate more completely than anastrozole in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1671-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9279. PubMed 18375896 ↗
  • Buzdar AU, Robertson JF, Eiermann W, Nabholtz JM. An overview of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of the newer generation aromatase inhibitors anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane. Cancer. 2002 Nov 1;95(9):2006-16. doi: 10.1002/cncr.10908. PubMed 12404296 ↗
  • Bisagni G, Cocconi G, Scaglione F, Fraschini F, Pfister C, Trunet PF. Letrozole, a new oral non-steroidal aromastase inhibitor in treating postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. A pilot study. Ann Oncol. 1996 Jan;7(1):99-102. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a010490. PubMed 9081401 ↗
  • Bajetta E, Zilembo N, Bichisao E, Martinetti A, Buzzoni R, Pozzi P, Bidoli P, Ferrari L, Celio L. Tumor response and estrogen suppression in breast cancer patients treated with aromatase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2000 Aug;11(8):1017-22. doi: 10.1023/a:1008388823113. PubMed 11038039 ↗
  • Plourde PV, Dyroff M, Dowsett M, Demers L, Yates R, Webster A. ARIMIDEX: a new oral, once-a-day aromatase inhibitor. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1995 Jun;53(1-6):175-9. doi: 10.1016/0960-0760(95)00045-2. PubMed 7626450 ↗
  • Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen in early breast cancer: patient-level meta-analysis of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2015 Oct 3;386(10001):1341-1352. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)61074-1. Epub 2015 Jul 23. PubMed 26211827 ↗
  • Johnston SR, Dowsett M. Aromatase inhibitors for breast cancer: lessons from the laboratory. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003 Nov;3(11):821-31. doi: 10.1038/nrc1211. No abstract available. PubMed 14668813 ↗
  • Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group (EBCTCG). Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005 May 14-20;365(9472):1687-717. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66544-0. PubMed 15894097 ↗
  • Anampa J, Sparano JA. New agents for the management of resistant metastatic breast cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2017 Dec;18(17):1815-1831. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2017.1409206. Epub 2017 Nov 27. PubMed 29171761 ↗
  • Burstein HJ, Lacchetti C, Anderson H, Buchholz TA, Davidson NE, Gelmon KA, Giordano SH, Hudis CA, Solky AJ, Stearns V, Winer EP, Griggs JJ. Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Focused Update. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Feb 10;37(5):423-438. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01160. Epub 2018 Nov 19. PubMed 30452337 ↗
  • Miziak P, Baran M, Blaszczak E, Przybyszewska-Podstawka A, Kalafut J, Smok-Kalwat J, Dmoszynska-Graniczka M, Kielbus M, Stepulak A. Estrogen Receptor Signaling in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Sep 23;15(19):4689. doi: 10.3390/cancers15194689. PubMed 37835383 ↗
  • Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Nov;72(6):524-541. doi: 10.3322/caac.21754. Epub 2022 Oct 3. PubMed 36190501 ↗
  • Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group. Psychol Med. 1998 May;28(3):551-8. doi: 10.1017/s0033291798006667. PubMed 9626712 ↗
  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12. PubMed 35020204 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 8, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 8, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07866430
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 8, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 8, 2026

Study contacts

Jesus Anampa, MD
Contact
janampa@montefiore.org
7184058505
Akash Shah
Contact
ashah1@montefiore.org
7184058505
Jesus R Anampa, MD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion